[Bug 947558] Re: Document Viewer (evince) fails to display certain pages on pdf documents

2013-11-04 Thread F.H.
Sebastien -- I'm the original reporter of his bug, and it no longer
affects, so please feel free to mark it as closed.  Thank you.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947558

Title:
  Document Viewer (evince) fails to display certain pages on pdf
  documents

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/947558/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1448519] Re: Logitech K400 cannot type in LUKS passphrase at boot

2016-03-04 Thread F.H.
Confirmed with Logitech MK270 and K400 keyboard + mouse combos on
3.19.0-51-generic SMP 64-bit.

Axel Pospischil (apos)'s workaround seems to have solved the problem for me:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1448519/comments/8

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1448519

Title:
  Logitech K400 cannot type in LUKS passphrase at boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1448519/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1033345] Re: Darktable colors & WB with NEX-C3 underexposed photos are much worse than with UFRaw

2014-05-05 Thread F.H.
** Changed in: darktable (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033345

Title:
  Darktable colors & WB with NEX-C3 underexposed photos are much worse
  than with UFRaw

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/darktable/+bug/1033345/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1316247] [NEW] Calculator gives wrong answers after undo

2014-05-05 Thread F.H.
Public bug reported:

On a clean installation of Ubuntu 14.04, 64-bit.  Steps to reproduce:

1. Open calculator and type "5000/60" followed by .   The
calculator produces the right answer, 83.333...

2. Type "/60" followed by  to divide by 60 again.  The calculator
again produces the right answer, 1.388...

3. Press -Z to undo the last calculation.

4. Press  twice to delete the last "60".

5. Type "12" followed by , to divide by 12 instead.

The calculator gives me the wrong answer!!!

See attached screenshot.

** Affects: gnome-calculator (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "Screenshots"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316247/+attachment/4105780/+files/wrong.png

** Package changed: darktable (Ubuntu) => gnome-calculator (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316247

Title:
  Calculator gives wrong answers after undo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-calculator/+bug/1316247/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1150956] [NEW] RATE function sometimes produces incorrect results!

2013-03-06 Thread F.H.
Public bug reported:

STEPS TO REPRODUCE:
Type "=RATE(50,35,-250,0)" on any cell, and press Enter.
The result should be 0.1398, but LibreOffice shows -1.9474!  

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
I'm using LibreOffice 3.5.7.2, Build ID: 350m1(Build:2), on Ubuntu 12.04, 
64-bit version, with up-to-date packages.

** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150956

Title:
  RATE function sometimes produces incorrect results!

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1150956/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1150956] Re: RATE function sometimes produces incorrect results!

2013-03-08 Thread F.H.
** Package changed: libreoffice (Ubuntu) => df-libreoffice

** Summary changed:

- RATE function sometimes produces incorrect results!
+ LibreOffice Calc's RATE function sometimes produces incorrect results!!!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150956

Title:
  LibreOffice Calc's RATE function sometimes produces incorrect
  results!!!

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1150956/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 801403] Re: [MS-7593, Realtek ALC889, Green Headphone Out, Front] No automute HP -> Line out

2011-11-16 Thread F.H.
David -- thanks.  The new alsa-info is here:
http://www.alsa-project.org/db/?f=38f3964aa142e95b0c56693746526d2e01526fcd

And here's the output of `modinfo snd-hda-codec`:

filename:   
/lib/modules/3.0.0-12-generic-pae/kernel/sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-codec.ko
license:GPL
description:HDA codec core
srcversion: BA5B1C249A0167C0AD24825
depends:snd-pcm,snd,snd-hwdep
vermagic:   3.0.0-12-generic-pae SMP mod_unload modversions 686

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801403

Title:
  [MS-7593, Realtek ALC889, Green Headphone Out, Front] No automute HP
  -> Line out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/801403/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 801403] Re: [MS-7593, Realtek ALC889, Green Headphone Out, Front] No automute HP -> Line out

2011-10-25 Thread F.H.
Hi David -- I just upgraded to 11.10 and this problem has resurfaced --
a regression.  Any suggestions?

** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Released => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801403

Title:
  [MS-7593, Realtek ALC889, Green Headphone Out, Front] No automute HP
  -> Line out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/801403/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1033345] [NEW] Darktable results with underexposed photos much worse than plain-vanilla UFRaw with NEX-C3

2012-08-05 Thread F.H.
Public bug reported:

STEPS TO REPEAT: take an underexposed photo with a Sony NEX-C3 camera,
import into darktable, and increase exposure (ev).  The results are
terrible.   Open the same raw file with UFRaw, increase exposure by the
same amount, and the results are good.

