[Bug 59298] xresprobe fails to detect some modes: ati radeon2 se + dell 2405FPW
Public bug reported: The highest modes aren't detected by xresprobe, but are detected by the ati driver: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo xresprobe ati Password: id: DELL 2405FPW res: 1680x1680 1600x1200 1280x1024 1152x864 1024x768 800x600 720x400 640x480 freq: 30-81 56-76 disptype: crt /var/log/Xorg.0.log snippet: (II) RADEON(0): I2C bus "DDC" initialized. (II) RADEON(0): Legacy BIOS detected (II) RADEON(0): Connector0: DDCType-2, DACType-1, TMDSType-0, ConnectorType-3 (II) RADEON(0): Connector1: DDCType-3, DACType-0, TMDSType--1, ConnectorType-2 (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" registered at address 0xA0. (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" removed. (II) RADEON(0): DDC Type: 2, Detected Type: 3 (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" registered at address 0xA0. (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" removed. (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" registered at address 0xA0. (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" removed. (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" registered at address 0xA0. (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" removed. (II) RADEON(0): DDC Type: 3, Detected Type: 0 (II) RADEON(0): EDID data from the display on port 1 -- (II) RADEON(0): Manufacturer: DEL Model: a010 Serial#: 825512531 (II) RADEON(0): Year: 2006 Week: 4 (II) RADEON(0): EDID Version: 1.3 (II) RADEON(0): Digital Display Input (II) RADEON(0): Max H-Image Size [cm]: horiz.: 52 vert.: 33 (II) RADEON(0): Gamma: 2.20 (II) RADEON(0): DPMS capabilities: StandBy Suspend Off; RGB/Color Display (II) RADEON(0): Default color space is primary color space (II) RADEON(0): First detailed timing is preferred mode (II) RADEON(0): redX: 0.640 redY: 0.330 greenX: 0.300 greenY: 0.607 (II) RADEON(0): blueX: 0.149 blueY: 0.060 whiteX: 0.312 whiteY: 0.328 (II) RADEON(0): Supported VESA Video Modes: (II) RADEON(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) RADEON(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) RADEON(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) RADEON(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) RADEON(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) RADEON(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) RADEON(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) RADEON(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) RADEON(0): Manufacturer's mask: 0 (II) RADEON(0): Supported Future Video Modes: (II) RADEON(0): #0: hsize: 1280 vsize 1024 refresh: 60 vid: 32897 (II) RADEON(0): #1: hsize: 1600 vsize 1200 refresh: 60 vid: 16553 (II) RADEON(0): #2: hsize: 1152 vsize 864 refresh: 75 vid: 20337 (II) RADEON(0): #3: hsize: 1680 vsize 1050 refresh: 60 vid: 179 (II) RADEON(0): Supported additional Video Mode: (II) RADEON(0): clock: 154.0 MHz Image Size: 519 x 324 mm (II) RADEON(0): h_active: 1920 h_sync: 1968 h_sync_end 2000 h_blank_end 2080 h_border: 0 (II) RADEON(0): v_active: 1200 v_sync: 1203 v_sync_end 1209 v_blanking: 1235 v_border: 0 (II) RADEON(0): Serial No: T613361N14RS (II) RADEON(0): Monitor name: DELL 2405FPW (II) RADEON(0): Ranges: V min: 56 V max: 76 Hz, H min: 30 H max: 81 kHz, PixClock max 170 MHz (II) RADEON(0): (II) RADEON(0): Primary: Monitor -- TMDS Connector -- DVI-I DAC Type -- TVDAC/ExtDAC TMDS Type -- Internal DDC Type -- DVI_DDC (II) RADEON(0): Secondary: Monitor -- NONE Connector -- VGA DAC Type -- Primary TMDS Type -- NONE DDC Type -- VGA_DDC (II) RADEON(0): PLL parameters: rf=2700 rd=12 min=2 max=46909632846912; xclk=16600 (WW) RADEON(0): Failed to detect secondary monitor, MergedFB/Clone mode disabled (==) RADEON(0): Using gamma correction (1.0, 1.0, 1.0) (II) RADEON(0): Validating modes on Primary head - (II) RADEON(0): DFP table revision: 4 (II) RADEON(0): Panel infos found from DDC detailed: 1920x1200 (II) RADEON(0): Valid Mode from Detailed timing table: 1920x1200 (II) RADEON(0): Valid Mode from standard timing table: 1280x1024 (II) RADEON(0): Valid Mode from standard timing table: 1600x1200 (II) RADEON(0): Valid Mode from standard timing table: 1152x864 (II) RADEON(0): Valid Mode from standard timing table: 1680x1050 (II) RADEON(0): Valid Mode from established timing table: 1280x1024 (II) RADEON(0): Valid Mode from established timing table: 1024x768 (II) RADEON(0): Valid Mode from established timing table: 1024x768 (II) RADEON(0): Valid Mode from established timing table: 800x600 (II) RADEON(0): Valid Mode from established timing table: 800x600 (II) RADEON(0): Valid Mode from established timing table: 640x480 (II) RADEON(0): Valid Mode from established timing table: 640x480 (II) RADEON(0): Total of 12 mode(s) found. (II) RADEON(0): Total number of valid DDC mode(s) found: 12 ** Affects: xresprobe (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- xresprobe fails to detect some modes: ati radeon2 se + dell 2405FPW https://launchpad.net/bugs/59298 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59298] Re: xresprobe fails to detect some modes: ati radeon2 se + dell 2405FPW
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log" http://librarian.launchpad.net/4161918/Xorg.0.log -- xresprobe fails to detect some modes: ati radeon2 se + dell 2405FPW https://launchpad.net/bugs/59298 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59298] Re: xresprobe fails to detect some modes: ati radeon2 se + dell 2405FPW
** Tags added: dapper -- xresprobe fails to detect some modes: ati radeon2 se + dell 2405FPW https://launchpad.net/bugs/59298 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 535029] Re: Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1
Colin, what can be done to convince folks that inclusion of this OpenSSH release in lucid is the best idea? The certificate authentication support is most compelling for large institutional installations, the same user base that focuses on LTS releases (and have long upgrade cycles). Missing it in this release will be costly to those same users. The fact that OpenSSH included the features in a point release is a compelling argument to the importance of the feature and the quality of implementation. -- Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 535029] Re: Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Watson (cjwatson) -- Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 535029] Re: Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1
Thanks for the attention, Colin. I can only imagine how busy you are right now. I'm very happy to hear the commitment to maintain a backport. Damien Miller has a pretty excellent track record, separate from OpenSSH's overall chain of successes (or lack thereof), but even so I can deeply understand the reluctance given the relative size, complexity, and *newness* of the certificate system. Personally I am convinced that its essential simplicity (compared to other certificate schemes) will prove successful in the long run. At any rate, thank you, and please accept my apologies for the out-of- protocol bug assignment. That was my bad, I was unsure of the best way to make sure my question came to your attention. Much appreciated, weaver -- Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 535029] Re: Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1
(Sorry for the double-post, just want threads of record like this to be accurate) Turns out revocation *is* supported, it's clearly in the release notes: http://www.openssh.com/txt/release-5.4 -- Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1340716] Re: segfault at 8 ip 08051738 sp bf97f4e0 error 4 in xrandr[8048000+c000]
Repro (intermittent): $ xrandr -q zsh: segmentation fault (core dumped) xrandr -q When xrandr does not crash, it variously returns one of two results (note the difference for second screen, DisplayPort-0): $ xrandr -q Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 4480 x 1440, maximum 16384 x 16384 LVDS connected 1920x1080+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 344mm x 194mm 1920x1080 60.2*+ 40.1 1680x1050 60.0 1400x1050 60.0 1280x1024 59.9 1440x900 59.9 1280x960 59.9 1280x854 59.9 1280x800 59.8 1280x720 59.9 1152x768 59.8 1024x768 59.9 800x60059.9 848x48059.7 720x48059.7 640x48059.4 DisplayPort-0 connected 2560x1440+1920+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 0mm x 0mm 1024x768 60.0 800x60060.3 56.2 848x48060.0 640x48059.9 DisplayPort-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) DisplayPort-2 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) VGA-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 2560x1440 (0x2e2) 241.5MHz h: width 2560 start 2608 end 2640 total 2720 skew0 clock 88.8KHz v: height 1440 start 1443 end 1448 total 1481 clock 60.0Hz $ xrandr -q Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 4480 x 1440, maximum 16384 x 16384 LVDS connected 1920x1080+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 344mm x 194mm 1920x1080 60.2*+ 40.1 1680x1050 60.0 1400x1050 60.0 1280x1024 59.9 1440x900 59.9 1280x960 59.9 1280x854 59.9 1280x800 59.8 1280x720 59.9 1152x768 59.8 1024x768 59.9 800x60059.9 848x48059.7 720x48059.7 640x48059.4 DisplayPort-0 connected 2560x1440+1920+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 597mm x 336mm 2560x1440 60.0*+ 1920x1200 59.9 1920x1080 60.0 60.0 50.0 59.9 24.0 24.0 1920x1080i 60.1 50.0 60.0 1600x1200 60.0 1680x1050 60.0 1280x1024 75.0 60.0 1280x800 59.8 1152x864 75.0 1280x720 60.0 50.0 59.9 1440x576i 50.1 1024x768 75.1 60.0 1440x480i 60.1 60.1 800x60075.0 60.3 720x57650.0 720x48060.0 59.9 640x48075.0 60.0 59.9 720x40070.1 DisplayPort-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) DisplayPort-2 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) VGA-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) $ uname -a Linux Ubu14Msw4-M4800 3.13.0-39-generic #66-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 28 13:30:27 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS $ dmesg | tail [ 226.671770] xrandr[2361]: segfault at 38 ip 004027ae sp 7fff63eb7e60 error 4 in xrandr[40+d000] [ 1566.312068] [drm:si_dpm_set_power_state] *ERROR* si_set_sw_state failed [ 1978.902140] xrandr[4990]: segfault at 38 ip 00402829 sp 7fff51114720 error 4 in xrandr[40+d000] [ 2206.271566] xrandr[5890]: segfault at 38 ip 00402829 sp 7fff2af7c580 error 4 in xrandr[40+d000] [ 2568.830335] xrandr[6049]: segfault at 38 ip 00402829 sp 7fffd3919610 error 4 in xrandr[40+d000] [ 2572.286594] xrandr[6054]: segfault at 38 ip 00402829 sp 7fffae5b4460 error 4 in xrandr[40+d000] [ 2580.897760] xrandr[6067]: segfault at 10 ip 00402ee6 sp 7fff96869490 error 4 in xrandr[40+d000] [ 2587.574203] xrandr[6094]: segfault at 38 ip 00402829 sp 7fff29572620 error 4 in xrandr[40+d000] [ 3001.398366] xrandr[6462]: segfault at 38 ip 00402829 sp 7fff5dc471f0 error 4 in xrandr[40+d000] [ 3109.594677] xrandr[6565]: segfault at 38 ip 00402829 sp 7fff534df710 error 4 in xrandr[40+d000] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1340716 Title: segfault at 8 ip 08051738 sp bf97f4e0 error 4 in xrandr[8048000+c000] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/x11-xserver-utils/+bug/1340716/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1939513] [NEW] Install Xubuntu 20.04 from USB drive -- Failed
Public bug reported: There was a generated bug report. I hope it didn't get lost while I tried to figure out login. Just trying to do a clean install of Xubuntu 20.04 on my new System76 Gazelle laptop. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: ubiquity 20.04.15.10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-43.49~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18 Uname: Linux 5.8.0-43-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.16 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.445.1 Date: Tue Aug 10 23:49:37 2021 InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/xubuntu.seed only-ubiquity quiet splash --- LiveMediaBuild: Xubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210209.1) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8 SourcePackage: grub-installer UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: grub-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal ubiquity-20.04.15.10 xubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939513 Title: Install Xubuntu 20.04 from USB drive -- Failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1939513/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
