[Bug 2080698] [NEW] Window movements can cause full framebuffer damage

2024-09-13 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported:

Upstream bug: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/3630
Upstream fix: 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/commit/030270ba3bf14b23a2d7a5371cf158ff2591f327


This should be patched in Noble.

** Affects: mutter (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Fix Released

** Affects: mutter (Ubuntu Noble)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: mutter (Ubuntu Oracular)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Fix Released

** Also affects: mutter (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mutter (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080698

Title:
  Window movements can cause full framebuffer damage

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2080698/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2076598] Re: friendly-names by default

2024-09-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I'll take a stab at removing this for PP release. I did take a
relatively quick look at this for OO but determined it wasn't hurting
anything so didn't prioritize it with all the other changes taking
place.

** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => later

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076598

Title:
  friendly-names by default

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2076598/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1957079] Re: [SRU] Update WALinuxAgent to 2.5.0

2024-07-09 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Or rather, 2068021 is a duplicate of this one. Either way, I think this
bug should be made a duplicate of the aforementioned bug report unless
otherwise stated.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957079

Title:
  [SRU] Update WALinuxAgent to 2.5.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1957079/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1957079] Re: [SRU] Update WALinuxAgent to 2.5.0

2024-07-09 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Is this perhaps a duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/2068021?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957079

Title:
  [SRU] Update WALinuxAgent to 2.5.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1957079/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1756785] Re: lxcfs startup failues because fuse directory not empty

2024-07-09 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks Felipe. This bug will remain in an incomplete state then, and
will expire in 53 days. Please give us an update if you have any new
information, or leads on this issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756785

Title:
  lxcfs startup failures because fuse directory not empty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxcfs/+bug/1756785/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2071949] Re: Missing frame pointers on Noble

2024-07-09 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks Danilo, it seems the fix from debian is pretty straightforward.

Would you like to do the SRU for this package?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071949

Title:
  Missing frame pointers on Noble

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipvsadm/+bug/2071949/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1756785] Re: lxcfs startup failures because fuse directory not empty

2024-07-09 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Summary changed:

- lxcfs startup failues because fuse directory not empty
+ lxcfs startup failures because fuse directory not empty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756785

Title:
  lxcfs startup failures because fuse directory not empty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxcfs/+bug/1756785/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2069324] Re: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used

2024-07-09 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thank you for your time in attempting to install the package Markus.

I agree with Paride in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/2069324/comments/8,
we should go ahead and implement this fix on our side.

I'll attempt a quick repro tomorrow, but I'm pretty booked so if it
takes substantial time then I'll defer the reproduction and validation
for someone else. If repro is easy, I'll go ahead and stage the change
back to Focal.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069324

Title:
  vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/2069324/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068729] Re: pam_radius_auth: Failed to open RADIUS IPv6 socket: Address family not supported by protocol

2024-07-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks for mentioning that, I definitely missed that in the setup.
However even with setting those parameters it is still not reproducible
(same steps as #12, except update the grub cmdline and use a VM instead
of container)

root@n-vm:~# cat /proc/cmdline 
BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-6.8.0-35-generic 
root=UUID=7df54820-4e88-4805-aed8-832ab23eb0ea ro ipv6.disable=1 console=tty1 
console=ttyS0

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068729

Title:
  pam_radius_auth: Failed to open RADIUS IPv6 socket: Address family not
  supported by protocol

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpam-radius-auth/+bug/2068729/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2072700] Re: [Bionic/Focal] Unbound prerm script stops the service on upgrades

2024-07-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thank you for making this bug report and making Ubuntu better Salvatore!

Does unbound remain inactive after the upgrade, or does the postinst
maintainer script start it up again for you successfully?

If automatically restarted, how long is this downtime you are
experiencing when doing the upgrades? I don't imagine it should be
terribly long, but I could see that being an issue on certain devices.

Either way, the patch seems simple enough. It will not apply directly to
the package, but we can simply remove #DEBHELPER# macro from
d/unbound.prerm and replace it with the fixed version.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072700

Title:
  [Bionic/Focal] Unbound prerm script stops the service on upgrades

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unbound/+bug/2072700/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2072700] Re: [Bionic/Focal] Unbound prerm script stops the service on upgrades

2024-07-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Actually this will be more involved than simply updating the prerm
maintainer script - simply because when you upgrade a package, the
currently installed prerm script will be executed, so changing this in a
new package upgrade will not fix the underlying issue, but will for the
next upgrades.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072700

Title:
  [Bionic/Focal] Unbound prerm script stops the service on upgrades

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unbound/+bug/2072700/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2072700] Re: [Bionic/Focal] Unbound prerm script stops the service on upgrades

2024-07-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks Salvatore.

This change makes sense to me.

I propose the following:

1) Creating a test package
2) Ensuring no other issues occur due to the change
3) If good - we can stage the changes in this package and tag it as 
block-proposed, what this will do is not immediately apply the change, but when 
another update comes along (either for security, or for a regular bug fix) this 
change will be included in that, as to eliminate the need for an extra update 
just for this.

This will not fix the issue on the next upgrade as mentioned before -
but the upgrades after that will have the updated behavior.

To have this new behavior immediately you will have to unfortunately
modify the prerm script currently installed - but of course do so at
your own risk :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072700

Title:
  [Bionic/Focal] Unbound prerm script stops the service on upgrades

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unbound/+bug/2072700/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2072700] Re: [Bionic/Focal] Unbound prerm script stops the service on upgrades

2024-07-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I kicked off a build for both bionic/focal at [0].

[0] - https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/lp2072700-unbound-
downtime

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072700

Title:
  [Bionic/Focal] Unbound prerm script stops the service on upgrades

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unbound/+bug/2072700/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064930] Re: dnsmasq cannot execute at systemctl

2024-07-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Nick, were there any other issues here? Sorry for letting this expire.

It looks like there's 2 improvements that could be made, but don't seem
high priority if nothing functional is really breaking -

1) check that the port is available in the maintainer script
2) if port is not open, create a descriptive error/warning

** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
   Status: Expired => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064930

Title:
  dnsmasq cannot execute at systemctl

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/2064930/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2024019] Re: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal

2024-07-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks Andreas. I retriggered gbrowse armhf again due to testbed error.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024019

Title:
  Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haproxy/+bug/2024019/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath

2024-07-15 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Ninoy, Andres, Any notable updates here?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286

Title:
  Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using
  Multipath

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1887558] Re: multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during boot

2024-07-15 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Apologies on delay in response, I was out for a bit and then got sick.
I'm going to propose the multipath-tools merge for oracular today and
then start experimenting with some fixes for this bug.

First thing I will try is moving the bcache-tools udev rules behind
multipath-tools.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887558

Title:
  multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during
  boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bcache-tools/+bug/1887558/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068645] Re: Oracular migration issues

2024-07-15 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Apologies on delay here. Was out for a bit and then got sick.

While I was out, debian updated to version 0.9.9-1.

I will update my branch to the latest debian version as well, and do
some testing once my package builds. If all goes green I'll submit the
MP today for review.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068645

Title:
  Oracular migration issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2068645/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068645] Re: Oracular migration issues

2024-07-16 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+git/multipath-tools/+merge/469512

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068645

Title:
  Oracular migration issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2068645/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath

2024-07-17 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Andres, great to hear you have a workaround, even if it isn't optimal.
Would you mind sharing what type of disks you are using? The original
bug report is talking about LUNs specifically and I am curious if this
extends to other types of devices.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286

Title:
  Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using
  Multipath

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2039594] Re: sgdisk - Unexpected Behavior with Decimal Point in Partition Size Specification

2024-08-29 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Bryce brought up a good point that silently truncating 9.5G to 9G could
be misleading for users. I made an upstream bug report to see if that
behavior could potentially be improved upon[0].

