[Touch-packages] [Bug 1484027] Re: systemd-tmpfiles-clean warns about duplicate /var/log line
If it was fixed in 8.12.0-1ubuntu3 why am I still seeing this on a 16.04.2 system with: apt-cache policy rsyslog rsyslog: Installed: 8.16.0-1ubuntu3 Candidate: 8.16.0-1ubuntu3 Version table: *** 8.16.0-1ubuntu3 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status It happens one per day it seems. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1484027 Title: systemd-tmpfiles-clean warns about duplicate /var/log line Status in rsyslog package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: Triggered by the two /var/log entries that were reported in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1434295, I get daily log messages from systemd-tmpfiles-clean saying: Aug 10 15:04:13 seraph systemd[1]: Starting Cleanup of Temporary Directories... Aug 10 15:04:13 seraph systemd-tmpfiles[5897]: [/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/var.conf:14] Duplicate line for path "/var/log", ignoring. Aug 10 15:04:13 seraph systemd[1]: Started Cleanup of Temporary Directories. I don't know much about systemd, so I have no ideas for how to fix it, sorry. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/1484027/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1535840] Re: systemd ignoring /etc/modules due to blacklist
Generally me work-around so far has been to avoid systemd! However, where that is not an option you might be able to edit /etc/default/watchdog so the module is loaded on watchdog start-up. It is not ideal as you might have some other reasons for wanting the /dev/watchdog virtual file to be testable without the watchdog having started though (e.g. automated install script that probes harder support, etc). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535840 Title: systemd ignoring /etc/modules due to blacklist Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I tried the daily build of 16.04 32-bit to test out the watchdog daemon code. Usually (Ubuntu 10.04-14.04) I add the watchdog module in /etc/modules so it is loaded at boot-time, as watchdog timer modules are not normally auto-loaded due to the risk of an unexpected reboot. However I now find that systemd is choosing to ignore my command to load the module in /etc/modules since it appears in the watchdog blacklist. Typical syslog entries look like this: Jan 19 16:46:14 ubuntu systemd-modules-load[337]: Module 'softdog' is blacklisted Jan 19 17:53:23 ubuntu systemd-modules-load[342]: Module 'softdog' is blacklisted This is just dumb! I have explicitly told the system to load the module, an action that works perfectly well using modprobe or by adding it to the start script for the watchdog, and yet systemd chooses to override that because of the blacklist for auto-loaded modules (in this case in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-watchdog.conf). $ lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) Release: 16.04 $ apt-cache policy systemd systemd: Installed: 228-4ubuntu1 Candidate: 228-4ubuntu1 Version table: *** 228-4ubuntu1 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status What I expect to happen is modules added to /etc/modules are loaded at boot time, and not subject to the blacklist for hardware detect / automatic loading. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1535840/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1594658] Re: diskless setup with nfs mounted home hangs on shutdown/reboot
We were seeing this on a fresh Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit installation using fixed IP addresses and automounter for NFS drives. The suggestion #7 seems to fix it for use, but it would be useful to know just what is happening with the script. Is it trawling through some user's home directory when expanding the '~*' entry in the case statement in /sbin/resolvconf by any chance? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594658 Title: diskless setup with nfs mounted home hangs on shutdown/reboot Status in nfs-utils package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Ubuntu 16.04 fresh install hangs when shutting down. The system is diskless PXE-booted with a couple of nfs mounted directories including homedir. As I have no persistent storage whatsoever, I don't have any logs, but in debug-shell, running journalctl -f I can see that it hangs at [ *] (1 of 2) A stop job running for Raise Network Interfaces (10s / 1min 30s)Jun 20 20:23:05 $hostname kernel: nfs: server $nfs-ip-address not responding, still trying Jun 20 20:23:05 $hostname kernel: nfs: server $nfs-ip-address not responding, still trying Jun 20 20:23:14 $hostname kernel: nfs: server $nfs-ip-address not responding, still trying Jun 20 20:24:08 $hostname kernel: nfs: server $nfs-ip-address not