[Bug 354029] [NEW] Brasero disk burning software fails disk copy complaining that the blank target CD is FULL
Public bug reported: Ubuntu Release 8.10 Kernel 2.6.27-11-generic GNOME 2.24.1 Brasero 0.8.2 Steps to reproduce 1. Insert Source CD 2. Select Disk Copy option 3. Wait for the Source CD to be copied and the tray to open 4. Replace the Source CD with a blank CD-R 5. An error indicating insufficient space will occur ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.8+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.2 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.27-11-generic i686 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Brasero disk burning software fails disk copy complaining that the blank target CD is FULL https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354029 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354029] Re: Brasero disk burning software fails disk copy complaining that the blank target CD is FULL
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24705405/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24705406/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24705408/profiles.ini.txt -- Brasero disk burning software fails disk copy complaining that the blank target CD is FULL https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354029 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354029] Re: Brasero disk burning software fails disk copy complaining that the blank target CD is FULL
BUG appears to have be fixed in Brasero 2.26.0 (jaunty 9.04 beta). Thanks -- Brasero disk burning software fails disk copy complaining that the blank target CD is FULL https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354029 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 354029] Re: Brasero disk burning software fails disk copy complaining that the blank target CD is FULL
Hi There, This bug appears to have been fixed in Brasero 2.26.0 (Jaunty 9.04 beta). Thanks Ernie On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Pedro Villavicencio wrote: > Thanks for your report, could you run brasero from the command line as: > brasero --debug &> brasero-debug.txt perform the operation to reproduce > the bug and attach the resulting file to the report?. May you also try > to reproduce the issue with Jaunty? are you using growisofs ? Thanks in > advance > > ** Package changed: ubuntu => brasero (Ubuntu) > > ** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu) > Importance: Undecided => Low > > ** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu) > Status: New => Incomplete > > ** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu) > Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) > > -- > Brasero disk burning software fails disk copy complaining that the blank > target CD is FULL > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354029 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in “brasero” source package in Ubuntu: Incomplete > > Bug description: > Ubuntu Release 8.10 > Kernel 2.6.27-11-generic > GNOME 2.24.1 > Brasero 0.8.2 > > Steps to reproduce > 1. Insert Source CD > 2. Select Disk Copy option > 3. Wait for the Source CD to be copied and the tray to open > 4. Replace the Source CD with a blank CD-R > 5. An error indicating insufficient space will occur > > ProblemType: Bug > Architecture: i386 > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 > Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.8+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.2 > ProcEnviron: > > PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games > LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 > SHELL=/bin/bash > SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 > Uname: Linux 2.6.27-11-generic i686 > -- Brasero disk burning software fails disk copy complaining that the blank target CD is FULL https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354029 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355996] [NEW] Power Management FAILS most of the time
Public bug reported: Ubuntu Release 8.10 Kernel 2.6.27-11 (generic) GNOME 2.24.1 Power Management FAILS to perform as expected MOST of the time because it is overly concerned about CPU cycles. It would be quite useful to have a check box which would instruct both screensaver and power management to IGNORE CPU utilization and shut of the screen as directed. This problem also exists in the 9.04 beta. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp Package: yelp 2.24.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux 2.6.27-11-generic i686 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Power Management FAILS most of the time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355996] Re: Power Management FAILS most of the time
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24851748/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24851749/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24851750/ProcStatus.txt -- Power Management FAILS most of the time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351786] [NEW] no DEFAULT (no user logged on) screensaver or power management options
Public bug reported: Ubuntu Release 8.10 Kernel 2.6.27-11 GNOME 2.24.1 I have not been able to find a way to specify DEFAULT (no user logged on) screen saver or power management options. Either the functionality existed and is POORLY documents or it should be provided. Eliminating this issue would make it easier for me to UPGRADE windoze users in my circle of influence to a better OS. Thanks in advance ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.8+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.2 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.27-11-generic i686 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- no DEFAULT (no user logged on) screensaver or power management options https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351786] Re: no DEFAULT (no user logged on) screensaver or power management options
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24536089/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24536090/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24536093/profiles.ini.txt -- no DEFAULT (no user logged on) screensaver or power management options https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352549] Re: VLC prevents power manager from working properly when a wmv movie has been paused
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24584040/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24584041/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24584042/profiles.ini.txt -- VLC prevents power manager from working properly when a wmv movie has been paused https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352549 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352549] [NEW] VLC prevents power manager from working properly when a wmv movie has been paused
Public bug reported: VLC media player 0.9.4 Grishenko Unbuntu Release 8.10 Linux Kernel 2.6.27-11 GNOME 2.24.1 Launch VLC to play a wmv movie, then pause it. VLC continues to suck up so many cpu cycles that the power manager is tricked into believing the the system is not idle and does not perform as expected. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.8+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.2 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.27-11-generic i686 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- VLC prevents power manager from working properly when a wmv movie has been paused https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352549 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 484392] Re: vlc disabled sleep mode and don't enabled it back
Once I execute VLC, the problem starts. In my case, VLC did NOT crash, but was terminated by the user. -- vlc disabled sleep mode and don't enabled it back https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484392 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 487318] Re: Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive 2009-11-23
** Attachment added: ".etc.fstab.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989158/.etc.fstab.txt ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989160/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989162/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989163/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "DevkitDisksDump.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989164/DevkitDisksDump.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989165/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989167/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: "Mounts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989168/Mounts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989169/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989170/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989171/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989172/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989173/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989174/XsessionErrors.txt -- Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive 2009-11-23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 487318] [NEW] Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive 2009-11-23
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: devicekit-disks Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA drive 9.04-rtm recognizes second and third SATA drives, displays proper label for each and allows me to mount following authorization. This problem did not manifest in 8.10 or 9.04. However, it is very obvious in 9.10 Betas and rtm. 9.10-rtm incorrectly displays drive size and the fact that it contains and extended partition as the label. Something like 620 GB Extended. A time-out error occurs a short while after authorization has been completed. karmic-desktop-i386 2009-10-20_2325.iso was downloaded using 9.04. Unetbootin was used on 9.04 to create an installation USB. All three SATA drives are attached to the same controller. All three drives function properly under 9.04-rtm. Only the first SATA drive functions properly under 9.10-rtm. Someone had to be exhausted for this to be overlooked in a sanity check. The partition used for the 9.10-rtm install was formatted as Ext3 during the installation. The failure, which is 100% repeatable, occurred following the initial install and also after completion of the update process earlier this evening. Also, the Removable Media menu entry disappears following the upgrade from the initial install and all partitions are listed under places. FYI also reproduced this problem via Kernel Linux 2.6.31-15-generic-pae GNOME 2.28.1 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Nov 23 13:50:51 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) MachineType: System manufacturer P5Q-E NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: devicekit-disks 007-2ubuntu3 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-15-generic-pae root=UUID=de2a0f92-4052-4432-ab89-ace479dbdb42 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-15.50-generic-pae SourcePackage: devicekit-disks Symptom: storage Uname: Linux 2.6.31-15-generic-pae i686 dmi.bios.date: 04/06/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 2101 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: P5Q-E dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr2101:bd04/06/2009:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnP5Q-E:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP5Q-E:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: P5Q-E dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer ** Affects: devicekit-disks (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive 2009-11-23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 487317] Re: Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive 2009-11-23
** Attachment added: ".etc.fstab.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989140/.etc.fstab.txt ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989141/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989142/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989144/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "DevkitDisksDump.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989145/DevkitDisksDump.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989146/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989147/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: "Mounts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989148/Mounts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989149/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989150/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989151/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989152/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989153/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989154/XsessionErrors.txt -- Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive 2009-11-23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 487317] [NEW] Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive 2009-11-23
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: devicekit-disks Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA drive 9.04-rtm recognizes second and third SATA drives, displays proper label for each and allows me to mount following authorization. This problem did not manifest in 8.10 or 9.04. However, it is very obvious in 9.10 Betas and rtm. 9.10-rtm incorrectly displays drive size and the fact that it contains and extended partition as the label. Something like 620 GB Extended. A time-out error occurs a short while after authorization has been completed. karmic-desktop-i386 2009-10-20_2325.iso was downloaded using 9.04. Unetbootin was used on 9.04 to create an installation USB. All three SATA drives are attached to the same controller. All three drives function properly under 9.04-rtm. Only the first SATA drive functions properly under 9.10-rtm. Someone had to be exhausted for this to be overlooked in a sanity check. The partition used for the 9.10-rtm install was formatted as Ext3 during the installation. The failure, which is 100% repeatable, occurred following the initial install and also after completion of the update process earlier this evening. Also, the Removable Media menu entry disappears following the upgrade from the initial install and all partitions are listed under places. FYI also reproduced this problem via Kernel Linux 2.6.31-15-generic-pae GNOME 2.28.1 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Nov 23 13:50:51 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) MachineType: System manufacturer P5Q-E NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: devicekit-disks 007-2ubuntu3 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-15-generic-pae root=UUID=de2a0f92-4052-4432-ab89-ace479dbdb42 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-15.50-generic-pae SourcePackage: devicekit-disks Symptom: storage Uname: Linux 2.6.31-15-generic-pae i686 dmi.bios.date: 04/06/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 2101 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: P5Q-E dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr2101:bd04/06/2009:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnP5Q-E:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP5Q-E:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: P5Q-E dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer ** Affects: devicekit-disks (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive 2009-11-23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 487318] Re: Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive 2009-11-23
Although I have 3 SATA drives which are attached to the same controller, the third is in a separate drive enclosure and may have been powered down when I reported this bug. The problem with the third drive was included because a bug had been reported in 8.04, I think, that affected ONLY the second drive and I wanted to indicate that this problem affects any physical drive except the first one on this controller. It is highly unlikely that this is a hardware/BIOS issue because all of my drives work correctly when I boot 9.04 which is also located on the first drive. If I need to change the title or anything else in this report to facilitate getting the problem resolved, please indicate what I should do. -- Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive 2009-11-23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 487318] Re: Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive 2009-11-23
The problem reported above of not being able to mount/access the second or third SATA hard drives which are attached to the same controller has been resolved via the following procedure: 1.Remove all partitions from the first SATA drive. 2.Set BIOS to Enhanced IDE. 3.Install XP-sp2. The install procedure will blue screen if it discovers that AHCI mode was enabled, so IDE mode was required to get past that Microshaft foolishness. 4.Set BIOS to AHCI to allow the controller to do what it was designed to do. 5.Using XP, delete all logical drives from the extended partition on the second SATA drive. 6.Using XP, delete the extended partition on the second SATA drive. 7.Using XP, create an extended partition on the second SATA drive. 8.Using XP, create a logical drive on the extended partition on the second SATA hard drive. 9.Using XP, format that logical drive. I chose 16k but cluster size should not be important, the default for NTFS could have been used. 10.Restore data to the logical drive from where it was backed up. 11.Repeat the steps used on the second SATA hard drive on the third SATA hard drive. 12.Navigate to Places and Removable Media in Ubuntu 9.10 13.Observe the Labels on the second and third SATA drives assigned by the format process. 14.Provide credentials and access each of those drives. Apparently the NTFS processing in 9.10 is more thorough concerning the Microshaft NTFS specification than XP-sp2. Please mark this bug report closed. XP-sp2 improperly created/formatted the sole logical drive in the extended partition of each of the suspect SATA hard drives. -- Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive 2009-11-23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 480969] [NEW] Ubuntu 9.10 Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-11
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA drive. Hibernate 9.10 via menu option then wait for a complete shutdown. Push power button. During power-up observe message concerning waking up. Select 9.04 from the Grub menu, Wait for the login prompt then login. Restart and then select 9.10. Notice that a normal 9.10 Cold Start has been executed. The 9.10 condition prior to hibernation has been LOST. Hibernation SHOULD be associated with a given OS not merely with a power-cycle. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Nov 11 14:07:25 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: yelp 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-15.50-generic-pae SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux 2.6.31-15-generic-pae i686 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:1833): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:1833): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (nautilus:1934): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1954): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed ** Affects: yelp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Ubuntu 9.10 Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480969 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 480969] Re: Ubuntu 9.10 Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-11
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35551282/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35551283/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35551284/ProcStatus.txt -- Ubuntu 9.10 Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480969 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 480969] Re: Ubuntu 9.10 Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-11
FYI - This should not matter, but the PC manifesting the failure is a desktop. -- Ubuntu 9.10 Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480969 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 481013] [NEW] NVIDIA 9500gt - Ubuntu 9.10 Screensaver Fails to Activate 2009-11-11
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA drive. NVIDIA 9500gt video card. Screensaver fails to activate although test modes operate correctly. Either Suspend and Hibenate can each be successfully executed via the panel menu which suggests that the environment can execute either. This could be caused by a problem with the video card, it's driver or the OS. I don't have an environment in which I can easily make that determination. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Nov 11 15:09:49 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: yelp 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-15.50-generic-pae SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux 2.6.31-15-generic-pae i686 ** Affects: yelp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- NVIDIA 9500gt - Ubuntu 9.10 Screensaver Fails to Activate 2009-11-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481013 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 481013] Re: NVIDIA 9500gt - Ubuntu 9.10 Screensaver Fails to Activate 2009-11-11
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35553005/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35553007/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35553008/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35553009/XsessionErrors.txt -- NVIDIA 9500gt - Ubuntu 9.10 Screensaver Fails to Activate 2009-11-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481013 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 481013] Re: NVIDIA 9500gt - Ubuntu 9.10 Screensaver Fails to Activate 2009-11-11
After a reboot, the screensaver did activate. However, the LCD display did not appear to fully turn off when it should have. I expected it to enter the no-signal low power state where the power light would turn amber. It never reached this state although it did go blank. In addition, 9.10 was never put to sleep. I was able to see the failures to turn the LCD display off properly followed by failure to sleep, by waiting the indicated times (3min for screensaver, 5min for turn off of LCD display and 10min more for OS sleep) after logging on. -- NVIDIA 9500gt - Ubuntu 9.10 Screensaver Fails to Activate 2009-11-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481013 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 481013] Re: NVIDIA 9500gt - Ubuntu 9.10 Screensaver Fails to Activate 2009-11-11
Nvidia 9500gt card will NOT function properly with generic Ubuntu drivers. Having been spoiled because Ubuntu has done such a great job with hardware interaction, I failed to notice that this problem was associated with use of generic drivers. Executed a clean reinstall of 9.10 Upgraded to Kernel 2.6.31-15 (default upgrade) 2009-11-15 Installed recommended Nvidia driver (185) Executed gconf-editor via Alt+F2 Changed apps gnome-power-manager actions sleep_type_ac from suspend to hibernate Screensaver, suspend and hibernate each function correctly on my desktop computer. Please close this issue – User Error. -- NVIDIA 9500gt - Ubuntu 9.10 Screensaver Fails to Activate 2009-11-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481013 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 482835] Re: Ubuntu 9.10 P5Q-E Sata300 Tx4 AHCI Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-14
Nvidia 9500gt card will NOT function properly with generic Ubuntu drivers. Having been spoiled because Ubuntu has done such a great job with hardware interaction, I failed to notice that this problem was associated with use of generic drivers. Executed a clean reinstall of 9.10 Upgraded to Kernel 2.6.31-15 (default upgrade) 2009-11-15 Installed recommended Nvidia driver (185) Executed gconf-editor via Alt+F2 Changed apps gnome-power-manager actions sleep_type_ac from suspend to hibernate Screensaver, suspend and hibernate each function correctly on my desktop computer. Please close this issue – User Error. -- Ubuntu 9.10 P5Q-E Sata300 Tx4 AHCI Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-14 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355996] Re: Power Management FAILS most of the time
This is still and issue with 9.10 and 10.04 b2 (lucid- desktop-i386_2010-04-12_0812). The screensaver should care about USER inactivity while powersave should also be concerned with system activity. A diff of two hard drives that contain more than 200 GBs each will take quite some time. Powersave should not kick in during this process but the screensaver should work as configured by the user. This will require two separate notions of inactivity, one for the screensaver only and one for both powersave and the screensaver. Shutdown, NOT suspend should be the default action when the power button is pushed. There are many cases when a hung system can only be addressed by removing power or forcing a shutdown. Shutting a hung system via the power button will do less harm that simpply removing power. Finally, hibernate and NOT suspend should be the powersave default because data will be lost during suspend if power is lost. -- Power Management FAILS most of the time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 562743] [NEW] Return From Hibernate Problem
Public bug reported: Left-click on power icon and select Hibernate. Respond to confirmation prompt. After PC powers down, turn power on. No indication of returning from hibernation, just a blinking cursor that can be moved down a line via the enter key. Following full return from hibernation, the screensaver will be active. UNFORTUNATELY, the default screensaver is a blank screen which would lead a casual observer to believe that the system is DEAD. Changing the default screensaver to GLText would solve this problem. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gnome (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-20.30-generic-pae 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-20-generic-pae i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Apr 13 20:10:39 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100412) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: meta-gnome2 ** Affects: meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- Return From Hibernate Problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562743 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 562748] [NEW] Suspend rather than Hibernate is the Default
Public bug reported: Shutdown, NOT suspend should be the Default action when the power button is pushed. There are many cases when a hung system can only be addressed by removing power or forcing a shutdown. Shutting a hung system down via the power button will do less harm that simply removing power. Finally, hibernate and NOT suspend should be the Power Management default because data will be lost during suspend if power is lost. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gnome (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-20.30-generic-pae 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-20-generic-pae i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Apr 13 20:19:23 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100412) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: meta-gnome2 ** Affects: meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- Suspend rather than Hibernate is the Default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 562755] [NEW] A single Screen-Saver/Power Management algorithm fails boundary conditions
Public bug reported: The screensaver should care about USER inactivity while powersave should ALSO be concerned with system activity. A diff of two hard drives that contain more than 200 GBs each will take quite some time. Powersave should not kick in during this process but the Screen-Saver should work as configured by the user. This will require two separate notions of inactivity, one for the Screen-Saver only and one for both Power Management and the Screen-Saver. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gnome (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-20.30-generic-pae 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-20-generic-pae i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Apr 13 20:30:26 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100412) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: meta-gnome2 ** Affects: meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- A single Screen-Saver/Power Management algorithm fails boundary conditions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562755 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 460201] Re: cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive
Please CLOSE this bug report. This problem was associated with some corruption of the filesystems on my hard drive. Removing and recreating partitions caused the problem reported to vanish. My Bad! -- cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460201 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 562807] Re: VLC Inhibits power management daemon when option UNCHECKED
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44121333/Dependencies.txt -- VLC Inhibits power management daemon when option UNCHECKED https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 562807] [NEW] VLC Inhibits power management daemon when option UNCHECKED
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vlc Change VLC power management interaction from default by unchecking Inhibit the power management daemon during playback. Observe that power management is inhibited although it should NOT be This problem has been reported but unaddressed since at least 9.04 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: vlc 1.0.5-2ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-20.30-generic-pae 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-20-generic-pae i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Apr 13 23:37:32 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100412) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: vlc ** Affects: vlc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- VLC Inhibits power management daemon when option UNCHECKED https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 562807] Re: VLC Inhibits power management daemon when option UNCHECKED
Unconditionally disabling the privacy/security provided by the Screen- Saver simply because VLC has been invoked, but is not being used to show a video, will GUARANTEE that Ubuntu will NEVER be accepted for use in the EXPLODING health-care industry. Hasn't anyone heard of HIPAA? -- VLC Inhibits power management daemon when option UNCHECKED https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548952] Re: gnome-nettool crashed with SIGSEGV in on_ping_graph_expose()
My hardware is Intel-based (e8500). Traceroute works OK. -- gnome-nettool crashed with SIGSEGV in on_ping_graph_expose() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 562807] Re: VLC Inhibits power management daemon when option UNCHECKED
Preparation 1.Set Screen-Save timeout to one minute. 2.Uncheck default inhibit Power Management in VLC. 3.Play media. 4.Pause playback. 5.Screen-Save and perhaps Power Management will be inhibited. Unexpected behavior. 6.Note, normal behavior when VLC playback is stopped or VLC is terminated. Check inhibit Power Management 1.Play media. 2.Stop playback. 3.Exit VLC 4.Screen-Save and perhaps Power Management will be inhibited. Unexpected behavior. 5.Start VLC and uncheck inhibit Power Management. 6.Exit VLC. 7.Screen-Save and perhaps Power Management will be inhibited. Unexpected behavior. Force return to normal behavior 1.Reboot. Dbus-Monitor Output: ag...@aguru-07-1004:~$ dbus-monitor signal sender=org.freedesktop.DBus -> dest=:1.96 serial=2 path=/org/freedesktop/DBus; interface=org.freedesktop.DBus; member=NameAcquired string ":1.96" method call sender=:1.96 -> dest=org.freedesktop.DBus serial=3 path=/org/freedesktop/DBus; interface=org.freedesktop.DBus; member=AddMatch string "type='method_call'" method call sender=:1.96 -> dest=org.freedesktop.DBus serial=4 path=/org/freedesktop/DBus; interface=org.freedesktop.DBus; member=AddMatch string "type='method_return'" method call sender=:1.96 -> dest=org.freedesktop.DBus serial=5 path=/org/freedesktop/DBus; interface=org.freedesktop.DBus; member=AddMatch string "type='error'" ^C ag...@aguru-07-1004:~$ -- VLC Inhibits power management daemon when option UNCHECKED https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 477425] [NEW] Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA drive 9.04-rtm recognizes second and third SATA drives, displays proper label for each and allows me to mount following authorization. This problem did not manifest in 8.10 or 9.04. However, it is very obvious in 9.10 Betas and rtm. 9.10-rtm incorrectly displays drive size and the fact that it contains and extended partition as the label. Something like 620 GB Extended. A time-out error occurs a short while after authorization has been completed. karmic-desktop-i386 2009-10-20_2325.iso was downloaded using 9.04. Unetbootin was used on 9.04 to create an installation USB. All three SATA drives are attached to the same controller. All three drives function properly under 9.04-rtm. Only the first SATA drive functions properly under 9.10-rtm. Someone had to be exhausted for this to be overlooked in a sanity check. The partition used for the 9.10-rtm install was formatted as Ext3 during the installation. The failure, which is 100% repeatable, occurred following the initial install and also after completion of the update process earlier this evening. Also, the Removable Media menu entry disappears following the upgrade from the initial install and all partitions are listed under places. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Nov 7 05:21:48 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: yelp 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic-pae SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic-pae i686 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:1888): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:1888): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:2007): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (nautilus:1988): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed ** Affects: yelp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477425 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 477425] Re: Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35310366/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35310367/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35310371/ProcStatus.txt -- Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477425 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 477425] Re: Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive
After executing the try Ubuntu-9.10 option from the LiveCD, I cannot access a second or third SATA drive. Symptoms seem identical to those described above. Functionality that worked correctly in 8.10 and 9.04 got broken in 9.10. -- Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477425 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 477789] [NEW] Ubuntu 9.10 Firefox HANGS!
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp This failure can occur if Firefox has windows open, even if the user is not directly interacting with any of them. One failure occurred while interacting with Places, but it usually occurs during interaction with a Firefox window. This failure has not occurred when only a single Firefox window is open. In 9.04, this could happen a few times a month. In 9.10, this failure seems to occur several times in a given week. When this failure occurs, power cycling or use of Ctrl-Alt-Backspace will be required to reset the system. Unfortunately, power cycling is sometimes the only way to reset the system when this failure occurs. My shared (XP/Ubuntu) data partition is formatted NTFS. That partition was trashed when this failure occurred before I had configured the X-window restart key sequence because a large 4GB file transfer was interrupted by power cycling. However, that data partition would probably have been trashed had it been formatted Ext3. Lesson learned. Execute large file transfers using XP until this failure gets corrected. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Nov 7 12:36:23 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: yelp 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic-pae SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic-pae i686 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:1906): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:1906): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (nautilus:2004): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:2027): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed ** Affects: yelp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Ubuntu 9.10 Firefox HANGS! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 477789] Re: Ubuntu 9.10 Firefox HANGS!
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35330414/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35330415/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35330416/ProcStatus.txt -- Ubuntu 9.10 Firefox HANGS! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 477425] Re: Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive
FYI Just reproduced this problem via Kernel Linux 2.6.31-15-generic-pae GNOME 2.28.1 -- Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477425 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 460201] Re: cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive
FYI The problem also occurs after installing karmic-desktop-i386 2009-10-26_1409. I forgot to mention that the Removable Media menu entry disappears following the upgrade from the initial install and all partitions are listed under places. -- cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460201 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 460201] Re: cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive
Do you REALLY want the windoze groupies to point out this problem AFTER 9.10 is released? -- cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460201 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 502884] [NEW] Ubuntu-910 VLC Inhibits Power Management 2009-01-04
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp 1.VLC Inhibits Power Management even when the CHECKBOX, Inhibit the power management daemon during playback, is unchecked. 2.A reboot is required to get power management to again function properly. VLC 1.0.2-1ubuntu2.1 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Jan 4 02:06:09 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: yelp 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-17.54-generic-pae SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux 2.6.31-17-generic-pae i686 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:1902): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:1902): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (nautilus:1997): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:2013): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (gnome-panel:1996): Gtk-WARNING **: gtk_widget_size_allocate(): attempt to allocate widget with width -5 and height 24 ** Affects: yelp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Ubuntu-910 VLC Inhibits Power Management 2009-01-04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502884 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 502884] Re: Ubuntu-910 VLC Inhibits Power Management 2009-01-04
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37402981/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37402982/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37402983/ProcStatus.txt -- Ubuntu-910 VLC Inhibits Power Management 2009-01-04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502884 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 482835] [NEW] Ubuntu 9.10 P5Q-E Sata300 Tx4 AHCI Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-14
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp Triple boot desktop system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA drive. Ubuntu 9.10 was installed via LiveCD with BIOS set to AHCI. Hibernate 9.10 via menu option then wait for power-down. Push power button. During power-up, observe message concerning waking up. A short while later, this screen will be redisplayed and then the computer will freeze requiring a power-cycle to get it going. It appears that after this power-cycle, a cold rather than a return-from-hibernation restart was executed and the condition of the system prior to hibernation was not restored. Suspend and Hibernation will each function correctly when executed from the menu in 9.04, which was installed with BIOS set to Enhanced IDE although the BIOS was set to AHCI when I last tested those functions and observed correct operation. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Nov 14 14:21:07 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) Package: yelp 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic-pae SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic-pae i686 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:1810): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:1810): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1910): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (nautilus:1869): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed (yelp:2302): Yelp-WARNING **: Failed to load config file: No such file or directory ** Affects: yelp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Ubuntu 9.10 P5Q-E Sata300 Tx4 AHCI Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-14 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 482835] Re: Ubuntu 9.10 P5Q-E Sata300 Tx4 AHCI Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-14
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35699380/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35699381/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35699382/ProcStatus.txt -- Ubuntu 9.10 P5Q-E Sata300 Tx4 AHCI Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-14 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 460201] [NEW] cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-Beta, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA drive 9.04-rtm recognizes second and third SATA drives, displays proper label for each and allows me to mount following authorization. 9.10-Beta incorrectly displays drive size and the fact that it contains and extended partition as the label. Something like 620 GB Extended. A time-out error occurs a short while after authorization has been completed. karmic-desktop-i386 2009-10-20_2325.iso was downloaded using 9.04. Unetbootin was used on 9.04 to create an installation USB. All three SATA drives are attached to the same controller. All three drives function properly under 9.04-rtm. Only the first SATA drive functions properly under 9.10-Beta. Someone had to be exhausted for this to be overlooked in a sanity check. The partition used for the 9.10-Beta install was formatted as Ext3 during the installation. The failure occurred following the initial install and also after completion of the update process earlier this evening. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Oct 24 21:11:45 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release Candidate i386 (20091020.3) Package: yelp 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686 ** Affects: yelp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460201 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 460201] Re: cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34346084/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34346085/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34346086/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34346087/XsessionErrors.txt -- cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460201 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 460201] Re: cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive
Shades of VISTA! After executing the try Ubuntu-9.10 option from the LiveCD, I cannot access a second or third SATA drive. This VISTA-like quality could do a lot to alienate someone who tries to install 9.10 on a second hard drive. Looks like I will have to hang onto 9.04 for a while. -- cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460201 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1133663] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders
** Attachment added: "file-roller 3.8.4 changes.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+attachment/3801755/+files/file-roller%203.8.4%20changes.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133663 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1133663] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders
Please re-open this bug. I tested using a recent 13.10 and file-roller 3.9.90 and observed that extract here fails to delay directory restore causing EVERY non-empty extracted folder to assume the date/time of extraction. I will attempt to attach a screenshot of the relevant portion of the GNOME file-roller 3.8.4 change log and a screenshot of a terminal window indicating stats on the OS in use, an ls -al of the iso used to install the OS and the current file-roller version. ** Attachment added: "file-roller 3.9.90.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+attachment/3801753/+files/file-roller%203.9.90.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133663 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1133663] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders
** Attachment added: "file-roller 3.9.90.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+attachment/3801754/+files/file-roller%203.9.90.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133663 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1133663] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders
Another data point. In addition to failing via the right click extract here menu, the CLI file-roller -h command produces the same failure. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133663 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1222166] [NEW] Grub2 failed to install GPT bootloader 1310
Public bug reported: Installation from 2013-09_05 amd64 iso failed to install a bootloader on a GPT disk. grub-install /dev/sdc works correctly from installed 12.04 and 13.04 Perhaps the installation process has failed to detect a GPT disk and is attempting to function as it would with MBR format. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: ubiquity 2.15.16 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-4.9-generic 3.11.0-rc7 Uname: Linux 3.11.0-4-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.12.1-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.336 Date: Sat Sep 7 07:39:24 2013 InstallCmdLine: noprompt cdrom-detect/try-usb=true file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash -- maybe-ubiquity LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 13.10 "Saucy Salamander" - Alpha amd64 (20130905) MarkForUpload: True ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: grub-installer UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: grub-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug saucy ubiquity-2.15.16 ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1222166 Title: Grub2 failed to install GPT bootloader 1310 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1222166/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1133107] Re: Hidden Microsoft ULA when installing Ubuntu Restricted Extras
BROKEN in 64-bit 1310 3.11.0-5-generic #11-Ubuntu SMP Fri Sep 6 19:01:31 UTC 2013 Question mark is displayed in the launcher but the installation "appears" to be hung. Someone unfamiliar with Unity might miss the question mark due to the ABUNDANCE of clutter. EVERY partition on the drive containing the OS is locked to the launcher with no way to turn that behavior off. What Ph.D on his FIRST work assignment designed that behavior? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133107 Title: Hidden Microsoft ULA when installing Ubuntu Restricted Extras To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1133107/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1298188] Re: Software Center KAPUT on or about 2014-03_12
** Attachment added: "BUG_SoftwareCenter_ChromeInstall_2014-03-25 21:41:05.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1298188/+attachment/4045973/+files/BUG_SoftwareCenter_ChromeInstall_2014-03-25%2021%3A41%3A05.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1298188 Title: Software Center KAPUT on or about 2014-03_12 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1298188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1298188] Re: Software Center KAPUT on or about 2014-03_12
** Attachment added: "BUG_SoftwareCenter_UbuntuRestrictedInstall_After failed Chrome_2014-03-25 21:56:32.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1298188/+attachment/4045975/+files/BUG_SoftwareCenter_UbuntuRestrictedInstall_After%20failed%20Chrome_2014-03-25%2021%3A56%3A32.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1298188 Title: Software Center KAPUT on or about 2014-03_12 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1298188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1298188] Re: Software Center KAPUT on or about 2014-03_12
** Attachment added: "BUG_SoftwareCenter_GpartedInstall_After failed Chrome_2014-03-25 21:53:52.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1298188/+attachment/4045976/+files/BUG_SoftwareCenter_GpartedInstall_After%20failed%20Chrome_2014-03-25%2021%3A53%3A52.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1298188 Title: Software Center KAPUT on or about 2014-03_12 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1298188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1298188] [NEW] Software Center KAPUT on or about 2014-03_12
Public bug reported: Software Center correctly installed the following programs when executed following the 64-bit 2014-03_11.iso Desktop Installation (3.13.0-16-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 4 23:02:40 UTC 2014): 1. Ubuntu Restricted Extras 2. Google Chrome Debian install 3. GParted 4. VLC 5. Unetbootin Software Center will hang if the first program installed is Ubuntu Restricted Extras. This bug manifests in every install after 2014-03_11 that I tested including the 2014-03_25 iso. Software Center will fail with a Package operation failed error when a Google Chorme Debian install is attempted. After that an attempt to install Ubuntu Restricted Extras or GParted would fail with the same error. Note, if the first program installed was GParted rather than Google Chrome or Unbuntu Restricted Extras, the GParted installation would be successful. Knowing the approximate date that the failure was introduced should help. Also, I am somewhat concerned that usability regression testing may not catch this because the problem manifests differently depending upon which program is installed first. Finally, if I install from 2014-03-11 and then update to (3.13.0-19-generic #40-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 24 02:36:06 UTC 2014) the failures described above will occur. ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1298188 Title: Software Center KAPUT on or about 2014-03_12 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1298188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1298188] Re: Software Center KAPUT on or about 2014-03_12
** Attachment added: "BUG_SofwareCenter_OnlyInstall_UbuntuRestricted_2014-03-25 22:08:08.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1298188/+attachment/4045972/+files/BUG_SofwareCenter_OnlyInstall_UbuntuRestricted_2014-03-25%2022%3A08%3A08.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1298188 Title: Software Center KAPUT on or about 2014-03_12 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1298188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1290228] Re: (14.04) Unable to install external deb packages "Package operation Failed"
Software Center correctly installed the following programs when executed following the 64-bit 2014-03_11.iso Desktop Installation (3.13.0-16-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 4 23:02:40 UTC 2014): 1. Ubuntu Restricted Extras 2. Google Chrome Debian install 3. GParted 4. VLC 5. Unetbootin Software Center will hang if the first program installed is Ubuntu Restricted Extras. This bug manifests in every install after 2014-03_11 that I tested including the 2014-03_25 iso. Software Center will fail with a Package operation failed error when a Google Chrome Debian install is attempted. After that an attempt to install Ubuntu Restricted Extras or GParted would fail with the same error. Note, if the first program installed was GParted rather than Google Chrome or Unbuntu Restricted Extras, the GParted installation would be successful. Knowing the approximate date that the failure was introduced should help. Also, I am somewhat concerned that usability regression testing may not catch this because the problem manifests differently depending upon which program is installed first. Finally, if I install from 2014-03-11 and then update to (3.13.0-19-generic #40-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 24 02:36:06 UTC 2014) the failures described above will occur. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290228 Title: (14.04) Unable to install external deb packages "Package operation Failed" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/software-center/+bug/1290228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292099] Re: Ubuntu 14.04 will not install Google Chrome through Ubuntu Software Center
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1290228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290228 Software Center correctly installed the following programs when executed following the 64-bit 2014-03_11.iso Desktop Installation (3.13.0-16-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 4 23:02:40 UTC 2014): 1. Ubuntu Restricted Extras 2. Google Chrome Debian install 3. GParted 4. VLC 5. Unetbootin Software Center will hang if the first program installed is Ubuntu Restricted Extras. This bug manifests in every install after 2014-03_11 that I tested including the 2014-03_25 iso. Software Center will fail with a Package operation failed error when a Google Chrome Debian install is attempted. After that an attempt to install Ubuntu Restricted Extras or GParted would fail with the same error. Note, if the first program installed was GParted rather than Google Chrome or Unbuntu Restricted Extras, the GParted installation would be successful. Knowing the approximate date that the failure was introduced should help. Also, I am somewhat concerned that usability regression testing may not catch this because the problem manifests differently depending upon which program is installed first. Finally, if I install from 2014-03-11 and then update to (3.13.0-19-generic #40-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 24 02:36:06 UTC 2014) the failures described above will occur. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292099 Title: Ubuntu 14.04 will not install Google Chrome through Ubuntu Software Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1292099/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1299749] [NEW] E4defrag fails to restore parent directory timestamp after defragmenting a file in that directory
Public bug reported: The effect of this bug is quite similar to the one the was reported via bug 1133663 ”Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders”. Directions to reproduce follow: 1. Create a tar.bz2 archive of a directory containing a fragmented file. One such file might be the 64-bit debian download of google-chrome-stable. 2. Extract that archive to a temporary location that is not on the same partition. 3. Consume some time, a few minutes will do. 4. E4defrag the partition. 5. Observe that the directory timestamp indicates the time that the file was defragmented. The original timestamp was not restored. The --delay-directory-restore flag got the job done for Extract Here. Might there be something similar for e4defrag? ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299749 Title: E4defrag fails to restore parent directory timestamp after defragmenting a file in that directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1299749/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1299935] [NEW] Login screen fails to adhere to (System Settings) Brightness & Lock configuration
Public bug reported: The Login screen will be displayed and the screen will never go blank under any of the following conditions: 1. Following a cold (power on) boot. 2. Following a warm (restart) boot. 3. Following detection of mouse movement or keyboard input when the screen was locked. This problem can be reproduced 100% of the time using an installation the 64-bit iso (2014-03_11 07:51) updated to 3.13.0-20-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 28 09:56:33 UTC 2014. The first two conditions are not new but the third appears to have been introduced when the unlock dialogue was replaced with the Login screen. ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299935 Title: Login screen fails to adhere to (System Settings) Brightness & Lock configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1299935/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1200898] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_free1()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1196063 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196063 ??? Could not find related bug 1196063. Was the bug number mistyped? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1200898 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_free1() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1200898/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1195874] Re: indicator-datetime-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
Is it too early in the development cycle to expect to be able to execute an installation without experiencing errors? How can a Beta be released in a few days when I get this error at the beginning of a USB install of the amd 64-bit desktop timestamped 2013-09-02 08:17? 1. I could NOT get the CD creator in 13.04 to complete without throwing an error, so I used 12.04.3 to reformat the usb and change it into a bootable device using the iso mentioned above. 2. Booted 3. Selected install Ubuntu 3. Checked the two boxes then OK 4. Waited a short while was greeted with this message -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195874 Title: indicator-datetime-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-datetime/+bug/1195874/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1195874] Re: indicator-datetime-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
Missed a step in the prior post, setting the timezone to usa Los Angeles This time: 1. Booted USB 2. Set timezone 3. Selected Install Unbuntu 4. ERROR -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195874 Title: indicator-datetime-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-datetime/+bug/1195874/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1290228] Re: (14.04) Unable to install external deb packages "Package operation Failed"
Could not figure out how to add multiple screenshots, so here is another one. ** Attachment added: "BUG_Google Chrome 64bit Debian install_A03g1404-0402 3.13.0-21-generic #43-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 31 22:52:24 UTC 2014__2014-04-03 01:36:18.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1290228/+attachment/4062498/+files/BUG_Google%20Chrome%2064bit%20Debian%20install_A03g1404-0402%203.13.0-21-generic%20%2343-Ubuntu%20SMP%20Mon%20Mar%2031%2022%3A52%3A24%20UTC%202014__2014-04-03%2001%3A36%3A18.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290228 Title: (14.04) Unable to install external deb packages "Package operation Failed" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/software-center/+bug/1290228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1290228] Re: (14.04) Unable to install external deb packages "Package operation Failed"
This "Critical" but "Unassigned" bug continues to manifest as described in comment #19. I will add the first screenshot here. ** Attachment added: "BUG_Ubuntu Restricted Extras_A03g1404-0402 3.13.0-21-generic #43-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 31 22:52:24 UTC 2014_2014-04-03 01:25:50.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1290228/+attachment/4062497/+files/BUG_Ubuntu%20Restricted%20Extras_A03g1404-0402%203.13.0-21-generic%20%2343-Ubuntu%20SMP%20Mon%20Mar%2031%2022%3A52%3A24%20UTC%202014_2014-04-03%2001%3A25%3A50.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290228 Title: (14.04) Unable to install external deb packages "Package operation Failed" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/software-center/+bug/1290228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1290228] Re: (14.04) Unable to install external deb packages "Package operation Failed"
Just a little addition for Comment #21 If you intend to use the Software Center to install "GDebi Package Installer", do it BEFORE attempting to install "Ubuntu Restricted Extras" via the Software Center. Once you enter the failed state associated with "Ubuntu Restricted Extras" installation, you are toast. If you have spent any time in the windoze world, you would have created an image before trying to install something; restored the working image if/when the installation failed; and then experimented to find a work around. Being more robust, Linux does not warrant those extra steps when dealing with open source. However when dealing with proprietary software one must expect the occasional "vista" experience. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290228 Title: (14.04) Unable to install external deb packages "Package operation Failed" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/software-center/+bug/1290228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1290236] [NEW] ubiquity gpt ext4 format error
Public bug reported: 1. Create an ext4 partition on a GPT disk using gparted (v16 or v18) but do not format it 2. Install 64-bit Ubuntu-14.04 desktop via 2014-03_09 07:49 iso from a USB stick checking the format box 3. Back up the newly created installation using Acronis True Home build 6673 4. Observe that sector-by-sector mode was forced because the ext4 partition was not recognized as such 5. Create a second ext4 partition and format that partition using gparted (v18) 6. Install 64-bit Ubuntu-14.04 desktop via 2014-03_09 07:49 iso from a USB stick leaving the format box unchecked 7. Back up the newly created installation using Acronis True Home build 6673 8. Observe that normal compression was applied resulting in a much smaller image because the ext4 partition was recognized as such It is my opinion that incorrect formatting might lead to manifestation of some nasty intermittent bugs. Hopefully these steps which are 100% reproducible will enable the bug to be located quickly. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290236 Title: ubiquity gpt ext4 format error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1290236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1290236] Re: ubiquity gpt ext4 format error
** Package changed: ubuntu => ubiquity (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290236 Title: ubiquity gpt ext4 format error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1290236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1290236] Re: ubiquity gpt ext4 format error
My concern was raised because Acronis True Image only exhibited the forced sector-by-sector behavior after 14.04 had been installed in a target partition that had been formatted by Ubiquity during the installation. If the target partition had been formatted by gparted v18 prior to the 14.04 installation, Acronis would have created a compressed image just as it would with an install of 13.10. Why does pre-formatting with gparted cause a different result than formatting during installation? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290236 Title: ubiquity gpt ext4 format error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1290236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1255558] Re: Can't type my password after cold boot
I too cannot always enter my password. 64-bit Desktop 14.04 2014-03-10 07:49 iso Fiddling with right-click, etc. enabled password input -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128 Title: Can't type my password after cold boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-greeter/+bug/128/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1255558] Re: Can't type my password after cold boot
A non-technical person managed to cause a system to crash a few minutes after she entered a certain sequence of keystrokes on a terminal that was NOT logged on. The programmer failed to flush the buffer and accepted contamination as well as logon commands. So I have attempted to use her non-technical methods to work around this problem. Click on the word Guest. Click on your user name. Right click and select "select all" Put the mouse pointer over the text box then press backspace. Now you should be able to enter your password. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128 Title: Can't type my password after cold boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-greeter/+bug/128/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292099] Re: Ubuntu Gnome 14.04 will not install Google Chrome through Ubuntu Software Center
I am experiencing the same failure. The 64-bit deb file that I downloaded recently has internal date time stamps on 2014-03_05. It installed correctly following installation of the 64-bit daily build iso (2014-03_12 07:50) but failed using daily build (2014-03_13 07:46). Since the installation worked perfectly yesterday, might an unintended editing change be the culprit? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292099 Title: Ubuntu Gnome 14.04 will not install Google Chrome through Ubuntu Software Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1292099/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292099] Re: Ubuntu 14.04 will not install Google Chrome through Ubuntu Software Center
For the record, 64-bit 14.04 (trusty-desktop- amd64_2014-03_14_07:45_.iso) also fails to install google-chrome-stable from a KNOWN good deb file. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292099 Title: Ubuntu 14.04 will not install Google Chrome through Ubuntu Software Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1292099/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292099] Re: Ubuntu 14.04 will not install Google Chrome through Ubuntu Software Center
The following link (Install Google Chrome in Ubuntu 14.04 / 13.10 / 13.04 / 12.04 using PPA) provides a workaround http://www.howopensource.com/2011/10/install-google-chrome-in- ubuntu-11-10-11-04-10-10-10-04/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292099 Title: Ubuntu 14.04 will not install Google Chrome through Ubuntu Software Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1292099/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292099] Re: Ubuntu 14.04 will not install Google Chrome through Ubuntu Software Center
Did you use the following quoted string? "deb http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292099 Title: Ubuntu 14.04 will not install Google Chrome through Ubuntu Software Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1292099/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292099] Re: Ubuntu 14.04 will not install Google Chrome through Ubuntu Software Center
When I can reboot into a different copy of 14.04, I will follow the instructions again. The string portion of the instructions can also be found under the Other Software tab of Software & Updates in a version of 14.04 prior to the one built from the 2014-03_13 iso. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292099 Title: Ubuntu 14.04 will not install Google Chrome through Ubuntu Software Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1292099/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292099] Re: Ubuntu 14.04 will not install Google Chrome through Ubuntu Software Center
I copied, pasted and chrome installed correctly. The lines are longer than the size of the display box so I had to carefully copy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292099 Title: Ubuntu 14.04 will not install Google Chrome through Ubuntu Software Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1292099/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1293770] [NEW] Ubuntu Restricted Extras Installation Hangs in Ubuntu14.04
Public bug reported: 64-bit 14.04 iso (2014-03_17_07:46) 1. Launch Software Center. 2. Select Ubuntu Restricted Extras, begin install, supply credentials. 3. In the past, the installation would appear to hang while actually waiting for user response to a Eula dialog that was not visible. If the launcher was not extremely cluttered by the HUGE number of partitions locked to it, a Question mark icon would appear in the launcher which could be clicked to make the Eula dialog visible. 4. Now the installation hangs but the Question mark icon never appears. 5. After killing the software-center process and then launching the Software Center, I was able to successfully install Gparted which leads me to point the finger at Ubuntu Restricted Extras. I believe that this bug got introduced/uncovered after 64-bit 14.04 iso (2014-03_12) and may be related the bug where Google-chrome-stable cannot be installed via the Software Center although the same version can be installed via PPA. ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1293770 Title: Ubuntu Restricted Extras Installation Hangs in Ubuntu14.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1293770/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1068341] Re: No way to specify correct dependencies for dkms packages (nvidia driver install fails to get matching header)
Nvidia can't/won't release drivers that will work with Ubuntu. Now What? 1. Deny that a problem exists. 2. Wait until Nvidia gets it act together, perhaps during this decade. 3. Massage Ubuntu to compensate for POORLY tested Nvidia products. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068341 Title: No way to specify correct dependencies for dkms packages (nvidia driver install fails to get matching header) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/+bug/1068341/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1076716] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-0-generic. Downloaded and tested today 2013-01_14 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076716/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1061639] Re: Upstartification of /etc/init.d/networking has lost deconfiguring-networking event causing bad side-effects
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-0-generic. Downloaded and tested today 2013-01_14 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1061639 Title: Upstartification of /etc/init.d/networking has lost deconfiguring- networking event causing bad side-effects To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1061639/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1087486] Re: CANNOT disable_Gparted places and locks EVERY partition to the launcher bar
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1060484 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060484 This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-0-generic. Downloaded and tested today 2013-01_14 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087486 Title: CANNOT disable_Gparted places and locks EVERY partition to the launcher bar To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1087486/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1068341] Re: No way to specify correct dependencies for dkms packages (nvidia driver install fails to get matching header)
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-0-generic. Downloaded and tested today 2013-01_14 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068341 Title: No way to specify correct dependencies for dkms packages (nvidia driver install fails to get matching header) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/+bug/1068341/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1060484] Re: When using gparted com.canonical.Unity.Devices blacklist is set back to Default of []
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-0-generic. Downloaded and tested today 2013-01_14 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060484 Title: When using gparted com.canonical.Unity.Devices blacklist is set back to Default of [] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1060484/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1087496] Re: Screenshot FORGETS to place the focus on the highlighted default text
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-0-generic. Downloaded and tested today 2013-01_14 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087496 Title: Screenshot FORGETS to place the focus on the highlighted default text To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1087496/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1073433] Re: Ext4 corruption associated with shutdown of Ubuntu 12.10
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-0-generic. Downloaded and tested yesterday 2013-01_14 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073433 Title: Ext4 corruption associated with shutdown of Ubuntu 12.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/1073433/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1087496] Re: Screenshot FORGETS to place the focus on the highlighted default text
I launched Screenshot to perform a screen capture. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087496 Title: Screenshot FORGETS to place the focus on the highlighted default text To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1087496/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1087496] Re: Screenshot FORGETS to place the focus on the highlighted default text
1. Launch Screenshot 2. Click Take Screenshot 3. After Save Screenshot dialog appears, start typing. The input text box does not have the focus and ignores user input until after the text box is MANUALLY selected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087496 Title: Screenshot FORGETS to place the focus on the highlighted default text To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1087496/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1060484] Re: When using gparted com.canonical.Unity.Devices blacklist is set back to Default of []
Will this BUG be fixed before 13.04 or should I AVOID 12.10 and continue to use 12.04? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060484 Title: When using gparted com.canonical.Unity.Devices blacklist is set back to Default of [] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1060484/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1076716] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
Will this BUG be fixed before 13.04 or should I AVOID 12.10 and continue to use 12.04? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076716/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1073433] Re: Ext4 corruption associated with shutdown of Ubuntu 12.10
The workaround of disabling networking becomes unavailable EACH time POORLY maintained Nvidia drivers randomly cause 12.10 to crash requiring a power cycle to recover. Will this BUG be fixed before 13.04 or should I AVOID 12.10 and continue to use 12.04? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073433 Title: Ext4 corruption associated with shutdown of Ubuntu 12.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1073433/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1087486] Re: CANNOT disable_Gparted places and locks EVERY partition to the launcher bar
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1060484 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060484 This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1210 (Quantal) with kernel 3.5.0-21-generic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087486 Title: CANNOT disable_Gparted places and locks EVERY partition to the launcher bar To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1087486/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1076716] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1210 (Quantal) with kernel 3.5.0-21-generic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076716/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1060484] Re: When using gparted com.canonical.Unity.Devices blacklist is set back to Default of []
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1210 (Quantal) with kernel 3.5.0-21-generic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060484 Title: When using gparted com.canonical.Unity.Devices blacklist is set back to Default of [] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1060484/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1076716] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-2-generic. Downloaded and tested today 2013-01_27 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076716/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