The attached screenshot shows darktable and UFRaw processing the same
photo after increasing exposure (ev).

Upgrading to the stable PPA version of darktable does not solve this
issue.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: darktable 0.9.3-2ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-27.43-generic 3.2.21
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-27-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu11
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Aug  5 22:04:49 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012)
SourcePackage: darktable
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-26 (101 days ago)

** Affects: darktable (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033345

Title:
  Darktable results with underexposed photos much worse than plain-
  vanilla UFRaw with NEX-C3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/darktable/+bug/1033345/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1033345] Re: Darktable results with underexposed photos much worse than plain-vanilla UFRaw with NEX-C3

2012-08-05 Thread F.H.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot - darktable vs UFRaw"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033345/+attachment/3249482/+files/NEX-C3-darktable-vs-ufraw.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033345

Title:
  Darktable results with underexposed photos much worse than plain-
  vanilla UFRaw with NEX-C3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/darktable/+bug/1033345/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1033345] Re: Darktable results with underexposed photos much worse than plain-vanilla UFRaw with NEX-C3

2012-08-06 Thread F.H.
Attached is the raw image with darktable's XMP
file.?field.comment=Attached is the raw image with darktable's XMP file.

** Attachment added: "Raw file and its darktable xmp file"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/darktable/+bug/1033345/+attachment/3250137/+files/raw-image-with-xmp.zip

** Summary changed:

- Darktable results with underexposed photos much worse than plain-vanilla 
UFRaw with NEX-C3
+ Darktable colors & WB with NEX-C3 underexposed photos are much worse than 
with UFRaw

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033345

Title:
  Darktable colors & WB with NEX-C3 underexposed photos are much worse
  than with UFRaw

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/darktable/+bug/1033345/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 801403] Re: [MS-7593, Realtek ALC889, Green Headphone Out, Front] No automute HP -> Line out

2011-11-21 Thread F.H.
David -- thank you.  I understand and appreciate your being upfront and 
transparent.  I'll try the latest drivers and will report back.
--
PS. Note that this machine is a ZaReason Limbo 7110 -- 
http://zareason.com/shop/Limbo-7110.html --  so this bug might be affecting a 
meaningful number of (unsuspecting) users.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801403

Title:
  [MS-7593, Realtek ALC889, Green Headphone Out, Front] No automute HP
  -> Line out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/801403/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 801403] Re: [MS-7593, Realtek ALC889, Green Headphone Out, Front] No automute HP -> Line out

2011-11-21 Thread F.H.
David -- I tried to test the latest drivers for Oneiric by following the
instructions here --
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Audio/InstallingLinuxAlsaDriverModules -- but
got the following error: "Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net
/ubuntu-audio-dev/ppa/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/main/source/Sources  404  Not
Found."  Suggestions?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801403

Title:
  [MS-7593, Realtek ALC889, Green Headphone Out, Front] No automute HP
  -> Line out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/801403/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 801403] Re: [MS-7593, Realtek ALC889, Green Headphone Out, Front] No automute HP -> Line out

2011-11-21 Thread F.H.
UPDATE: After the last update and reboot, this is working fine for me,
so I'm marking it as "Fix Released."

** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801403

Title:
  [MS-7593, Realtek ALC889, Green Headphone Out, Front] No automute HP
  -> Line out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/801403/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 41774] Re: Gksudo password prompt mangled onscreen when Caps Lock is on

2012-01-26 Thread F.H.
Thanks.  This has not been an issue for me for a long time... I'll mark
as fix released.

** Changed in: gksu (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/41774

Title:
  Gksudo password prompt mangled onscreen when Caps Lock is on

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gksu/+bug/41774/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 947558] [NEW] Document Viewer (evince) fails to display certain pages on pdf documents

2012-03-05 Thread F.H.
Public bug reported:

It happens only with some documents.  Did not happen prior to 11.10.
Attached screenshot shows same PDF document as displayed by Document
Viewer (evince) on the left, and as displayed by Adobe Reader on the
right.

Here's an example: 
http://www.siv.gov.do/docs/Prospectos/SIVEM-065-PC0112-I-II-III.pdf 
Evince displays only the odd pages of this document correctly;  Adobe Reader 
displays all pages correctly.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: evince 3.2.1-0ubuntu2.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-16.28-generic 3.0.17
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-16-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Mar  5 17:13:24 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012)
KernLog:
 
SourcePackage: evince
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: evince (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947558

Title:
  Document Viewer (evince) fails to display certain pages on pdf
  documents

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/947558/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 947558] Re: Document Viewer (evince) fails to display certain pages on pdf documents

2012-03-05 Thread F.H.
** Attachment added: "Evince on the left, Adobe Reader on the right"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947558/+attachment/2819640/+files/screenshot--evince-versus-adobe-reader.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947558

Title:
  Document Viewer (evince) fails to display certain pages on pdf
  documents

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/947558/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 943494] Re: Login screen shows corrupted fragments of prior user's session on dual-screen setup with proprietary nvidia drivers

2012-02-29 Thread F.H.
** Attachment added: "Photo of login screen corruption"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943494/+attachment/2794762/+files/photo.jpg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943494

Title:
  Login screen shows corrupted fragments of prior user's session on
  dual-screen setup with proprietary nvidia drivers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/943494/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 943494] [NEW] Login screen shows corrupted fragments of prior user's session on dual-screen setup with proprietary nvidia drivers

2012-02-29 Thread F.H.
Public bug reported:

See attached photo.  The login screen is showing screen fragments of the
prior user's session -- which could contain sensitive or private
information.  This happens only very rarely, after prolonged multi-day
use.  Logging in and out gets rid of the problem.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: xorg 1:7.6+7ubuntu7.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-16.28-generic 3.0.17
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-16-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
.proc.driver.nvidia.gpus.0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/0'
.proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
.proc.driver.nvidia.version:
 NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  280.13  Wed Jul 27 16:53:56 
PDT 2011
 GCC version:  gcc version 4.6.1 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.1-9ubuntu3)
.tmp.unity.support.test.0:
 
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: 
[core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,mousepoll,compiztoolbox,imgpng,snap,vpswitch,move,resize,unitymtgrabhandles,gnomecompat,wall,grid,regex,place,animation,session,workarounds,expo,fade,scale,ezoom,unityshell]
CompositorRunning: compiz
Date: Wed Feb 29 13:50:40 2012
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: oneiric
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus:
 nvidia-current, 280.13, 3.0.0-12-generic, x86_64: installed
 nvidia-current, 280.13, 3.0.0-16-generic, x86_64: installed
 virtualbox, 4.1.2, 3.0.0-12-generic, x86_64: installed
 virtualbox, 4.1.2, 3.0.0-16-generic, x86_64: installed
GraphicsCard:
 nVidia Corporation GF106 [GeForce 450 GTS] [10de:0dc4] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 
[VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:2360]
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012)
JockeyStatus:
 xorg:nvidia_current - NVIDIA accelerated graphics driver (Proprietary, 
Enabled, In use)
 xorg:nvidia_current_updates - NVIDIA accelerated graphics driver (post-release 
updates) (Proprietary, Disabled, Not in use)
MachineType: MSI MS-7593
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-16-generic 
root=UUID=c628fd7c-55fe-46e7-931b-dfdb979e054f ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 04/28/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: V3.6
dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: MSI X58M (MS-7593)
dmi.board.vendor: MSI
dmi.board.version: 1.0
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD
dmi.chassis.version: 1.0
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrV3.6:bd04/28/2010:svnMSI:pnMS-7593:pvr1.0:rvnMSI:rnMSIX58M(MS-7593):rvr1.0:cvnMICRO-STARINTERNATIONALCO.,LTD:ct3:cvr1.0:
dmi.product.name: MS-7593
dmi.product.version: 1.0
dmi.sys.vendor: MSI
version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.6+bzr20110929-0ubuntu6.1
version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs 20090808ubuntu26
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.26-1ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 7.11-0ubuntu3
version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 7.11-0ubuntu3
version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers N/A
version.xserver-xorg: xserver-xorg 1:7.6+7ubuntu7.1
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.6.0-1ubuntu13
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 
1:6.14.99~git20110811.g93fc084-0ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.15.901-1ubuntu2.1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 
1:0.0.16+git20110411+8378443-1

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug compiz-0.9 corruption oneiric patch running-unity 
ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943494

Title:
  Login screen shows corrupted fragments of prior user's session on
  dual-screen setup with proprietary nvidia drivers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/943494/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 943494] Re: Login screen shows corrupted fragments of prior user's session on dual-screen setup with proprietary nvidia drivers

2012-02-29 Thread F.H.
** Tags added: lightdm

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943494

Title:
  Login screen shows corrupted fragments of prior user's session on
  dual-screen setup with proprietary nvidia drivers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/943494/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1150956]

2013-06-13 Thread F.H.
Created attachment 80500
Test files for edge cases of RATE function (ODS and CSV)

The attached .tar.gz archive contains (1) an ODF file that produces bad
results on edge cases with the RATE() function and (2) a CSV version of
the same file but with only correct results.  I'm the author of both
files and hereby license them jointly under MPL and LGPL.  Please let me
know if this suffices.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150956

Title:
  LibreOffice Calc's RATE function sometimes produces different results
  as some versions of MS Office

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1150956/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1150956]

2013-05-30 Thread F.H.
I'm the original reporter of the bug on Launchpad.  This bug looks
critical to me, because it can directly lead to financial losses from
incorrect rate-of-return calculations in spreadsheets.

Let me explain the severity of the bug with an example.

If one invests, say, $250 today in exchange for receiving an annual
payment of $35 forever in perpetuity, the annual return will be 35/250 =
0.14, or 14%/year.[1]

Now imagine that instead of receiving the annual payments of $35 in
perpetuity, one will receive them only for a fixed number of years. In
this case, the rate of return will necessarily be lower than 14%/year.
The lower the number of years, the lower the rate of return; the greater
the number of years, the closer to 14%/year the rate of return will be.
Indeed, the rate of return asymptotically approaches 14%/year as the
number of years increases to infinity.[2]

This is *exactly* what I get in other spreadsheet programs, but NOT in
LibreOffice. For example, when I try these formulas in Google
Spreadsheets, the results asymptotically approach 14%:

=RATE(10, 35, -250, 0) returns 0.06637326
=RATE(20, 35, -250, 0) returns 0.12724192
=RATE(30, 35, -250, 0) returns 0.13702841
=RATE(40, 35, -250, 0) returns 0.13923873
=RATE(50, 35, -250, 0) returns 0.13979829
=RATE(60, 35, -250, 0) returns 0.13994592
=RATE(70, 35, -250, 0) returns 0.13998544
=RATE(80, 35, -250, 0) returns 0.13999607
=RATE(90, 35, -250, 0) returns 0.13999894
=RATE(100, 35, -250, 0) returns 0.1371

When I try those formulas in LibreOffice, many of the answers are
nonsensical!

It would be better for LibreOffice to return an error than an incorrect
number!

--

[1] See formula in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_value_of_money#Present_value_of_a_perpetuity

[2] See explanation in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_value_of_money

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150956

Title:
  LibreOffice Calc's RATE function sometimes produces different results
  as some versions of MS Office

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1150956/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1150956]

2013-05-30 Thread F.H.
Christopher:

To see the results asymptotically approaching 0.14, increase the number
of periods, not the annuity payment (in other words, keep the annuity
payment at 35) -- i.e., =RATE([change this number],35,-250,0).

As I wrote above, returning an error is a *lot* better than returning
the wrong number, because the RATE() function is used only for financial
calculations.  When there's money on the line, a non-working spreadsheet
that reports an error is better than a working one that gives the user a
bad answer.

I would NOT have reported this bug if LibreOffice had returned an error.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150956

Title:
  LibreOffice Calc's RATE function sometimes produces different results
  as some versions of MS Office

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1150956/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1150956] Re: LibreOffice Calc's RATE function sometimes produces incorrect results!!!

2013-05-22 Thread F.H.
Christopher -- sure.  I just tried this on Google Drive's Spreadsheet
and on Microsoft Excel:

=RATE(50,35,-250,0)

The result in both cases is approximately 0.1398.

When I try the same formula in LibreOffice, I get a nonsensical answer.
(I sure hope no one out there is using this function to calculate
important financial figures!)  I'm using LibreOffice 3.5.7.2 Build ID:
350m1(Build:2) on Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit.

Hope this is helpful.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150956

Title:
  LibreOffice Calc's RATE function sometimes produces incorrect
  results!!!

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1150956/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1150956] Re: LibreOffice Calc's RATE function sometimes produces incorrect results!!!

2013-05-27 Thread F.H.
Christopher:

> What specific version of Excel?

Excel 2003 on a Windows XP VM under VirtualBox.  To get the answer, you
must enable iterative calculations, increase the number of iterations,
and lower the maximum change per iteration.  Otherwise you will get the
#NUM! error.

