[Bug 282799] [NEW] gnome-session not starting panel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-session After update in Intrepid Beta, I can't get to a normal desktop. The panel doesn't start, metacity crashes. We've tried creating an entirely new user, but the same problems persist. gconf dump attached. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 Package: gnome-session 2.24.0-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-session Uname: Linux 2.6.27-7-generic i686 ** Affects: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- gnome-session not starting panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282799 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 282799] Re: gnome-session not starting panel
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18505499/Dependencies.txt -- gnome-session not starting panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282799 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 282799] Re: gnome-session not starting panel
** Attachment added: "gconf.xml" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18505521/gconf.xml -- gnome-session not starting panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282799 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222796] Re: Brightness up not generating ACPI event on Thinkpad T43p, T42, X31, X40, R52
I have an X60s. The recent hotkey update made by volume up/down keys worked (they had worked in Hardy, but regressed in Intrepid Beta). However, the mute hotkey invokes Lock Screen. I believe a previous reporter with an X60s noted that a brightness key made music/audio stop playing. This doesn't happen for me (when listening with Rhythmbox). -- Brightness up not generating ACPI event on Thinkpad T43p, T42, X31, X40, R52 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222796 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 280676] [NEW] no sound in intrepid beta
Public bug reported: When I upgraded to Intrepid Beta on 7 Oct, sound worked. After today's update (9 Oct), sound doesn't work. Alsa info at http://www.alsa- project.org/db/?f=396a832572721b4c1d8293f81f62b1ae65926f44 This could be a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/273578 ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- no sound in intrepid beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 280676] Re: no sound in intrepid beta
Audio reappeared with 10 Oct update. Probably fixed. -- no sound in intrepid beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP
I'd like to reassure everyone that we are productively and actively engaged with Mozilla, and that there is a strong desire from everyone involved to identify a positive, constructive solution that addresses the concerns raised in this bug report. Also, please remember that this page is, in fact, a bug report and therefore isn't the most productive place to add "me too" comments. Back in comment 96 (https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/269656/comments/96 ), tacone created some links to Brainstorm items that can more effectively tally numbers of folks with different opinions. Voting those options up or down will turn your opinion into something that can be measured. -- AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP
I don't think Ubuntu/Canonical should *write* a "plain English" version of someone else's license. Obviously Mozilla has written the license in the language they want our users to read and understand, and our interpretation of that may not be the same as Mozilla's or the law's interpretation. I think *presenting* such an explanation is a good idea however, and I will ask Mozilla Corp if they can/will provide a "plain English" version to be used in a FAQ-type explanation for our users (or even consider making the EULA more readable). -- AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 17641] Re: wastebasket opens automatically
No longer happens. I think it's safe to mark this as closed. Cheers, Jane -- wastebasket opens automatically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331618] [NEW] make new tab behaviour consistent in Firefox
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox I am filing this bug as part of the Feature Freeze exception process[1]. Currently, when you start Firefox the first tab opens with a search page (on the belief that search is one of the most common use cases in this scenario). However, when opening a new tab, the tab opens a blank page. A common use can in opening a new tab is also that users will search, and we could display the same search page in the new tabs. There could also be a user preference, to allow the user to change this if they prefer the blank page to the "quick search" page [2]. This has been implemented and is available for testing[3]. It did not land in time for Feature Freeze because (a) it was a late-blooming idea, and (b) we're still coordinating with Mozilla. The technical risk involved in the change is low. There will be additional testing required around the new preference option, and the specific use case of opening new tabs. There remains some procedural risk, as we need to discuss further with Mozilla. So while testing can occur in the PPA, I don't think we should land the change until all parties are satisfied. A related issue (but not being proposed for Feature Freeze exception) is bug# 331575. [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess [2] http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/screens_newtab/Preferences.png [3] http://launchpad.net/~asac/+archive ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- make new tab behaviour consistent in Firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331618 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348517] [NEW] contradictory message in upgrade process
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Upgrading from 8.10 (Intrepid) to 9.04 Beta (Jaunty) (okay,actually a few days before the actual beta...), in the "Do you want to start the upgrade?" window, I am told: "This download will take about 9 minutes with your connection." immediately followed by: "Fetching and installing the upgrade can take several hours." These are contradictory and confusing messages, and should be reconciled somehow. ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Status: Confirmed -- contradictory message in upgrade process https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348517 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560] [NEW] screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg I have an Iiyama ProLite B2403WS monitor. Ubuntu 8.10 (Intrepid) provided reasonable screen resolution; Jaunty beta (actually the day before beta) no longer does. I don't remember the resolution it used to find, but it was higher than the current options, and had a 16x9 aspect ratio. ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348566] [NEW] menu icons don't match other file icons
