[Bug 140666] Re: changelogs.ubuntu.com lags behind archive
No, this is still a problem. For example right now acpid 1.0.6-9ubuntu4.9.04.2 is available in jaunty-security, but the changelog is not on changelogs.ubuntu.com. This means that I can't review it from within aptitude before upgrading. (I can of course open a web browser and find the changelog on launchpad, but that is not nearly as convenient) -- changelogs.ubuntu.com lags behind archive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140666 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345397] Re: [patch] Fix ability to modify keyboard repeat rate
> Some more regression discussion: > We tried backporting this patch to intrepid, but we found that this produced > a regression: some keys such as the left/down arrow keys no longer repeated. > The good news is that no one has produced this regression yet using the > patched evdev packages in jaunty, but it is something to look out for. Let me be the first to report this then :-( With evdev 1:2.1.1-1ubuntu4 on Jaunty left,down,end no longer repeats. 1:2.1.1-1ubuntu3 works fine. Repeat for those keys can be enabled using "xset r 113; xset r 115; xset r 116", as suggested in bug 281546. -- [patch] Fix ability to modify keyboard repeat rate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363904] Re: SLURM Security Flaw
Made this bug private, since the DSA is available. (The previous mail to slurm-announce was also public) ** Visibility changed to: Public -- SLURM Security Flaw https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363904] Re: SLURM Security Flaw
** Attachment added: "debdiff between 1.3.13-1 and 1.3.15-1 for jaunty" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25846901/1.3.13-1_to_1.3.15-1.debdiff -- SLURM Security Flaw https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363904] Re: SLURM Security Flaw
The attached debdiffs is between current versions in intrepid and jaunty, and the fixed versions in sid and lenny. -- SLURM Security Flaw https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363904] Re: SLURM Security Flaw
** Attachment added: "debdiff between 1.3.6-1 and 1.3.6-1lenny3 for intrepid" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25846942/1.3.6-1_to_1.3.6-1lenny3.debdiff -- SLURM Security Flaw https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253904] Re: does not build a lot of metapackages any more
I just got pointed at this bug when asking for intrepid linux-image- debug packages on IRC. I see how some might think it makes sense to throw kernel debug packages with normal debug packages. However I disagree. Debug information for kernel+modules is special because it is needed for low level debugging tools like systemtap and oprofile, which are both available in the normal archive. Especially oprofile is very useful to benchmark and/or troubleshoot servers, I don't think you should have to enable a ddebs repo just to do this. Also, how do you even figure out that they are on ddebs? And how do you handle upgrades from hardy for people who use this kind of tools? A smaller problem, is that the package are not really available on ddebs either. The packages are on http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/main/l/linux/, but they are not in the Packages files so you can't install them using APT. One bigger problem that will prevent me from installing them is that bug 185625 (sign the repository at ddebs.ubuntu.com) is not fixed. This means that in Intrepid it is currently impossible to get trusted kernel debug packages. :-( -- does not build a lot of metapackages any more https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 269652] Re: Worrying message " ata4: EH pending after 5 tries, giving up" from dmesg
waspbr: No, this bug has nothing what so ever to do with Xorg, you should report a separate bug for your xorg problems. Mårten: Yes, it was a change in sata_nv that caused the problem. To be more specific it was commit 2fd673ecf0378ddeeeb87b3605e50212e0c0ddc6, as I wrote in my upstream bug report. For those not following the upstream bug, Tejun Heo have found and fixed the problem. His patch is included in the newly released 2.6.27-rc8, which means that as soon as Ubuntus kernel is rebased on rc8 we will get the fix. -- Worrying message " ata4: EH pending after 5 tries, giving up" from dmesg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269652 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277338] [NEW] FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xmonad
Hi,
I hereby request a FFE to sync the following two source packages from
Debian unstable to Intrepid:
xmonad 0.8-1
xmonad-contrib 0.8-1
I know this is very late in the release cycle, but I still think this
would make sense. I also hope that it is OK to use a single bug for
two source packages like this, the packages only makes sense together.
Reasons for a FFE:
* 0.8 is the latest stable version, released 2008-09-05.
* xmonad have good release management and is very stable.
* 0.8 brings have several nice fixes and features, and it would be
very nice to not have this in intrepid.
* xmonad{,-contrib} is small and self contained with no rdepends on
any other packages.
* xmonad{,-contrib} 0.8-1 is in Debian unstable. The source packages
builds in an intrepid pbuilder and the resulting packages works.
* Only two outstanding bugs in Debian.
* 484091 - minor request for changed handling of .xsession-files
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=484091
* 500833 - Request is to compile -contrib with utf8 support
(--flags=with_utf8). This is a bigger issue, but at least not a
regression as utf8 is disabled in the current 0.7 packages as
well.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=500833
The lack of rdepends, and state of the packages in Debian makes me
think this FFE would be quite safe even this late in the Intrepid
release cycle. It will only affect xmonad users most likely make them
happy!
Required files for FFE:
diffstats, pbuilder logs and install logs is attached.
Changelogs:
The tarball does not include a normal changelog. I think "The
headlines" part from the release announcement is good:
> The headlines:
>
> * A general purpose replacement for "gaps" has been adopted.
> * Floating windows pop up on the current screen by default
> * Locale support
> * Rock solid code: No new crash-inducing bugs reported in this
> release cycle
> * Many new extensions, including the ability to write your own
> configuration parsers.
> * The 1000th commit was made to the project
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2008-September/047114.html
A more detailed changelog is available on the haskell wiki:
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Xmonad/Notable_changes_since_0.7
Testing:
I have been using my packages a few days now. I have not tested all
the 100+ extensions that is available in xmonad-contrib, but the
ones that I use work as expected. The new "ManageDocks" feature is
also working fine.
Please let me know if this FFE request is missing any neccessary
information.
Cheers,
** Affects: xmonad (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277338
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277338] Re: FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable
** Attachment added: "diffstat_xmonad-contrib_0.7_0.8.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18145980/diffstat_xmonad-contrib_0.7_0.8.txt -- FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277338] Re: FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable
** Attachment added: "diffstat_xmonad_0.7_0.8.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18145995/diffstat_xmonad_0.7_0.8.txt -- FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277338] Re: FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable
** Attachment added: "install_0.8-1.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18145999/install_0.8-1.log -- FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277338] Re: FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable
** Attachment added: "pbuilder_xmonad-contrib_0.8-1.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18146003/pbuilder_xmonad-contrib_0.8-1.log -- FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277338] Re: FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable
** Attachment added: "pbuilder_xmonad_0.8-1.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18146006/pbuilder_xmonad_0.8-1.log -- FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277338] Re: FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable
Oh, he seems to have uploaded it yesterday, when I had already started putting this together. Of course we should sync xmonad-contrib 0.8-2 instead. As -2 only makes this small change to the build options I don't think there is any reason to believe that it will not compile/install/run in Intrepid just as -1, but I can't verify this until I get home from work tonight. Thanks for the +1 :-) -- FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277338] Re: FFE: Please sync xmonad 0.8-1 and xmonad-contrib 0.8-2 from Debian unstable
** Summary changed:
- FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable
+ FFE: Please sync xmonad 0.8-1 and xmonad-contrib 0.8-2 from Debian unstable
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: xmonad
+
+ UPDATE: 2008-10-03
+ Changed Summary to request xmonad 0.8-1, xmonad-contrib 0.8-2 as contrib -2
was uploaded to Debian yesterday with a small fix for Debian bug #500833. See
comments on this bug for details.
Hi,
I hereby request a FFE to sync the following two source packages from
Debian unstable to Intrepid:
xmonad 0.8-1
xmonad-contrib 0.8-1
I know this is very late in the release cycle, but I still think this
would make sense. I also hope that it is OK to use a single bug for
two source packages like this, the packages only makes sense together.
Reasons for a FFE:
* 0.8 is the latest stable version, released 2008-09-05.
* xmonad have good release management and is very stable.
* 0.8 brings have several nice fixes and features, and it would be
very nice to not have this in intrepid.
* xmonad{,-contrib} is small and self contained with no rdepends on
any other packages.
* xmonad{,-contrib} 0.8-1 is in Debian unstable. The source packages
builds in an intrepid pbuilder and the resulting packages works.
* Only two outstanding bugs in Debian.
* 484091 - minor request for changed handling of .xsession-files
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=484091
* 500833 - Request is to compile -contrib with utf8 support
(--flags=with_utf8). This is a bigger issue, but at least not a
regression as utf8 is disabled in the current 0.7 packages as
well.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=500833
The lack of rdepends, and state of the packages in Debian makes me
think this FFE would be quite safe even this late in the Intrepid
release cycle. It will only affect xmonad users most likely make them
happy!
Required files for FFE:
diffstats, pbuilder logs and install logs is attached.
Changelogs:
The tarball does not include a normal changelog. I think "The
headlines" part from the release announcement is good:
> The headlines:
>
> * A general purpose replacement for "gaps" has been adopted.
> * Floating windows pop up on the current screen by default
> * Locale support
> * Rock solid code: No new crash-inducing bugs reported in this
> release cycle
> * Many new extensions, including the ability to write your own
> configuration parsers.
> * The 1000th commit was made to the project
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2008-September/047114.html
A more detailed changelog is available on the haskell wiki:
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Xmonad/Notable_changes_since_0.7
Testing:
I have been using my packages a few days now. I have not tested all
the 100+ extensions that is available in xmonad-contrib, but the
ones that I use work as expected. The new "ManageDocks" feature is
also working fine.
Please let me know if this FFE request is missing any neccessary
information.
Cheers,
--
FFE: Please sync xmonad 0.8-1 and xmonad-contrib 0.8-2 from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277338
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277338] Re: FFE: Please sync xmonad 0.8-1 and xmonad-contrib 0.8-2 from Debian unstable
On Friday 03 October 2008 16.22.27 StefanPotyra wrote: > I'm setting this bug back to new, since you'll need another ACK from a > motu-release member so that the FFe is granted. Yeah, I assumed that I would have to get another +1 for you or somebody else again after testing -2. :-) Should I have changed the bug status myself? Just so I know the correct work flow for next time. On Friday 03 October 2008 09.20.40 Pär Andersson wrote: > As -2 only makes this small change to the build options I don't think > there is any reason to believe that it will not compile/install/run in > Intrepid just as -1, but I can't verify this until I get home from work > tonight. It turns out that I was very, very WRONG! Building -2 is much more complicated than -1. * xmonad-contrib 0.8-2 have a build-depends on libghc6-utf8-string-dev (= 0.3.1.1-2), but 0.3.1-1 is in intrepid. * xmonad-contrib also requires a profiling enabled package, libghc6-utf8-string-prof, which is not build for 0.3.1-1. I have thought about three different ways to handle this. Sorted with my least preferred solution first: 1. Modify xmonad-contrib and haskell-utf8-string in Ubuntu. * haskell-utf8.string 0.3.1ubuntu1 will build a -prof package. * xmonad-contrib 0.8-2ubuntu1 will have modified build-depends to require 0.3.1-1ubuntu1 (with I think is recent enough for xmonad) This solution sucks so much that I almost didn't include it. We get two packages that both differs from Debian. I have not built any packages to try this. 2. Go back to the original plan. Use both xmonad and xmonad-contrib version 0.8-1. We know that this builds and works. However the utf8 support would be very nice to have, so this is not perfect. 3. Two more syncs. Sync the source package haskell-utf8-string 0.3.1.1-2 from Debian sid. haskell-utf8-string have a build-depend on haskell-devscripts (>= 0.6.13), Intrepid have 0.6.12. This means that if we don't wan't to change the build-dep a sync of haskell-devscripts 0.6.13 from Debian lenny would also be needed. 0.6.13 change two things. It bumps Standards-Version and fixes FTBFS bugs by replacing one call of "ghc-pkg" with "ghc-pkg6". The second fix makes me think we want this version in Ubuntu anyway. * haskell-devscripts 0.6.13 builds fine in an intrepid pbuilder. * haskell-uft8-string 0.3.1.1-2 then builds fine in the pbuilder. * xmonad-contrib 0.8-2 then (finally!) builds fine in the pbuilder. The resulting packages have utf8 working just as it should. This would be my preferred solution. It keeps Ubuntu in sync with Debian and gives us a xmonad-contrib with working utf8. If you think this might be a possible solution, then how should I proceed. Should I file two extra FFEs for the syncs of haskell-utf8-string and haskell-devscripts, or throw them into this one? Not knowing this is the reason that I only briefly described them, and not included diffstats, pbuilder logs etc yet. -- FFE: Please sync xmonad 0.8-1 and xmonad-contrib 0.8-2 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 277338] Re: FFE: Please sync xmonad 0.8-1 and xmonad-contrib 0.8-2 from Debian unstable
Sorry for not replying to this earlier! I have had a hardware failure in my home workstation where I do all my Ubuntu testing/development. It took some time, but now I have gotten it into a somewhat usable state. :-) On Sunday 05 October 2008 12.56.59 StefanPotyra wrote: > Ok, libghc6-utf8-string-dev is only used by geordi in build-depends > apart from that after a quick search. geordi builds fine in a pbuilder with the new libghc6-utf8-string-dev and haskell-devscripts. After installation geordi segfault on startup. However the version from intrepids repositories behaves in the exact same way, so I don't think this have anything to do with the utf8-string package. > I just rebuilt haskell-devscripts, haskell-utf8-string and geordi, and > looks all good. Also from looking at the diff of haskell-utf8-string, > the code changes don't look too invasive to me. I reviewed the changes in both packages earlier, and don't really have anything to add. Both looks quite safe. As I mentioned before I have also built all the mentioned packages, and been using the resulting xmonad + contrib since then. Is there anything more I can do to help this along? -- FFE: Please sync xmonad 0.8-1 and xmonad-contrib 0.8-2 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 277338] Re: FFE: Please sync xmonad 0.8-1 and xmonad-contrib 0.8-2 from Debian unstable
On Saturday 04 October 2008 15.01.45 StefanPotyra wrote: > ok, the haskell-devscripts change looks good to me, and as haskell- > utf8-string is currently not in intrepid, we won't risk breakage. I think you missed that haskell-utf8-string only is the name of the source package. It is at version 0.3.1-1 in intrepid and builds the following binary packages: libghc6-utf8-string-doc libghc6-utf8-string-dev The version in Debian is 0.3.1.1-2 and in addition to the above it also builds: libghc6-utf8-string-prof The -prof package is needed by xmonad-contrib as it builds a libghc6-xmonad- contrib-prof package. Thanks a lot for taking time to look at this! -- FFE: Please sync xmonad 0.8-1 and xmonad-contrib 0.8-2 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 271502] [NEW] No ddebs for -backports
Public bug reported: There are no repository files for [version]-backports on http://ddebs.ubuntu.com. (In /dists there is no directories for hardy- backports, gutsy-backports etc) However if you look manually under /pool the dbgsym packages for backports is available. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- No ddebs for -backports https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271502 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 269652] Re: Worrying message " ata4: EH pending after 5 tries, giving up" from dmesg
