date:20240423

Great, thanks for follow up, I'm closing the report

** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062574

Title:
  Another fresh insstall

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/2062574/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2062377] Re: Ubuntu 24.04: gnome-shell crashes on Xorg if a legacy X11 cursor theme is selected

Confirmed:

#6  0x7da91c9077fb in _XError () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
#7  0x7da91c90790f in ??? () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
#8  0x7da91c9079cd in ??? () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
#9  0x7da91c90971d in _XReply () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
#10 0x7da91c909aa5 in XSync () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
#11 0x7da91c909b3f in ??? () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
#12 0x7da91c8e0b2d in XFreeCursor () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
#13 0x7da91cf73c85 in meta_cursor_renderer_x11_update_cursor
(renderer=0x5f58cdeed1a0, cursor_sprite=0x5f58cdc29790)
at ../src/backends/x11/meta-cursor-renderer-x11.c:113
#14 0x7da91cec592f in meta_cursor_renderer_update_cursor
(renderer=0x5f58cdeed1a0, cursor_sprite=0x5f58cdc29790)
at ../src/backends/meta-cursor-renderer.c:425
#15 0x7da91cec5a3c in meta_cursor_renderer_force_update
(renderer=0x5f58cdeed1a0) at ../src/backends/meta-cursor-renderer.c:460
#16 0x7da91cf7121e in meta_backend_x11_reload_cursor (x11=0x5f58cdc05470)
at ../src/backends/x11/meta-backend-x11.c:1121
#17 0x7da91cfa0754 in update_cursor_theme (x11_display=0x5f58cdfd9b30)
at ../src/x11/meta-x11-display.c:1757
#18 0x7da91dbb86bd in ??? () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 0x7da91dbb87c1 in g_signal_emit_valist ()
at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062377

Title:
  Ubuntu 24.04: gnome-shell crashes on Xorg if a legacy X11 cursor theme
  is selected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2062377/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060924] Re: [Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04 Bug] Can not detect iscsi disk storage and kernel show " detected conn error (1020)"

2024-04-23 Thread xiaochun Lee

From continue investigate on it, we found the root cause is that
installer in Ubuntu can not  sync the iscsi IQN name (iscsi qualified
name) defined in UEFI to OS /etc/iscsi/initiatorname.iscsi via  iscsi
iBFT (iscsi boot firmware table), even we add dracut parameter
"rd.driver.pre=iscsi_ibft rd.iscsi.firmware=1 rd.iscsi.ibft=1
rd.iscsi.initiator=iqn.1986-03.com.example:lql
rd.iscsi.param=node.startup=automatic"

Ubuntu can detect the remote iscsi disk, If we overwrite the default
line in /etc/iscsi/initiaorname.iscsi to
"InitiatorName=iqn.1986-03.com.example:lql" manually and restart iscsid
and open-iscsi service.

Note: the string "iqn.1986-03.com.example:lql" is the name defined in
UEFI for iscsi target lun.

But after install OS to remote iscsi disk, we can not boot up from the
installed OS, because initrd doesn't include iscsi drivers (libiscsi,
scsi_transport_iscsi, iscsi_tcp, libiscsi_tcp) and services open-iscsi
and iscsid and their needed utilities, like iscsiadm, iscsid.

So I was just wondering of Canonical experts if Ubuntu support iscsi
installation or not?

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060924

Title:
  [Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04 Bug] Can not detect iscsi disk storage and kernel
  show " detected conn error (1020)"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2060924/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060727] Re: The keyboard does not work after latest kernel update

2024-04-23 Thread Roxana Nicolescu

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060727

Title:
  The keyboard does not work after latest kernel update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2060727/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063132] Re: Gnome-tweaks crashes system

Thank you for your bug report, could you try to collect the journalctl
log from the system or see if there are any gnome-shell error in there?

** Changed in: gnome-tweaks (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063132

Title:
  Gnome-tweaks crashes system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2063132/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2062377] Re: Ubuntu 24.04: gnome-shell crashes on Xorg if a legacy X11 cursor theme is selected

** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062377

Title:
  Ubuntu 24.04: gnome-shell crashes on Xorg if a legacy X11 cursor theme
  is selected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2062377/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1927807] Re: "https" address causes zsync download to fail with error 'could not read control file from URL'

2024-04-23 Thread Simon

there should be an warning message in the zsync program if you attempt
to use https, since it appears to not be supported in all cases.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927807

Title:
  "https" address causes zsync download to fail with error 'could not
  read control file from URL'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/1927807/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063147] Re: No lower VRR range for display

2024-04-23 Thread Eduard Kachur

LFC on supported monitor seems to be working well. Looks like a visual
issue.

** Attachment added: "video_2024-04-23_10-24-46.mp4"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2063147/+attachment/5769596/+files/video_2024-04-23_10-24-46.mp4

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063147

Title:
  No lower VRR range for display shown in Settings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/2063147/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2061373] Re: [Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04 Bug] Print grub message before the uefi POST screen disappears in Ubuntu24.04 Beta

2024-04-23 Thread xiaochun Lee

** Summary changed:

- Print kernel messages before the uefi POST screen disappears in Ubuntu24.04 
Beta
+ [Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04 Bug] Print grub message before the uefi POST screen 
disappears in Ubuntu24.04 Beta

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061373

Title:
  [Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04 Bug] Print grub message before the uefi POST
  screen disappears in Ubuntu24.04 Beta

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2061373/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063147] Re: No lower VRR range for display shown in Settings

** Summary changed:

- No lower VRR range for display
+ No lower VRR range for display shown in Settings

** Also affects: mutter via
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/3434
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063147

Title:
  No lower VRR range for display shown in Settings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/2063147/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2048517] Re: EPYC-Rome model without XSAVES may break live migration since the removal of the flag on the physical CPU

2024-04-23 Thread Giuseppe Petralia

Hello Mauricio,

thanks for providing the nova patch. It worked as expected.


I installed on a node with xsaves enabled and updated nova.conf 

# dpkg -l | grep nova
ii  nova-api-metadata 2:21.2.4-0ubuntu2.7~ppa3  
   all  OpenStack Compute - metadata API frontend
ii  nova-common   2:21.2.4-0ubuntu2.7~ppa3  
   all  OpenStack Compute - common files
ii  nova-compute  2:21.2.4-0ubuntu2.7~ppa3  
   all  OpenStack Compute - compute node base
ii  nova-compute-kvm  2:21.2.4-0ubuntu2.7~ppa3  
   all  OpenStack Compute - compute node (KVM)
ii  nova-compute-libvirt  2:21.2.4-0ubuntu2.7~ppa3  
   all  OpenStack Compute - compute node libvirt support
ii  python3-nova  2:21.2.4-0ubuntu2.7~ppa3  
   all  OpenStack Compute Python 3 libraries


# grep cpu_model /etc/nova/nova.conf
cpu_model = EPYC-Rome
cpu_model_extra_flags = -xsaves

Then I restarted nova-compute.

I had the following VM running which was using xsaves:

# virsh dumpxml instance-001499b6 | grep xsaves



I stopped/started the VM and the xsaves feature was disabled after that 

# virsh dumpxml instance-001499b6 | grep xsaves



and that allowed me to migrate the VM to a node with xsaves disabled (newer 
kernel)

I think next step should be to start SRU process for this patch,
correct?


Thanks,
Giuseppe

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048517

Title:
  EPYC-Rome model without XSAVES may break live migration since the
  removal of the flag on the physical CPU

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/2048517/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1430531] Re: FILEOPEN: Opening file from Samba share produce Document in Use dialog (~/.gvfs or mount.cifs)

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1430531

Title:
   FILEOPEN: Opening file from Samba share produce Document in Use
  dialog (~/.gvfs or mount.cifs)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1430531/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2053254] Re: [FFe] Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics packages)

2024-04-23 Thread Jose Luis Rivero

The ignition-common and ignition-physics packages has be removed from
Ubuntu in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ros-
catkin/+bug/2063103 yesterday.

It can be totally omitted totally. I'm going to close the MR and edit
the description.

** Summary changed:

- [FFe] Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics 
packages)
+ [FFe] Update urdfdom and dart for Noble (Open Robotics packages)

** Description changed:

  Versions bump for the Open Robotics Community packages:
   - urdfdom to 4.0.0-0ubuntu1
     (Imported from https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/urdfdom)
   - dart to 6.13.1+ds-0ubuntu2
     https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/dart/log/?h=ubuntu/devel
- 
- As a side effect ignition-physics package needs also to be patch updated:
-  - ignition-physics to 5.1.0+ds1-4.1ubuntu2
-    (Imported from https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/ignition-physics)
- 
- The review found that there was a problem with a missing ignition-common 
package in s390:
-  - ignition-common (needs a rev bump)
-    
https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ignition-common/log/?h=ubuntu/noble
  
  Package PPA:
   https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/urdfdom4-noble/+packages
  
  (three merge-request are ready for review)
  
  [Other info]
  
  I have both version bumps ready on Debian but the 64bit_time transition[1] is 
preventing the
  packages to go through the lib transition since two weeks ago and counting. 
As we want to
  have these new versions in 24.04 (feature freeze is coming soon), we do the 
version bump
  directly on Ubuntu.
  
  [Justification]
  
  Important updates in a couple of packages used by the Open Robotics
  Community, particularly affecting ROS (Robot Operative System) and the
- ignition/Gazebo simulator.
+ Gazebo simulator.
  
   * urdfdom is changing the ABI/API completely by replacing tinyxml with 
tinyxml2
   * Dart current version 6.12.1 was released in .. 2019.
  
  There are important bugfixes in DART, specially the fix for a ton of
  compiler warnings with gcc-13 and patches for skeleton trees and
  grouping of constraints.
  
  Both packages should be lintian clean.
  
  [Transition details]
  
- The PPA includes all direct dependencies of urfdom and DART (ignition-
- physics and ros-urdf).
- 
-  * ignition-physics include a patch to work with new DART adding conditional 
code to deal with
-    minor DART API renames.
+ The PPA includes all direct dependencies of urfdom and DART (ros-urdf).
  
  All the previous architectures where the software was building before
  are also supported in the update with an important exception: new DART
  upstream releases do not support 32 bits, so armhf is lost from the
  list.
  
  [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2024/02/msg0.html
+ 
+ 
+ {edited on Apr 23rd -- removed since ignition packages were removed from 
Ubuntu}
+ 
+ As a side effect ignition-physics package needs also to be patch updated:
+  - ignition-physics to 5.1.0+ds1-4.1ubuntu2
+    (Imported from https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/ignition-physics)
+ 
+ The review found that there was a problem with a missing ignition-common 
package in s390:
+  - ignition-common (needs a rev bump)
+    
https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ignition-common/log/?h=ubuntu/noble

** Description changed:

  Versions bump for the Open Robotics Community packages:
   - urdfdom to 4.0.0-0ubuntu1
     (Imported from https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/urdfdom)
   - dart to 6.13.1+ds-0ubuntu2
     https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/dart/log/?h=ubuntu/devel
  
  Package PPA:
   https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/urdfdom4-noble/+packages
  
  (three merge-request are ready for review)
  
  [Other info]
  
  I have both version bumps ready on Debian but the 64bit_time transition[1] is 
preventing the
  packages to go through the lib transition since two weeks ago and counting. 
As we want to
  have these new versions in 24.04 (feature freeze is coming soon), we do the 
version bump
  directly on Ubuntu.
  
  [Justification]
  
  Important updates in a couple of packages used by the Open Robotics
  Community, particularly affecting ROS (Robot Operative System) and the
  Gazebo simulator.
  
   * urdfdom is changing the ABI/API completely by replacing tinyxml with 
tinyxml2
   * Dart current version 6.12.1 was released in .. 2019.
  
  There are important bugfixes in DART, specially the fix for a ton of
  compiler warnings with gcc-13 and patches for skeleton trees and
  grouping of constraints.
  
  Both packages should be lintian clean.
  
  [Transition details]
  
  The PPA includes all direct dependencies of urfdom and DART (ros-urdf).
  
  All the previous architectures where the software was building before
  are also supported in the update with an important exception: new DART
  upstream releases do not support 32 bits, so armhf is lost from the
  list.
  
  [1] https://lists.de

[Bug 2062377] Re: Ubuntu 24.04: gnome-shell crashes on Xorg if a legacy X11 cursor theme is selected

In progress: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/3718

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062377

Title:
  Ubuntu 24.04: gnome-shell crashes on Xorg if a legacy X11 cursor theme
  is selected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2062377/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063186] [NEW] package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.36-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus paquet mysql-server-8.0 script post-installation installé a renvoyé un état de sortie

2024-04-23 Thread theisen

Public bug reported:

Ce n'est pas un bug mais plutôt un défaut d'installation.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: mysql-server-8.0 8.0.36-0ubuntu0.22.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-28.29~22.04.1-generic 6.5.13
Uname: Linux 6.5.0-28-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
Date: Tue Apr 23 09:14:00 2024
ErrorMessage: le sous-processus paquet mysql-server-8.0 script 
post-installation installé a renvoyé un état de sortie d'erreur 1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-03-11 (773 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012)
Logs.var.log.daemon.log:
 
Logs.var.log.mysql.error.log: 
MySQLConf.etc.mysql.my.cnf: my.cnf links to /etc/mysql/mysql.cnf
MySQLVarLibDirListing: []
ProcCmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.5.0-28-generic 
root=UUID=8b1f7d0c-297b-46cf-a1aa-78e07b1bb8fd ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.10, Python 3.10.12, python3-minimal, 
3.10.6-1~22.04
PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python3.10, Python 3.10.12, python-is-python3, 3.9.2-2
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.21.1ubuntu2.3
 apt  2.4.12
SourcePackage: mysql-8.0
Title: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.36-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 failed to 
install/upgrade: le sous-processus paquet mysql-server-8.0 script 
post-installation installé a renvoyé un état de sortie d'erreur 1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-05-10 (713 days ago)

** Affects: mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063186

Title:
  package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.36-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: le sous-processus paquet mysql-server-8.0 script
  post-installation installé a renvoyé un état de sortie d'erreur
  1.mysql et mysql-server ne démarrent pas.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/2063186/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054477] Re: [FFe] Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

2024-04-23 Thread Jose Luis Rivero

The ogre-next update was released and ignition-cmake was removed in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ros-catkin/+bug/2063103. I've
updated the statuses. All done here.

** Changed in: ogre-next (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

** Changed in: ignition-cmake (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054477

Title:
  [FFe] Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-cmake/+bug/2054477/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063147] Re: No lower VRR range for display shown in Settings

2024-04-23 Thread Bug Watch Updater

** Changed in: mutter
   Status: Unknown => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063147

Title:
  No lower VRR range for display shown in Settings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/2063147/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063015] Re: autopkgtest fails with version 1.0.1-17ubuntu1

This bug was fixed in the package tcpxtract - 1.0.1-17ubuntu3

---
tcpxtract (1.0.1-17ubuntu3) noble; urgency=medium

  * Update configuration parser to resolve autopkgtest crash (LP: #2063015):
- d/p/90_terminate_lexem.patch: enable verbose parser errors,
  terminate comment line lexem, match '(' ' ',' and ')' explicitly.
  * d/rules: run smoke test at the build time.

 -- Vladimir Petko   Tue, 23 Apr 2024
15:14:54 +1200

** Changed in: tcpxtract (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063015

Title:
  autopkgtest fails with version 1.0.1-17ubuntu1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tcpxtract/+bug/2063015/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2062561] Re: There are no APT sources configured in /etc/apt/sources.list or /etc/apt/sources.list.d.

This bug was fixed in the package landscape-client - 24.02-0ubuntu5

---
landscape-client (24.02-0ubuntu5) noble; urgency=medium

  * d/p/2062561-fix-deb822-sources.patch: fix to include deb822 formatted
sources when collecting source channels (LP: #2062561)

 -- Austin Nhung   Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:42:34
-0600

** Changed in: landscape-client (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062561

Title:
  There are no APT sources configured in /etc/apt/sources.list or
  /etc/apt/sources.list.d.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape-client/+bug/2062561/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2061589] Re: tcpxtract: FTBFS: confy.c:494:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘yylex’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

This bug was fixed in the package tcpxtract - 1.0.1-17ubuntu3

---
tcpxtract (1.0.1-17ubuntu3) noble; urgency=medium

  * Update configuration parser to resolve autopkgtest crash (LP: #2063015):
- d/p/90_terminate_lexem.patch: enable verbose parser errors,
  terminate comment line lexem, match '(' ' ',' and ')' explicitly.
  * d/rules: run smoke test at the build time.

 -- Vladimir Petko   Tue, 23 Apr 2024
15:14:54 +1200

** Changed in: tcpxtract (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061589

Title:
  tcpxtract: FTBFS: confy.c:494:16: error: implicit declaration of
  function ‘yylex’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tcpxtract/+bug/2061589/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice

I haven't managed to reproduce this issue yet, I've installing various
dual boot combinations of Xubuntu/Lubuntu into a BIOS qemu VM.

@guiverc If you could provide exact steps to reproduce this starting
from an empty virtual machine, that would be extremely helpful.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624

Title:
  lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does
  appear & offer OS choice

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058769] Re: proposed-migration for click 0.5.2-2

This bug was fixed in the package click - 0.5.2-2ubuntu4

---
click (0.5.2-2ubuntu4) noble; urgency=medium

  * Fix preload path harder.

 -- Steve Langasek   Tue, 23 Apr 2024
04:32:56 +

** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058769

Title:
  proposed-migration for click 0.5.2-2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/click/+bug/2058769/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063184] Re: Strong Color contrast on Cinnamon desktop

2024-04-23 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.  It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general.  It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people interested in the package can find the bugs
about it.  You can find some hints about determining what package your
bug might be about at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage.
You might also ask for help in the #ubuntu-bugs irc channel on
Libera.chat.

To change the source package that this bug is filed about visit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2063184/+editstatus and add the
package name in the text box next to the word Package.

[This is an automated message.  I apologize if it reached you
inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.]

** Tags added: bot-comment

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063184

Title:
  Strong Color contrast on Cinnamon desktop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2063184/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063127] Re: package thunderbird 2:1snap1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: new thunderbird package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-04-23 Thread Brian Murray

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2061918 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061918

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2061918
   package thunderbird 2:1snap1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: new 
thunderbird package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit 
status 1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063127

Title:
  package thunderbird 2:1snap1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: new
  thunderbird package pre-installation script subprocess returned error
  exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/2063127/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2061918] Re: package thunderbird 2:1snap1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: new thunderbird package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061918

Title:
  package thunderbird 2:1snap1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: new
  thunderbird package pre-installation script subprocess returned error
  exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/2061918/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063189] [NEW] please remove android-platform-frameworks-native from ubuntu

2024-04-23 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle

Public bug reported:

This package has a t64 transition in proposed which has not migrated...
the reason it has not migrated is that the only interesting binary
package this source builds (android-platform-frameworks-native-headers)
has long since been taken over by a different source package (android-
platform-tools). So this package should be removed (with care taken to
ensure that the android-platform-frameworks-native-headers binary
package does not get deleted as well!)

** Affects: android-platform-frameworks-native (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063189

Title:
  please remove android-platform-frameworks-native from ubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/android-platform-frameworks-native/+bug/2063189/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2061027] Re: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration

2024-04-23 Thread Vladimir Petko

Fixed in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tcpxtract/+bug/2063015

This bug was fixed in the package tcpxtract - 1.0.1-17ubuntu3

---
tcpxtract (1.0.1-17ubuntu3) noble; urgency=medium

  * Update configuration parser to resolve autopkgtest crash (LP: #2063015):
- d/p/90_terminate_lexem.patch: enable verbose parser errors,
  terminate comment line lexem, match '(' ' ',' and ')' explicitly.
  * d/rules: run smoke test at the build time.

 -- Vladimir Petko  Tue, 23 Apr 2024
15:14:54 +1200

** Changed in: tcpxtract (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061027

Title:
  FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tcpxtract/+bug/2061027/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063193] [NEW] Invalid display EDID cause wrong display settings

2024-04-23 Thread EToniolo

Public bug reported:

On my laptop Sony Vaio F11 the full hd screen has yhe incorrect size of 
2048x1536(4:3) instead of the right one of 1920x1080. I can only see the top 
left part of the screen(gnome, visible area aside, works fine).
With the Ubuntu 23.10 the problem does not occur and the correct panel 
resolution is managed.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: linux-image-6.8.0-31-generic 6.8.0-31.31
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-31.31-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-31-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/seq:giulia 1940 F pipewire
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  giulia 1949 F wireplumber
 /dev/snd/controlC1:  giulia 1949 F wireplumber
CRDA: N/A
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Apr 23 10:51:32 2024
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-11-20 (885 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012)
MachineType: Sony Corporation VPCF11M1E
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=it_IT.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 TERM=xterm-256color
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
ProcFB: 0 nouveaudrmfb
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.8.0-31-generic 
root=UUID=d90ba042-8a89-406c-bdc2-f4094f5f3af6 ro quiet splash 
drm.edid_firmware=card0-LVDS-1:edid/1920x1080.bin vt.handoff=7
RelatedPackageVersions:
 linux-restricted-modules-6.8.0-31-generic N/A
 linux-backports-modules-6.8.0-31-generic  N/A
 linux-firmware20240318.git3b128b60-0ubuntu2
SourcePackage: linux
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-04-19 (4 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 02/26/2010
dmi.bios.release: 2.60
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: R0260Y6
dmi.board.asset.tag: N/A
dmi.board.name: VAIO
dmi.board.vendor: Sony Corporation
dmi.board.version: N/A
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: N/A
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: Sony Corporation
dmi.chassis.version: N/A
dmi.ec.firmware.release: 2.60
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrR0260Y6:bd02/26/2010:br2.60:efr2.60:svnSonyCorporation:pnVPCF11M1E:pvrC604HLG1:rvnSonyCorporation:rnVAIO:rvrN/A:cvnSonyCorporation:ct10:cvrN/A:skuN/A:
dmi.product.family: VAIO
dmi.product.name: VPCF11M1E
dmi.product.sku: N/A
dmi.product.version: C604HLG1
dmi.sys.vendor: Sony Corporation

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063193

Title:
  Invalid display EDID cause wrong display settings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2063193/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059756] Re: [SRU] adsys 0.14.1

** Changed in: golang-1.22 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Description changed:

  [context]
  ADSys is a tool designed for administering and implementing Group Policy 
Objects (GPOs) from Active Directory on Linux systems. It includes a suite of 
services and commands that empower administrators to efficiently manage policy 
updates and maintain compliance with organizational business rules.
  
  Given that ADSys directly interfaces with Active Directory and needs to
  align with new business requirements in LTS releases, it has been
  essential to keep the package consistently updated with the latest
  changes of ADSys upstream source. As ADSys is a key component of our
  commercial offerings, our customers anticipate the availability of
  recently implemented features in the 22.04 release.
  
  Now that ADSys has a complete set of features, the request is to proceed
  with a one-off release of ADSys 0.14.1 to 22.04. Please note that any
  new features introduced in subsequent versions will be exclusively
  available in 24.04 and later releases.
  
  This version includes a comprehensive end to end automated test suite
  that runs ADSys against a real Active directory environment.
  
  Version 0.14.1 is available for 22.04 in a PPA
  (https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-enterprise-desktop/+archive/ubuntu/adsys)
  and already used in production by customers.
  
  At this time of writing the number of open issues is 1 in Launchpad and
  16 in GitHub including 6 enhancements. None of them have a high or
  critical importance.
  
  [references]
  LP: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys
  LP Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys
  GitHub: https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/
  GH Bugs: https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/issues
  Documentation: https://canonical-adsys.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/stable/
  Initial SRU discussion: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2023-June/005650.html
  
  [changes]
  Full LP Changelog: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+changelog
   * New features
     * New policies:
   - Add mount / network shares policy manager
   - Add AppArmor policy manager
   - Support multiple AD backends and implement Winbind support
   - Add system proxy policy manager
   - Add certificate policy manager for machines
   - Add adsysctl policy purge command to purge applied policies
   - Full documentation
   - Full end to end automated test suite.
  
   * Enhancements
    * Add a --machine / -m flag to adsysctl applied, indicating the policies 
applied to the current machine
    * Expose Ubuntu Pro status in the "status" command
    * Update scripts manager creation
    * List Pro policy types in service status output
    * Warn when Pro-only rules are configured
    * Use systemd via D-Bus instead of systemctl commands
    * Add placeholder notes for entry types
    * Rework Kerberos ticket handling logic to satisfy the Heimdal 
implementation of Kerberos
    * Rework policy application sync strategy
    * Print logs when policies are up to date
    * Update policy definitions to include dconf key for dark mode background
    * Infer user KRB5CCNAME path via the libkrb5 API (LP: #2049061)
    * Allow sssd backend to work without ad_domain being set (LP: #2054445)
    * Update apport hook to include journal errors and package logs
  
   * Bug fixes
    * Fix policy update failing when GPT.INI contains no version key
    * Fix object lookup for users having a FQDN as their hostname
    * Support special characters in domains when parsing sssd configuration
    * Fix DCONF_PROFILE not considering default_domain_suffix on sssd.conf
    * Ensure empty state for dconf policy
    * Handle case mismatches in GPT.INI file name
    * Ensure GPO URLs contain the FQDN of the domain controller
    * Add runtime dependency on nfs-common
  
   * Other
    * Updates to latest versions of Go (fixing known Go vulnerabilities)
    * Updates to latest versions of the Go dependencies
    * Updates and improvements to CI and QoL
    * Migrate translation support to native approach using go-i18n + gotext and 
switch to upstream gotext version
  
  Dependencies:
  * Build-dep: golang-go (>= 2:1.22~)
  
  * Dependencies to backport to 22.04:
-   * golang-go >= 2:1.22
+   * golang-go >= 2:1.22
    * ubuntu-proxy-manager (suggest. Required for Proxy support - feature will 
be disabled otherwise)
    * python3-cepces (suggest. Required for Certificates autoenrollment support 
- feature will be disabled otherwise)
    * Note: Both are currently in the new queue of 22.04 : 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=
- 
  
  [test plan]
  # Process
  Adsys follows a robust continuous integration and testing process. It is 
covered by a comprehensive automated tests suite 
(https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/actions/workflows/qa.yaml) and an automated 
end to end test suite that runs in a real active directory environment 
(https:

[Bug 2048232] Re: [SRU] Backport to 22.04 LTS

** Changed in: ubuntu-proxy-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => New

** Also affects: ubuntu-proxy-manager (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: ubuntu-proxy-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048232

Title:
  [SRU] Backport to 22.04 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-proxy-manager/+bug/2048232/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2048514] Re: [SRU] Backport to 22.04 LTS

** Changed in: python-cepces (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => New

** Changed in: python-requests-gssapi (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => New

** Also affects: python-requests-gssapi (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: python-cepces (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: python-cepces (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: python-requests-gssapi (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048514

Title:
  [SRU] Backport to 22.04 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-cepces/+bug/2048514/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063194] [NEW] Sync capnproto 1.0.1-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-04-23 Thread Skia

Public bug reported:

Please sync capnproto 1.0.1-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

Changelog entries since current noble version 1.0.1-3build4:

capnproto (1.0.1-4) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Add patch for FTBFS on 32-bit ARM after the time_t 64 transition.
Thank you to Arnd Bergmann, Wookey, Tom Lee, and Andrey Rakhmatullin
for their for help resolving this bug.  (Closes: #1067916)

 -- tony mancill   Mon, 15 Apr 2024 22:09:51 -0700

** Affects: capnproto (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Graham Inggs (ginggs)
 Status: In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063194

Title:
  Sync capnproto 1.0.1-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/capnproto/+bug/2063194/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063194] Re: Sync capnproto 1.0.1-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-04-23 Thread Graham Inggs

** Changed in: capnproto (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Graham Inggs (ginggs)

** Changed in: capnproto (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063194

Title:
  Sync capnproto 1.0.1-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/capnproto/+bug/2063194/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060260] Re: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 7.0.18 and SDK 7.0.118

2024-04-23 Thread Dominik Viererbe

Hello Timo (or someone else from the SRU Team), the dotnet7 (and also
dotnet6) package is known to contain a .git directory. I should have put
this in the SRU description. The build process gathers metadata that is
required. Upstream fixed this with dotnet8. We do not want to spend time
on backporting this, because .NET 7 will go EoL (upstream) in less than
a month (on 14th May 2024).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060260

Title:
  [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 7.0.18 and SDK 7.0.118

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet7/+bug/2060260/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063197] [NEW] zfcpdump-kernel update to v6.8

2024-04-23 Thread Paolo Pisati

Public bug reported:

zfcpdump-kernel update to v6.8

** Affects: zfcpdump-kernel (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063197

Title:
  zfcpdump-kernel update to v6.8

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfcpdump-kernel/+bug/2063197/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-23 Thread Frank Heimes

Hi @seth-arnold,
I am not in-depth familiar with security related updates (since they happen 
rarely for me, and if private-security are handled by the security team anyway).

"
My assumption is that these package updates should be published first to 
-updates for autopkgtest testing, and once they have passed testing and phased 
to users, then we should republish these updates to -security so that they are 
available to all users. Does this sound correct?
"
There are no autopkgtests (for historical reasons and since lot's of functions 
in that package req. the hw to be configured in a certain way, which cannot 
guaranteed by the build systems), but the packages get (and already got) 
already manually tested upfront, with focus on the changes (according to test 
plan in SRU justification).

"
This is much easier to execute if the updates have been built in a PPA with 
only -security enabled, and not -updates. (The -security pocket is built with 
only packages from -release and -security, not -updates.) Do packages built in 
such a PPA exist?
"
I've now kicked off build in a -security only PPA here:
https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp2059303-sec
(so yes, they build there, but it'll take a while until published)

"
The SRU workflow asks for packages to be either uploaded with dput to the queue 
or debdiffs provided. I see some debdiffs here, but some additional work was 
performed after most of the debdiffs were uploaded.
"
The changes are some broken URL references in some quilt patch headers, I've 
fixed those.

"
Are the posted debdiffs something that the SRU team should work with? The 
Ubuntu Sponsors team was added around three weeks ago, before much of the work 
was done, it's entirely possible that this has fallen off their radar as a 
result. (And, the general hustle of responding to the xz-utils issue, release 
time goals, etc.)
"
I think the debdiffs should be taken (as usual).
It's difficult to get SRUs processed around release times.

One concern I have is that copying the packages might not work, since there is 
a bootloader component that is signed, and the signing key is based on the 
location where the package is build.
Hence a package build in PPA will be signed with the PPA key and not with the 
official ('production') key
and so copying it over from PPA to archive will probably mess up things.

So I believe the debdiffs need to be the base for an upload (by a
sponsor), then build for the archives (that will ensure signing with the
proper key), then published on -proposed, verified there and then
eventually released.

(I'm attaching the debdiffs again, with fixed urls)

** Attachment added: "debdiffs.tgz"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools/+bug/2059303/+attachment/5769649/+files/debdiffs.tgz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059303

Title:
  [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality
  (s390-tools)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2059303/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2048232] Re: [SRU] Backport to 22.04 LTS

** Description changed:

As part of our entreprise desktop offering, there is the request to
backport ubuntu-proxy-manager to 22.04 LTS. The package is in universe
for now.

Ubuntu Proxy Manager is a D-Bus mediated service intended to be
triggered by ADSys, our Active Directory GPO integration. ADSys has been
available starting Ubuntu 21.04, and Ubuntu Proxy Manager was first
released in Ubuntu 23.04.
+
+ It depends on the new golang 1.22 SRU attached to
+ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-1.22/+bug/2059756

[Impact]

* ubuntu-proxy-manager is a new package. Impact is thus only for people
installing.
* To leverage the functionality of the package, a recent enough ADSys
version must be used (at least 0.11.0, not currently in Jammy but there are
approved plans to backport ADSys 0.13.2).
* In addition to the ADSys requirement above, the machine must be
Pro-enabled and a Proxy GPO must be configured on the Windows AD controller.
* No impact is expected if the conditions above are not met.
* This is a entreprise feature requested by desktop customers running LTS.

[Test Plan]

1. Configure your machine with AD, with a correctly configured SSSD and KRB5
(AD user should be able to log in). Instructions can be found on
https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/wiki/2.-Prerequisites
2. Install admx and adml files on your AD controller:
https://canonical-adsys.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/stable/how-to/set-up-ad/
3. Join machine to Ubuntu Pro to enable proxy policy application
4. Configure some proxy settings in AD
(https://canonical-adsys.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/stable/explanation/proxy/),
for instance:
* HTTP Proxy
* Ignored hosts
5. Install ADSys (at least version 0.11.0) and ubuntu-proxy-manager, then
run `adsysctl update -m` to force a refresh of the policies
6. Ensure GSettings/APT/environment proxy values are correctly set (full
list of supported proxy backends can be seen here:
https://github.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-proxy-manager#supported-backends)
7. Remove/purge the ubuntu-proxy-manager package and run `adsysctl update
-m` again -- a warning should show reflecting that ADSys has detected a
configured proxy policy but ubuntu-proxy-manager is not installed for it to be
applied. ADSys's exit code will remain 0.

[Where problems could occur]

* Network access of various programs will be hindered if incorrect
proxy settings are configured.

[Other Info]

* The current version of ADSys in Jammy does not interact with this package
whatsoever, but there are plans to backport the latest version.
* A passing PPA build for ubuntu-proxy-manager can be seen here:
https://launchpad.net/~gabuscus/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/15678628/+listing-archive-extra
- * We have previously requested a FFe for ubuntu-proxy-manager for Focal:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+source/adsys/+bug/2012371
+ * We have previously requested a FFe for ubuntu-proxy-manager for Focal:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+source/adsys/+bug/2012371

--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048232

Title:
[SRU] Backport to 22.04 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-proxy-manager/+bug/2048232/+subscriptions

--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice

I have made many installs of various boxes, and exploring logs of the
iso.qa.ubu link in comment #3 i see only two references to this issue
(within a few days of each other), which include the following

---
hp dc7700 (c2d-e6320, 8gb, amd/ati rv610/radeon hd2400 pro/xt)
testcase: install using existing partition
---

I've made four installs on that box today
(https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/453/builds/300140/testcases/1701/results/)
yet did NOT experience the issue.  Currently the box has two installs
(first was full disk, then auto-resize equiv.. ) so I'll try and repeat
the install I made in the next hour+ and see if it occurs.

Lubuntu testcases are described here -
https://discourse.lubuntu.me/t/testing-checklist-understanding-the-
testcases/2743

but an INSTALL USING EXISTING PARTITION means

- boot install media
- using manual partitioning, selecting an existing partition (for /) BUT DO NOT 
FORMAT  (ie. re-use it...)


This is NO longer possible with Xubuntu as FORMAT is now mandatory (due to 
another bug, scheduled for fix post-release of noble..) 

I'll add some non-standard packages to one of my installed systems on
dc7700 (per testcase; something for installer to re-install), then
attempt to re-create this issue & reply back in an hour (or three) and
see if it re-occurs...  then provide detailed description of what I did
(if issue re-occurs).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624

Title:
  lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does
  appear & offer OS choice

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 2063132] Re: Gnome-tweaks crashes system

2024-04-23 Thread Bill Wilken

I wish I could, but Ubuntu wouldn’t reinstall without a disk format

Sent from my iPad

> On Apr 23, 2024, at 3:20 AM, Sebastien Bacher <2063...@bugs.launchpad.net> 
> wrote:
> 
> Thank you for your bug report, could you try to collect the journalctl
> log from the system or see if there are any gnome-shell error in there?
> 
> ** Changed in: gnome-tweaks (Ubuntu)
>   Status: New => Incomplete
> 
> -- 
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063132
> 
> Title:
>  Gnome-tweaks crashes system
> 
> Status in subiquity:
>  Invalid
> Status in ubuntu-desktop-provision:
>  Invalid
> Status in gnome-tweaks package in Ubuntu:
>  Incomplete
> 
> Bug description:
>  I installed 24.04 using Yaru.  Later tried to change to Dark.  After
>  reboot, system responded with "Something went wrong."  Subsequent
>  reboot attempts produced login screen, but after logging, kept on
>  getting "Something went wrong."  Tried all Ubuntu recovery options,
>  none worked.  One probe using the command line implied that something
>  went south in a Python server.
> 
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2063132/+subscriptions
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063132

Title:
  Gnome-tweaks crashes system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2063132/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063194] Re: Sync capnproto 1.0.1-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-04-23 Thread Graham Inggs

This bug was fixed in the package capnproto - 1.0.1-4
Sponsored for Skia (hyask)

---
capnproto (1.0.1-4) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Add patch for FTBFS on 32-bit ARM after the time_t 64 transition.
Thank you to Arnd Bergmann, Wookey, Tom Lee, and Andrey Rakhmatullin
for their for help resolving this bug.  (Closes: #1067916)

 -- tony mancill   Mon, 15 Apr 2024 22:09:51 -0700

** Changed in: capnproto (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063194

Title:
  Sync capnproto 1.0.1-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/capnproto/+bug/2063194/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056758] Re: ubuntu-bug doesn't let me file bugs for Snap thunderbird

2024-04-23 Thread Benjamin Drung

https://github.com/canonical/apport/pull/324 got merged.

** Changed in: apport
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056758

Title:
  ubuntu-bug doesn't let me file bugs for Snap thunderbird

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/2056758/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063112] Re: [arm64] autopkgtest - insufficient number of hugepages for all tests to succeed

2024-04-23 Thread Frode Nordahl

** Description changed:

  In bug 2059400 we switch to using 1G hugepages on arm64, as 2M hugepages
- does not work. For the OVN autopkgtests using 2 1G hugepages is
+ does not work. For the OVN autopkgtests using 1 1G hugepage is
  sufficient, but for the openvswitch autopkgtests that is not enough for
  all tests to succeed.
  
  Bump number of 1G hugepages for the openvswitch autopkgtest.

** Description changed:

  In bug 2059400 we switch to using 1G hugepages on arm64, as 2M hugepages
- does not work. For the OVN autopkgtests using 1 1G hugepage is
- sufficient, but for the openvswitch autopkgtests that is not enough for
- all tests to succeed.
+ does not work. For the OVN autopkgtests using 1 1G hugepage per NUNMA
+ node is sufficient, but for the openvswitch autopkgtests that is not
+ enough for all tests to succeed.
  
  Bump number of 1G hugepages for the openvswitch autopkgtest.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063112

Title:
  [arm64] autopkgtest - insufficient number of hugepages for all tests
  to succeed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/2063112/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063132] Re: Gnome-tweaks crashes system

let's close then, feel free to reopen if you can get the needed
information though

** Changed in: gnome-tweaks (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063132

Title:
  Gnome-tweaks crashes system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2063132/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060391] Re: gnome desktop cannot start as mutter fails to find drmModeCloseFB

2024-04-23 Thread Erkin Alp Güney

libdrm.so.2 => /opt/amdgpu/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdrm.so.2
(0x785c9fdef000)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060391

Title:
  gnome desktop cannot start as mutter fails to find drmModeCloseFB

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2060391/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060391] Re: gnome desktop cannot start as mutter fails to find drmModeCloseFB

2024-04-23 Thread Erkin Alp Güney

just realised mutter isn't even installed on fresh 24.04 installs,
that's why i failed to reproduce that on a fresh install

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060391

Title:
  gnome desktop cannot start as mutter fails to find drmModeCloseFB

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2060391/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice

I completed an install on dc7700

- two systems (noble) exist on drive
- boot install media (lubuntu noble RC)
- select partition (I selected SDA2, ignoring SDA1) for `/` WITHOUT FORMAT
- let it install

(this system is OLD, legacy-BIOS so no ESP; Lubuntu's calamares doesn't
create one by default for BIOS machine; iso.qa report at
https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/453/builds/300140/testcases/1701/results/)

on reboot; two options appeared in grub.

- SDA1 was in grub & when booted looked untouched
- SDA2 contained new install, file-system system directories all time-stamped 
mins ago (not hours ago) as expected for new install.. packages I added are 
present (fortune, clementine etc)..

I COULD NOT RE-CREATE THIS ISSUE..

Only difference between this and prior install could have been I
selected second partition (SDA2) where last time I selected SDA1?? but I
can't see that as making an difference; could it??


Given I've only experienced this issue twice, and could not re-create.. I'd be 
happy with marking bug as INCOMPLETE..


I could re-try by installing to SDA1 (same type of install) if you think there 
is any chance of difference.. but I couldn't re-create issue today (me 
attempting same type of install on same box)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624

Title:
  lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does
  appear & offer OS choice

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063200] [NEW] useradd --extrausers --groups tries to lock /etc/group

2024-04-23 Thread Valentin David

Public bug reported:

On Ubuntu Core 24 calling the command line

useradd --extrausers --groups somegroup somenewuser

... fails with:

useradd: cannot lock /etc/group; try again later.

It worked on 22.04. /etc is not writable. It also fails if somegroup is
a group in extrausers.

** Affects: shadow (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063200

Title:
  useradd --extrausers --groups tries to lock /etc/group

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/2063200/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-restricted-modules-azure/5.15.0-1062.71)

2024-04-23 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-restricted-modules-azure 
(5.15.0-1062.71) for jammy have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

nvidia-graphics-drivers-390/390.157-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 (armhf)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/jammy/update_excuses.html#linux-restricted-modules-azure

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013

Title:
  Packaging resync

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1990200] Re: goa-daemon crashed with SIGABRT

2024-04-23 Thread Bug Watch Updater

** Changed in: gnome-online-accounts
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990200

Title:
  goa-daemon crashed with SIGABRT

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/1990200/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060391] Re: gnome desktop cannot start as mutter fails to find drmModeCloseFB

2024-04-23 Thread DooMMasteR

Erkin you have the same issue I had

`/etc/ld.so.conf.d/`

should have a amdgpu conf that includes the externally packaged libs and
apparently this config slipped through the testing.

You can either uninstall the amdgpu-dkms stuff and the libs or just delete the 
conf file that makes the dynamic linker include the old lib.
Then reboot and all should be fine.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060391

Title:
  gnome desktop cannot start as mutter fails to find drmModeCloseFB

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2060391/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice

Hi Chris, i'll try the same thing:
- two preinstalled noble system on MBR, with sda1 and sda2
- install lubuntu without reformat on sda1 first
- install lubuntu without reformat on sda2 second

If none of that reproduces, i'll mark it incomplete.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624

Title:
  lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does
  appear & offer OS choice

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056758] Re: ubuntu-bug doesn't let me file bugs for Snap thunderbird

Thanks Benjamin!

** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056758

Title:
  ubuntu-bug doesn't let me file bugs for Snap thunderbird

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/2056758/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2051123] Re: Kernel traces leading to crash - refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free and refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory -- lib/refcount.c

2024-04-23 Thread GuoqingJiang

Just noticed master-next has disabled tasklets for dm-crypt.

https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/mantic/commit/?h=master-
next&id=13104eddc76990dc3e4183cff050c9b6dc5e859e

I suppose hwe-6.5 will sync from mantic later, so please try with the
newer kernel.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051123

Title:
  Kernel traces leading to crash - refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free
  and refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory  --  lib/refcount.c

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe-6.5/+bug/2051123/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063200] Re: useradd --extrausers --groups tries to lock /etc/group

2024-04-23 Thread Simon Chopin

** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063200

Title:
  useradd --extrausers --groups tries to lock /etc/group

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/2063200/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112

2024-04-23 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot

This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-azure/5.15.0-1063.72
kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and
update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the
tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-azure' to 'verification-done-jammy-
linux-azure'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-
needed-jammy-linux-azure' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux-azure'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-azure-v2 
verification-needed-jammy-linux-azure

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060780

Title:
  CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2060780/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054855] Re: Azure: Network doesn't get configured after triggering kdump

2024-04-23 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot

This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-azure/5.15.0-1063.72
kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and
update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the
tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-azure' to 'verification-done-jammy-
linux-azure'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-
needed-jammy-linux-azure' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux-azure'.


If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.


See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-azure-v2 
verification-needed-jammy-linux-azure

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054855

Title:
  Azure: Network doesn't get configured after triggering kdump

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/2054855/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1721094] Re: Preview window not smooth, 'jumps' around the screen

2024-04-23 Thread Bug Watch Updater

** Changed in: gnome-sushi
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1721094

Title:
  Preview window not smooth, 'jumps' around the screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-sushi/+bug/1721094/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063139] Re: Please rebuild using rocprim 5.7.1-2

2024-04-23 Thread Graham Inggs

** Changed in: hipcub (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Graham Inggs (ginggs)

** Changed in: rocsparse (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Graham Inggs (ginggs)

** Changed in: rocthrust (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Graham Inggs (ginggs)

** Changed in: rocthrust (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: rocsparse (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: hipcub (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063139

Title:
  Please rebuild using rocprim 5.7.1-2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hipcub/+bug/2063139/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1970773] Re: Verify YAML configuration after package upgrades

** Tags added: foundations-todo

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970773

Title:
  Verify YAML configuration after package upgrades

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/1970773/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice

@guiverc, it seemingly reproduced with an install to sda1, but only
_without_ the format

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624

Title:
  lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does
  appear & offer OS choice

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063200] Re: useradd --extrausers --groups tries to lock /etc/group

2024-04-23 Thread Simon Chopin

Quick repro steps:

❯ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:noble shadow
Creating shadow
Starting shadow
❯ lxc exec shadow bash
root@shadow:~# mv /etc /etc_write
root@shadow:~# mkdir /etc
root@shadow:~# mount -o bind,ro /etc_write /etc
root@shadow:~# useradd --extrausers --groups somegroup somenewuser
useradd: cannot lock /etc/group; try again later.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063200

Title:
  useradd --extrausers --groups tries to lock /etc/group

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/2063200/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice

Hmm it seemingly reproduced once, but then i fixed it with dpkg-
reconfigure grub-pc, did another install to overwrite it, and it was
working there.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624

Title:
  lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does
  appear & offer OS choice

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063204] [NEW] Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml

Public bug reported:

The /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml, generated by livecd-rootfs, 
shouldn't exist any more IIUC.
That functionality was moved into src:ubuntu-settings and shipped as 
/usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml

This is according to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-
settings/23.10.1

The duplicated "renderer: NetworkManager" doesn't cause any harm in the
live-session, AFAICT.

** Affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063204

Title:
  Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in
  addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2063204/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063203] [NEW] Build ubuntu-core-desktop images

2024-04-23 Thread Łukasz Zemczak

Public bug reported:

[Impact]

We want to be able to build iso installer images that would install
Ubuntu Core Desktop to target device. This is a completely new image and
product, but it's important to get building as early as possible.

The first core series that we want to support here is 24. However, due
to issues with the ubuntu-core-desktop installer snap, the snap does not
work on noble (which would be the best place to build the images from).
However, since Ubuntu Core Desktop is a separate entity outside of the
archive, it actually does not matter which Ubuntu series the 'installer'
part is. We can install Ubuntu Core Desktop 24 with no problems from a
mantic installer.

And this is what we want to do: backport the ubuntu-core-desktop build
changes to mantic and, for now, use it for building the mantic images.
We can switch to noble once noble works with the snap again.

[Test Case]

Run an image build on cdimage of ubuntu-core-desktop and see that the
image builds and boots into the installer.

[Regression Potential]

Since some code-paths needed to be changes, there is a very low risk of
other ubuntu-image based builds failing. So a re-check of all ubuntu-
image based images would be recommended.

** Affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063203

Title:
  Build ubuntu-core-desktop images

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2063203/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058415] Re: Reading binary data in paraview broken by libexpat1 update

2024-04-23 Thread Peter Heywood

VTK has been patched upstream to correctly handle AppendedData elements
in .vtu files  with the updated/patched libexpat1:


https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/-/commit/db8f9efca220c9d16a30958e179abae3379d0011

https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/-/issues/19258

This will need backporting to older VTK releases on ubuntu's where
libexpat1's fixes have been backported, which if I'm reading the ubuntu
package release dates correctly is Jammy(security, updates), Mantic
(security, updates) and potentially Noble (release).

** Bug watch added: gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/-/issues #19258
   https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/-/issues/19258

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058415

Title:
  Reading binary data in paraview broken by libexpat1 update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dune-grid/+bug/2058415/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice

Reproduced again. I think the steps are, and they have to be repeated
from step 1 each time:

Start with clean disk:
1. Partition disk as MBR with two partitions, install lubuntu on sda1 _with_ 
format
2. Install lubuntu on sda2 _with_ format
3. Install lubuntu on sda1 _without_ format


I'll spend a bit more time later trying to figure out the exact root cause, but 
this seems like a rather specific issue that shouldn't be a release blocker for 
sure.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624

Title:
  lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does
  appear & offer OS choice

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2055012] Re: When I upgraded from 22.04 to 24.04, DNS resolution went wrong.

2024-04-23 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo

I can confirm this is an issue, although it's not caused by Network
Manager so I'll go ahead and set it as invalid.

After trying to do a "do-release-upgrade -d" from a brand new
installation of Jammy 22.04.4, gnome-shell crashed and interrupted the
upgrade.

After that, this is what "dpkg --list | grep systemd" looks like:

ii  dbus-user-session 1.14.10-4ubuntu4  
   amd64simple interprocess messaging system (systemd --user 
integration)
ii  gnome-logs42.0-1
   amd64viewer for the systemd journal
ii  libnss-systemd:amd64  249.11-0ubuntu3.12
   amd64nss module providing dynamic user and group name 
resolution
ii  libpam-systemd:amd64  249.11-0ubuntu3.12
   amd64system and service manager - PAM module
ii  libsystemd-shared:amd64   255.4-1ubuntu8
   amd64systemd shared private library
ii  libsystemd0:amd64 255.4-1ubuntu8
   amd64systemd utility library
ii  networkd-dispatcher   2.1-2ubuntu0.22.04.2  
   all  Dispatcher service for systemd-networkd connection 
status changes
ii  python3-systemd   235-1build4   
   amd64Python 3 bindings for systemd
ii  systemd   255.4-1ubuntu8
   amd64system and service manager
ii  systemd-dev   255.4-1ubuntu8
   all  systemd development files
ii  systemd-hwe-hwdb  249.11.5  
   all  udev rules for hardware enablement (HWE)
ii  systemd-oomd  249.11-0ubuntu3.12
   amd64Userspace out-of-memory (OOM) killer
ii  systemd-sysv  249.11-0ubuntu3.12
   amd64system and service manager - SysV links
ii  systemd-timesyncd 255.4-1ubuntu8
   amd64minimalistic service to synchronize local time with NTP 
servers


and /etc/resolv.conf is a broken link as systemd-resolved is not installed and 
/run/systemd/resolve doesn't exist:

/etc/resolv.conf -> ../run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf



** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055012

Title:
  When I upgraded from 22.04 to 24.04, DNS resolution went wrong.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/2055012/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2055012] Re: When I upgraded from 22.04 to 24.04, DNS resolution went wrong.

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055012

Title:
  When I upgraded from 22.04 to 24.04, DNS resolution went wrong.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/2055012/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063167] Re: loki-ecmwf uninstallable issue

2024-04-23 Thread Jeremy Bícha

** Changed in: loki-ecmwf (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063167

Title:
  loki-ecmwf uninstallable issue

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/loki-ecmwf/+bug/2063167/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058415] Re: Reading binary data in paraview broken by libexpat1 update

2024-04-23 Thread Peter Heywood

** Also affects: vtk7
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** No longer affects: vtk7

** Also affects: vtk7 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058415

Title:
  Reading binary data in paraview broken by libexpat1 update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dune-grid/+bug/2058415/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063207] [NEW] libllvm18:i386 conflicts with libllvm18

2024-04-23 Thread Guilhem Lettron

Public bug reported:

libllvm18:i386 conflict with libllvm18, but isn't mark like so.

```
Unpacking libllvm18:i386 (1:18.1.3-1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libllvm18_1%3a18.1.3-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite shared '/usr/lib/llvm-18/lib/libLLVM.so.1', which is 
different from other instances of package libllvm18:i386
```

** Affects: llvm-toolchain-18 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063207

Title:
  libllvm18:i386 conflicts with libllvm18

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-18/+bug/2063207/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063207] Re: libllvm18:i386 conflicts with libllvm18

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: llvm-toolchain-18 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063207

Title:
  libllvm18:i386 conflicts with libllvm18

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-18/+bug/2063207/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063154] Re: Wireguard imported with Network manager does not work after latest upgrade, wg-quick using the same config file works

2024-04-23 Thread Martin Randau

Well, with a new set of upgrades the problem seems to have resolved
itself.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063154

Title:
  Wireguard imported with Network manager does not work after latest
  upgrade, wg-quick using the same config file works

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/2063154/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060880] Re: squid crashes after update to 4.10-1ubuntu1.10

2024-04-23 Thread Marc Deslauriers

The regression fix has now been published:

https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6728-3

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060880

Title:
  squid crashes after update to 4.10-1ubuntu1.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid/+bug/2060880/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice

Just an FYI... but on the two cases I've encountered this issue I didn't
install as per #14.  I'll have always performed a

1. full disk install (any prior partitioning erased); noble (may not have been 
lubuntu) but single partition only
2. install alongside (calamares wording; auto-resize type creating a second 
install)

(ie. I did two install types & achieved same result as steps 1 & 2 as
Mate (mkukri) in comment #14)

At step 3 my usual thing is a 'replace partition' (calamares wording)
install using one of the partitions (this is a FORMAT install).. where
which partition I use is ~random (usually opting to keep the partition
I'll most recognize as untouched; the install where I changed the
wallpaper usually so easily recognized)..

Any testing of 'install using existing partition' for me would be 4th
(or 5th) install almost guaranteed I believe..

My point is it can be triggered in other ways I believe, but again very
few users will encounter it... I rarely encountered it!


(then again what I listed ^ is what I did today, do most days probably too.. 
maybe why I've not experienced it much as I suspect i re-use SDA2 most days (& 
not sda1); ie. changing wallpaper on that first install (of the day) so its 
recognized on the many installs that usually follow...)

I concur with view not a release blocker.

--  said by me on #lubuntu-devel (matrix)
> It may worthwhile (if not fixed & I doubt it will be) for me to create a page 
> on [lubuntu]discourse(doco) for users should they encounter this issue  ... 
> to me it's not a big issue; I've only encountered it rarely, it requires 
> specific conditions I doubt many will encounter.. but could be mentioned in 
> release notes as well with somewhere we can point users too...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624

Title:
  lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does
  appear & offer OS choice

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060659] Re: X11 fractional scaling support is missing in 46.0

2024-04-23 Thread mtech

This fix is working. Checked on the updated version released on 23rd
April 2024

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060659

Title:
  X11 fractional scaling support is missing in 46.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/magpie/+bug/2060659/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063204] Re: Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml

** Tags added: iso-testing

** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063204

Title:
  Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in
  addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2063204/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056758] Re: ubuntu-bug doesn't let me file bugs for Snap thunderbird

2024-04-23 Thread Benjamin Drung

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056758

Title:
  ubuntu-bug doesn't let me file bugs for Snap thunderbird

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/2056758/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060659] Re: X11 fractional scaling support is missing in 46.0

2024-04-23 Thread Harald Hannelius

Thank You very much. Works.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060659

Title:
  X11 fractional scaling support is missing in 46.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/magpie/+bug/2060659/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059756] Re: [SRU] adsys 0.14.1

2024-04-23 Thread Gabriel Nagy

** Patch removed: "ubuntu-proxy-manager_0.1~22.04.1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/2059756/+attachment/5761552/+files/ubuntu-proxy-manager_0.1~22.04.1.debdiff

** Patch added: "ubuntu-proxy-manager_0.1.1~22.04.1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/2059756/+attachment/5769691/+files/ubuntu-proxy-manager_0.1.1~22.04.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059756

Title:
  [SRU] adsys 0.14.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/2059756/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice

Yes, I agree there might be other ways to trigger it, I'm just leaving a
reproducible one I found above.

And not being a release blocker doesn't mean it won't be fixed btw, just
that I am not going to rush this.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624

Title:
  lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does
  appear & offer OS choice

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2061882] Re: Thunderbird snap loses local folder settings in 24.04

Examining the information you have given us, this does not appear to be
a bug report so we are closing it. We understand the difficulties you
are facing, but it is better to raise problems you are having in the
support tracker at https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu if you are
uncertain if they are bugs. If you would prefer live chat support, you
can find an IRC support channel for your flavor of Ubuntu here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/ChannelList. You can also find help with
your problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community
http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or
https://ubuntuforums.org. For help on reporting bugs, see
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs.

** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061882

Title:
  Thunderbird snap loses local folder settings  in 24.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/2061882/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063204] Re: Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml

** Description changed:

  The /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml, generated by livecd-rootfs, 
shouldn't exist any more IIUC.
  That functionality was moved into src:ubuntu-settings and shipped as 
/usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml
  
  This is according to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-
  settings/23.10.1
  
  The duplicated "renderer: NetworkManager" doesn't cause any harm in the
  live-session, AFAICT.
+ 
+ The /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml file is carried over into
+ the installed system (target).
+ 
+ After "apt install --reinstall ubuntu-settings" the file gets deleted.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063204

Title:
  Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in
  addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2063204/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2061918] Re: package thunderbird 2:1snap1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: new thunderbird package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-04-23 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov

I think release upgrader settings changed. To do deb2snap transitions
first before upgrade happens.

Because during upgrade, packages are inconsistent, and snap hooks must
be deffered until they are safe to execute on the system.

Note all other deb2snap transitions were always graceful and would
attempt transition later if snap configuration fails during upgrade.

See old LXD deb2snap .deb logic.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061918

Title:
  package thunderbird 2:1snap1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: new
  thunderbird package pre-installation script subprocess returned error
  exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/2061918/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2061918] Re: package thunderbird 2:1snap1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: new thunderbird package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-04-23 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov

*should be changed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061918

Title:
  package thunderbird 2:1snap1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: new
  thunderbird package pre-installation script subprocess returned error
  exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/2061918/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060624] Re: lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does appear & offer OS choice

(
another FYI   I mentioned it's no longer re-creatable with Xubuntu due to 
forced FORMAT currently with `ubuntu-desktop-installer` ...

the issue i'm referring to is/was https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-
desktop-provision/+bug/2058638  .. current 'fix' being to force format ,
but my understanding is that will be reverted once time is available to
correct the current 'regression' format triggers with 24.04 over 23.10 &
earlier)

This bug (2060624) thus can only be triggered (I believe) by the calamares 
installer used Lubuntu, Kubuntu & Ubuntu.Unity;  as ubuntu-desktop-installer is 
forcing format (at least for now).
)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624

Title:
  lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does
  appear & offer OS choice

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060624/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060300] Re: KMS overlay causes OOM oops on 3A+

2024-04-23 Thread Dave Jones

Have now also observed this on the Zero 2W with the current noble daily
server image. Interestingly, it *didn't* occur directly on the image at
first. This booted happily on the Zero 2W. However, this same card was
then used to test a 3A+. On the 3A+ I regenerated the initramfs (testing
a reported issue on low-memory boards), then moved the card back to the
Zero 2W and observed the same OOM issue on boot as the 3A+ does without
the CMA-128 workaround.

I also tried re-generating the initrd on the Zero 2W, but it still
booted happily after that without the workaround. This implies there's
something about the initrd, which is triggering the issue (sizing,
position in memory, I'm not sure?) but that the Zero 2W may
coincidentally run into the issue in normal operation.

Placing the CMA-128 workaround on the KMS overlay worked around the
issue, so I'll now add a [pi02] section in the config.txt applying the
same workaround for this board too.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060300

Title:
  KMS overlay causes OOM oops on 3A+

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/2060300/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063209] [NEW] FS-Cache: Duplicate cookie detected (NFS)

2024-04-23 Thread geole0

Public bug reported:

Good morning
I think it's the same problem as bug 19223670. But it's in NFS.
I actually have two mounts in the fstab

lsb_release -d
Description:Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS

grep nfs /etc/fstab
192.168.1.22:/media/NosDonnees  /media/NosDonneesBureau  nfs  
defaults,user,auto,_netdev
192.168.1.22:/home/a  /media/UbuntuBureau nfs  defaults,user,auto,_netdev

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063209

Title:
  FS-Cache: Duplicate cookie detected (NFS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2063209/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056760] Re: [snap]Thunderbird doesn't authenticate with sssd-kcm