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org I just upgraded to 9.04 Beta (actually the day before the beta). I have new Open Office icons for the relevant files, but the small icons in GNOME menu are the same icons as in previous releases. I think they should match. i.e,. the icons in the menu that link to the application should be the same (or at least be in the same family) as the icons used for the files produced by that application. ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- menu icons don't match other file icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348566 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348599] [NEW] mute on volume control UI has no effect
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-media I'm running 9.04 Beta (actually day before the beta). The mute option in the volume control window (accessed from the top panel) seems to have no effect. The hardware mute button works fine. This is possible related to (or perhaps a duplicate of) https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-media/+bug/272336 ** Affects: gnome-media (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- mute on volume control UI has no effect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348599 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348889] [NEW] too many notifications after upgrade to Jaunty
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pidgin After an upgrade to Jaunty beta, my system now notifies 4 different ways of a new IRC message. I have the 2 new ones from the new notification scheme (i.e, the black bubble and the envelope in the top panel) and I have the 2 old ones (the Pidgin icon in the top panel and the flashing Pidgin window in the bottom panel). Having my system notify me 4 separate ways for the same event is too much. I believe this is only a problem with upgrades, not new installs, and think that upgrades needs to be dealt with intelligently in the apps and the new notification system. I suspect but do not know for sure that this may happen for other apps as well (e.g, Evolution). Given our user base, we will likely have more upgraders than new installers, so I think this is a pretty serious usability issue. ** Affects: pidgin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- too many notifications after upgrade to Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348889 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "LsHal.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360306/LsHal.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "LsMod.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360307/LsMod.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "XorgConf.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360309/XorgConf.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560] apport-collect data
Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: xorg 1:7.4~5ubuntu16 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 ProcVersion: Linux version 2.6.28-11-generic (bui...@palmer) (gcc version 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) ) #37-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 23 16:40:23 UTC 2009 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin netdev plugdev powerdev scanner video -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360305/Dependencies.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "LsPci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360308/LsPci.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "XorgLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360311/XorgLog.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "Xrandr.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360313/Xrandr.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "XorgLogOld.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360312/XorgLogOld.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "glxinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360314/glxinfo.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "setxkbmap.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360315/setxkbmap.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "system.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360316/system.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "xdpyinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360317/xdpyinfo.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "xkbcomp.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360320/xkbcomp.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348908] [NEW] Flash v9 crashes Firefox in Jaunty (beta)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox After an upgrade to Jaunty Beta, the previously installed Flash plugin reliably caused Firefox to crash. Version in question was Shockwave Flash version 9.0 r48. Shockwave Flash version 10.0 r22 seems to work. ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Flash v9 crashes Firefox in Jaunty (beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560] Re: screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty
Aaargh, doing apport-collect with the external monitor actually turned on, which I suspect will be more helpful :) -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560] apport-collect data
Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: xorg 1:7.4~5ubuntu16 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 ProcVersion: Linux version 2.6.28-11-generic (bui...@palmer) (gcc version 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) ) #37-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 23 16:40:23 UTC 2009 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin netdev plugdev powerdev scanner video -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361085/Dependencies.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "LsHal.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361086/LsHal.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "LsMod.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361087/LsMod.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "LsPci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361088/LsPci.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "XorgConf.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361089/XorgConf.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "XorgLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361090/XorgLog.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "Xrandr.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361093/Xrandr.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "glxinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361095/glxinfo.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "setxkbmap.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361096/setxkbmap.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "XorgLogOld.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361091/XorgLogOld.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "system.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361097/system.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "xdpyinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361098/xdpyinfo.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560]
** Attachment added: "xkbcomp.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361099/xkbcomp.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 349129] [NEW] window notification never stops
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 A normal Firefox notification is to have the minimised window in the lower panel (sorry, I don't know what to call that) pulse with colour. E.g,. if you click on a link from another app like email, Firefox opens that page and you get that pulsing visual indicator from Firefox. That works. But expected behaviour is that when you then give Firefox (or maybe that specific tab) the focus, that notification stops. This is the behaviour from Intrepid and previous versions. However, in Jaunty Beta, that no longer works. Even when the new tab has the focus (i.e, you have seen it), the pulsing notification continues. I haven't figured out what consistently makes it stop, but it seems to involve leaving that window and coming back 2-3 times to convince Firefox you've actually seen the new tab :) ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- window notification never stops https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349129 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 349472] [NEW] update-manager won't start
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager I am running Jaunty beta, and after updating this morning update-manager won't start. Trying in a terminal, I get j...@randolph:~$ update-manager Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/update-manager", line 29, in import gtk File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.6/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py", line 38, in import gobject as _gobject File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.6/gtk-2.0/gobject/__init__.py", line 33, in from glib import spawn_async, idle_add, timeout_add, timeout_add_seconds, \ File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.6/gtk-2.0/glib/__init__.py", line 30, in from glib._glib import * ImportError: /var/lib/python-support/python2.6/gtk-2.0/glib/_glib.so: undefined symbol: PyUnicodeUCS4_DecodeUTF8 Everything seems to be up to date - e.g, I have apt-get clean 'ed, and Synaptic works and says there are no updates to install. Possibly related, while doing this morning's updates, I was automatically logged off. I'm not sure but I suspect it was an update being installed that forced me off. It was after logging back in that I wanted to check to make sure the updates had finished, and that's when I discovered that update-manager would no longer start. ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- update-manager won't start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350178] [NEW] [LENOVO 17045UG] suspend/resume failure
Public bug reported: Failed to resume after suspend. It *may* have been that the battery ran out while it was suspended, because I may have some funkiness in my battery. Or that could be entirely unrelated :) ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation: This occured during a previous suspend and prevented it from resuming properly. Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apportcheckresume Failure: suspend/resume InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6 MachineType: LENOVO 17045UG Package: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.38 ProcAttrCurrent: unconfined ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=53516ec1-432b-4321-8311-c62548033ef1 ro quiet splash ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/apport/apportcheckresume ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-11.38-generic SourcePackage: linux StressLog: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/var/lib/pm-utils/stress.log' Tags: resume suspend Title: [LENOVO 17045UG] suspend/resume failure UserGroups: ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-kerneloops i386 resume suspend -- [LENOVO 17045UG] suspend/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350178 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350178] Re: [LENOVO 17045UG] suspend/resume failure
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24445383/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24445384/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24445385/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "HalComputerInfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24445386/HalComputerInfo.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24445387/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24445388/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24445389/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24445390/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24445391/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24445392/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24445393/ProcStatus.txt -- [LENOVO 17045UG] suspend/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350178 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 356152] Re: update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week