I have verified this bug using an unpatched mainline linux-2.6 kernel, found the commit causing trouble, and reported the bug upstream. ** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #11615 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11615 ** Also affects: linux via http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11615 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Worrying message " ata4: EH pending after 5 tries, giving up" from dmesg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269652 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228525] Re: googleearth-package 0.5.4 required from Debian
0.5.4 is now in intrepid and I can verify that it builds and works as expected on hardy (I backported it using prevu). I believe this should be fixed by an SRU. SRU justification: the current version in hardy doesn't work at all. How to reproduce the error: aptitude install googleearth-package; make-googleearth-package Suggested fix: sync 0.5.4 from intrepid, the changes between 0.5.2 and 0.5.4 are quite small: googleearth-package (0.5.4) unstable; urgency=low * Support Google Earth 4.3 * We have to revert to using LD_LIBRARY_PATH instead of ld-linux.so.2, otherwise Google Earth 4.3 can't work. There isn't any workaround known at this time. * Revert --quiet being the default. This totally messes up being able to get error messages. The default verboseness problem is postponed for a new major version release. -- Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:47:32 -0600 googleearth-package (0.5.3) unstable; urgency=low * Added --verbose and made --quiet the default (closes: #466589) -- Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:54:59 -0700 ** Changed in: googleearth-package (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- googleearth-package 0.5.4 required from Debian https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228525 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 185625] Re: sign the repository at ddebs.ubuntu.com
"Reported on 2008-01-24" and not a single response from any ubuntu developer or Security Team member about this? All packages are built on the normal build servers. I really can't see any reason for it to be hard to get ddebs.ubuntu.com signed, either by the standard archive key or a separate one. Two big problems with the current situation: 1. Many Ubuntu developers is probably using ddebs.ubuntu.com. I really don't like developers of the distribution I use to get malicious packages installed. 2. Users will be told to enable this repository to help triage bugs. This teaches them that it is OK to ignore security warnings from APT. The second problem is of course the same when using PPAs. But there the problem is harder to solve, and is beeing discussed in bug #125103. -- sign the repository at ddebs.ubuntu.com https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185625 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348118] [NEW] Missing Build-Depends: python2.6
Public bug reported: The source package python-3.0 3.0.1-0ubuntu8 uses python2.6 to build the documentation. (See debian/patches/htmldoc-python26.dpatch) However python2.6 is missing from the Build-Depends. I think it should be added to make the dependency obvious, without this you also can't backport the package without modifying the source. ** Affects: python3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Missing Build-Depends: python2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348118 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106382] Re: [sync request] Please sync debtorrent from Debian unstable (main)
As I said in my previous reply debtorrent will NOT work without the necessary infrastructure. Debtorrent is a great idea, but a sync is unfortunately not enough to get it working on Ubuntu. -- [sync request] Please sync debtorrent from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 94604] Re: [need-packaging] nspluginwrapper
** Changed in: Debian Bugwatch: Debian Bug tracker #410061 => Debian Bug tracker #423131 Status: Fix Released => Unknown ** Summary changed: - [need-packaging] nspluginwrapper + Please sync nspluginwrapper from Debian unstable (was: [need-packaging] nspluginwrapper) ** Tags removed: needs-packaging -- Please sync nspluginwrapper from Debian unstable (was: [need-packaging] nspluginwrapper) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94604 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 94604] Re: Please sync nspluginwrapper from Debian unstable (was: [need-packaging] nspluginwrapper)
nspluginwrapper is now included in Debian unstable so this should be a sync request bug. However the package in Debian currently fails to build from source on both sid and gutsy due to a missing build dependency. I have reported this upstream and the sync should probably wait until that bug is closed. -- Please sync nspluginwrapper from Debian unstable (was: [need-packaging] nspluginwrapper) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94604 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 81217] Re: Audio/video metadata extraction does not work
I can confirm this on amd64. Output below for mpeg, mp3 and ogg files. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a Linux bacon 2.6.20-15-generic #2 SMP Sun Apr 15 06:17:24 UTC 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ file Katter.mpg Katter.mpg: MPEG sequence, v1, system multiplex [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ tracker-extract Katter.mpg video/mpeg (:5678): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_element_get_bus: assertion `GST_IS_ELEMENT (element)' failed (:5678): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_bus_add_signal_watch_full: assertion `GST_IS_BUS (bus)' failed (:5678): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid (NULL) pointer instance (:5678): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_signal_connect_data: assertion `G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE (instance)' failed (:5678): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_object_unref: assertion `object != NULL' failed (:5678): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_set: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (:5678): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_set: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (:5678): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_set: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (:5678): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_element_set_state: assertion `GST_IS_ELEMENT (element)' failed ** (:5678): CRITICAL **: poll_for_state_change: assertion `extractor && extractor->playbin' failed (:5678): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_element_set_state: assertion `GST_IS_ELEMENT (element)' failed (:5678): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_object_unref: assertion `object != NULL' failed [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ file leksaksbilen.mp3 leksaksbilen.mp3: Audio file with ID3 version 23.0 tag, MP3 encoding [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ tracker-extract leksaksbilen.mp3 audio/mpeg (:5707): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_element_get_bus: assertion `GST_IS_ELEMENT (element)' failed (:5707): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_bus_add_signal_watch_full: assertion `GST_IS_BUS (bus)' failed (:5707): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid (NULL) pointer instance (:5707): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_signal_connect_data: assertion `G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE (instance)' failed (:5707): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_object_unref: assertion `object != NULL' failed (:5707): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_set: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (:5707): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_set: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (:5707): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_set: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (:5707): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_element_set_state: assertion `GST_IS_ELEMENT (element)' failed ** (:5707): CRITICAL **: poll_for_state_change: assertion `extractor && extractor->playbin' failed (:5707): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_element_set_state: assertion `GST_IS_ELEMENT (element)' failed (:5707): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_object_unref: assertion `object != NULL' failed [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ file /usr/share/sounds/KDE_Beep_Double.ogg /usr/share/sounds/KDE_Beep_Double.ogg: Ogg data, Vorbis audio, mono, 44100 Hz, ~64000 bps, created by: Xiph.Org libVorbis I (1.0.1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ tracker-extract /usr/share/sounds/KDE_Beep_Double.ogg application/ogg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ** Changed in: tracker (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info => Confirmed -- Audio/video metadata extraction does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/81217 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 81217] Re: Audio/video metadata extraction does not work