responding, still trying Second job in "(1 of 2)" is thermald, turning it off does not fix the problem. Also, this counter "(10s / 1min 30s)" stops visually updating. server $nfs-ip-address is not responding, because, all network interfaces are already down at this point. I am not exactly sure why this happens. Looks like there is a wrong ordering of shutdown of systemd services, which bring down interfaces before something nfs-related, but I am not sure if that's the reason of hanging. Workaround that fixes the problem: In /lib/systemd/system/networking.service comment following line: ExecStop=/sbin/ifdown -a --read-environment To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1594658/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1577596] Re: ntpd not started when using ntpdate
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1575572 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575572 I don't think this is a duplicate of bug #1575572 I am seeing this problem on an Ubuntu 16.04 machine that has the update "This bug was fixed in the package init-system-helpers - 1.29ubuntu2" mentioned as being a fix for that bug but ntpd is still broken on booting. I am seeing this: Jul 12 14:14:43 metop ntpd[1933]: unable to bind to wildcard address :: - another process may be running - EXITING Jul 12 14:14:50 metop ntpdate[1758]: step time server 134.36.22.27 offset 0.264278 sec So basically the systemd dependency arrangement is broken: ntpdate is slow now (as for comment #16 above) and not exiting before ntpd is started, it then it fails due to ntpdate still running. A later manual start of ntpd works fine, but that is not an acceptable situation for machines that are unattended and/or used by people that don't have administrative rights (or knowledge) to manually start ntpd later. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577596 Title: ntpd not started when using ntpdate Status in init-system-helpers package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in ntp package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: After updating from 14.04 to 16.04 on a number of my systems, ntpd no longer starts at boot on any of those systems. `systemctl status ntp` shows: ntp.service - LSB: Start NTP daemon Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/ntp; bad; vendor preset: enabled) Active: inactive (dead) Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8) May 02 19:10:14 host systemd[1]: Stopped LSB: Start NTP daemon. May 02 19:10:17 host systemd[1]: Stopped LSB: Start NTP daemon. Manually starting it using `systemctl start ntp` works fine. However, systemd does not seem to want to start it automatically at boot time. As best as I can tell based on trial and error, there is something special about the combination of the service being named "ntp.service" and the service depending on network.target. However, I haven't been able to identify exactly what is causing this. If I copy the init script to any other name, everything works fine: cp /etc/init.d/ntp /etc/init.d/ntpd Edit /etc/init.d/ntpd and change "Provides: ntp" to "Provides: ntpd" systemctl enable ntpd # After a reboot, ntpd.service is started, but ntp.service is not. If I remove "$network" from the "# Required-Start: $network $remote_fs $syslog" line in /etc/init.d/ntp, then systemd starts it automatically ... But of course it is started before the network comes up, so it fails. If I replace /etc/init.d/ntp with a file containing only the following, systemd won't try to start it automatically at boot: #!/bin/sh ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides: ntp # Required-Start: $network # Required-Stop: $network # Default-Start: 2 3 4 5 # Default-Stop: 1 # Short-Description: Start NTP daemon ### END INIT INFO echo "script was run" >> /ntp.log If I rename that same dummy script to /etc/init.d/ntp2, it is started automatically at boot. However, grepping the systemd source code and my systemd config files for ntp doesn't seem to find anything that might cause this behavior: /etc/systemd# grep -iR ntp * timesyncd.conf:#NTP= timesyncd.conf:#FallbackNTP=ntp.ubuntu.com /lib/systemd# grep -R ntp * system/systemd-timesyncd.service.d/disable-with-time-daemon.conf:ConditionFileIsExecutable=!/usr/sbin/ntpd system/systemd-timesyncd.service.d/disable-with-time-daemon.conf:ConditionFileIsExecutable=!/usr/sbin/openntpd Binary file systemd-networkd matches Binary file systemd-timedated matches Binary file systemd-timesyncd matches What else can I do to debug this further? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/init-system-helpers/+bug/1577596/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1535840] [NEW] systemd ignoring /etc/modules due to blacklist
Public bug reported: I tried the daily build of 16.04 32-bit to test out the watchdog daemon code. Usually (Ubuntu 10.04-14.04) I add the watchdog module in /etc/modules so it is loaded at boot-time, as watchdog timer modules are not normally auto-loaded due to the risk of an unexpected reboot. However I now find that systemd is choosing to ignore my command to load the module in /etc/modules since it appears in the watchdog blacklist. Typical syslog entries look like this: Jan 19 16:46:14 ubuntu systemd-modules-load[337]: Module 'softdog' is blacklisted Jan 19 17:53:23 ubuntu systemd-modules-load[342]: Module 'softdog' is blacklisted This is just dumb! I have explicitly told the system to load the module, an action that works perfectly well using modprobe or by adding it to the start script for the watchdog, and yet systemd chooses to override that because of the blacklist for auto-loaded modules (in this case in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-watchdog.conf). $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) Release:16.04 $ apt-cache policy systemd systemd: Installed: 228-4ubuntu1 Candidate: 228-4ubuntu1 Version table: *** 228-4ubuntu1 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status What I expect to happen is modules added to /etc/modules are loaded at boot time, and not subject to the blacklist for hardware detect / automatic loading. ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535840 Title: systemd ignoring /etc/modules due to blacklist Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I tried the daily build of 16.04 32-bit to test out the watchdog daemon code. Usually (Ubuntu 10.04-14.04) I add the watchdog module in /etc/modules so it is loaded at boot-time, as watchdog timer modules are not normally auto-loaded due to the risk of an unexpected reboot. However I now find that systemd is choosing to ignore my command to load the module in /etc/modules since it appears in the watchdog blacklist. Typical syslog entries look like this: Jan 19 16:46:14 ubuntu systemd-modules-load[337]: Module 'softdog' is blacklisted Jan 19 17:53:23 ubuntu systemd-modules-load[342]: Module 'softdog' is blacklisted This is just dumb! I have explicitly told the system to load the module, an action that works perfectly well using modprobe or by adding it to the start script for the watchdog, and yet systemd chooses to override that because of the blacklist for auto-loaded modules (in this case in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-watchdog.conf). $ lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) Release: 16.04 $ apt-cache policy systemd systemd: Installed: 228-4ubuntu1 Candidate: 228-4ubuntu1 Version table: *** 228-4ubuntu1 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status What I expect to happen is modules added to /etc/modules are loaded at boot time, and not subject to the blacklist for hardware detect / automatic loading. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1535840/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 459730] Re: rsyslog doesn't create /dev/xconsole
This is still present in the development branch for 16.04 Jan 19 17:53:23 ubuntu rsyslogd-2039: Could not open output pipe '/dev/xconsole':: No such file or directory [v8.14.0 try http://www.rsyslog.com/e/2039 ] System information: $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) Release:16.04 $ apt-cache policy rsyslog rsyslog: Installed: 8.14.0-2ubuntu2 Candidate: 8.14.0-2ubuntu2 Version table: *** 8.14.0-2ubuntu2 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459730 Title: rsyslog doesn't create /dev/xconsole Status in One Hundred Papercuts: Triaged Status in rsyslog package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: Binary package hint: rsyslog Looks like this was missed in the move to upstart. This function was called in init.d/rsyslog start: create_xconsole() { if [ ! -e /dev/xconsole ] then mknod -m 640 /dev/xconsole p chown root:adm /dev/xconsole [ -x /sbin/restorecon ] && /sbin/restorecon /dev/xconsole fi } I can't find any reference to it now. If this is old school then it should be re moved from the config. rsyslog: Installed: 4.2.0-2ubuntu5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/459730/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1535854] [NEW] watchdog daemon going in to failed state on reboot
Public bug reported: I was testing the watchdog daemon code on the development version of 16.04 today and found the associated systemd service files for this has some bugs. The first of these was a typo in /lib/systemd/system/watchdog.service where there was a missing ['] character. This lead to an error message "Unbalanced quoting, ignoring" which was easy to fix. The update is now in the source-forge repository for the project as commit http://sourceforge.net/p/watchdog/code/ci/38e6430f80907a84741c760ef48df69a679b294c/ However, I have not found the reason for the second problem where the daemon has some fault at reboot time and goes in to "failed state" and then it will not restart with the machine booting. The typical related syslog entries are: Jan 19 16:46:08 ubuntu watchdog[2066]: stopping daemon (5.14) Jan 19 16:46:08 ubuntu systemd[1]: Stopping watchdog daemon... Jan 19 16:46:09 ubuntu systemd[1]: watchdog.service: Control process exited, code=exited status=1 Jan 19 16:46:09 ubuntu systemd[1]: Stopped watchdog daemon. Jan 19 16:46:09 ubuntu systemd[1]: watchdog.service: Unit entered failed state. Jan 19 16:46:09 ubuntu systemd[1]: watchdog.service: Triggering OnFailure= dependencies. Jan 19 16:46:09 ubuntu systemd[1]: watchdog.service: Failed to enqueue OnFailure= job: Resource deadlock avoided Jan 19 16:46:09 ubuntu systemd[1]: watchdog.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. I am guessing this is related to the shut-down approach for the watchdog daemon where normally the wd_keepalive daemon is started afterwards (to prevent a reboot if the hardware module is configured for "no way out" so the timer cannot be stopped). $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) Release:16.04 $ apt-cache policy watchdog watchdog: Installed: 5.14-3 Candidate: 5.14-3 Version table: *** 5.14-3 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/universe i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status I have contacted the watchdog project maintainer with a view to working out a solution to this. This bug report is more of a marker to let folks know that there is an issue here if you plan on having high-availability servers based on Ubuntu 16.04 (well, any systemd based system really..) where watchdog-based fault recovery is an expectation. ** Affects: watchdog (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Package changed: rsyslog (Ubuntu) => watchdog (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535854 Title: watchdog daemon going in to failed state on reboot Status in watchdog package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I was testing the watchdog daemon code on the development version of 16.04 today and found the associated systemd service files for this has some bugs. The first of these was a typo in /lib/systemd/system/watchdog.service where there was a missing ['] character. This lead to an error message "Unbalanced quoting, ignoring" which was easy to fix. The update is now in the source-forge repository for the project as commit http://sourceforge.net/p/watchdog/code/ci/38e6430f80907a84741c760ef48df69a679b294c/ However, I have not found the reason for the second problem where the daemon has some fault at reboot time and goes in to "failed state" and then it will not restart with the machine booting. The typical related syslog entries are: Jan 19 16:46:08 ubuntu watchdog[2066]: stopping daemon (5.14) Jan 19 16:46:08 ubuntu systemd[1]: Stopping watchdog daemon... Jan 19 16:46:09 ubuntu systemd[1]: watchdog.service: Control process exited, code=exited status=1 Jan 19 16:46:09 ubuntu systemd[1]: Stopped watchdog daemon. Jan 19 16:46:09 ubuntu systemd[1]: watchdog.service: Unit entered failed state. Jan 19 16:46:09 ubuntu systemd[1]: watchdog.service: Triggering OnFailure= dependencies. Jan 19 16:46:09 ubuntu systemd[1]: watchdog.service: Failed to enqueue OnFailure= job: Resource deadlock avoided Jan 19 16:46:09 ubuntu systemd[1]: watchdog.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. I am guessing this is related to the shut-down approach for the watchdog daemon where normally the wd_keepalive daemon is started afterwards (to prevent a reboot if the hardware module is configured for "no way out" so the timer cannot be stopped). $ lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) Release: 16.04 $ apt-cache policy watchdog watchdog: Installed: 5.14-3 Candidate: 5.14-3 Version table: *** 5.14-3 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/universe i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status I have contacted the watchdog project maintainer with a view to working out a solution to this. This bug report is more of a marker to let folks know that there is an issue here if y
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1328264] Re: packaging issues with the trusty Xstack in precise xserver-xorg-lts-trusty
A recent update to the update-manager seems to have fixed this for me. Still problems with the Nvidia driver post-update, but that is not the same bug/dependency issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328264 Title: packaging issues with the trusty Xstack in precise xserver-xorg-lts- trusty Status in “apt” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Hello, I've tested the trusty Xstack HWE xserver-xorg-lts-trusty in precise; When you have installed another Xstack (e.g.saucy), it is not possible to install the trusty Xstack smoothly. Only installing the original precice Xstack (xserver-xorg-lts- precise), which removes the current xstack and after that installing the trusty xstack in one step without restart, works. Please help to make that smoother! Thanks, Bernhard Error Message while trying to install trusty xstack, when saucy xstack is installed (in precise); apt-get install -V libglapi-mesa-lts-trusty libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-trusty xserver-xorg-lts-trusty xserver-xorg-input-all-lts-trusty xserver-xorg-video-all-lts-trusty libgl1-mesa-dri-lts-trusty x11-xserver-utils-lts-trusty libglapi-mesa-lts-trusty:i386 libgl1-mesa-dri-lts-trusty:i386 libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-trusty:i386 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libglapi-mesa-lts-trusty : Conflicts: libglapi-mesa libglapi-mesa-lts-trusty:i386 : Conflicts: libglapi-mesa xserver-xorg-lts-trusty : Conflicts: libglapi-mesa (>= 0~) Conflicts: libgles2-mesa (>= 0~) E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1328264/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1192037] Re: rsyslog shuts down too soon with Upstart
I would also like to have shutdown messages logged. Could it be configured to stop on reaching the last of the init-style of run-levels? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1192037 Title: rsyslog shuts down too soon with Upstart Status in “rsyslog” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: The Upstart configuration file (/etc/init/rsyslog.conf) that appears to come with rsyslog 5.8.6-1ubuntu8 contains the stanza "stop on runlevel [06]". This results in some applications being unable to log their shutdown messages. This is a particular problem if those messages are important, such as from the STONITH meatware module. This would also be a problem for any application that needed to report trouble during a shutdown. I don't see any viable alternative to simply removing the "stop" stanza from /etc/init/rsyslog.conf. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/1192037/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1237042] Re: ureadahead source needs "tracing_enabled" changed to "tracing_on" for 12.04.3
Still broken on 12.04.5 recently updated: $ apt-cache policy ureadahead ureadahead: Installed: 0.100.0-12 Candidate: 0.100.0-12 Version table: *** 0.100.0-12 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ uname -a Linux pscpc 3.13.0-34-generic #60~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 13 15:55:33 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Also finding nothing in /var/lib/ureadahead suggesting it never worked on my system (installed as 12.04.4 I think) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ureadahead in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1237042 Title: ureadahead source needs "tracing_enabled" changed to "tracing_on" for 12.04.3 Status in “ureadahead” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: On a fresh install of Ubuntu 12.04.3 (64-bit), ureadahead was always exiting with status code 5. When manually run as: sudo /sbin/ureadahead --force-trace --debug The output is: Counted 4 CPUs trace: Missing uselib tracing: No such file or directory ureadahead: Error while tracing: No such file or directory The uselib tracing notice is not important. The "error while tracing" notice lead me to compare ureadahead sources between 12.04.3 and 13.04. Note that ureadahead in 13.04 works. I noticed this difference on lines 195 and 232: if (set_value (dfd, "tracing_enabled", vs: if (set_value (dfd, "tracing_on", This change is mentioned in the changelog as: ureadahead (0.100.0-13) raring; urgency=low * src/trace.c: tracing_enabled is deprecated and gone, switch to tracing_on (LP: #1085766). -- Andy Whitcroft Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:05:17 + I suspect that this issue occurs in 12.04.3 because it is now using the newer raring kernel 3.8.0-31. Previous flavors of 12.04 such as 12.04.2 do not seem to exhibit this ureadahead issue, probably because the kernel is older 3.5.xx. As a proof-of-concept test, I hex edited the 12.04.3 /sbin/ureadahead to change "tracing_enabled" to "tracing_on". Upon reboot, now ureadahead works, generates the /var/lib/ureadahead/pack file, and it does not report status code 5. Another workaround is to use the ureadahead binary from 13.04, but the updated /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libext2fs.so.2.4 is also required from 13.04. $ lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS Release: 12.04 $ apt-cache policy ureadahead ureadahead: Installed: 0.100.0-12 Candidate: 0.100.0-12 Version table: *** 0.100.0-12 0 500 http://mirror.peer1.net/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ureadahead/+bug/1237042/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1328264] Re: packaging issues with the trusty Xstack in precise xserver-xorg-lts-trusty
This bug, the ability to get the kernel back on to a supported stream, is still broken a month on, even though there was some update to the update manager today (which still caused a crash report, though that was supposed to be fixed). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328264 Title: packaging issues with the trusty Xstack in precise xserver-xorg-lts- trusty Status in “apt” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Hello, I've tested the trusty Xstack HWE xserver-xorg-lts-trusty in precise; When you have installed another Xstack (e.g.saucy), it is not possible to install the trusty Xstack smoothly. Only installing the original precice Xstack (xserver-xorg-lts- precise), which removes the current xstack and after that installing the trusty xstack in one step without restart, works. Please help to make that smoother! Thanks, Bernhard Error Message while trying to install trusty xstack, when saucy xstack is installed (in precise); apt-get install -V libglapi-mesa-lts-trusty libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-trusty xserver-xorg-lts-trusty xserver-xorg-input-all-lts-trusty xserver-xorg-video-all-lts-trusty libgl1-mesa-dri-lts-trusty x11-xserver-utils-lts-trusty libglapi-mesa-lts-trusty:i386 libgl1-mesa-dri-lts-trusty:i386 libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-trusty:i386 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libglapi-mesa-lts-trusty : Conflicts: libglapi-mesa libglapi-mesa-lts-trusty:i386 : Conflicts: libglapi-mesa xserver-xorg-lts-trusty : Conflicts: libglapi-mesa (>= 0~) Conflicts: libgles2-mesa (>= 0~) E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1328264/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1328264] Re: packaging issues with the trusty Xstack in precise xserver-xorg-lts-trusty
Running from the command line reports: $ /usr/bin/update-manager Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/defer/__init__.py", line 473, in _inline_callbacks result = gen.throw(result.type, result.value, result.traceback) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/UpdateManager/backend/InstallBackendAptdaemon.py", line 54, in commit yield self._run_in_dialog(trans, self.INSTALL) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/defer/__init__.py", line 473, in _inline_callbacks result = gen.throw(result.type, result.value, result.traceback) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/UpdateManager/backend/InstallBackendAptdaemon.py", line 75, in _run_in_dialog yield dia.run() aptdaemon.errors.TransactionFailed: Transaction failed: None The following packages have unmet dependencies: libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-trusty: Depends: libglapi-mesa-lts-trusty (= 10.1.3-0ubuntu0.1~precise1) but 10.1.3-0ubuntu0.1~precise1 is to be installed Depends: libx11-6 (>= 2:1.4.99.1) but 2:1.4.99.1-0ubuntu2.2 is to be installed Depends: libxdamage1 (>= 1:1.1) but 1:1.1.3-2build1 is to be installed xserver-xorg-lts-trusty: Depends: xserver-xorg-core-lts-trusty (>= 2:1.11) but 2:1.15.1-0ubuntu2~precise1 is to be installed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328264 Title: packaging issues with the trusty Xstack in precise xserver-xorg-lts- trusty Status in “apt” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Hello, I've tested the trusty Xstack HWE xserver-xorg-lts-trusty in precise; When you have installed another Xstack (e.g.saucy), it is not possible to install the trusty Xstack smoothly. Only installing the original precice Xstack (xserver-xorg-lts- precise), which removes the current xstack and after that installing the trusty xstack in one step without restart, works. Please help to make that smoother! Thanks, Bernhard Error Message while trying to install trusty xstack, when saucy xstack is installed (in precise); apt-get install -V libglapi-mesa-lts-trusty libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-trusty xserver-xorg-lts-trusty xserver-xorg-input-all-lts-trusty xserver-xorg-video-all-lts-trusty libgl1-mesa-dri-lts-trusty x11-xserver-utils-lts-trusty libglapi-mesa-lts-trusty:i386 libgl1-mesa-dri-lts-trusty:i386 libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-trusty:i386 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libglapi-mesa-lts-trusty : Conflicts: libglapi-mesa libglapi-mesa-lts-trusty:i386 : Conflicts: libglapi-mesa xserver-xorg-lts-trusty : Conflicts: libglapi-mesa (>= 0~) Conflicts: libgles2-mesa (>= 0~) E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1328264/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp