[Bug 160999] Re: Cores don't dump when they otherwise should

2008-08-23 Thread Gerald Combs
"coretst" is a program I wrote which simply dumps cores. I wrote it to
show that the core dump behavior of Ubuntu doesn't match the
documentation. That is, that pre-existing core dumps aren't being
overwritten when they should. And Ubuntu's core dump behavior is
_definitely_ part of Ubuntu...

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: Invalid => New

-- 
Cores don't dump when they otherwise should
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160999
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 160999] Re: Cores don't dump when they otherwise should

2008-08-23 Thread Gerald Combs
As it turns out, this is a bug in apport. The attached patch makes
apport conform to the behavior described in core(5).

** Attachment added: "Update apport to remove pre-existing core files"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17035692/apport-gcc.patch

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: None => apport

** Summary changed:

- Cores don't dump when they otherwise should
+ Apport doesn't remove pre-existing core files

-- 
Apport doesn't remove pre-existing core files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160999
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 160999] Re: Apport doesn't remove pre-existing core files

2008-08-23 Thread Gerald Combs
Upon further investigation, it looks like the Linux kernel opens the
core file with "O_CREAT  | O_NOFOLLOW | O_LARGEFILE", then performs the
checks listed core(5):
http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.26.3/fs/exec.c#L1749

Apport appears to change its uid/gid to the failing process, then tries
to open the core file with "O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_EXCL". This takes
care of the permission check specified in core(5), but it doesn't handle
any of the others. In particular, using O_EXCL, means it doesn't
overwrite pre-existing core files, which is the source of my original
complaint.

core(5) says core files should be created except in the following cases:

   *  The  process  does  not  have permission to write the core file.
  (By default the core file is called core, and is created in  the
  current  working  directory.   See below for details on naming.)
  Writing the core file will fail if the directory in which it  is
  to  be  created is non-writable, or if a file with the same name
  exists and is not writable or is not a regular file (e.g., it is
  a directory or a symbolic link).

   *  A  (writable,  regular) file with the same name as would be used
  for the core dump already exists, but there  is  more  than  one
  hard link to that file.

   *  The  file  system  where  the core dump file would be created is
  full; or has run out of inodes; or is mounted read only; or  the
  user has reached their quota for the file system.

   *  The  directory in which the core dump file is to be created does
  not exist.

   *  RLIMIT_CORE or RLIMIT_FSIZE resource limits for  a  process  are
  set to zero (see getrlimit(2)).

   *  The binary being executed by the process does not have read per‐
  mission enabled.

   *  The process is executing a  set-user-ID  (set-group-ID)  program
  that is owned by a user (group) other than the real user (group)
  ID of  the  process.   (However,  see  the  description  of  the
  prctl(2)  PR_SET_DUMPABLE  operation, and the description of the
  /proc/sys/fs/suid_dumpable file in proc(5).)

My patch doesn't address any of these, and should be ignored.

Ether Apport should be updated to conform to these cases, or the core(5)
man page should be updated to note Apport's behavior.

** Summary changed:

- Apport doesn't remove pre-existing core files
+ Apport doesn't conform to core(5)

** Attachment removed: "Update apport to remove pre-existing core files"

   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17035692/apport-gcc.patch

-- 
Apport doesn't conform to core(5)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160999
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 160999] Re: Apport doesn't conform to core(5)

2008-08-26 Thread Gerald Combs
Also, if ApplicationA crashes and Apport fails to overwrite an old core
file from ApplicationB which happens to be lying around, wouldn't the
report generated by Apport be at best useless, and at worst misleading?

-- 
Apport doesn't conform to core(5)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160999
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 254025] Re: Uninitialized static variables on x86_64

2008-08-01 Thread Gerald Combs

** Attachment added: "Add debug printfs to epan/dissectors/packet-gsm_a.c"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16481800/gsm_a_debug.diff

-- 
Uninitialized static variables on x86_64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254025
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 254025] [NEW] Uninitialized static variables on x86_64

2008-08-01 Thread Gerald Combs
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gcc-4.1

[ Note: This is a bounce from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37001 ]

Wireshark's Buildbot system recently uncovered what appears to be a bug
in gcc. The following code:

static guinttap_current=0;
[ ... ]
fprintf(stderr, "dissect_bssmap tap_current: %u\n", tap_current);

produces the following output:

dissect_bssmap tap_current: 2801996644

'lsb_release -rd' output:
Description:Ubuntu 7.10
Release:7.10

'dpkg -l | grep gcc' output:

ii  gcc4:4.1.2-9ubuntu2 
The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-3.3-base   1:3.3.6-15ubuntu2
The GNU Compiler Collection (base package)
ii  gcc-4.14.1.2-16ubuntu2  
The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-4.1-base   4.1.2-16ubuntu2  
The GNU Compiler Collection (base package)
ii  gcc-4.2-base   4.2.1-5ubuntu4   
The GNU Compiler Collection (base package)
ii  lib32gcc1  1:4.2.1-5ubuntu4 
GCC support library (32 bit Version)
ii  libgcc11:4.2.1-5ubuntu4 
GCC support library