Are you sure? Looking at the first comment to this bug it works fine without full path on i386. I can also get good output from other file types without full path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ tracker-extract vga1.png image/png Image:Comments=Created with The GIMP; Image:Height=315; Image:Width=1078; However I do get a different crash when specifying full path for audio/video files. Ogg files still produce no output at all, with or without full path. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ tracker-extract /home/paran/Katter.mpg video/mpeg GThread-ERROR **: file gthread-posix.c: line 367 (): error 'Cannot allocate memory' during 'pthread_create' aborting... Aborted [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ tracker-extract /home/paran/leksaksbilen.mp3 audio/mpeg GThread-ERROR **: file gthread-posix.c: line 367 (): error 'Cannot allocate memory' during 'pthread_create' aborting... Aborted [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ file finalman-hus.ogg finalman-hus.ogg: Ogg data, Vorbis audio, stereo, 44100 Hz, ~112001 bps, created by: Xiph.Org libVorbis I (1.0.1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ tracker-extract /home/paran/finalman-hus.ogg application/ogg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ tracker-extract finalman-hus.ogg application/ogg There is no lack of free memory to allocate: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 40461924002520 43672 0 728882187080 -/+ buffers/cache:17425522303640 Swap:0 0 0 ** Changed in: tracker (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info => Confirmed -- Audio/video metadata extraction does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/81217 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 94604] Re: Please sync nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-2 from Debian unstable contrib (was: [need-packaging] nspluginwrapper)
The FTBFS bug is now fixed upstream. 0.9.91.4-2 builds fine in a gutsy pbuilder, please sync. ** Summary changed: - Please sync nspluginwrapper from Debian unstable (was: [need-packaging] nspluginwrapper) + Please sync nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-2 from Debian unstable contrib (was: [need-packaging] nspluginwrapper) -- Please sync nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-2 from Debian unstable contrib (was: [need-packaging] nspluginwrapper) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94604 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137263] Re: auctex is uninstallable
bug still present in auctex 11.83-7ubuntu1. CompilationLog is attached. ** Attachment added: "CompilationLog" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9830379/CompilationLog -- auctex is uninstallable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73862] Re: Add optimized cipher modules to initramfs
> I can confirm that this is not the case, as I do use such a setup in my > laptop. lsmod only shows aes, but not aes-i586. Sorry, I was mistaken. > It would probably pop up if I had entered it in /etc/modules, but since > we cannot modify that file easily (you would need some magic to detect > the architecture and module name and stuff), it would be really great if > this wasn't really necessary. I think a better solution would be to create /etc/modprobe.d/cryptsetup and let it contain (on amd64): alias aes aes_x86_64 alias twofish twofish_x86_64 ... That would set the asm optimized modules as default. However we could look into this for hardy. The version that have now been included in gutsy will work fine and will give most users of encrypted disks a nice speed boost. :-) -- Add optimized cipher modules to initramfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 147343] Re: gpg ignores 1 as valid trust value
This is caused by debian/patches/70_trust_error.dpatch which was incorrectly added to the latest ubuntu version. That was meant to close LP: #39459, which was however already fixed in the current ubuntu version so now that patch instead cause this bug. I have verifyed that removing 70_trust_error.dpatch closes this bug, and does not cause LP: #39459 to re-appear. ** Changed in: gnupg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- gpg ignores 1 as valid trust value https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147343 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 147343] Re: gpg ignores 1 as valid trust value
** Attachment added: "gnupg.debian.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9609670/gnupg.debian.patch ** Tags added: patch -- gpg ignores 1 as valid trust value https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147343 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 148119] Re: release link broken
The link at the top of the page, after "The following releases of Ubuntu are available:" for gutsy links to feisty. -- release link broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148119 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 43324] Re: There is no 64 bit package available.
wine 0.9.45 for amd64 is in gutsy now. ** Changed in: wine (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- There is no 64 bit package available. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92553] Re: No kernel debug image meta packages
I know it is not entirely correct to add ubuntu-main-sponsors to this. However, the package is in main, and kernel team have completely ignored this for four months now. (I have submitted this bug, sent e-mail to their list, made a patch and sent that to the list etc.) I also know that they probably simply have to much work to do, so this way maybe some other in main sponsors have time to look at this. The bug is trivial and easy to fix, but very annoying to those who actually use the kernel debug packages. -- No kernel debug image meta packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92553 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133452] Re: gutsy amd64: flashplugin-nonfree not working
Feel free to modify my changelog entry, or remove it and write your own, whatever. I don't really need any credit for a small one line fix :-) -- gutsy amd64: flashplugin-nonfree not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133452 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133452] Re: gutsy amd64: flashplugin-nonfree not working
Yes, bug 138145 is probably quite easy to fix, but please post those comments on that on that bug instead of this one. Also while I believe that your patch would work, it will install the wrapped plugin the wrong way. -n is used to prevent nspluginwrapper from creating symlinks as this is handeled by the alternatives system. The real problem is that update-alternatives is called with the wrong path, which my patch already fixes. -- gutsy amd64: flashplugin-nonfree not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133452 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133452] Re: gutsy amd64: flashplugin-nonfree not working
flashplugin-nonfree-9.0.48.0.0ubuntu9 did not attempt to fix this bug so it is not strange that it is still present. However you seem to have some other problem with your nspluginwrapper. -n is a ubuntu specific option that is patched into nspluginwrapper and it is working fine for me. If it is not working for you then that is a separate bug that you should report against the nspluginwrapper package. -- gutsy amd64: flashplugin-nonfree not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133452 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133452] Re: gutsy amd64: flashplugin-nonfree not working
updated patch that applies to 9.0.48.0.0ubuntu9 ** Attachment added: "flashplugin-nonfree.debian.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9249110/flashplugin-nonfree.debian.patch -- gutsy amd64: flashplugin-nonfree not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133452 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133452] Re: gutsy amd64: flashplugin-nonfree not working
same patch as debdiff ** Attachment added: "debdiff_9.0.48.0.0ubuntu9-9.0.48.0.0ubuntu10" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9249116/debdiff_9.0.48.0.0ubuntu9-9.0.48.0.0ubuntu10 -- gutsy amd64: flashplugin-nonfree not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133452 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 138985] Re: flashplugin-nonfree does not install flashplayer
Is flash mentioned in the list of installed plug-ins in firefox? (Type "about:plugins" in the address field to see the list.) Are you running gutsy i386 or amd64? -- flashplugin-nonfree does not install flashplayer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138985 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139023] Re: make-googleearth-package doesn't use latest version
Debian seems to have a fix for this problem. http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/contrib/g/googleearth-package /googleearth-package_0.3.2/changelog ** Changed in: googleearth-package (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- make-googleearth-package doesn't use latest version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139023 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133006] Please sync gnuserv 3.12.7-5 from Debian unstable
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnuserv Current ubuntu version is 3.12.7-4 and have no ubuntu specific changes. 3.12.7-5 is needed for gnuserv to work with emacs22 which is now in gutsy. Debian changelog: gnuserv (3.12.7-5) unstable; urgency=low * Adding support for emacs22 (Thanks Junichi Uekawa) (Closes: 432854) -- Mike O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:47:37 -0400 ** Affects: gnuserv (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please sync gnuserv 3.12.7-5 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124876] Re: Should install nvidia-glx-new instead of nvidia-glx for video cards that can handle -new
Couldn't update-manager also check if nvidia-glx-new is supported and ask if it could replace nvidia-glx with that? Off course this check should only happen if nvidia-glx is already installed. -- Should install nvidia-glx-new instead of nvidia-glx for video cards that can handle -new https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124876 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92553] Re: No kernel debug image meta packages
The attached patch for linux-meta in gutsy adds linux-image-debug meta packages for generic, 386, ume and server as these are the architectures that have linux-image-debug packages available according to packages.ubuntu.com. The patch was also sent to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. ** Attachment added: "add debug meta packages" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8922836/linux-meta_linux-image-debug.debdiff -- No kernel debug image meta packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92553 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139665] apparmor profile error messages
Public bug reported: The cupsys apparmor profile is still to restrictive. I am using cupsys 1.3.0-4ubuntu3 on amd64 and get the following errors to dmesg. This is when trying to print to PDF, which seems to fail: [110434.217141] audit(1189790585.293:18281): operation="capable" name="dac_override" pid=2357 profile="/usr/lib/cups/backend/cups-pdf" [110434.217150] audit(1189790585.293:18282): operation="capable" name="dac_read_search" pid=2357 profile="/usr/lib/cups/backend/cups-pdf" [110434.232496] audit(1189790585.321:18283): operation="inode_permission" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" name="/etc/papersize" pid=2362 profile="/usr/lib/cups/backend/cups-pdf" The following is when printing a single page to my USB printer that I think is using the hpijs backend. No errors in cups logs, and the page printed fine, but still prints apparmor warnings to dmesg. dmesg: [110473.515355] audit(1189790675.717:18284): operation="inode_permission" requested_mask="rw" denied_mask="rw" name="/dev/tty" pid=2442 profile="/usr/sbin/cupsd" [110473.542908] audit(1189790675.773:18285): operation="inode_permission" requested_mask="rw" denied_mask="rw" name="/dev/tty" pid=2445 profile="/usr/sbin/cupsd" cups/acces_log: localhost - - [14/Sep/2007:19:24:35 +0200] "POST /printers/skrivare HTTP/1.1" 200 226016 Print-Job successful-ok cups/page_log: skrivare spacewoman 56 [14/Sep/2007:19:24:37 +0200] 1 1 - localhost ** Affects: cupsys (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- apparmor profile error messages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139665 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 136634] Re: Unable to download packages using Gutsy debmirror
Confirmed. debmirror is broken in gutsy and won't download packages. marcolinos solution worked for me as well. ** Changed in: debmirror (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Unable to download packages using Gutsy debmirror https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136634 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 140666] changelogs.ubuntu.com lags behind archive
Public bug reported: http://changelogs.ubuntu.com needs to be updated/synchronized with the Ubuntu archive much more often. Currently it lags several hours behind. This means that the "show changelog" feature of aptitude, and probably other package managers, is almost always broken for new versions of packages. This makes the feature rather worthless as it is mainly when upgrading a package to a new version that you wish to review the changelog before. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- changelogs.ubuntu.com lags behind archive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140666 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73862] Re: Add optimized cipher modules to initramfs
Sorry for forgetting about this bug. Thank you Anthony porting this to a newer crypsetup. Reinhard: I only think this is needed for the root file system. If you for example only have /home on dm-crypt then it will set up after leaving initramfs. This means that all kernel modules are available and insmod will be smart enough to load the optimized one. -- Add optimized cipher modules to initramfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73862] Re: Add optimized cipher modules to initramfs
One more thing, should this bug really still be Incomplete+Undecided? -- Add optimized cipher modules to initramfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 140672] syslogd profile needs setuid+setgid
Public bug reported: syslogd needs to be allowed to change uid/gid to the syslog user. The attached patch applies to latest ubuntu apparmor bzr. ** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: patch -- syslogd profile needs setuid+setgid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140672 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 140672] Re: syslogd profile needs setuid+setgid
** Attachment added: "apparmor-syslogd.diff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9344028/apparmor-syslogd.diff ** Tags added: patch -- syslogd profile needs setuid+setgid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140672 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139001] Re: UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.44
Is there any chance of getting this in before the BetaFreeze tomorrow? I see that there are deb packages with 0.9.45 (build by Scott Ritchie) on http://wine.budgetdedicated.com. -- UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.44 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106382] Re: [sync request] Please sync debtorrent from Debian unstable (main)
Debtorrent seems like a great feature, but it is probably to late to get it working for Gutsy? It needs to have some extra repository meta data generated. For Debian these files are available at http://merkel.debian.org/~ajt/extrapieces/. This URL is also hard coded into the python source code. To run on Ubuntu somebody would have to arrange for the same files to be generated periodically for ubuntu using the included "hippy.py" script. This needs to be run on some machine which have a local mirror. Then of course the source needs to be changed to point to this URL, or better make it a configure option. -- [sync request] Please sync debtorrent from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133452] Re: gutsy amd64: flashplugin-nonfree not working
This debdiff makes postinst add the correct alternative. ** Attachment added: "debdiff_9.0.48.0.0ubuntu8-9.0.48.0.0ubuntu9" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9097740/debdiff_9.0.48.0.0ubuntu8-9.0.48.0.0ubuntu9 ** Tags added: patch -- gutsy amd64: flashplugin-nonfree not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133452 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137048] amsn can't log in
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: amsn This is using latest amsn 0.97RC1+dfsg-0ubuntu1, gutsy, x86_64. amsn starts, but when selecting "Log In" absolute nothing happens, no login window, no console output, no nothing. The rest of amsn GUI is still working, I can enter the preferences and so on. I didn't find any verbosity options, and don't know anything about debugging a tcl/tk application so I am afraid I can't write a more detailed bug report than this. I have reinstalled 0.96+dfsg1-2build1 which is working fine. ** Affects: amsn (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- amsn can't log in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137048 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137048] Re: amsn can't log in
Do you also use amd64? I suspect that an ordinary backtrace would be useless, as aMSN is written in TCL, an interpreted language, so the backtrace would only be of the interpreter. Also I would have to figure out where to put a breakpoint, as aMSN as I said doesn't crash, but continue working. I am sure that there are other, recommended ways of debugging TCL, I don't know them and unfortunately don't have the time to research that right now. -- amsn can't log in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137048 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137048] Re: amsn can't log in
I did some more testing. It seems that if I disable "auto-connect on startup" then I get a proper login after a restart. If I then re-enable auto-connect and restarts amsn again the problem returns. -- amsn can't log in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137048 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92553] Re: No kernel debug image meta packages
** Tags added: patch -- No kernel debug image meta packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92553 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137263] auctex is uninstallable
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: auctex i can't install auctex in gutsy. The following NEW packages will be installed: auctex 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/1126kB of archives. After unpacking 4268kB will be used. Writing extended state information... Done Preconfiguring packages ... Selecting previously deselected package auctex. (Reading database ... 197799 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking auctex (from .../auctex_11.83-6ubuntu2_all.deb) ... Setting up auctex (11.83-6ubuntu2) ... install/auctex: Setting up for emacs22 (log file: /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/auctex//CompilationLog)... emacs-package-install: /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/auctex emacs22 emacs22 failed at /usr/lib/emacsen-common/emacs-package-install line 30, line 1. dpkg: error processing auctex (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Errors were encountered while processing: auctex E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Setting up auctex (11.83-6ubuntu2) ... install/auctex: Setting up for emacs22 (log file: /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/auctex//CompilationLog)... emacs-package-install: /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/auctex emacs22 emacs22 failed at /usr/lib/emacsen-common/emacs-package-install line 30, line 1. dpkg: error processing auctex (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Errors were encountered while processing: auctex Bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/feisty-backports/+bug/134717 in feisty- backports might be related. I had emacs22 from feisty-backports installed before upgrading to gutsy, but I have tried removing (and purgeing) all related emacs and auctex packages and verified that this bug still occurs when trying to install them again. ** Affects: auctex (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- auctex is uninstallable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137263] Re: auctex is uninstallable
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 134717 Auctex in feisty does not work when emacs is upgraded to emacs22 from feisty-backports -- auctex is uninstallable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137263] Re: auctex is uninstallable
This is not a duplicate of 134717. That bug is against feisty-backports and only discusses backporting while this is a bug in auctex in gutsy. To mark this as a duplicate you should first change the description, and also add auctex(Ubuntu) to the affected packages. -- auctex is uninstallable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 43324] Re: There is no 64 bit package available.
Does this package contain a 64-bit wine binary? Will that binary run 32bit Windows applications? If not then I think it would be a big misstake to include it. The thing users want when they install wine is to run some specific Windows program, and probably 99.9% of all Windows programs is only distributed as 32bit binaries. -- There is no 64 bit package available. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139001] Re: UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45
** Summary changed: - UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.44 + UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45 -- UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139001] Re: UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45
** Attachment added: "diffstat_0.9.42_0.9.45.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9444145/diffstat_0.9.42_0.9.45.txt -- UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139001] Re: UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45
** Attachment added: "wine_0.9.45-0ubuntu2.dsc" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9444144/wine_0.9.45-0ubuntu2.dsc -- UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139001] Re: UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45
** Attachment added: "debdiff_0.9.45-0ubuntu1-1_0.9.45-0ubuntu2" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9444149/debdiff_0.9.45-0ubuntu1-1_0.9.45-0ubuntu2 -- UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139001] Re: UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45
** Attachment added: "buildlog_0.9.45-0ubuntu2_amd64.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9444147/buildlog_0.9.45-0ubuntu2_amd64.txt -- UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139001] Re: UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45
** Attachment added: "debdiff_0.9.42-0ubuntu1_0.9.45-0ubuntu2" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9444148/debdiff_0.9.42-0ubuntu1_0.9.45-0ubuntu2 -- UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139001] Re: UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45
I tried sending the following to launchpad by mail earler today, but it must have gotten stuck somewhere... Some people seems to think that the lib/lib32 issue on amd64 is release-critical, and Scott have posted on the motu list that he won't have time to fix this until later. For this reason I have made a new version of the wine package that corrects this problem. I have also renamed the orig.tar.gz, and corrected a small typo in debian/rules. Anyway, these are all small changes so I have left Scott Richie as original uploader as I do not which to take credit for his work. The attached debdiff between his version on REVU and my version is only 93 lines. Attached are debdiffs between latest Ubuntu version, and also between my package and Scotts on REVU. I also attach diffstat, and buildlogs as required by the FreezeExceptionProcess. I won't post wines own changelog, as you have already ACKed that the latest crack is good :-) ** Attachment added: "wine_0.9.45-0ubuntu2.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9444136/wine_0.9.45-0ubuntu2.diff.gz -- UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139665] Re: apparmor profile error messages
Martin: I am not seeing any more cups audit messages, but on the other hand some of the "too powerful" capabilities seems to have been given to cups now. If I can help debug this further to produce a better solution please let me know. -- apparmor profile error messages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139665 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137263] Re: auctex is uninstallable
Same problem with the version from Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# dpkg -i /home/paran/Desktop/auctex_11.83-7_all.deb Selecting previously deselected package auctex. (Reading database ... 220790 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking auctex (from .../Desktop/auctex_11.83-7_all.deb) ... Setting up auctex (11.83-7) ... install/auctex: Setting up for emacs22 (log file: /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/auctex//CompilationLog)... emacs-package-install: /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/auctex emacs22 emacs22 failed at /usr/lib/emacsen-common/emacs-package-install line 30, line 1. dpkg: error processing auctex (--install): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Errors were encountered while processing: auctex ** Attachment added: "/usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/auctex/CompilationLog" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9444332/CompilationLog -- auctex is uninstallable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137263] Re: auctex is uninstallable
Reinhard, if you look a bit closer you will see that I did just that together with my last comment. :-) -- auctex is uninstallable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139001] Re: UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45
Off course, but it sounded like it could take a little longer than this before you got time to fix this. I checked on REVU before submitting my e-mail that didn't make it through. Should have checked again before posting again manually perhaps. Anyway the duplicated work doesn't matter, it wasn't that much. I only want to make really sure that we really do get a working wine on amd64 for gutsy. Could somebody on the UVF team please let us know if a package on REVU is enough or if you need files posted here on LP as well? -- UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92553] Re: No kernel debug image meta packages
Updated debdiff that applies to 2.6.22.12.14 ** Attachment added: "linux-meta_2.6.22.12.14_linux-image-debug.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9464658/linux-meta_2.6.22.12.14_linux-image-debug.debdiff -- No kernel debug image meta packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92553 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137263] Re: auctex is uninstallable
** Changed in: auctex (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- auctex is uninstallable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173833] Re: evdev mouse fails on hardy: cannot open input pEvdev
> Repeating, don't use the by-path or the by-id link. At least for me, it doesn't work. Then you should report a separate bug because of course they should work. Here is a part of my xorg.conf that is working in latest Hardy: Section "InputDevice" Identifier "microsoft-kbd" Driver "evdev" Option "CoreKeyboard" Option "Device" "/dev/input/by-id/usb-Microsoft_Comfort_Curve_Keyboard_2000-event-kbd" Option "XkbRules" "xorg" Option "XkbModel" "evdev" Option "XkbLayout" "se" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Das Keyboard" Driver "evdev" Option "CoreKeyboard" Option "Device" "/dev/input/by-id/usb-046a_Das_Keyboard-event-kbd" Option "XkbRules" "xorg" Option "XkbModel" "evdev" Option "XkbLayout" "se" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "LogitechMouse" Driver "evdev" Option "CorePointer" Option "SendCoreEvents""true" Option "Device" "/dev/input/by-id/usb-Logitech_USB_Receiver-event-mouse" EndSection -- evdev mouse fails on hardy: cannot open input pEvdev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173833 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173833] Re: evdev mouse fails on hardy: cannot open input pEvdev
This bug is caused by an configuration change that is undocumented, the man page contains options that are no longer valid. This is made worse by the fact that the error message is very unclear. Both problems are resolved in upstream git (freedesktop.org, not debian). The Debian package is also mainained in git, which makes me a bit unsure of how to submit a patch for this. I guess I should do it the "git way" and not submit a normal debdiff here? My proposed solution is to simply cherry pick 7f1e8146d4b13929a86a4b80f783a720c1b5573a and 11cf9c92c0d31d1058ec6c013b7126bd8909beba from freedesktop. Those two commits contain improved error messages, and an updated man page. This is how I did this locally: git clone git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-xorg/driver/xserver-xorg-input-evdev git remote add xorg git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/driver/xf86-input-evdev git fetch xorg git-cherry-pick 7f1e8146d4b13929a86a4b80f783a720c1b5573a git-cherry-pick 11cf9c92c0d31d1058ec6c013b7126bd8909beba I then verified that the package still builds ok, the man-page is updated, and when using an old xorg.conf Xorg.0.log now contains "No Device specified." instead of "cannot open input pEvdev". -- evdev mouse fails on hardy: cannot open input pEvdev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173833 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 206302] Re: scim fails to initialize, segfaults, makes kde4 apps take long to load
Confirmed once agin on latest Hardy. When starting any KDE4 application they block while waiting for scim, until it fails. The simple fix of removing all scim-related packages worked here as well: libskim0 skim libscim8c2a scim-bridge-agent scim-bridge-client-gtk scim-bridge-client-qt scim-bridge-client-qt4 scim-modules-socket scim-qtimm ** Changed in: scim (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- scim fails to initialize, segfaults, makes kde4 apps take long to load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206302 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212973] Re: tray icon in KDE4
** Attachment added: "debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13153277/amsn_bug_212973_debdiff -- tray icon in KDE4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212973] [NEW] tray icon in KDE4
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: amsn On KDE4 the tray icon from AMSn ends up as a normal window and not in the tray as expected. The issue have been discussed in the KDE bugtracker, and was fixed in amsn svn revision 9595. Attached is a debdiff which includes the patch from SVN as debian/patches/07-fix_kde4_tray_icon.dpatch. ** Affects: kdebase Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: amsn (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #155730 http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155730 ** Also affects: kdebase via http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155730 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- tray icon in KDE4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212973] Re: tray icon in KDE4
Some more info: I did verify that the tray icon still works as expected on KDE3. The patch itself was taken from svn using: svn diff -r 9594:9595 https://amsn.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/amsn/trunk/amsn -- tray icon in KDE4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212973] Re: tray icon in KDE4
** Changed in: amsn (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- tray icon in KDE4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92553] No kernel debug image meta packages
Public bug reported: In addition to the existing meta packages for linux-image-[generic/server] and linux-headers-[generic/server] I think there should also be packages for linux-image-debug-[generic/server] that depend on the latest debug image packages. Without this the debug image package have to be installed manually every time the kernel is upgraded. ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- No kernel debug image meta packages https://launchpad.net/bugs/92553 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89366] Re: initramfs scripts kill initial "coldplug" udev processing before devices needed for root filesystem are loaded
I run into this bug yesterday when I upgraded my laptop from edgy to feisty. I have an encypted root filesystem (dm-crypt + LUKS) on /dev/sda3. The initramfs hook script from cryptsetup tries to open /dev/sda3 before the device has been created wich obvously fails so that the machine can't boot. Adding a 5 second sleep at the end of 'init-premount/udev' fixes the problem for me as well, but that is not really a nice solution. -- initramfs scripts kill initial "coldplug" udev processing before devices needed for root filesystem are loaded https://launchpad.net/bugs/89366 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84016] Re: Unmet dependency in metapackage linux-image-generic
The problem seems to be linux-meta-2.6.17.11 packages that have been uploaded to edgy-security without corresponding kernel packages. For example the meta package linux-image-generic now depends on linux- image-2.6.17-11-generic which does not exist in the repository. -- Unmet dependency in metapackage linux-image-generic https://launchpad.net/bugs/84016 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73862] Re: Add optimized cipher modules to initramfs
Yes, the patch is against the cryptsetup ubuntu package and only modifies a few lines of debian/initramfs-cryptroot-hook. However the patch is for 1.0.4-8ubuntu1 and don't seem to apply cleanly to the current feisty version 1.0.4+svn26-1ubuntu1. I can make a new version tomorrow if you don't want to do it yourself. -- Add optimized cipher modules to initramfs https://launchpad.net/bugs/73862 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67894] Re: Keycode 111 starts ksnapshot (hardcoded?)
** Changed in: kdebase (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: kdebase => kdelibs Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed -- Keycode 111 starts ksnapshot (hardcoded?) https://launchpad.net/bugs/67894 -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73862] Re: Add optimized cipher modules to initramfs
patch ** Attachment added: "Add optimized cipher modules to initramfs" http://librarian.launchpad.net/5215026/initramfs-cryptroot-hook-patch -- Add optimized cipher modules to initramfs https://launchpad.net/bugs/73862 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73862] Add optimized cipher modules to initramfs
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cryptsetup The initramfs hook script only adds a module named $cipher.ko for each cipher that is used. Some ciphers have assembly optimized kernel modules on some architectures wich should be used instead as they give much better performance. (Using aes-i586.ko instead of aes.ko on my system doubles disk throughput for sustained reads, while using 60% instead of 100% CPU) Attached is a patch against feisty. I have only tested to build a initramfs with it in a chroot, but it seems to be working. The patch use find to look for cipher modules in $MODULESDIR/kernel/arch directory wich should only find the asm module as the normal ones are in $MODULESDIR/kernel/crypto. It would be better to look directly in $MODULESDIR/kernel/arch/`uname -i`/crypto/, but uname -i only returns "unknown" on Ubuntu. ** Affects: cryptsetup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Add optimized cipher modules to initramfs https://launchpad.net/bugs/73862 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 524226] Re: ssh-import-id: retrieve a key from a public keyserver and add to the authorized_keys file
I think a name like "ssh-import-launchpad-id" would be more appropriate for something this Launchpad specific. -- ssh-import-id: retrieve a key from a public keyserver and add to the authorized_keys file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409440] Re: upstream compiled binaries built with executable stacks
With version 2:8.660-0ubuntu1 on amd64, the list of files with an executable stack is shorter: xorg-driver-fglrx: /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 /usr/lib/dri/fglrx_dri.so /usr/lib32/libGL.so.1.2 /usr/lib32/dri/fglrx_dri.so I used "execstack -c" to remove the executable stack from those and rebooted. I have only tested a few minutes, but so far everything seems OK. Tested: xv - mplayer -vo xv OpenGL - glxgears, fgl_glxgears, ppracer, mplayer -vo gl2 This is using an integrated HD3200 card: 01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon HD 3200 Graphics -- upstream compiled binaries built with executable stacks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 405227] Re: gdm fails to start if /var/log/gdm does not exist
This bug is about GDM breaking when a user remove system directories that they should never remove. Importance Critical would be ridiculous, I actually think even Medium is too much. It is an incorrect assumption that it is OK to "tidy up" by running "rm -rf /var/log/*". Doing that is never correct, AFAIK /var/cache is the only directory under /var where the FHS say you may remove anything at any time. There is probably many other programs that can't recreate their own log directory, especially programs running as non-root. Only root can write to /var/log, so giving write permissions for other system uid/gid is often the reason that an application have a separate directory under /var/log. (SSD) Users that like to put /var/log on tmpfs will need to sync files to/from it at boot/shutdown, just as if they put any other system directory on tmpfs. If there are guides/howtos suggesting to mount an empty tmpfs on /var/log at boot then those guides needs to be fixed. Here are the relevant parts of FHS[1] and Debian Policy[2]: [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/fhs/fhs-2.3.html#THEVARHIERARCHY [2] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html -- gdm fails to start if /var/log/gdm does not exist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405227 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 395591] Re: Installing GDM 2.26 doesn't update /etc/X11/default-display-manager
The debconf files that handles this is missing from the source package in karmic. The code is still there in gdm.postinst and gdm.prerm, but gdm.config and gdm.template is gone. Rebuilding 2.27.90, with those two files taken unmodified from 2.20.10 seems to work. -- Installing GDM 2.26 doesn't update /etc/X11/default-display-manager https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395591 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 269652] Re: Worrying message " ata4: EH pending after 5 tries, giving up" from dmesg
Michael Sandford writes: > I'm getting this error on boot and it is rendering my two SATA drives > unusable. No, this bug did not cause any hard resets of the sata link or any SStatus 100, SControl 300 errors. It only flooded this type of messages: ata4: EH complete ata4: EH pending after 5 tries, giving up This means that you have another problem and should open another bug. -- Worrying message " ata4: EH pending after 5 tries, giving up" from dmesg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269652 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366041] Re: Down and Left arrow don't repeat
This bug is still present with xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.2.5-1ubuntu5 in Karmic. For me the bug started after bug 345397 was fixed in Jaunty (as I commented on that bug at the time). https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input- evdev/+bug/345397/comments/9 ** Tags added: karmic -- Down and Left arrow don't repeat https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453064] Re: Incorrect Intel firmware file name
"oliver.g...@gmail.com" writes: > There is a bug in LBM - it is based on comapt-wireless 2.6.32-rc4.. > Ubuntu needs to change this immediately.. Kernel oops's are common in > that release across many wireless drivers.. It has been fixed in > rc5.. I cannot use lbm because of it.. This bug is about intel firmware file names. Please report your problem as a new bug. -- Incorrect Intel firmware file name https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453064] [NEW] Incorrect Intel firmware file name
Public bug reported:
/lib/firmware/2.6.31-14-generic/lbm-iwlwifi-5000-1.ucode is API v2 and
should be named lbm-iwlwifi-5000-2.ucode. As you see the -1 LBM
package matches the -2 file in linux-firmware:
$ sha1sum /lib/firmware/{,"2.6.31-14-generic/"}*iwlwifi-5000-*
f06ff86c8baa8616de584f8b0fff072a9aab6a44 /lib/firmware/iwlwifi-5000-1.ucode
b1dc5068cd536a97af7e3c0090a5a632d09ab2f3 /lib/firmware/iwlwifi-5000-2.ucode
b1dc5068cd536a97af7e3c0090a5a632d09ab2f3
/lib/firmware/2.6.31-14-generic/lbm-iwlwifi-5000-1.ucode
Also confirmed this by downloading the firmware iwlwifi-5000-2.ucode
from Intel:
b1dc5068cd536a97af7e3c0090a5a632d09ab2f3 iwlwifi-5000-2.ucode
WiFi works, but the file name problem case the following kernel error
messages:
[ 137.691196] iwlagn :03:00.0: firmware: requesting
lbm-iwlwifi-5000-2.ucode
[ 138.136768] iwlagn :03:00.0: lbm-iwlwifi-5000-2.ucode firmware file req
failed: -2
[ 138.136828] iwlagn :03:00.0: firmware: requesting
lbm-iwlwifi-5000-1.ucode
[ 138.290188] iwlagn :03:00.0: Loaded firmware lbm-iwlwifi-5000-1.ucode,
which is deprecated. Please use API v2 instead.
[ 138.290254] iwlagn :03:00.0: loaded firmware version 8.24.2.12
[ 138.466569] Registered led device: iwl-phy0::radio
[ 138.466595] Registered led device: iwl-phy0::assoc
[ 138.466625] Registered led device: iwl-phy0::RX
[ 138.466643] Registered led device: iwl-phy0::TX
After renaming lbm-iwlwifi-5000-1.ucode to lbm-iwlwifi-5000-2.ucode
the above messages is replaced by:
[ 30.302953] iwlagn :03:00.0: firmware: requesting
lbm-iwlwifi-5000-2.ucode
[ 30.400389] iwlagn :03:00.0: loaded firmware version 8.24.2.12
[ 30.576366] Registered led device: iwl-phy0::radio
[ 30.576389] Registered led device: iwl-phy0::assoc
[ 30.576407] Registered led device: iwl-phy0::RX
[ 30.576423] Registered led device: iwl-phy0::TX
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Oct 16 14:24:08 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
Package: linux-backports-modules-2.6.31-14-generic 2.6.31-14.16
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=
PATH=(custom, no user)
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.47-generic
SourcePackage: linux-backports-modules-2.6.31
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic x86_64
XsessionErrors: (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:2123): GLib-CRITICAL **:
g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed
** Affects: linux-backports-modules-2.6.31 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug
--
Incorrect Intel firmware file name
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