Unfortunately this morning I forced an update (still hadn't seen any automatic notification). But for completeness... j...@randolph:~$ ps ax | grep update-not 3427 ?S 0:00 update-notifier --startup-delay=60 j...@randolph:~$ killall update-notifier ; update-notifier --debug-updates (update-notifier:8155): update-DEBUG: update_check() ** (update-notifier:8155): DEBUG: /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check returned 0 (security: 0) PID TTY TIME CMD ** (update-notifier:8155): DEBUG: crashreport_check I've also attached /var/log/apt/term.log ** Attachment added: "term.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24943313/term.log -- update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356152 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357143] Re: [LENOVO 17045UG] suspend/resume failure
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24966281/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24966282/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24966283/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "HalComputerInfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24966285/HalComputerInfo.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24966286/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24966287/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24966288/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24966289/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24966290/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24966291/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24966292/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "SleepLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24966293/SleepLog.txt -- [LENOVO 17045UG] suspend/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357143 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357143] [NEW] [LENOVO 17045UG] suspend/resume failure
Public bug reported: Failure to resume after suspend. Note that I previously reported bug #350178, which was complicated by a failing/failed battery. I now have a shiny new battery which behaves perfectly as far as I can tell, but still had a resume failure. ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation: This occured during a previous suspend and prevented it from resuming properly. Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apportcheckresume Failure: suspend/resume InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6 MachineType: LENOVO 17045UG Package: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.40 ProcAttrCurrent: unconfined ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=53516ec1-432b-4321-8311-c62548033ef1 ro quiet splash ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/apport/apportcheckresume ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-11.40-generic SourcePackage: linux Tags: resume suspend Title: [LENOVO 17045UG] suspend/resume failure UserGroups: ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-kerneloops i386 resume suspend -- [LENOVO 17045UG] suspend/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357143 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 356152] Re: update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week
** Attachment added: "term.log.1.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24967727/term.log.1.gz -- update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356152 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 356152] Re: update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week
So you seem to be saying that I installed something from Add/Remove and that reset the 7 day clock, and therefore I didn't get any notification about updates. Is that right? If so, I think there is more to this than that. I very well could be wrong, but I don't *think* I installed anything. What I think I may have done was open Add/Remove to check to see if a certain app was in our repositories. But even if I did install something (it's definitely possible and I'm sure you can tell from the logs - they are much more reliable than my memory!), there wasn't a "oh, and by the way there are new updates. Would you like to install them too?" message. If we gave that sort of notice, then resetting the clock is perfectly acceptable. But without that, to the user it is the equivalent of changing the desktop wallpaper resulting in them not getting updates. I completely understand if there isn't time to fix this, but I think it is a bigger problem for the average user than you seem to. We have a secret (to most users) new algorithm of update notification. And because of bug #351484, it is confusing to the people who do take the time to try to understand what's happening. And then on top of that, this bug means that the user can take seemingly unrelated actions which impact that (secret and/or confusing) algorithm. The end result to the user is unpredictability and confusion, which I think is the last thing we want. I think that will result in people not trusting the system, feeling like it's random and therefore unreliable, not installing updates, and generally having a poorer and potentially less secure experience. (Hopefully without the world crashing to a halt, given my dire predictions! ;) ) -- update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356152 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 356152] [NEW] update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-notifier This report is not a duplicate of bug #332945. I upgraded to Jaunty beta on Wed 25 March. According to the desired behaviour described in bug #332945 and elsewhere, update-manager should notify me at least once a week to tell me about updates. I have had no notification since I upgraded 13 days ago (and have not installed any updates since Beta). ** Affects: update-notifier (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356152 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 361021] [NEW] tracker indexer never finishes
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tracker Running 9.04 (Jaunty) beta, after a rebooting Tracker starts to index files, and never finishes. It hangs about, using around 48% CPU until I explicitly kill it. The System Monitor says it is "running", but the hover bubble never changes (stalled at 6772 files out of 13143, after 3 min and 53 secs). ** Affects: tracker (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- tracker indexer never finishes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361021 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351437] [NEW] gnome-power-manager reports battery alive when it appears to be dead
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager g-p-m is reporting that my battery is charged, has about an hour of life left. However, the hardware battery light is flashing to indicate a fault, and if I unplug then the laptop immediately dies. I'm assuming my battery has just failed completely (for some unknown reason), but if that's the case, then why is g-p-m continuing to report the battery as working and charged? FWIW, I also reported bug #350178 so you may find some debugging info there. Let me know if you need anything else. ** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-power-manager reports battery alive when it appears to be dead https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351437 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351449] [NEW] update notification no longer appears after upgrade
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager After upgrading to Jaunty (beta) the notification icon for update- manager no longer appears. My settings check for updates daily, and should display the icon when there are updates. When I start the update-manager directly (i.e., Sys -> Admin -> Update Manager), it works fine - it seems to be only the notification that has gone missing. ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- update notification no longer appears after upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351449] Re: update notification no longer appears after upgrade
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 332945 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 332945 [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information -- update notification no longer appears after upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351484] [NEW] update-manager options no longer match functionality
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Given the new behavior described in bug #332945 , it seems to me that the options in update-manager are misleading. For example, - I have update-manager configured to check for updates daily. Why give me this option when you have disabled the notification associated with it? - I have update-manager configured to "notify about available updates". Again, misleading to give me the option when the corresponding functionality isn't there. ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- update-manager options no longer match functionality https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351484 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351484] Re: update-manager options no longer match functionality
Screenshot of System->Admin->Update manager->Settings attached. ** Attachment added: "Screenshot-Software Sources.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24506326/Screenshot-Software%20Sources.png -- update-manager options no longer match functionality https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351484 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352293] [NEW] apport-collect creates extraneous bug mail by doing attachments individually
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apport The apport tools are very cool! But apport-collect collects a bunch of logs/config files and attaches them to the bug one by one. This generates a lot of bug mail, and a lot of vertical space in the bug page in Launchpad. However, I note that the kernel variant (I think it is /usr/share/apport/apportcheckresume ) collects a bunch of log files and attaches them to the bug in one operation, this saving on mail and vertical space on the bug page. Can apport-collect handle attachments that same way apportcheckresume does? (For reference, you can see examples of each at bug #348560 and bug #350178) ** Affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- apport-collect creates extraneous bug mail by doing attachments individually https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352293 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348560] Re: screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty
Yep, manually editing xorg.conf as suggested worked. Will leave it to you whether to close the bug or leave it open (one could argue that it should have been detected and set up automatically). Thanks! -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67190] home page settings lost after dist-upgrade
Public bug reported: After doing a dist-upgrade from Dapper to Edgy, the home page settings in Firefox are lost. Specifically, the "Home Page" setting in Edit->Prefs is blank (whereas I believe it used to be a static Ubuntu file from teh doc team). (The Edit->Prefs->When-Firefox-starts field is still set to "show my home page") The resulting behaviour is that when starting Firefox the start page is simply blank, and clicking the home icon when on another page has no effect. ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- home page settings lost after dist-upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/67190 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67190] Re: home page settings lost after dist-upgrade
Yes, the homepage is back, so it is effectively fixed for me. I can't confirm if it's fixed for someone doing a dist-upgrade for the first time, as I can't test that. -- home page settings lost after dist-upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/67190 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63153] Re: No grub menu after upgrading from dapper to edgy
Attached. ** Attachment added: "menu.lst attached" http://librarian.launchpad.net/4624904/menu.lst -- No grub menu after upgrading from dapper to edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/63153 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 66432] print defaults are annoying
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org-calc The default way in which OO prints spreadsheets is to print every worksheet in the file. I believe that a high percentage of the time, the user actually only wants to print the currently active worksheet, and I think it would be a wiser default to have the print function (both File->Print and the Print File Directly button) only print the active worksheet. I believe (but am not 100% sure) that printing the active sheet only is how Excel works, and I think it's how most users will expect the print function to work. ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- print defaults are annoying https://launchpad.net/bugs/66432 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63153] Re: No grub menu after upgrading from dapper to edgy
Probably best to close this one - too old to reproduce the issue now. Thanks! -- No grub menu after upgrading from dapper to edgy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 18203] Re: essid ignored, system confused by other APs
I can't duplicate this anymore (am on Ubuntu 7.04 and a different set of wireless APs), so perhaps best to close it. -- essid ignored, system confused by other APs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132251] wired network with Intel 82573L doesn't work
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6-386 On a Thinkpad X60s (with Intel 82573L), the wired network only works if the network cable is plugged in at boot time. This is seen both in 7.04 (Feisty) and in the Gutsy development build from 12 Aug 07. ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- wired network with Intel 82573L doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132251 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132251] Re: wired network with Intel 82573L doesn't work
I don't know if this matters, but do you want that when it recognises the wired network (i.e,. plugged in at boot) or when the wired doesn't work? -- wired network with Intel 82573L doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132251 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132251] Re: wired network with Intel 82573L doesn't work
** Attachment added: "lspci-vv.output" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8809188/lspci-vv.output -- wired network with Intel 82573L doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132251 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132251] Re: wired network with Intel 82573L doesn't work
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvn.output" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8809189/lspci-vvn.output -- wired network with Intel 82573L doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132251 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 75478] Re: No shortcut to OpenOffice::Draw
Inkscape was chosen as the default vector drawing program (and I believe has been that way from the first release of Ubuntu). The Open Office Draw menu was removed because it duplicated functionality from Inkscape (which is the program most people would use when invoking the drawing program directly). When Inkscape was chosen, it was more full featured and more well known - I don't know if that has changed now. As mentioned above, it is certainly possible to add Open Office Draw to the menu from the menu editor for those people who prefer it as their main vector drawing program. The OpenOffice Math entry was removed on the belief that very few people (if any) invoked it directly - people who used it would like do so from within an Open Office document or presentation and its presence in the menu was unnecessary. -- No shortcut to OpenOffice::Draw https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99771] Re: update manager not running after upgrade
Didn't happen in an upgrade from 7.04 (Feisty) to 7.10 (Gutsy), so bug should probably be closed. Thanks! -- update manager not running after upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99771 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209695] [NEW] attachments open in read only mode
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mozilla-thunderbird When clicking on an attachment to a Thunderbird mail message, OpenOffice will open that attachment in read-only mode. This is new behaviour in 8.04 LTS, and has been implemented in response to bug #87101. However, I personally consider this new behaviour to be a bug, as it creates workflow hurdles. Consider the following example: I receive a spreadsheet as an attachment. I open it, and in looking at it want to do something minor like add a column of numbers or some other minor operation. In this case I have no interest in saving those changes. However, in order to do this simple task, I have to actually save the file to a local directory, add my numbers, then go and delete the file afterwards (or gather loads of unwanted files on my hard disk). I understand the rationale behind the original bug report, but I disagree with the implementation of the "fix". I think a more logical solution to bug 87101 is to warn the user at the time they try to save something to /tmp, rather than assume that in all cases someone wants changes to be permanent. The core issue is trying to stop people from saving to temp storage, and so I think the solution should be targetted there. I think the current behaviour of forcing a file to be opened read only gets in the way in a number of situations, and is a bug. ** Affects: mozilla-thunderbird (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- attachments open in read only mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 87101] Re: when opening an attachment, it should be written to tmp as a read-only file
I think the fix has introduced a new bug. Please see bug #201134 -- when opening an attachment, it should be written to tmp as a read-only file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87101 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 87101] Re: when opening an attachment, it should be written to tmp as a read-only file
Sorry, don't see the bug linked above, it has nothing to do with this. Instead, please see bug #209695 :) -- when opening an attachment, it should be written to tmp as a read-only file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87101 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209695] Re: attachments open in read only mode
Yes, I'm proposing that the behaviour we are trying to guard against is people unintentionally saving files to temp storage. So it seems to me a reasonable way to address that (where reasonable means I don't really know how hard the tech implementation is ;) ) is to provide a suitable warning when someone tries to do exactly that - save to temp. The issue to me seems to be in OpenOffice and other applications that save files - that is where users go wrong. I think making apps like Thunderbird open attachments in a given way isn't the right place to address the original issue, as it catches too many other use cases. I haven't tried the mozilla-open-office plug in so don't know for sure, but from your description of "allows you to save anyplace you want", that isn't what I am looking for. I am looking for Mozilla behaviour that lets me open an attachment and then modify it directly if I want. I don't think my mail program should assume that I will misuse my document editor. If my document editor (e.g,. OpenOffice) is worried about me accidentally saving to temp storage, then I think it is reasonable that it warn me if I attempt to do such a thing. -- attachments open in read only mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209695] Re: attachments open in read only mode
I looked for the plugin you mention, but can't find it. Can you confirm name and repository? Thanks, Jane -- attachments open in read only mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 204659] [NEW] call it 8.04 LTS in upgrade windows
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager In the update manager window, the "a new distribution is available" line calls the new version 8.04. It should be called 8.04 LTS. Similarly, in the Distribution Upgrade progress window, the header says "Upgrading Ubuntu to version 8.04". This also should say 8.04 LTS. The LTS is a significant part of the name and identity of this release - we should call it 8.04 LTS consistently, rather than just 8.04. Thanks, Jane ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- call it 8.04 LTS in upgrade windows https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204659 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 40702] Re: Way too much orange icons
I just upgraded to 8.04 LTS (Hardy) Beta and think this is an issue again. I am not presenting this from a personal taste "I like/don't like orange perspective", but from a functional perspective I believe we have lost a lot of usability. For example, compare the following set of icons, all of which often appear in the top panel: Firefox the generic folder update notifier crash report icon tracker All have orange as the primary colour. Some are meant to convey a warning or notification status (update notifier, crash report), while others are simply functional (Firefox, Tracker, Folder). I question that interpretation of a tangerine theme to mean that all icons should incorporate that colour. It seems things have swung so far in the orange/tangerine direction that much of the information conveyed by an individual icon has disappeared. Cheers, Jane -- Way too much orange icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/40702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96706] Re: menu editor won't accept changes
Travis -
Re earlier comment, I wasn't enabling New Login in Nested Window - I was
trying to add Add/Remove programs which had disappeared. This turned
out to be because of bug #96694, the root cause of which was because I
was in the adm group but not the admin group. This was caused by the
fact that my initial install on this machine was version 4.10 (warty)
which relied on the adm group. Since then I have only done upgrades,
not new installs, so I was never part of the admin group (which was
added around Dapper-ish timeframe).
At any rate, I have added myself to admin, and now Alacarte works fine.
I wonder if the behaviour I was seeing was due to inadequate
permissions. If that's the case, then a warning message from Alacarte
("your user doesn't have permission") would probably be advisable.
--
menu editor won't accept changes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99771] update manager not running after upgrade
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Following a dist upgrade from 6.10 (Edgy) to Feisty Beta, the update manager/update notification fails to runs automatically. When invoked from the menu it works fine, but I don't get the update notification icon in the upper right as expected. ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- update manager not running after upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/99771 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96694] Re: lost menu items after dist upgrade to beta
Ah - may be getting close. Am not part of "admin" but I am part of "adm" (which I understand is old version of admin?) The groups command gives me: jane adm dialout cdrom floppy audio dip video plugdev lpadmin scanner -- lost menu items after dist upgrade to beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96694] Re: lost menu items after dist upgrade to beta
Nope, have never touched the groups list and had this capability (and menu items) prior to upgrading to Feisty. I was running a fully up-to- date Edgy system prior to the upgrade. The upgrade didn't go completely smoothly, but it eventually did install everything. Don't know how something could have reverted to Dapper though. -- lost menu items after dist upgrade to beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96694] Re: lost menu items after dist upgrade to beta
gnome-app-install is installed, and I've attached applications.menu Have also discovered that Synaptic no longer appears in my menus after upgrade. And a bunch of other things that should be in that submenu (I only have 6 items in System->Admin, while a default installation seem to be about 15 items). Can't add them back because of bug 96706. ** Attachment added: "applications.menu" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7116476/applications.menu -- lost menu items after dist upgrade to beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96694] Re: lost menu items after dist upgrade to beta
A little more info: mdz thinks this is related to the fact that I installed 4.10 (Warty) originally on this machine, and have only upgraded at every release since then. Since Warty is the only fresh install I've ever done, I have always been in the adm group and never in the admin group. For some reason this didn't cause issues in previous releases, but maybe there is something about Feisty that now is more reliant on the admin group than previously? And, presumably, it isn't a good idea to automatically move everyone that had been in adm to admin automatically. -- lost menu items after dist upgrade to beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96694] lost menu items after dist upgrade to beta
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-menus After an upgrade from Ubuntu 6.10 (Edgy) to 7.04 Beta, several key menu items were lost. Specifically - add/remove programs - menu editor ** Affects: gnome-menus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- lost menu items after dist upgrade to beta https://launchpad.net/bugs/96694 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96694] Re: lost menu items after dist upgrade to beta
Sorry, just found the menu editor (under System->Pref->Main Menu). FWIW, I think that is an odd place and and odd name for it. Was it an upstream change to move it there? Made more sense to me in previous location (Accessories->Menu Editor). -- lost menu items after dist upgrade to beta https://launchpad.net/bugs/96694 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96706] menu editor won't accept changes
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: alacarte After upgrade to Feisty Beta, the menu editor won't accept changes. Clicking on menu item to add it to the menu shows a checkmark in the box momentarily, but then it automatically disappears, without taking any effect. ** Affects: alacarte (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- menu editor won't accept changes https://launchpad.net/bugs/96706 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96706] Re: menu editor won't accept changes
Ran from a terminal: same results (i.e., doesn't work) and no error message of any sort. -- menu editor won't accept changes https://launchpad.net/bugs/96706 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96706] Re: menu editor won't accept changes
Attached. ** Attachment added: "alacartebug.tar.gz" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7046487/alacartebug.tar.gz -- menu editor won't accept changes https://launchpad.net/bugs/96706 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99779] open office menu items reverted to old names
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org Menu names for Open Office programs in Feisty Beta have reverted to the old Base/Calc/Impress/Writer. In previous versions of Ubuntu these were called Spreadsheet/Database, etc which are more understandable to most people. Not sure if this was an intentional decision, but I believe they should stay with the more accessible terms. ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- open office menu items reverted to old names https://launchpad.net/bugs/99779 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 74682] Re: Mysterious segfault of many GNOME programs makes gnome-session unresponsive
I noticed this behaviour as well (up to date Edgy). Several hours before noticing the issue, gaim crashed. At some point during the day (perhaps at the time of the gaim crash) I also had some sort of error/bug reporting dialog (which I don't think was the Gnome bug buddy), which I canceled. Not sure if either of these are related. -- Mysterious segfault of many GNOME programs makes gnome-session unresponsive https://launchpad.net/bugs/74682 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73450] copy/paste into thunderbird crashes open office
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org Copying a block of text from an OpenOffice document and pasting it into a Thunderbird email composition window causes OpenOffice to crash. Additional info: - Ubuntu 6.10 (Edgy), up to date - no special formatting in the Open Office text (i.e., no bold, italics, graphics, etc. Just straight text with all default settings) - either Edit->Paste or Ctrl-V cause the crash. If you paste into Thunderbird with Edit->Paste Without Formatting, it is fine. (I haven't tried pasting into other apps, I have only noticed this in Thunderbird.) ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- copy/paste into thunderbird crashes open office https://launchpad.net/bugs/73450 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 31483] Re: Default window size of Preferences window insufficient
I have since upgraded to version 6.10 (Edgy) and it seems the problem is still there. My resolution is 1024x768. I tried at 800x600 and didn't notice a change in behaviour. -- Default window size of Preferences window insufficient https://launchpad.net/bugs/31483 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 62946] typo in warning message
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: synaptic During a dist-upgrade, I got a warning message about support ending for a number of packages. Small typo in that message: "havn't" should be "haven't" ** Affects: synaptic (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- typo in warning message https://launchpad.net/bugs/62946 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 62948] can't install apparent updates
Public bug reported: I did a dist-upgrade from Dapper to Edgy-Beta. It generally went very smoothly, but at the end of the process update-manager believes I have about 40 updates that need to be installed (one is hpijs and the remaining 39 or so are python- packages). However, when trying to perform those updates I get a message which says "not all updates can be installed, run a distribution upgrade to install as many as possible". If I then click "distribution upgrade", I get a message saying my system is up to date. However, update-manager still thinks the ~40 updates are needed. Let me know if you need additional info. Thanks! ** Affects: synaptic (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- can't install apparent updates https://launchpad.net/bugs/62948 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63155] still have test pattern usplash after dist-upgrade
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: usplash I did a dist-upgrade from Dapper to Edgy-beta. In general it went smoothly. However, upon rebooting, I have the test pattern usplash instead of the Ubuntu artwork. I suspect this is a video driver thing and may be related to bug 63153. ** Affects: usplash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- still have test pattern usplash after dist-upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/63155 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