> Unfortunately, this was not a different, exact command

Try these, then:

=RATE(50,36,-250,0)
=RATE(50,37,-250,0)
=RATE(50,38,-250,0)
=RATE(50,39,-250,0)
=RATE(50,40,-250,0)

These RATE functions are supposed to return the internal rate of return
of investing -250 in exchange for receiving a recurring payiment of
respectively 36, 37, 38, 39, and 40 per period for a total of 50
periods, with no payment at the end.

LibreOffice returns a nonsensical answer in ALL of these cases!!!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150956

Title:
  LibreOffice Calc's RATE function sometimes produces incorrect
  results!!!

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1150956/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1150956] Re: LibreOffice Calc's RATE function sometimes produces incorrect results!!!

2013-05-27 Thread F.H.
PS. It would be a LOT better if LibreOffice returned a #NUM! error
instead of an incorrect number.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150956

Title:
  LibreOffice Calc's RATE function sometimes produces incorrect
  results!!!

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1150956/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1150956] Re: LibreOffice Calc's RATE function sometimes produces incorrect results!!!

2013-05-28 Thread F.H.
I really don't know what else to tell you...

Did you try them in Google Spreadsheets?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150956

Title:
  LibreOffice Calc's RATE function sometimes produces incorrect
  results!!!

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1150956/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1150956] Re: LibreOffice Calc's RATE function sometimes produces different results as some versions of MS Office

2013-05-28 Thread F.H.
Björn: thank you for upstreaming it.

Let me try and explain why LibreOffice returning -1.9474... as the
result of =RATE(50,35,-250,0) is really a *very* bad thing, and should
be marked as a CRITICAL bug.  I''ll try to provide an intuitive
explanation without delving into too much math.

Let's start with the simplest example.  If you invest $250 today in exchange 
for receiving an annual payment of $35 *forever in perpetuity*, your annual 
return will be 35/250 = 0.14, or 14%/year.  You can see that the formula for a 
perpetual annuity is Present Value = Annuity / Rate; hence Rate = Annuity / 
Present Value) in lots of websites.  Here's the Wikipedia page on it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_value_of_money#Present_value_of_a_perpetuity

Now imagine that instead of receiving the annual payments of $35 in
perpetuity, you will receive them only for a fixed number of years.  In
this case, your annual return will necessarily be lower than 14%/year.
The greater the number of years, the closer to 14%/year your annual rate
of return will be.  Specifically, your internal rate of return will
asymptotically approach 14%/year as the number of years during which you
will receive the annual payments increases to infinity.

This is ***EXACTLY*** what I get in other spreadsheet programs, but NOT
in LibreOffice.  IT'S MATH.  Since you guys are having problems with
Excel, try these formulas in Google Spreadsheets, and you will see how
the results asymptotically approach 14%:

RATE(10, 35, -250, 0)   returns 0.06637326
RATE(20, 35, -250, 0)   returns 0.12724192
RATE(30, 35, -250, 0)   returns 0.13702841
RATE(40, 35, -250, 0)   returns 0.13923873
RATE(50, 35, -250, 0)   returns 0.13979829
RATE(60, 35, -250, 0)   returns 0.13994592
RATE(70, 35, -250, 0)   returns 0.13998544
RATE(80, 35, -250, 0)   returns 0.13999607
RATE(90, 35, -250, 0)   returns 0.13999894
RATE(100, 35, -250, 0)   returns 0.1371

Then go and try those formulas in LibreOffice.

As I wrote before, returning an error would be a *LOT* better than the
wrong number!!!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150956

Title:
  LibreOffice Calc's RATE function sometimes produces different results
  as some versions of MS Office

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1150956/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1150956] Re: LibreOffice Calc's RATE function sometimes produces different results as some versions of MS Office

2013-05-28 Thread F.H.
Björn: will do.  Sorry if my comment was too long or had too much info.
Thank you so much for your help!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150956

Title:
  LibreOffice Calc's RATE function sometimes produces different results
  as some versions of MS Office

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1150956/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 800836] Re: Screen corruption upon login using dual monitors with Nvidia Twinview

2011-11-08 Thread F.H.
Bryce -- thank you.  I can confirm this is fixed in 11.10, which I'm
using exclusively now.  Please feel free to close this bug (I don't
think it would be right for me to do it, because it affects two other
people who may still be on 11.04).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800836

Title:
  Screen corruption upon login using dual monitors with Nvidia Twinview

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/800836/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs