[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061995] Re: ULLTS 22, 24: FontConfig broken by including ".conf" file
** Also affects: fontconfig (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061995 Title: ULLTS 22,24: FontConfig broken by including ".conf" file Status in Ubuntu: New Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: This happens to me on both ULTS 22 and ULKTS 24 on FotnConfig in somewhat different ways: * In ULTS 24 if there is a file '/etc/fonts/local.conf' then all fonts are rendered as if the font were not hinted or 'hinting' were 'false'. This is not noticeable if antialiasing is on, and most users default to antialiasing. * In ULTS 22 if there is a file '$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf' then some fonts are no longer found, or get rendered with rectangular shapes. I guess not many users customize their font settings. A telling example from ULTS 22: $ cat /etc/fonts/conf.d/10-antialias.conf false $ cp -p /etc/fonts/conf.d/10-antialias.conf $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf $ fc-list 'dejavu sans mono' family $ rm $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf $ fc-list 'dejavu sans mono' family DejaVu Sans Mono This happens also with a skeleton '$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf' (or '/etc/fonts/local.conf') too: $ cat > $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf $ fc-list 'dejavu sans mono' family $ rm $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf $ fc-list 'dejavu sans mono' family DejaVu Sans Mono None of these anomalies happen under ULST 20. My impression: symptoms vary and are weird, so probably it is something like a buffer overflow when reading the ".conf" files or the use of not-initialized memory. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2061995/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061995] Re: ULTS 22, 24: FontConfig broken by including ".conf" file
** Summary changed: - ULLTS 22,24: FontConfig broken by including ".conf" file + ULTS 22,24: FontConfig broken by including ".conf" file -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061995 Title: ULTS 22,24: FontConfig broken by including ".conf" file Status in Ubuntu: New Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: This happens to me on both ULTS 22 and ULKTS 24 on FotnConfig in somewhat different ways: * In ULTS 24 if there is a file '/etc/fonts/local.conf' then all fonts are rendered as if the font were not hinted or 'hinting' were 'false'. This is not noticeable if antialiasing is on, and most users default to antialiasing. * In ULTS 22 if there is a file '$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf' then some fonts are no longer found, or get rendered with rectangular shapes. I guess not many users customize their font settings. A telling example from ULTS 22: $ cat /etc/fonts/conf.d/10-antialias.conf false $ cp -p /etc/fonts/conf.d/10-antialias.conf $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf $ fc-list 'dejavu sans mono' family $ rm $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf $ fc-list 'dejavu sans mono' family DejaVu Sans Mono This happens also with a skeleton '$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf' (or '/etc/fonts/local.conf') too: $ cat > $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf $ fc-list 'dejavu sans mono' family $ rm $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf $ fc-list 'dejavu sans mono' family DejaVu Sans Mono None of these anomalies happen under ULST 20. My impression: symptoms vary and are weird, so probably it is something like a buffer overflow when reading the ".conf" files or the use of not-initialized memory. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2061995/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061995] Re: ULTS 22, 24: FontConfig broken by including ".conf" file
After several hundred package updates over time this problem is no longer occurring, I suspect that it was something buggy in the XML library used by FotnConfig. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061995 Title: ULTS 22,24: FontConfig broken by including ".conf" file Status in Ubuntu: New Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: This happens to me on both ULTS 22 and ULKTS 24 on FotnConfig in somewhat different ways: * In ULTS 24 if there is a file '/etc/fonts/local.conf' then all fonts are rendered as if the font were not hinted or 'hinting' were 'false'. This is not noticeable if antialiasing is on, and most users default to antialiasing. * In ULTS 22 if there is a file '$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf' then some fonts are no longer found, or get rendered with rectangular shapes. I guess not many users customize their font settings. A telling example from ULTS 22: $ cat /etc/fonts/conf.d/10-antialias.conf false $ cp -p /etc/fonts/conf.d/10-antialias.conf $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf $ fc-list 'dejavu sans mono' family $ rm $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf $ fc-list 'dejavu sans mono' family DejaVu Sans Mono This happens also with a skeleton '$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf' (or '/etc/fonts/local.conf') too: $ cat > $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf $ fc-list 'dejavu sans mono' family $ rm $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/fonts.conf $ fc-list 'dejavu sans mono' family DejaVu Sans Mono None of these anomalies happen under ULST 20. My impression: symptoms vary and are weird, so probably it is something like a buffer overflow when reading the ".conf" files or the use of not-initialized memory. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2061995/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 988144] Re: Getting error message: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(605) [sender=3.0.9]
This happens for me too with files of a few GB sometimes on ULTS 14 with RSYNC 3.1.0. > It also works, when I try rsync with -W option at client side. Same, and for me it works also when specifying '--block-size 4096'. What this makes me suspect is that the remote 'rsync' process takes too long to send back the list of block checksums to the local 'rsync' in some situations, and a smaller checksum granularity, or asking for checksums to not be computed avoids that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988144 Title: Getting error message: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(605) [sender=3.0.9] Status in rsync package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: 1) The release of Ubuntu you are using, via 'lsb_release -rd' or System -> About Ubuntu Precise 12.04LTS 2) The version of the package you are using, via 'apt-cache policy pkgname' or by checking in Software Center Installed: 3.0.9-1ubuntu1 Candidate: 3.0.9-1ubuntu1 Version table: *** 3.0.9-1ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) What you expected to happen I was using rsync to backup my Home DIrectorys' contents and at one point in the backup it gave me this error: Downloads/Windows.7.Ultimate.32-64Bit.(2011-02-09).iso 3809312768 83% 21.03MB/s0:00:35 rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes to socket [sender]: Broken pipe (32) rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (70735 bytes received so far) [sender] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(605) [sender=3.0.9] This only came about when it was trying to copy my Windows ISO from my directory over to my backup drive that I have formatted in EXT4 - so I'm not sure of the issue it's having. This is the command I used to backup: rsync --progress -rEog --exclude Videos/ --exclude converted_music/ --exclude VirtualBox\ VMs/ --exclude virtual-drives/ --exclude Backup_of_boot_sectors/ --exclude examples.desktop --exclude Music/ --exclude .ecryptfs --exclude .VirtualBox/ --exclude .thumbnails/ --exclude .thunderbird/ --exclude .vidalia/ --exclude .teamviewer/ --exclude Templates/ --exclude sources.list --exclude wary-5.3.iso --exclude Public/ --exclude .cache/ /home/alex/ /media/backup/12.04 -Precise-backup_4.23.2012/ Please look into this for me. Thank you To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+bug/988144/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 988144] Re: Getting error message: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(605) [sender=3.0.9]
> the remote 'rsync' process takes too long to send back the > list of block checksums to the local 'rsync' in some situations As to that a quick web search indicates previous reports: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/68775/rsync-timed-out 3 «It looks like the server times out on the SSH connection level.» «Since the timeout appears to happen when rsync is creating the checksums» https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7195 «it seems - in my case at least - to be related to the delta-xfer algorithm» ** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #7195 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7195 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988144 Title: Getting error message: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(605) [sender=3.0.9] Status in rsync package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: 1) The release of Ubuntu you are using, via 'lsb_release -rd' or System -> About Ubuntu Precise 12.04LTS 2) The version of the package you are using, via 'apt-cache policy pkgname' or by checking in Software Center Installed: 3.0.9-1ubuntu1 Candidate: 3.0.9-1ubuntu1 Version table: *** 3.0.9-1ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) What you expected to happen I was using rsync to backup my Home DIrectorys' contents and at one point in the backup it gave me this error: Downloads/Windows.7.Ultimate.32-64Bit.(2011-02-09).iso 3809312768 83% 21.03MB/s0:00:35 rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes to socket [sender]: Broken pipe (32) rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (70735 bytes received so far) [sender] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(605) [sender=3.0.9] This only came about when it was trying to copy my Windows ISO from my directory over to my backup drive that I have formatted in EXT4 - so I'm not sure of the issue it's having. This is the command I used to backup: rsync --progress -rEog --exclude Videos/ --exclude converted_music/ --exclude VirtualBox\ VMs/ --exclude virtual-drives/ --exclude Backup_of_boot_sectors/ --exclude examples.desktop --exclude Music/ --exclude .ecryptfs --exclude .VirtualBox/ --exclude .thumbnails/ --exclude .thunderbird/ --exclude .vidalia/ --exclude .teamviewer/ --exclude Templates/ --exclude sources.list --exclude wary-5.3.iso --exclude Public/ --exclude .cache/ /home/alex/ /media/backup/12.04 -Precise-backup_4.23.2012/ Please look into this for me. Thank you To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+bug/988144/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work
Note that this long story started from kernel upgrades, and so far nobody has made an important point... When you install a new kernel package, you may want to remove all previous versions indeed, *except* the one that is currently running. Because if you remove the package for the currently running kernel, if you add a new device or do anything that requires loading a module, that will fail. This is because kernel modules by default require an exactly matching kernel version, unlike shared objects or other stuff that gets upgraded. A few other useful things will fail if a running kernel is not matched by an installed package. This would require extra logic to special-case the kernel packages for this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267059 Title: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Precise: Fix Committed Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Trusty: Fix Released Bug description: I have a system that runs unattended-upgrades just fine. Now i want to automate removal of old kernels and kernel header packages that are accumulating otherwise. So i set 'Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused- Dependencies "true";'. But it doesn't work. Details: Lots of stuff pending autoremoval: $ apt-get --assume-no autoremove Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED linux-headers-3.2.0-38 linux-headers-3.2.0-38-generic linux-headers-3.2.0-39 linux-headers-3.2.0-39-generic linux-headers-3.2.0-40 linux-headers-3.2.0-40-generic linux-headers-3.2.0-41 linux-headers-3.2.0-41-generic linux-headers-3.2.0-43 linux-headers-3.2.0-43-generic linux-headers-3.2.0-44 linux-headers-3.2.0-44-generic linux-headers-3.2.0-45 linux-headers-3.2.0-45-generic linux-headers-3.2.0-48 linux-headers-3.2.0-48-generic linux-headers-3.2.0-51 linux-headers-3.2.0-51-generic linux-headers-3.2.0-52 linux-headers-3.2.0-52-generic linux-headers-3.2.0-53 linux-headers-3.2.0-53-generic linux-headers-3.2.0-54 linux-headers-3.2.0-54-generic linux-headers-3.2.0-55 linux-headers-3.2.0-55-generic linux-headers-3.2.0-56 linux-headers-3.2.0-56-generic linux-image-3.2.0-39-generic linux-image-3.2.0-40-generic linux-image-3.2.0-41-generic linux-image-3.2.0-43-generic linux-image-3.2.0-44-generic linux-image-3.2.0-45-generic linux-image-3.2.0-48-generic linux-image-3.2.0-51-generic linux- image-3.2.0-52-generic linux-image-3.2.0-53-generic linux-image-3.2.0-54-generic linux-image-3.2.0-55-generic linux-image-3.2.0-56-generic 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 41 to remove and 13 not upgraded. After this operation, 2,893 MB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? N Abort. Note that the majority of these packages have been installed by unattended-upgrades from precise-security. According to the comments within/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended- upgrades, this should automate autoremoval: // Do automatic removal of new unused dependencies after the upgrade // (equivalent to apt-get autoremove) Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies "true"; but nothing happens (note the line "Packages that are auto removed: '' ": $ unattended-upgrades --debug --dry-run Initial blacklisted packages: Starting unattended upgrades script Allowed origins are: ['o=Ubuntu,a=precise-security'] adjusting candidate version: '' adjusting candidate version: '' adjusting candidate version: '' adjusting candidate version: '' adjusting candidate version: '' adjusting candidate version: '' Checking: bc ([""]) Checking: grub-common ([""]) Checking: grub-pc ([""]) Checking: grub-pc-bin ([""]) Checking: grub2-common ([""]) Checking: iproute ([""]) Checking: landscape-common ([""]) pkgs that look like they should be upgraded: Fetched 0 B in 0s (0 B/s) blacklist: [] Packages that are auto removed: '' InstCount=0 DelCount=0 BrokenCout=0 No packages found that can be upgraded unattended I am using unattended-upgrades-0.76ubuntu1 on Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1267059/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