For now, I'll wait to hear from upstream rather than pushing these fixes
into Jammy and Focal.

[0] -
https://sourceforge.net/p/gptfdisk/discussion/939590/thread/d6c0241a23/

** Description changed:

  [ Impact ]
  When creating a partition with sgdisk, if you provide a decimal input it will
  be incorrectly interpreted. For example, putting in the command
  sgdisk --new=1:0:+7.5G --typecode=1:8300 ./a.img to create a 7.5G partition,
  the tool will actually create a 3.5K partition.
  
  [ Test Plan ]
  $ lxc launch ubuntu:jammy j
  $ lxc shell j
  # apt update -y && apt upgrade -y
  # apt install -y gdisk
  # fallocate -l 10G a.img
  # sgdisk --new=1:0:+7.5G --typecode=1:8300 ./a.img
  # fdisk -l ./a.img | grep filesystem | awk '{print $5}'
  3.5K
  
  (Test Fix Jammy)
  # add-apt-repository ppa:mitchdz/lp2039594-gdisk-decimal
  # apt install -y gdisk
  # dpkg -s gdisk | grep Version:
  Version: 1.0.8-4ubuntu1~jammy1
  # rm ./a.img
  # fallocate -l 10G a.img
  # sgdisk --new=1:0:+7.5G --typecode=1:8300 ./a.img
  # fdisk -l ./a.img | grep filesystem | awk '{print $5}'
  7G
  
  ( Test Fix focal)
  # add-apt-repository ppa:mitchdz/lp2039594-gdisk-decimal
  # apt install -y gdisk
  # dpkg -s gdisk | grep Version:
  Version: 1.0.5-1ubuntu1~focal3
  # rm ./a.img
  # fallocate -l 10G a.img
  # sgdisk --new=1:0:+7.5G --typecode=1:8300 ./a.img
  # fdisk -l ./a.img | grep filesystem | awk '{print $5}'
  7G
  
  [ Where problems could occur ]
  * Some tool could be used to this behavior and fixing this could cause what is
    assumed to be a regression.
  * Adds a new while loop, while potentially negligible, will use more CPU 
cycles.
+ * Silently truncating, for example, 9.5G to 9G could be misleading for users.
  
  [Original Bug Descriptio]
  When using the sgdisk command to create a new partition with a specified 
size, the tool behaves unexpectedly when a size is specified with a decimal 
point. Specifically, using a size like 7.5G results in the partition size being 
set to 3.5 KiB instead.
  
  Steps to Reproduce:
  
  Run the following command to create a partition:
  
  sgdisk --new=1:0:+7.5G --typecode=1:8300 --change-name=1:boot
  /dev/sda
  
  Verify the size of the newly created partition using sgdisk --print
  /dev/sda.
  
  Expected Behavior:
  The partition size should be set to 7.5 gigabytes, as specified in the --new 
command.
  
  Actual Behavior:
  The partition size is set to 3.5 KiB.
  
  Additional Information:
  
  The issue can be worked around by specifying the size in megabytes,
  such as 7500M.
  
  System Information:
  
  Operating System: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
  sgdisk Version: GPT fdisk (sgdisk) version 1.0.8

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039594

Title:
  sgdisk - Unexpected Behavior with Decimal Point in Partition Size
  Specification

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdisk/+bug/2039594/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073677] Re: Remove dmraid from oracular?

2024-09-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Can u-r-u please warn user on upgrade about the removal of this package?

I'm not sure if there's a fool-proof way to determine that a user will
be impacted by this package, and the risk of uninstalling it
automatically could cause the system to not boot.

Therefore, I'd rather play it safe and have a block during the upgrade
that explicitly requires a "yes" from the user if dmraid is installed. I
don't have strong opinions on this though if the upgrade team has
another strong opinion.

I am working on the release notes now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073677

Title:
  Remove dmraid from oracular?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2073677/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078871] [NEW] Using a percentage of memory no longer works

2024-09-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported:

It seems the latest stress-ng changed how percentages are handled and
using it to populate a percentage of memory does not work.


[ Reproducer ]

$ lxc launch o-vm
$ lxc shell o-vm
# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu Oracular Oriole (development branch)
Release:24.10
Codename:   oracular
# apt update -y && apt install -y stress-ng
# dpkg -s stress-ng | grep Version:
Version: 0.18.02-1
# stress-ng -vm 1 --vm-bytes 20%
stress-ng: debug: [139883] invoked with 'stress-ng -vm 1 --vm-bytes 20%' by 
user 0 'root'
stress-ng: debug: [139883] stress-ng 0.18.02
stress-ng: debug: [139883] system: Linux o-vm 6.8.0-31-generic #31-Ubuntu SMP 
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Apr 20 00:40:06 UTC 2024 x86_64, gcc 14.2.0, glibc 2.40, 
little endian
stress-ng: debug: [139883] RAM total: 954.6M, RAM free: 433.0M, swap free: 0.0
stress-ng: debug: [139883] temporary file path: '/root', filesystem type: ext2 
(1738063 blocks available)
stress-ng: debug: [139883] 1 processor online, 8 processors configured
stress-ng: info:  [139883] defaulting to a 1 day run per stressor
stress-ng: debug: [139883] CPU data cache: L1: 32K, L2: 4096K, L3: 16384K
stress-ng: debug: [139883] cache allocate: shared cache buffer size: 16384K
stress-ng: info:  [139883] dispatching hogs: 1 vm
stress-ng: debug: [139883] starting stressors
stress-ng: debug: [139883] 1 stressor started
stress-ng: debug: [139884] vm: [139884] started (instance 0 on CPU 0)
stress-ng: debug: [139884] vm: using method 'all'
stress-ng: info:  [139885] vm: gave up trying to mmap, no available memory, 
skipping stressor
stress-ng: debug: [139884] vm: [139884] exited (instance 0 on CPU 0)
stress-ng: warn:  [139883] vm: [139884] aborted early, out of system resources
stress-ng: debug: [139883] vm: [139884] terminated (no resources)
stress-ng: debug: [139883] metrics-check: all stressor metrics validated and 
sane
stress-ng: info:  [139883] skipped: 1: vm (1)
stress-ng: info:  [139883] passed: 0
stress-ng: info:  [139883] failed: 0
stress-ng: info:  [139883] metrics untrustworthy: 0
stress-ng: info:  [139883] successful run completed in 10.03 secs


( Testing the previous version )
# wget 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/stress-ng_0.17.06-1build1_amd64.deb
# dpkg -i ./stress-ng_0.17.06-1build1_amd64.deb
# dpkg -s stress-ng | grep Version:
Version: 0.17.06-1build1
# stress-ng -vm 1 --vm-bytes 20% --timeout 10s
stress-ng: debug: [140097] invoked with 'stress-ng -vm 1 --vm-bytes 20% 
--timeout 10s' by user 0 'root'
stress-ng: debug: [140097] stress-ng 0.17.06
stress-ng: debug: [140097] system: Linux o-vm 6.8.0-31-generic #31-Ubuntu SMP 
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Apr 20 00:40:06 UTC 2024 x86_64, gcc 13.2.0, glibc 2.39
stress-ng: debug: [140097] RAM total: 954.6M, RAM free: 368.2M, swap free: 0.0
stress-ng: debug: [140097] temporary file path: '/root', filesystem type: ext2 
(1738698 blocks available)
stress-ng: debug: [140097] 1 processor online, 8 processors configured
stress-ng: info:  [140097] setting to a 10 secs run per stressor
stress-ng: debug: [140097] CPU data cache: L1: 32K, L2: 4096K, L3: 16384K
stress-ng: debug: [140097] cache allocate: shared cache buffer size: 16384K
stress-ng: info:  [140097] dispatching hogs: 1 vm
stress-ng: debug: [140097] starting stressors
stress-ng: debug: [140097] 1 stressor started
stress-ng: debug: [140098] vm: [140098] started (instance 0 on CPU 0)
stress-ng: debug: [140098] vm: using method 'all'
stress-ng: debug: [140098] vm: [140098] exited (instance 0 on CPU 0)
stress-ng: debug: [140097] vm: [140098] terminated (success)
stress-ng: debug: [140097] metrics-check: all stressor metrics validated and 
sane
stress-ng: info:  [140097] skipped: 0
stress-ng: info:  [140097] passed: 1: vm (1)
stress-ng: info:  [140097] failed: 0
stress-ng: info:  [140097] metrics untrustworthy: 0
stress-ng: info:  [140097] successful run completed in 10.01 secs