'gcc -v' output:
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,treelang --prefix=/usr
--enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib
--without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.1.3 --program-suffix=-4.1
--enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug
--enable-mpfr --enable-checking=release x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)

Steps to reproduce:

  Download a recent Wireshark tarball from 
  http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/src/ or check out from SVN at
  http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/wireshark/trunk/

  Apply the attached patch and build Wireshark.

  Download the capture file from
 
http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/captures/fuzz-2008-07-31-3587.pcap

  Run './tshark -nVr /tmp/fuzz-2008-07-31-3587.pcap > /dev/null 2>
/tmp/tp.out; head -10 /tmp/tp.out'

You should see something like the following:

dissect_bssmap tap_current: 2801996644
dissect_bssmap tap_current: 0
dissect_bssmap tap_current: 1
dissect_dtap tap_current: 2801996612
dissect_bssmap tap_current: 2
dissect_dtap tap_current: 0
dissect_bssmap tap_current: 3
dissect_dtap tap_current: 1
dissect_bssmap tap_current: 0
dissect_bssmap tap_current: 1

Sorry I don't have a smaller test case.

** Affects: gcc-4.1 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Uninitialized static variables on x86_64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254025
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 210670] Re: tshark uses up all the space in /tmp

2009-01-20 Thread Gerald Combs
TShark inherits that behavior from Wireshark (which _does_ let you go
back in time). It probably shouldn't do that, but you can work around
the problem using the ring buffer (-b) option:
http://www.wireshark.org/docs/man-pages/tshark.html

-- 
tshark uses up all the space in /tmp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210670
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 134171] Re: Nashbar web site renders incorrectly in Firefox 2.0.0.6 on Feisty

2007-10-10 Thread Gerald Combs
The Nashbar site is the only one I've seen so far.  If it happens in FF
2.0.0.6 on Feisty, but _not_ FF 2.0.0.6 on OS X and Windows, how is that
a site issue?

-- 
Nashbar web site renders incorrectly in Firefox 2.0.0.6 on Feisty 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134171
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 134171] Nashbar web site renders incorrectly in Firefox 2.0.0.6 on Feisty

2007-08-22 Thread Gerald Combs
Public bug reported:

The main body of each page on www.nashbar.com is shifted to the right
under Firefox 2.0.0.6 on Feisty.  I don't think this is a Nashbar
problem or a Firefox problem, since the page loads fine in Firefox
2.0.0.6 on OS X and Windows.

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Nashbar web site renders incorrectly in Firefox 2.0.0.6 on Feisty 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134171
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 160999] Re: Cores don't dump when they otherwise should

2007-11-08 Thread Gerald Combs
(I'm running Gutsy, BTW)

-- 
Cores don't dump when they otherwise should
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160999
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 160999] Cores don't dump when they otherwise should

2007-11-08 Thread Gerald Combs
Public bug reported:

While debugging some code, I noticed that existing core files aren't
being overwritten when they should be.  According to core(5), the
following file should be overwritten, but it's not:

bam:/tmp$ id -un
gerald
bam:/tmp$ ls -l core
-rw--- 1 gerald gerald 3407872 2007-10-30 21:22 core
bam:/tmp$ date
Thu Nov  8 09:36:23 PST 2007
bam:/tmp$ ./coretst 
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
bam:/tmp$ ls -l core
-rw--- 1 gerald gerald 3407872 2007-10-30 21:22 core

Creating the initial core file works fine:

bam:/tmp$ rm core
bam:/tmp$ ./coretst 
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
bam:/tmp$ ls -l core
-rw--- 1 gerald gerald 163840 2007-11-08 09:36 core
bam:/tmp$ date
Thu Nov  8 09:36:49 PST 2007

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Cores don't dump when they otherwise should
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160999
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 58376] Re: Ethereal is old and dangerously buggy, update to wireshark

2007-05-02 Thread Gerald Combs
Which version of Wireshark are you trying to compile, and what shows up
in config.log?  Also, do you have the glib and gtk+ _dev_ packages
installed?

FWIW, we've been using Ubuntu (breezy, then dapper, now edgy) in our
Buildbot environment since the name change.  Compilation _shouldn't_ be
a problem...

-- 
Ethereal is old and dangerously buggy, update to wireshark
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/58376
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1750178] [NEW] Download time estimates include "with a 56k modem"

2018-02-17 Thread Gerald Combs
Public bug reported:

This is admittedly a minor nit, but estimatedDownloadTime in
DistUpgradeView.py reports download times for a 1Mbps DSL connection and
a 56k modem. Would it be possible to report estimates for more
contemporary bandwidths?

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1750178

Title:
  Download time estimates include "with a 56k modem"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1750178/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 75618] Re: Complains about IPv6 entries in resolv.conf

2020-07-26 Thread Gerald Combs
This affects Wireshark 2.0.x and earlier. Support for ADNS was removed
from Wireshark in March 2016, prior to the 2.2.0 release:
https://code.wireshark.org/review/c/14519/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75618

Title:
  Complains about IPv6 entries in resolv.conf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/wireshark/+bug/75618/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 50093] Re: Some sysctl's are ignored on boot

2017-08-21 Thread Gerald Combs
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 771372
   procps runs too early in the boot process

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50093

Title:
  Some sysctl's are ignored on boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/50093/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1516451] Re: check_disk plugin broken after upgrade to 15.10

2017-03-13 Thread Gerald Combs
This appears to be fixed upstream via
https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/issues/4184

** Bug watch added: github.com/Icinga/icinga2/issues #4184
   https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/issues/4184

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1516451

Title:
  check_disk plugin broken after upgrade to 15.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1516451/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1516451] Re: check_disk plugin broken after upgrade to 15.10

2017-03-13 Thread Gerald Combs
Oops - please disregard comment #14 - it's specific to Icinga.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1516451

Title:
  check_disk plugin broken after upgrade to 15.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1516451/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1282805] [NEW] Wireshark repository URL changed

2014-02-20 Thread Gerald Combs
Public bug reported:

The Wireshark project recently migrated from Subversion to Git. As a
result the anonsvn URL at the top of
https://code.launchpad.net/wireshark should probably be replaced with
one or more of the following:

Code review site: https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/
Git clone URLs: https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/admin/projects/wireshark
Repository browser: 
https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=summary

(I'm reporting this against the Wireshark package instead of the project
because the "Report a bug" link at https://launchpad.net/wireshark is
disabled.)

** Affects: wireshark (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1282805

Title:
  Wireshark repository URL changed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireshark/+bug/1282805/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 898124] Re: Missing Files for Apache2::SizeLimit in libapache2-mod-perl2 (2.0.5-2 oneiric)

2012-03-05 Thread Gerald Combs
This affects Bugzilla 4.0 and 4.2 as well.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/898124

Title:
  Missing Files for Apache2::SizeLimit in libapache2-mod-perl2 (2.0.5-2
  oneiric)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache2-mod-perl2/+bug/898124/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 985097] [NEW] scan-build uses huge amounts of memory

2012-04-18 Thread Gerald Combs
Public bug reported:

After upgrading a build machine from oneiric (clang 2.9) to precise
(clang 3.0) I noticed that scan-build uses much more RAM. For example,
running scan-build on packet-rrc.c in the Wireshark sources uses about
600 MB with clang 2.9 and over 7 GB with clang 3.0.

** Affects: clang (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985097

Title:
  scan-build uses huge amounts of memory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clang/+bug/985097/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1082767] Re: Configure-time ps command truncates command names

2012-12-15 Thread Gerald Combs
That's because "/sbin/getty" is shorter than 15 characters, which means
that /proc//status isn't truncating it.

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #513460
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513460

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082767

Title:
  Configure-time ps command truncates command names

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1082767/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1082767] Re: Configure-time ps command truncates command names

2012-12-15 Thread Gerald Combs
...and this problem has been reported before: http://bugs.debian.org
/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513460

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082767

Title:
  Configure-time ps command truncates command names

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1082767/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1082767] Re: Configure-time ps command truncates command names

2012-12-16 Thread Gerald Combs
This is indeed ultimately a kernel limitation, one which will likely
never be fixed. Procps should probably be modified to use
/proc//cmdline instead of the first line of /proc//status for
command names since this can affect other programs as well as indicated
by the Debian bug.

In the mean time, check_procs is broken. Can we work around the problem
by configuring nagios-plugins with a ps argument that returns the full
command name, e.g. something like

  --with-ps-command="/bin/ps axwwo 'stat uid pid ppid vsz rss pcpu etime
command'"

instead of

  --with-ps-command="/bin/ps axwwo 'stat uid pid ppid vsz rss pcpu etime
comm args'"

?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082767

Title:
  Configure-time ps command truncates command names

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1082767/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1015405] Re: ClamAV error: CL_EFORMAT: Bad format or broken data

2012-07-25 Thread Gerald Combs
It looks like this is a known bug in ClamAV 0.97.5 and will be fixed in
0.97.6: https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=5252

** Bug watch added: bugzilla.clamav.net/ #5252
   https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=5252

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015405

Title:
  ClamAV error: CL_EFORMAT: Bad format or broken data

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1015405/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 898124] Re: Missing Files for Apache2::SizeLimit in libapache2-mod-perl2 (2.0.5-2 oneiric 2.0.5-5 precise)

2012-07-16 Thread Gerald Combs
Is 2.0.5 strictly necessary? Manually installing
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/amd64/libapache2-mod-
perl2/2.0.4-7ubuntu2 on oneiric seems to work fine.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/898124

Title:
  Missing Files for Apache2::SizeLimit in libapache2-mod-perl2 (2.0.5-2
  oneiric 2.0.5-5 precise)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache2-mod-perl2/+bug/898124/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1082767] [NEW] Configure-time ps command truncates command names

2012-11-24 Thread Gerald Combs
Public bug reported:

It looks like the nagios-plugins package is configured with

  --with-ps-command="/bin/ps axwwo 'stat uid pid ppid vsz rss pcpu etime
comm args'"

Unfortunately using "comm" returns truncated command names (via
/proc/[pid]/status) which makes it difficult or impossible to use
check_procs -C. For example, "check_procs -C apache2" fails while
"check_procs -C apach" works. It looks like the package should be
configured with "cmd" or "command" (which use /proc/[pid]/cmdline)
instead, e.g.

  --with-ps-command="/bin/ps axwwo 'stat uid pid ppid vsz rss pcpu etime
command args'"

** Affects: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082767

Title:
  Configure-time ps command truncates command names

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1082767/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1082767] Re: Configure-time ps command truncates command names

2012-11-24 Thread Gerald Combs
** Description changed:

  It looks like the nagios-plugins package is configured with
  
-   --with-ps-command="/bin/ps axwwo 'stat uid pid ppid vsz rss pcpu etime
+   --with-ps-command="/bin/ps axwwo 'stat uid pid ppid vsz rss pcpu etime
  comm args'"
  
  Unfortunately using "comm" returns truncated command names (via
  /proc/[pid]/status) which makes it difficult or impossible to use
  check_procs -C. For example, "check_procs -C apache2" fails while
- "check_procs -C apach" works. It looks like the package should be
- configured with "cmd" or "command" (which use /proc/[pid]/cmdline)
- instead, e.g.
- 
-   --with-ps-command="/bin/ps axwwo 'stat uid pid ppid vsz rss pcpu etime
- command args'"
+ "check_procs -C apach" works.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082767

Title:
  Configure-time ps command truncates command names

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1082767/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 774215] Re: include/asm missing - change "Suggest" to "Depends" on gcc-multilib

2011-06-10 Thread Gerald Combs
This affects the Clang Static Analyzer (scan-build) as well:

In file included from /usr/include/errno.h:36:
In file included from /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25:
/usr/include/linux/errno.h:4:10: fatal error: 'asm/errno.h' file not found
#include 
 ^

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774215

Title:
  include/asm missing - change "Suggest" to "Depends" on gcc-multilib

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-defaults/+bug/774215/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 809813] Re: dumpcap uses obsolete (PF_INET, SOCK_PACKET) at wireshark non-root start

2011-07-15 Thread Gerald Combs
This should be fixed in libpcap 1.2 as described at

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=469579&aid=3368133&group_id=53067

** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #3368133
   http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=3368133

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809813

Title:
  dumpcap uses obsolete (PF_INET,SOCK_PACKET) at wireshark non-root
  start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/wireshark/+bug/809813/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 199050] Re: vmware-server is not available in hardy

2010-09-28 Thread Gerald Combs
VMWare Server 1.x has been EOLed and 2.x is heading in that direction:

http://www.vmware.com/support/policies/lifecycle/general/index.html#policy_server

Should this bug be closed?

-- 
vmware-server is not available in hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199050
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 75618] Re: Complains about IPv6 entries in resolv.conf

2010-09-18 Thread Gerald Combs
Brian, it looks like the Lucid package uses c-ares instead of ADNS for
asynchronous name resolution. IPv6 name server support was added to
c-ares in version 1.7.1.

-- 
Complains about IPv6 entries in resolv.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96585] Re: Does not configure ipv6 address if "inet" is before "inet6"

2010-09-19 Thread Gerald Combs
I can confirm that this affects hardy, but it appears to be fixed on
lucid.

-- 
Does not configure ipv6 address if "inet" is before "inet6"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96585
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs