[Touch-packages] [Bug 1966849] Re: gzip exec format error under WSL
Reported to WSL: https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/8219 ** Bug watch added: github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues #8219 https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/8219 ** Also affects: gzip via https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/8219 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gzip in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966849 Title: gzip exec format error under WSL Status in gzip: Unknown Status in gzip package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: gzip version 1.10-4ubuntu3 fails to run under WSL1 on Windows 19044.1620, making WSL pretty much unusable. bash: /usr/bin/gzip: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: gzip 1.10-4ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Microsoft 4.4.0-19041.1237-Microsoft 4.4.35 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-19041-Microsoft x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu79 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown Date: Tue Mar 29 06:40:33 2022 ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8 SHELL=/usr/bin/fish SourcePackage: gzip UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gzip/+bug/1966849/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1966849] Re: gzip exec format error under WSL
Note that only 1.10-4ubuntu3 is affected, so users can install gzip 1.10-4ubuntu1 and set the package on hold for the time being, until the issue is resolved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gzip in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966849 Title: gzip exec format error under WSL Status in gzip: Unknown Status in gzip package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: gzip version 1.10-4ubuntu3 fails to run under WSL1 on Windows 19044.1620, making WSL pretty much unusable. bash: /usr/bin/gzip: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: gzip 1.10-4ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Microsoft 4.4.0-19041.1237-Microsoft 4.4.35 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-19041-Microsoft x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu79 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown Date: Tue Mar 29 06:40:33 2022 ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8 SHELL=/usr/bin/fish SourcePackage: gzip UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gzip/+bug/1966849/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1966849] Re: gzip exec format error under WSL
Also affects: gzip (=1.10-4ubuntu4) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gzip in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966849 Title: gzip exec format error under WSL Status in gzip: New Status in gzip package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: gzip version 1.10-4ubuntu3 fails to run under WSL1 on Windows 19044.1620, making WSL pretty much unusable. bash: /usr/bin/gzip: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: gzip 1.10-4ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Microsoft 4.4.0-19041.1237-Microsoft 4.4.35 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-19041-Microsoft x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu79 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown Date: Tue Mar 29 06:40:33 2022 ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8 SHELL=/usr/bin/fish SourcePackage: gzip UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gzip/+bug/1966849/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947318] [NEW] ip xfrm policy help gives invalid output
Public bug reported:
On Ubuntu Focal, the `ip x p h` command from iproute2 (5.5.0-1ubuntu1)
gives the following output:
UPSPEC := proto { { tcp | tcp | tcp | tcp } [ sport PORT ] [ dport PORT ] |
{ icmp | icmp | icmp } [ type NUMBER ] [ code NUMBER ] |
gre [ key { DOTTED-QUAD | NUMBER } ] | PROTO }
I don't think the proto is intended to be "{ tcp | tcp | tcp | tcp }" or
"{ icmp | icmp | icmp }"
The same command provided by iproute2 in Debian Buster
(4.20.0-2+deb10u1), Bullseye (5.10.0-4) and Ubuntu Groovy
(5.7.0-1ubuntu1) generates the following output, which looks like
intended.
UPSPEC := proto { { tcp | udp | sctp | dccp } [ sport PORT ] [ dport PORT ]
|
{ icmp | ipv6-icmp | mobility-header } [ type NUMBER ] [
code NUMBER ] |
gre [ key { DOTTED-QUAD | NUMBER } ] | PROTO }
It certainly makes more sense that proto may be one of "{ tcp | udp |
sctp | dccp }" than "{ tcp | tcp | tcp | tcp }".
Should any relevant fix be ported to the LTS version, Focal, too?
** Affects: iproute2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947318
Title:
ip xfrm policy help gives invalid output
Status in iproute2 package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
On Ubuntu Focal, the `ip x p h` command from iproute2 (5.5.0-1ubuntu1)
gives the following output:
UPSPEC := proto { { tcp | tcp | tcp | tcp } [ sport PORT ] [ dport PORT ]
|
{ icmp | icmp | icmp } [ type NUMBER ] [ code NUMBER ] |
gre [ key { DOTTED-QUAD | NUMBER } ] | PROTO }
I don't think the proto is intended to be "{ tcp | tcp | tcp | tcp }"
or "{ icmp | icmp | icmp }"
The same command provided by iproute2 in Debian Buster
(4.20.0-2+deb10u1), Bullseye (5.10.0-4) and Ubuntu Groovy
(5.7.0-1ubuntu1) generates the following output, which looks like
intended.
UPSPEC := proto { { tcp | udp | sctp | dccp } [ sport PORT ] [ dport PORT
] |
{ icmp | ipv6-icmp | mobility-header } [ type NUMBER ]
[ code NUMBER ] |
gre [ key { DOTTED-QUAD | NUMBER } ] | PROTO }
It certainly makes more sense that proto may be one of "{ tcp | udp |
sctp | dccp }" than "{ tcp | tcp | tcp | tcp }".
Should any relevant fix be ported to the LTS version, Focal, too?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1947318/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871465] [NEW] ssh_config(5) contains outdated information
Public bug reported: The release of OpenSSH 8.2 has removed `ssh-rsa` from the default list of CACertificateAlgorithms. However the latest `openssh-client` still ships the man page for ssh_config(5) that contains the following description: CASignatureAlgorithms Specifies which algorithms are allowed for signing of certificates by certificate authorities (CAs). The default is: ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521, ssh-ed25519,rsa-sha2-512,rsa-sha2-256,ssh-rsa ssh(1) will not accept host certificates signed using algorithms other than those specified. As far as I am concerned, `ssh-rsa` should be dropped from the list so as to match the behavior of ssh(1). ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: manpage ** Description changed: The release of OpenSSH 8.2 has removed `ssh-rsa` from the default list of CACertificateAlgorithms. However the latest `openssh-client` still ships the man page for ssh_config(5) that contains the following description: - CASignatureAlgorithms - Specifies which algorithms are allowed for signing of certificates by certificate authorities (CAs). The default is: + CASignatureAlgorithms + Specifies which algorithms are allowed for signing of certificates + by certificate authorities (CAs). The default is: - ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521, -ssh-ed25519,rsa-sha2-512,rsa-sha2-256,ssh-rsa + ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521, + ssh-ed25519,rsa-sha2-512,rsa-sha2-256,ssh-rsa - ssh(1) will not accept host certificates signed using - algorithms other than those specified. + ssh(1) will not accept host certificates signed using algorithms + other than those specified. As far as I am concerned, `ssh-rsa` should be dropped from the list so as to match the behavior of ssh(1). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871465 Title: ssh_config(5) contains outdated information Status in openssh package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: The release of OpenSSH 8.2 has removed `ssh-rsa` from the default list of CACertificateAlgorithms. However the latest `openssh-client` still ships the man page for ssh_config(5) that contains the following description: CASignatureAlgorithms Specifies which algorithms are allowed for signing of certificates by certificate authorities (CAs). The default is: ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521, ssh-ed25519,rsa-sha2-512,rsa-sha2-256,ssh-rsa ssh(1) will not accept host certificates signed using algorithms other than those specified. As far as I am concerned, `ssh-rsa` should be dropped from the list so as to match the behavior of ssh(1). To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1871465/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