** Affects: stress-ng (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: stress-ng (Ubuntu Noble)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Fix Released

** Affects: stress-ng (Ubuntu Oracular)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: stress-ng (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: stress-ng (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: stress-ng (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078871

Title:
  Using a percentage of memory no longer works

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stress-ng/+bug/2078871/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078871] Re: Using a percentage of memory no longer works

2024-09-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Description changed:

  It seems the latest stress-ng changed how percentages are handled and
  using it to populate a percentage of memory does not work.
  
- 
  [ Reproducer ]
  
- $ lxc launch o-vm
+ $ lxc launch ubuntu-devel:oracular o
  $ lxc shell o-vm
  # lsb_release -a
  No LSB modules are available.
  Distributor ID: Ubuntu
  Description:Ubuntu Oracular Oriole (development branch)
  Release:24.10
  Codename:   oracular
  # apt update -y && apt install -y stress-ng
  # dpkg -s stress-ng | grep Version:
  Version: 0.18.02-1
  # stress-ng -vm 1 --vm-bytes 20%
  stress-ng: debug: [139883] invoked with 'stress-ng -vm 1 --vm-bytes 20%' by 
user 0 'root'
  stress-ng: debug: [139883] stress-ng 0.18.02
  stress-ng: debug: [139883] system: Linux o-vm 6.8.0-31-generic #31-Ubuntu SMP 
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Apr 20 00:40:06 UTC 2024 x86_64, gcc 14.2.0, glibc 2.40, 
little endian
  stress-ng: debug: [139883] RAM total: 954.6M, RAM free: 433.0M, swap free: 0.0
  stress-ng: debug: [139883] temporary file path: '/root', filesystem type: 
ext2 (1738063 blocks available)
  stress-ng: debug: [139883] 1 processor online, 8 processors configured
  stress-ng: info:  [139883] defaulting to a 1 day run per stressor
  stress-ng: debug: [139883] CPU data cache: L1: 32K, L2: 4096K, L3: 16384K
  stress-ng: debug: [139883] cache allocate: shared cache buffer size: 16384K
  stress-ng: info:  [139883] dispatching hogs: 1 vm
  stress-ng: debug: [139883] starting stressors
  stress-ng: debug: [139883] 1 stressor started
  stress-ng: debug: [139884] vm: [139884] started (instance 0 on CPU 0)
  stress-ng: debug: [139884] vm: using method 'all'
  stress-ng: info:  [139885] vm: gave up trying to mmap, no available memory, 
skipping stressor
  stress-ng: debug: [139884] vm: [139884] exited (instance 0 on CPU 0)
  stress-ng: warn:  [139883] vm: [139884] aborted early, out of system resources
  stress-ng: debug: [139883] vm: [139884] terminated (no resources)
  stress-ng: debug: [139883] metrics-check: all stressor metrics validated and 
sane
  stress-ng: info:  [139883] skipped: 1: vm (1)
  stress-ng: info:  [139883] passed: 0
  stress-ng: info:  [139883] failed: 0
  stress-ng: info:  [139883] metrics untrustworthy: 0
  stress-ng: info:  [139883] successful run completed in 10.03 secs
  
- 
  ( Testing the previous version )
  # wget 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/stress-ng_0.17.06-1build1_amd64.deb
  # dpkg -i ./stress-ng_0.17.06-1build1_amd64.deb
  # dpkg -s stress-ng | grep Version:
  Version: 0.17.06-1build1
  # stress-ng -vm 1 --vm-bytes 20% --timeout 10s
  stress-ng: debug: [140097] invoked with 'stress-ng -vm 1 --vm-bytes 20% 
--timeout 10s' by user 0 'root'
  stress-ng: debug: [140097] stress-ng 0.17.06
  stress-ng: debug: [140097] system: Linux o-vm 6.8.0-31-generic #31-Ubuntu SMP 
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Apr 20 00:40:06 UTC 2024 x86_64, gcc 13.2.0, glibc 2.39
  stress-ng: debug: [140097] RAM total: 954.6M, RAM free: 368.2M, swap free: 0.0
  stress-ng: debug: [140097] temporary file path: '/root', filesystem type: 
ext2 (1738698 blocks available)
  stress-ng: debug: [140097] 1 processor online, 8 processors configured
  stress-ng: info:  [140097] setting to a 10 secs run per stressor
  stress-ng: debug: [140097] CPU data cache: L1: 32K, L2: 4096K, L3: 16384K
  stress-ng: debug: [140097] cache allocate: shared cache buffer size: 16384K
  stress-ng: info:  [140097] dispatching hogs: 1 vm
  stress-ng: debug: [140097] starting stressors
  stress-ng: debug: [140097] 1 stressor started
  stress-ng: debug: [140098] vm: [140098] started (instance 0 on CPU 0)
  stress-ng: debug: [140098] vm: using method 'all'
  stress-ng: debug: [140098] vm: [140098] exited (instance 0 on CPU 0)
  stress-ng: debug: [140097] vm: [140098] terminated (success)
  stress-ng: debug: [140097] metrics-check: all stressor metrics validated and 
sane
  stress-ng: info:  [140097] skipped: 0
  stress-ng: info:  [140097] passed: 1: vm (1)
  stress-ng: info:  [140097] failed: 0
  stress-ng: info:  [140097] metrics untrustworthy: 0
  stress-ng: info:  [140097] successful run completed in 10.01 secs

** Description changed:

  It seems the latest stress-ng changed how percentages are handled and
  using it to populate a percentage of memory does not work.
  
  [ Reproducer ]
  
- $ lxc launch ubuntu-devel:oracular o
+ $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:oracular o
  $ lxc shell o-vm
  # lsb_release -a
  No LSB modules are available.
  Distributor ID: Ubuntu
  Description:Ubuntu Oracular Oriole (development branch)
  Release:24.10
  Codename:   oracular
  # apt update -y && apt install -y stress-ng
  # dpkg -s stress-ng | grep Version:
  Version: 0.18.02-1
  # stress-ng -vm 1 --vm-bytes 20%
  stress-ng: debug: [139883] invoked with 'stress-ng -vm 1 --vm-bytes 20%' by 
user 0 'root'
  stress-ng: debug: [139883] stress-ng 0.18.02
  stress-ng: debug: [139883] system: Linux o-vm 6.8.0-31-generic #31-Ubuntu SMP 
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat A

[Bug 2078888] [NEW] Oracular 0.9.9-1ubuntu2 autopkgtest failures

2024-09-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported:

Oracular is failing[0] on the following architectures:

* arm64
* ppc64el
* s390x


The reason is the addition of the string in the tgtbasedmpaths test `systemctl 
status multipathd.socket` which now checks the status of the socket. The socket 
is not enabled by default on these architectures, and therefore returns `3` 
instead of `0`, failing the test right away.

Although this change is not normal, the intended fix could be to allow
the socket to be inactive (which would be a pefectly normal situation),
as long as the rest of the test passes.


[0] - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/multipath-tools

** Affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: update-excuse

** Tags added: update-excuse

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207

Title:
  Oracular 0.9.9-1ubuntu2 autopkgtest failures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/207/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078888] Re: Oracular 0.9.9-1ubuntu2 autopkgtest failures

2024-09-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+git/multipath-tools/+merge/472529

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207

Title:
  Oracular 0.9.9-1ubuntu2 autopkgtest failures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/207/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078888] Re: Oracular 0.9.9-1ubuntu2 autopkgtest failures

2024-09-04 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Description changed:

  Oracular is failing[0] on the following architectures:
  
  * arm64
  * ppc64el
  * s390x
  
- 
- The reason is the addition of the string in the tgtbasedmpaths test 
`systemctl status multipathd.socket` which now checks the status of the socket. 
The socket is not enabled by default on these architectures, and therefore 
returns `3` instead of `0`, failing the test right away.
+ The reason is the addition of the string in the tgtbasedmpaths test
+ `systemctl status multipathd.socket` which now checks the status of the
+ socket. The socket is not enabled by default on these architectures, and
+ therefore returns `3` instead of `0`, failing the test right away.
  
  Although this change is not normal, the intended fix could be to allow
  the socket to be inactive (which would be a pefectly normal situation),
  as long as the rest of the test passes.
  
+ This fix is forward to Debian[1].
  
  [0] - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/multipath-tools
+ [1] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080441

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207

Title:
  Oracular 0.9.9-1ubuntu2 autopkgtest failures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/207/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078888] Re: Oracular 0.9.9-1ubuntu2 autopkgtest failures

2024-09-04 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)

** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207

Title:
  Oracular 0.9.9-1ubuntu2 autopkgtest failures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/207/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal

2024-09-05 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Verified the following packages:

* (jammy) - 3.9.27-0ubuntu0.1
* (focal) - 3.8.3-0ubuntu0.1

Verification notes:

(Jammy)

$ lxc launch ubuntu:jammy j-vm --vm
$ lxc shell j-vm
# apt update -y
# apt install -y rabbitmq-server
# cat 

[Bug 2073932] Re: rabbitmq_global_publishers and rabbitmq_global_consumers fail to handle unclean client termination

2024-09-05 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
The following package has been verified:

* (jammy) - 3.9.27-0ubuntu0.1

(Jammy)
$ lxc launch ubuntu:jammy j-vm --vm
$ lxc shell j-vm
# apt update -y
# apt install -y rabbitmq-server
# dpkg -s rabbitmq-server | grep Version:
Version: 3.9.13-1ubuntu0.22.04.2
# echo '[rabbitmq_prometheus].' > /etc/rabbitmq/enabled_plugins
# systemctl restart rabbitmq-server.service
# wget wget 
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-perf-test/releases/download/v2.21.0/perf-test-2.21.0.jar
# apt install -y default-jre
# for i in $(seq 1 5); do java -jar perf-test-2.21.0.jar --time 5; curl -s 
127.0.0.1:15692/metrics | grep -E 'rabbitmq_global_(consumers|publishers){'; 
done

rabbitmq_global_consumers{protocol="amqp091"} 1
rabbitmq_global_publishers{protocol="amqp091"} -1

rabbitmq_global_consumers{protocol="amqp091"} 2
rabbitmq_global_publishers{protocol="amqp091"} -2

rabbitmq_global_consumers{protocol="amqp091"} 3
rabbitmq_global_publishers{protocol="amqp091"} -3
...
# cat 
rabbitmq_global_consumers{protocol="amqp091"} 0
rabbitmq_global_publishers{protocol="amqp091"} 0
< cut here>
rabbitmq_global_consumers{protocol="amqp091"} 0
rabbitmq_global_publishers{protocol="amqp091"} 0
< cut here>
rabbitmq_global_consumers{protocol="amqp091"} 0
rabbitmq_global_publishers{protocol="amqp091"} 0
...


** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073932

Title:
  rabbitmq_global_publishers and rabbitmq_global_consumers fail to
  handle unclean client termination

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2073932/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078871] Re: Using a percentage of memory no longer works

2024-09-05 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Colin, thanks for taking a look into this. I'll build that commit today
and try it out :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078871

Title:
  Using a percentage of memory no longer works

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stress-ng/+bug/2078871/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078871] Re: Using a percentage of memory no longer works

2024-09-05 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Those debug comments were very useful!

It looks like it's attempting to allocate 836.7M. I'm not currently sure
how it got to that number though.

root@o-vm:~/git/stress-ng# ./stress-ng -vm 1 --vm-bytes 20%
stress-ng: debug: [154029] invoked with './stress-ng -vm 1 --vm-bytes 20%' by 
user 0 'root'
stress-ng: debug: [154029] stress-ng 0.18.03 gbca728b8f636
stress-ng: debug: [154029] system: Linux o-vm 6.8.0-31-generic #31-Ubuntu SMP 
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Apr 20 00:40:06 UTC 2   
 024 x86_64, gcc 14.2.0, glibc 2.40, little endian
stress-ng: debug: [154029] RAM total: 954.6M, RAM free: 291.5M, swap free: 0.0
stress-ng: debug: [154029] temporary file path: '/root/git/stress-ng', 
filesystem type: ext2 (1070924 blocks available)
stress-ng: debug: [154029] 1 processor online, 8 processors configured
stress-ng: info:  [154029] defaulting to a 1 day run per stressor
stress-ng: debug: [154029] CPU data cache: L1: 32K, L2: 4096K, L3: 16384K
stress-ng: debug: [154029] cache allocate: shared cache buffer size: 16384K
stress-ng: info:  [154029] dispatching hogs: 1 vm
stress-ng: debug: [154029] starting stressors
stress-ng: debug: [154029] 1 stressor started
stress-ng: debug: [154030] vm: [154030] started (instance 0 on CPU 0)
stress-ng: debug: [154030] vm: using method 'all'
stress-ng: info:  [154031] vm: gave up trying to mmap 836.7M after 100 
attempts, errno=12 (Cannot allocate memory), skipping stressor
stress-ng: debug: [154030] vm: [154030] exited (instance 0 on CPU 0)
stress-ng: warn:  [154029] vm: [154030] aborted early, out of system resources
stress-ng: debug: [154029] vm: [154030] terminated (no resources)
stress-ng: debug: [154029] metrics-check: all stressor metrics validated and 
sane
stress-ng: info:  [154029] skipped: 1: vm (1)
stress-ng: info:  [154029] passed: 0
stress-ng: info:  [154029] failed: 0
stress-ng: info:  [154029] metrics untrustworthy: 0
stress-ng: info:  [154029] successful run completed in 9.94 secs
root@o-vm:~/git/stress-ng# ./stress-ng --version
stress-ng, version 0.18.03 (gcc 14.2.0, x86_64 Linux 6.8.0-31-generic) 💻🔥

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078871

Title:
  Using a percentage of memory no longer works

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stress-ng/+bug/2078871/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2046994] Re: Spotlight search function broken with macOS Ventura and later client

2024-09-05 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hello Xander,

I apologize for the package being broken for you.

Since we didn't have the tools to test this for Focal, we made the
decision to build the package and keep it in the -proposed pocket until
someone could test it. And this just so happens to be something you
helped us verify, so thank you for that!

I will go ahead and request the migration from focal-proposed to focal-
updates.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046994

Title:
  Spotlight search function broken with macOS Ventura and later client

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/samba/+bug/2046994/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2046994] Re: Spotlight search function broken with macOS Ventura and later client

2024-09-05 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Xander,

Actually - what source did you build from?

If you are willing, would you be able to test the package that is in
-proposed? That has the patch fix in it, and should be good to go.

You will need to add the proposed archive, instructions can be found
here[0].


[0] - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046994

Title:
  Spotlight search function broken with macOS Ventura and later client

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/samba/+bug/2046994/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1887558] Re: multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during boot

2024-09-05 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Since I am unsure if the bug is in bcache-tools or multipath-tools at
the moment, I also raised an upstream bug report with multipath-
tools[0].

[0] - https://github.com/opensvc/multipath-tools/issues/96

** Bug watch added: github.com/opensvc/multipath-tools/issues #96
   https://github.com/opensvc/multipath-tools/issues/96

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887558

Title:
  multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during
  boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bcache-tools/+bug/1887558/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078871] Re: Using a percentage of memory no longer works

2024-09-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks Colin. Building now in my VM.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078871

Title:
  Using a percentage of memory no longer works

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stress-ng/+bug/2078871/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078871] Re: Using a percentage of memory no longer works

2024-09-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Alright, I've built commit  and the memory looks right, but I'm still
seeing a failure.

It looks like the right math is being done (345.4M free * .02 == 69.1)
but mmap is still failing for some reason?

# git log -n 1 --oneline
3f6556fec (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) stress-*: fix vm memory 
% size parameter handling
# ./stress-ng -vm 1 --vm-bytes 20%
stress-ng: debug: [231531] invoked with './stress-ng -vm 1 --vm-bytes 20%' by 
user 0 'root'
stress-ng: debug: [231531] stress-ng 0.18.03 g3f6556fecb43
stress-ng: debug: [231531] system: Linux o-vm 6.8.0-31-generic #31-Ubuntu SMP 
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Apr 20 00:40:06 UTC 2024 x86_64, gcc 14.2.0, glibc 2.40, 
little endian
stress-ng: debug: [231531] RAM total: 954.6M, RAM free: 345.4M, swap free: 0.0
stress-ng: debug: [231531] temporary file path: '/root/git/stress-ng', 
filesystem type: ext2 (1070715 blocks available)
stress-ng: debug: [231531] 1 processor online, 8 processors configured
stress-ng: info:  [231531] defaulting to a 1 day run per stressor
stress-ng: debug: [231531] CPU data cache: L1: 32K, L2: 4096K, L3: 16384K
stress-ng: debug: [231531] cache allocate: shared cache buffer size: 16384K
stress-ng: info:  [231531] dispatching hogs: 1 vm
stress-ng: debug: [231531] starting stressors
stress-ng: debug: [231531] 1 stressor started
stress-ng: debug: [231533] vm: [231533] started (instance 0 on CPU 0)
stress-ng: debug: [231533] vm: using method 'all'
stress-ng: info:  [231534] vm: gave up trying to mmap 69.1M after 100 attempts, 
errno=12 (Cannot allocate memory), skipping stressor
stress-ng: debug: [231533] vm: [231533] exited (instance 0 on CPU 0)
stress-ng: warn:  [231531] vm: [231533] aborted early, out of system resources
stress-ng: debug: [231531] vm: [231533] terminated (no resources)
stress-ng: debug: [231531] metrics-check: all stressor metrics validated and 
sane
stress-ng: info:  [231531] skipped: 1: vm (1)
stress-ng: info:  [231531] passed: 0
stress-ng: info:  [231531] failed: 0
stress-ng: info:  [231531] metrics untrustworthy: 0
stress-ng: info:  [231531] successful run completed in 9.93 secs

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078871

Title:
  Using a percentage of memory no longer works

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stress-ng/+bug/2078871/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078871] Re: Using a percentage of memory no longer works

2024-09-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks, rebuilding now. I see you have an even newer version commit
83946105770ca209ebbcfa2dc2792ce65505d43b already so I'll build based off
that.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078871

Title:
  Using a percentage of memory no longer works

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stress-ng/+bug/2078871/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078871] Re: Using a percentage of memory no longer works

2024-09-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Seems to work great now. Thanks for your help Colin :)

root@o-vm:~/git/stress-ng# ./stress-ng -vm 1 --vm-bytes 20% --timeout 10s
stress-ng: debug: [270645] invoked with './stress-ng -vm 1 --vm-bytes 20% 
--timeout 10s' by user 0 'root'
stress-ng: debug: [270645] stress-ng 0.18.03 g83946105770c
stress-ng: debug: [270645] system: Linux o-vm 6.8.0-31-generic #31-Ubuntu SMP 
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Apr 20 00:40:06 UTC 2024 x86_64, gcc 14.2.0, glibc 2.40, 
little endian
stress-ng: debug: [270645] RAM total: 954.6M, RAM free: 335.8M, swap free: 0.0
stress-ng: debug: [270645] temporary file path: '/root/git/stress-ng', 
filesystem type: ext2 (1070643 blocks available)
stress-ng: debug: [270645] 1 processor online, 8 processors configured
stress-ng: info:  [270645] setting to a 10 secs run per stressor
stress-ng: debug: [270645] CPU data cache: L1: 32K, L2: 4096K, L3: 16384K
stress-ng: debug: [270645] cache allocate: shared cache buffer size: 16384K
stress-ng: info:  [270645] dispatching hogs: 1 vm
stress-ng: debug: [270645] starting stressors
stress-ng: debug: [270645] 1 stressor started
stress-ng: debug: [270646] vm: [270646] started (instance 0 on CPU 0)
stress-ng: debug: [270646] vm: using method 'all'
stress-ng: debug: [270646] vm: [270646] exited (instance 0 on CPU 0)
stress-ng: debug: [270645] vm: [270646] terminated (success)
stress-ng: debug: [270645] metrics-check: all stressor metrics validated and 
sane
stress-ng: info:  [270645] skipped: 0
stress-ng: info:  [270645] passed: 1: vm (1)
stress-ng: info:  [270645] failed: 0
stress-ng: info:  [270645] metrics untrustworthy: 0
stress-ng: info:  [270645] successful run completed in 10.01 secs
root@o-vm:~/git/stress-ng# git log -n 1 --oneline
839461057 (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) stress-dev: clean up 
build warning on non-x86 builds

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078871

Title:
  Using a percentage of memory no longer works

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stress-ng/+bug/2078871/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078871] Re: Using a percentage of memory no longer works

2024-09-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
As an aside, it'd be nice (in my opinion) to have data for how much
space is being mmap'd even when there is no failure. I just like more
data points being available when easily possible.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078871

Title:
  Using a percentage of memory no longer works

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stress-ng/+bug/2078871/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2079015] Re: Redundant systemd unit smartd.service

2024-09-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I can confirm this is an issue.

FWIW, I think the tool is supposed to use smartmontools to be enabled,
e.g.

$ systemctl enable smartmontools

I've subscribed ubuntu-server and added to backlog.

** Changed in: smartmontools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079015

Title:
  Redundant systemd unit smartd.service

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/smartmontools/+bug/2079015/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078527] Re: sys.version from mod_python cannot be parsed by the python platform module

2024-09-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks.

I tried attempted to cherry-pick
65df799943ef39984c09ff3a5668957a35dba38b on top of our codebase and
unfortunately it does not apply cleanly. We would need to move ahead of
debian, or wait for debian to pick up the new 3.5.0.4.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078527

Title:
  sys.version from mod_python cannot be parsed by the python platform
  module

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mod-python/+bug/2078527/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078871] Re: Using a percentage of memory no longer works

2024-09-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Great. Let me know if you plan to push the new release to Debian soon,
and then I can request a sync from Debian.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078871

Title:
  Using a percentage of memory no longer works

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stress-ng/+bug/2078871/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078555] Re: Upgrading from 22.04 to 24.04.01 breaks dnsmasq

2024-09-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Running into this in server triage as well, Just checking in to see if
someone is working on this bug?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078555

Title:
  Upgrading from 22.04 to 24.04.01 breaks dnsmasq

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2078555/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073677] Re: Remove dmraid from oracular?

2024-09-09 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
dmraid had some functionality. I think if users are even using it with a
small patch on top, it would be nice to be notified beforehand that it
is being removed via the release notes.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073677

Title:
  Remove dmraid from oracular?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2073677/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073677] Re: Remove dmraid from oracular?

2024-09-09 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I just put a section in the Oracular release notes about the dmraid
removal. If there's strong opinions against it please do let me know and
I'd be glad to have a discussion.

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-notes
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073677

Title:
  Remove dmraid from oracular?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2073677/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2080494] Re: Hang in Unbound 1.13.1

2024-09-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
server-triage-discuss, tagging you to see if unbound is a good MRE
candidate - I see no MRE has been done in the past. I'm not sure if
there's a historical reason for that. Might be a good time to consider
MRE?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080494

Title:
  Hang in Unbound 1.13.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unbound/+bug/2080494/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2080494] Re: Hang in Unbound 1.13.1

2024-09-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hi Firxiao, it seems the issues you mentioned[0][1] doesn't have a
definitive answer if it solves the problem. Would you be willing to help
test out any changes?

Ideally we would cherry-pick the upstream changes, but at a very cursory
glance it seems a decent chunk of code was changed, so merge conflicts
could be likely. This is the route we would go first before upgrading
the version, but perhaps it could be time to do a minor release update.
This would require some review of the changes in 1.13.1 -> 1.13.2 to
ensure no feature regressions occur. I'm not saying this is the case,
but just stating it's not something that will instantly happen.

[0] - https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/issues/439
[1] - https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/issues/411

** Bug watch added: github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/issues #439
   https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/issues/439

** Bug watch added: github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/issues #411
   https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/issues/411

** Tags added: server-triage-discuss

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080494

Title:
  Hang in Unbound 1.13.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unbound/+bug/2080494/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2079886] Re: package php8.3-fpm 8.3.6-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed php8.3-fpm package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-09-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hi Frederick, thanks for making this bug report and making Ubuntu
better!

It seems the actual error is

failed to open configuration file '/etc/php/8.3/fpm/php-fpm.conf': No
such file or directory (2)

Can you see if that file exists on your system? Are you able to
reinstall the package and see if this error persists?

** Changed in: php8.3 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079886

Title:
  package php8.3-fpm 8.3.6-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed php8.3-fpm package post-installation script subprocess
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php8.3/+bug/2079886/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2052610] Re: value too great for base error with locale fr_FR

2024-09-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Dustin, if you're getting the email notifications - are you planning on
taking a look at the upstream bug soon? We could plan to go ahead of
debian with sufficient testing, but would rather wait for Dustin since
he maintains both upstream and this Ubuntu package.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052610

Title:
  value too great for base error with locale fr_FR

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/byobu/+bug/2052610/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-28 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Apologies for the delay, I'm picking this back up today.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2065848] Re: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount.

2024-05-28 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks for the update Jacob, we will wait to hear back from you.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065848

Title:
  An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite
  the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resource-agents/+bug/2065848/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066914] Re: tmux 3.4 stalls during active pane zoom

2024-05-28 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thank you for making this bug report Dom!

I've been unable to reproduce this error that you're showing.

I tried on my noble laptop, a noble LXC container, and on an AWS EC2
instance.

How are you creating the panes? Maybe there's a weird bug if you zoom in
a certain pane configuration, I've just attempted simple
horizontal/vertical split.

I see gce as the CloudPlatform, how are you connecting to the tmux
server? Are you simply ssh'ing into the machine and running tmux?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066914

Title:
  tmux 3.4 stalls during active pane zoom

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tmux/+bug/2066914/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-29 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I have reproduced this issue on a live noble server running exim4.
Digging deeper now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067490] Re: byobu prompt

2024-05-30 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hi Djerk,

The default byobu prompt was updated since Ubuntu Noble to show the time
elapsed from the previous command. You can see this code in
/usr/share/byobu/profiles/bashrc

You can see this profile is being applied at the end of your ~/.bashrc
file.

At the moment I don't think there's a way to explicitly disable just the
timer, but feel free to create your own profile and/or modify your
~/.bashrc to remove the timer.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067490

Title:
  byobu prompt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/byobu/+bug/2067490/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-30 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I think I have found a fix for this issue.

My hunch is there is something buggy about the run{} command when
invoking programs directly. I wrapped the contents of run with an
explicit shell invocation, e.g.

condition = ${run{/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl \ 

   --ip ${quote:$sender_host_address} \ 
 
   --scope mfrom \  
 
   --identity ${quote:$sender_address}} \   
 
   {no}{${if eq {$runrc}{1}{yes}{no 
 

now becomes

condition = ${run{/bin/bash -c "/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl \
   --ip ${quote:$sender_host_address} \
   --scope mfrom \
   --identity ${quote:$sender_address}"} \
   {no}{${if eq {$runrc}{1}{yes}{no

Dominic, are you still using mantic or are you on noble by now? I'd be
glad to prepare a package for you to test if you are comfortable with
that. Alternatively you can test the changes I mentioned here. This code
is found in /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.template but of course be careful if
you are modifying this file on a live system.

I've tested this code change with a valid E2E case with SPF, and I also
tested a local lxc system with no SPF to ensure SPF validation failures
occur correctly.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067490] Re: byobu prompt

2024-05-30 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I'm also curious about the screen corruption and I'd like to reproduce
it in-case it is a real bug others are experiencing.

Djerk, how are you connecting to your system you are running byobu on?
Is this a local system or are you connecting to a remote system and then
invoking byobu?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067490

Title:
  byobu prompt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/byobu/+bug/2067490/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-30 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Nice catch, I like that updated version better. This also leads more
credence to an issue with parsing.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-30 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
With this said, I have reservations about removing a quote macro without
research. It does more than just quote wrap a variable, it also escapes
quotes and other special characters from the variable

To be honest, I'm no expert in this source code, but if the variables
$sender_host_address or $sender_address come from metadata that the user
controls, they can create a malicious payload and achieve ACE in a
subprocess.

This might not be an issue at all, and the variable could be properly
sanitized by this point, but it's a concern I'd like to investigate
before removing it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-30 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I'll do a bit of git archaeology tomorrow to try and find out why the
quote macros were added. Otherwise, my vote is to go with the bash
invocation in the sub-process so that way we can keep the quote macros.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066999] Re: Add ARM support

2024-05-31 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Description changed:

- ARM support needed a one line change, found upstream at
- https://github.com/aws/amazon-ec2-hibinit-
- agent/commit/ab70d14fce4d9f05d54b363a0d849c5169e01ffa
+ [ Impact ] 
+ This is a hardware enablement change to support hibernation on ARM.
+ 
+ [ Test Plan ]
+ The test plan is the same steps, but tested on both ARM64 and AMD64 to ensure 
functional enablement and no regressions for amd64.
+ 
+ 1. Create an AWS instance
+ 2. Update the hibernation agent
+ 3. Spawn a process
+ 4. Initiate hibernation of the instance
+ 5. Resume the instance
+ 6. Check that the process is still running on the instance
+ 
+ [ Where problems could occur ]
+ * Regressions in hibernation on amd64 instances due to changes to support arm.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066999

Title:
  Add ARM support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2066999/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066999] Re: Add ARM support

2024-05-31 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I've tested the agent on amd64 instances to ensure no regression when
updating. Further results for ARM enablement coming soon.

** Description changed:

- [ Impact ] 
+ [ Impact ]
  This is a hardware enablement change to support hibernation on ARM.
+ 
+ Related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
+ aws/+bug/2060992
  
  [ Test Plan ]
  The test plan is the same steps, but tested on both ARM64 and AMD64 to ensure 
functional enablement and no regressions for amd64.
  
  1. Create an AWS instance
  2. Update the hibernation agent
  3. Spawn a process
  4. Initiate hibernation of the instance
  5. Resume the instance
  6. Check that the process is still running on the instance
  
  [ Where problems could occur ]
  * Regressions in hibernation on amd64 instances due to changes to support arm.

** Summary changed:

- Add ARM support
+ enable hibernation on ARM

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066999

Title:
  enable hibernation on ARM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2066999/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Interesting, is there no improvements at all? Did you ensure the correct
version is installed?

I can take a dive into the git history to see if I can find other
potential fixes, but I remember looking a little while back and not
finding anything that looked like a smoking gun, especially since I'm
not sure what the actual bug is other than the resulting effect of high
CPU usage.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286

Title:
  Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using
  Multipath

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I was also thinking about similar things.

FYI - I did find out why ${quote:} is being used -
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697057

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #697057
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697057

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I have a few leads I want to investigate, will report back once I do
some testing.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks for doing some testing around the quotes, was that with using
/usr/bin/bash?

Also the lead I had was the changelog entry from upstream:
JH/24 The ${run} expansion item now expands its command string elements after
  splitting.  Previously it was before; the new ordering makes handling
  zero-length arguments simpler.  The old ordering can be obtained by
  appending a new option "preexpand", after a comma, to the "run".

So I tried using ,preexpand to hopefully get it to work and
unfortunately just see a parsing error now, similar to [0].

[0] - https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=exim-
us...@exim.org&q=subject:%22%5C%5Bexim%5C%5D+Failed+to+expand+ACL+string%22&o=newest&f=1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Jammy)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286

Title:
  Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using
  Multipath

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)

** Also affects: exim4 (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: exim4 (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu Mantic)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)

** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu Noble)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067942] [NEW] autopkgtest failure in oracular

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported:

fcgiwrap has been failing autopkgtest in proposed -
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/fcgiwrap/oracular/amd64

Most likely related to the git upgrade. Can be reproduced in an LXC
container easily:

$ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:oracular o
$ lxc shell o
# wget 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/fcgiwrap/1.1.0-14build1/fcgiwrap_1.1.0-14build1.dsc
# wget 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/fcgiwrap_1.1.0-14build1_amd64.deb
# wget 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/fcgiwrap/1.1.0-14build1/fcgiwrap_1.1.0.orig.tar.xz
# wget 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/fcgiwrap/1.1.0-14build1/fcgiwrap_1.1.0-14build1.debian.tar.xz
# cat 

[Bug 2067942] Re: autopkgtest failure in oracular

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Description changed:

  fcgiwrap has been failing autopkgtest in proposed -
  https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/fcgiwrap/oracular/amd64
  
  Most likely related to the git upgrade. Can be reproduced in an LXC
  container easily:
  
  $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:oracular o
  $ lxc shell o
  # wget 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/fcgiwrap/1.1.0-14build1/fcgiwrap_1.1.0-14build1.dsc
  # wget 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/fcgiwrap_1.1.0-14build1_amd64.deb
  # wget 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/fcgiwrap/1.1.0-14build1/fcgiwrap_1.1.0.orig.tar.xz
  # wget 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/fcgiwrap/1.1.0-14build1/fcgiwrap_1.1.0-14build1.debian.tar.xz
  # cat 

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks for clarifying, I misread what you meant, now I understand.

I was looking through https://github.com/Exim/exim/blob/master/doc/doc-
txt/ChangeLog to see if there were any other changes between version
4.95 and 4.96 and I don't see much else other than JH/24.

Currently I think that [0] and [1] broke something in how we are using
it.

It looks like [1] attempts to fix the run{ } parsing, even going as far
to add

${run{DIR/aux-fixed/0002.runfile ${quote:1}}{$value}{2}}

as a testcase, which is supposed to test using quotes in the run{}
command, but of course isn't doing variable substitution within the
quote and is not as complicated.

Unfortunately right now I'm not sure exactly what to test, I'm going to
dig into the actual source changes in [0] and [1] to see if there is an
implementation detail that isn't caught in the docs.

[0] - 
https://github.com/Exim/exim/commit/cfe6acff2ddc7eb03b3489770219edf829abd323
[1] - 
https://github.com/Exim/exim/commit/44b6e099b76f403a55e77650821f8a69e9d2682e

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
One extra thing I tried, is to use the condition check logic Jammy is
using by default (which I tested a jammy system does have working SPF),
except I added preexpand like [0] mentions to use the "old" parsing
method. This didn't work, but just putting my attempt here for future
reference:

condition = ${run,preexpand {/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl --ip \
   ${quote:$sender_host_address} --identity \
   ${if def:sender_address_domain \
   {--scope mfrom  --identity ${quote:$sender_address}}\
   {--scope helo --identity ${quote:$sender_helo_name\
   {no}{${if eq {$runrc}{1}{yes}{no

[0] -
https://github.com/Exim/exim/commit/cfe6acff2ddc7eb03b3489770219edf829abd323

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I ran `sudo exim4 -bd -d+all` on my server and sent myself an email with
the current config in noble to see what the errors look like, and I get
a ton of information, it looks like the parsing worked correctly at
least (argv[6]).

23:35:50.263 410533 direct command:
23:35:50.263 410533   argv[0] = '/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl'
23:35:50.263 410533   argv[1] = '--ip'
23:35:50.263 410533   argv[2] = '${quote:$sender_host_address}'
23:35:50.263 410533   argv[3] = '--scope'
23:35:50.263 410533   argv[4] = 'mfrom'
23:35:50.263 410533   argv[5] = '--identity'
23:35:50.263 410533   argv[6] = '${quote:$sender_address}'
23:35:50.263 410533 direct command after expansion:
23:35:50.263 410533   argv[0] = '/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl'
23:35:50.263 410533   argv[1] = '--ip'
23:35:50.263 410533   argv[2] = '185.125.188.123'
23:35:50.263 410533   argv[3] = '--scope'
23:35:50.263 410533   argv[4] = 'mfrom'
23:35:50.263 410533   argv[5] = '--identity'
23:35:50.263 410533   argv[6] = '"@canonical.com"'
23:35:50.263 410533 (tainted)
23:35:50.263 410533 daemon-accept forking for expand-run
23:35:50.265 410533 daemon-accept forked for expand-run: 410540

The unfortunate thing is no real information is shown in expand-run
which is what I really care about.

It'd be nice to see what was ran in that forked process

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067942] Re: autopkgtest failure in oracular

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Running the autopkgtest commands manually in an LXC container:

```
AUTOPKGTEST_TMP="/tmp/autopkgtest.mitch/autopkgtest_tmp"
rm -rf "$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP"
mkdir -p "$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP"
cd "$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP"
export GIT_AUTHOR_NAME=root
export GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL=root@localhost
export GIT_AUTHOR_DATE=@1234567890 +
export GIT_COMMITTER_NAME=root
export GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL=root@localhost
export GIT_COMMITTER_DATE=@1234567890 +
git init test1
git -C test1 commit --allow-empty -m test

tee /etc/nginx/sites-available/default 

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I'll ask internally again, but the original reasoning why we deviated
from debian is explained at https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952738

It is definitely open to discussion, and these woes with the parser can
help justify it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067942] Re: autopkgtest failure in oracular

2024-06-04 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/fcgiwrap/+git/fcgiwrap/+merge/466889

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067942

Title:
  autopkgtest failure in oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fcgiwrap/+bug/2067942/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067942] Re: autopkgtest failure in oracular

2024-06-04 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: fcgiwrap (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)

** Changed in: fcgiwrap (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: fcgiwrap (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067942

Title:
  autopkgtest failure in oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fcgiwrap/+bug/2067942/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066999] Re: enable hibernation on ARM

2024-06-04 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This is the shell script I made to test for amd64 regressions, and the
results.

mitchdz-hibernate-test-6mantic results:
Version: 1.0.0-0ubuntu16.23.10.1~mantic1
 22:50:50 up 0 min,  0 user,  load average: 1.18, 0.40, 0.14

mitchdz-hibernate-test-6focal results:
Version: 1.0.0-0ubuntu9.6~focal1
 23:36:28 up 46 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.31, 0.08, 0.02

mitchdz-hibernate-test-6jammy results:
Version: 1.0.0-0ubuntu11.22.04.5~jammy1
 23:00:46 up 10 min,  0 users,  load average: 0.23, 0.07, 0.02

mitchdz-hibernate-test-6noble results:
Version: 1.0.0-0ubuntu16.24.04.1~noble1
 23:07:27 up 17 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.24, 0.06, 0.02

mitchdz-hibernate-test-6oracular results:
Version: 1.0.0-0ubuntu17~oracular1
 23:14:17 up 24 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.00


** Attachment added: "test_arm_regression"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2066999/+attachment/5786062/+files/test_arm_regression

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066999

Title:
  enable hibernation on ARM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2066999/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2062058] Re: Add a UFW firewall config to support QUIC

2024-06-05 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hello, nginx versions 1.26.0-1ubuntu2 is now available for oracular.
This contains the code from [0] and therefore should be available. I am
closing this bug now.

[0] - https://salsa.debian.org/nginx-team/nginx/-/merge_requests/73

** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062058

Title:
  Add a UFW firewall config to support QUIC

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/2062058/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064380] Re: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-06-05 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
0.9.7-7 is now in -proposed thanks to Steve Langasek. I see the merge
doesn't have a few of the changes I needed when I was in the process of
the noble merge[0][1].

Had a quick chat with Steve Langasek on IRC and mentioned I'll keep an
eye on the migration and handle any fixes/changes that are needed.

** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064380

Title:
  Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2064380/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064380] Re: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-06-05 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Setting to in-Progress to track the migration.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064380

Title:
  Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2064380/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068645] [NEW] Oracular migration issues

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported:

This bug tracks multipath-tools migration failures.

** Affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
 Importance: High
 Assignee: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)
 Status: In Progress


** Tags: update-excuse

** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)

** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Tags added: update-excuse

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068645

Title:
  Oracular migration issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2068645/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064380] Re: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Since multipath-tools was merged and is now in -proposed, I am closing
this bug and creating a new one to track the migration failures.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2068645

** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064380

Title:
  Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2064380/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068645] Re: Oracular migration issues

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+git/multipath-tools/+merge/467051

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068645

Title:
  Oracular migration issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2068645/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thank you for making this bug report!

I wonder if this can be fixed by the solution in this blog[0], but the
blog is pretty old so I'd be surprised such an old solution fixes it.

[0] - https://adriano.ws/fixing-updates-detected-log-freshclam-daemon-
error/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067608

Title:
  clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/2067608/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
[0] in my previous comment and still see the failure.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067608

Title:
  clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/2067608/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
reproduction:

$ lxc launch ubuntu:noble n
$ lxc shell n
# apt update -y && apt install -y logwatch clamav
# logwatch --service clam-update

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067608

Title:
  clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/2067608/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Actually I think what may be happening here is that clamav-
freshclam.service updates the database routinely, so when logwatch
attempts to update it, there is nothing to update, so the failure
message is actually expected.

heynnema, how does your /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log look like now?

** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067608

Title:
  clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/2067608/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I agree. I think we may have a case to do libspf2 inclusion, I'll be
happy to start investigating that package and situation a bit deeper
next week.

For now, the default SPF code in mantic/noble is broken out of the box
and I'm not sure which solution (calling bash, removing the quote macro)
I like better. They both work, but I have reservations on the security
implications that I don't believe I have the bandwidth right now to
properly address.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
No, Version 0.9.4 is not planned to be backported to Jammy. Big updates
like these do not happen often to stable releases.

To get this fixed, the specific bug will be narrowed down and just the
fix itself will need to be backported. I'd be glad to do some
investigation on what other commits may look like the fix if you are
able to test them out.

Alternatively, do you have steps to reproduce this issue? I can
investigate it more in my testbed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286

Title:
  Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using
  Multipath

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068547] Re: package rabbitmq-server 3.12.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote rabbitmq-server, o script post-installation retornou erro do status de saída 1

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hello, thank you for making this bug report!

Can you please give the status of `systemctl status rabbitmq-
server.service`?

** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068547

Title:
  package rabbitmq-server 3.12.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: o
  subprocesso instalado, do pacote rabbitmq-server, o script post-
  installation retornou erro do status de saída 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2068547/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068641] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 apache2: misleading comment in default /etc/apache2/apache2.conf

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hello Oliver,

Thank you for making this bug report!

This documentation is pulled directly from Debian which you can find at
[0]. I think it'd be best to have a discussion about this with Debian.
Would you be okay making this bug report with Debian as well?

[0] - https://salsa.debian.org/apache-
team/apache2/-/blob/master/debian/config-
dir/apache2.conf.in?ref_type=heads#L153

** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068641

Title:
  Ubuntu 24.04 apache2: misleading comment in default
  /etc/apache2/apache2.conf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2068641/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2065848] Re: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount.

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks for the update Jacob. I will leave this bug alone and wait to
hear back.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065848

Title:
  An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite
  the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resource-agents/+bug/2065848/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068750] [NEW] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN

2024-06-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported:

[ Impact ] 
webkit2gtk does not ask for the PIN on a PIN protected smartcard.

There is an upstream fix at https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/pull/26074

[ Test Plan ]
The test plan is manual due to the nature of the bug needing hardware that is 
difficult to simulate.

An E2E test of using the smartcard with a PIN on it will be performed.

[ Where problems could occur ]
* Adds an extra check every time a smartcard is used. Although likely nominal, 
it does add computation time.
* This is both a bug fix, but also a functional addition. Software using this 
library could be unknowingly relying on the behavior of no PIN requested, and 
therefore break once this functionality is added.

** Affects: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068750

Title:
  webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/+bug/2068750/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068750] Re: webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN

2024-06-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Also affects: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068750

Title:
  webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/+bug/2068750/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068750] Re: [SRU] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN

2024-06-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Summary changed:

- webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN
+ [SRU] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN

** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu Focal)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068750

Title:
  [SRU] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/+bug/2068750/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal

2024-06-08 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
My test PPA passed the CI/CD -
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-rabbitmq-server/+/915836

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248

Title:
  MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2040367] Re: Merge at from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-29 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I got the package to be reuploaded. Just waiting to see if it goes
through this time.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040367

Title:
  Merge at from Debian unstable for noble

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/at/+bug/2040367/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059403] Re: package bind9-host 1:9.18.18-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

2024-03-29 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I don't see many concerning things in the logs. Could you try to
reinstall the package and see what happens?

$ sudo apt install bind9-host --reinstall

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059403

Title:
  package bind9-host 1:9.18.18-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 failed to
  install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you
  should  reinstall it before attempting configuration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/2059403/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2040360] Re: [FFE ] Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for noble

2024-04-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Just for completeness - I mentioned a multipathd seg fault. There is no
bug report for this as I could not reproduce this in Debian, so it seems
Ubuntu specific. It can be easily reproduced by uninstalling multipath-
tools and reinstalling it with apt once you do the merge.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040360

Title:
  [FFE ] Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for noble

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2040360/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   5   >