[Touch-packages] [Bug 1689460] Re: bluetoothd crashing with SIGSEGV in avdtp_unref from setup_free from setup_unref from transport_cb from accept_cb

2023-02-17 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Reopened because we're still getting this crash on lunar. Just not very
often.

** Tags added: lunar

** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Released => Confirmed

** Tags removed: artful wily yakkety zesty
** Tags added: focal jammy kinetic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1689460

Title:
  bluetoothd crashing with SIGSEGV in avdtp_unref from setup_free from
  setup_unref from transport_cb from accept_cb

Status in bluez package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding 
bluez.  This problem was most recently seen with package version 5.43-0ubuntu1, 
the problem page at 
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/b07fc39aa06a535581fad194d445c76f189364c1 
contains more details, including versions of packages affected, stacktrace or 
traceback, and individual crash reports.
  If you do not have access to the Ubuntu Error Tracker you can request it at 
http://forms.canonical.com/reports/.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1689460/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1689448] Re: bluetoothd crashed with SIGSEGV in avdtp_stream_set_transport transport_cb accept_cb g_main_dispatch g_main_context_dispatch

2023-02-17 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Reopened. It's still crashing in current releases.

** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Released => Confirmed

** Tags removed: wily yakkety zesty
** Tags added: jammy kinetic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1689448

Title:
  bluetoothd crashed with SIGSEGV in avdtp_stream_set_transport
  transport_cb accept_cb g_main_dispatch g_main_context_dispatch

Status in bluez package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding 
bluez.  This problem was most recently seen with package version 5.43-0ubuntu1, 
the problem page at 
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/74228037aee5c1e95c18d26533f63d5396d48e3e 
contains more details, including versions of packages affected, stacktrace or 
traceback, and individual crash reports.
  If you do not have access to the Ubuntu Error Tracker you can request it at 
http://forms.canonical.com/reports/.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1689448/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1999104] Re: arm64: broken c++ exception handler support leads to std::terminate() being called and program abort

2023-02-17 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi William,

I sincerely apologise for the delay.

Currently libunwind is stuck in -proposed due to benign autopkgtest
regressions in the kernel packages.

If you go to the below page:

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html

And search for "libunwind" you will see entries for Bionic and Focal.

It is SRU policy to not release a package with current autopkgtest
regressions.

Now, I have spent more time than I am willing to admit on trying to
debug these failures, and I have also asked the Kernel Team, several
which took a look, and some Launchpad admins, and we are still a bit
stuck. The problem does not reproduce locally, only on Launchpad
builders.

For example, take the 4.15 Bionic Kernel:

https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/linux/bionic/amd64

(it is a reverse dependency of libunwind, which is why it is selected
for autopkgtest)

https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-
bionic/bionic/amd64/l/linux/20230110_115614_09e98@/log.gz

It rebuilds fine, but then runs into apt resolver trouble when running
the kernel testsuite.

autopkgtest makes a dummy package, that contains the list of necessary
dependencies to run the testsuite, dpkg -i to install the package, and
then does an apt install -f to force dependency resolution. The dummy
package is called autopkgtest-satdep.

https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Cszfkvy47Z/

But it fails in strange ways, like not being able to select build-
essential, even though it is already installed in the builder.

I am still trying to debug the root cause behind these autopkgtest
regressions, which is why things have been delayed.

There is a provision in SRUs where they can be released as long as I can
prove that the upload did not cause the regression:

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

In which case, I may as well invoke this clause, since I don't wish to
keep you waiting any longer.

I will try and get this package released within the week.

Thanks,
Matthew

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libunwind in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1999104

Title:
  arm64: broken c++ exception handler support leads to std::terminate()
  being called and program abort

Status in libunwind package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libunwind source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in libunwind source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  On architectures other than i386 and amd64, the C++ exception support
  in libunwind appears to be broken, always failing and calling
  std::terminate() which leads to the program aborting.

  (gdb) bt
  #0  __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50
  #1  0xf7c2daac in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
  #2  0xf7e21868 in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler() ()
 from /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
  #3  0xf7e1f21c in ?? () from /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
  #4  0xf7e1f280 in std::terminate() ()
 from /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
  #5  0xf7e1f5e0 in __cxa_rethrow ()
 from /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
  #6  0xf7e21804 in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler() ()
 from /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
  #7  0xf7e1f21c in ?? () from /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
  #8  0xf7e1f280 in std::terminate() ()
 from /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
  #9  0xf7e1f574 in __cxa_throw ()
 from /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
  #10 0xf7fb9f50 in function_throws_int () at lib.cpp:9
  #11 0x0d54 in main (argc=1, argv=0xfab8) at main.cpp:9

  Compiling libunwind with --enable-cxx-exceptions enabled leads to
  _Unwind_RaiseException being called during __cxa_throw(), which fails
  to find a handler, and the generic std::terminate() is called instead,
  aborting the program.

  On i386 and amd64 this doesn't seem to be the case, and the libunwind
  handlers seem to be present.

  To fix, we only enable the configure option --enable-cxx-exceptions on
  i386 and amd64 only, in debian/rules. This lets other architectures
  fall back to the symbols provided by libgcc_s, which implementation
  works correctly.

  [Testcase]

  Ali Sadi has provided a reproducer program.

  Start an arm64 instance, for example, a c6g.medium instance on AWS,
  with either Bionic or Focal.

  $ wget 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libunwind/+bug/1999104/+attachment/5635122/+files/libunwind.tar.gz
  $ sudo apt install -y build-essential libunwind-dev
  $ tar xvf libunwind.tar.gz && cd test
  $ make all

  There are two executable, main and main_unwind. main is not linked to
  libunwind, and main_unwind is linked to libunwind.

  $ ./main
  int throws lib
  int caught main
  $ ./main_unwind
  terminate called after throwing an instance of 'int'
  terminate called recursively
  Aborted (c

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1979610] Re: armhf: perl modules not rebuild? Loadable Library and Binary mismatch for pspp build.

2023-02-17 Thread Friedrich-beckmann
** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: pspp (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to perl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1979610

Title:
  armhf: perl modules not rebuild? Loadable Library and Binary mismatch
  for pspp build.

Status in pspp:
  Unknown
Status in perl package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in pspp package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in pspp package in Debian:
  Unknown

Bug description:
  During the build of the pspp 1.6.0-1 package for kinetic the
  regression fails for the armhf architecture in the perl module tests.
  The reported error is:

  +PSPP.c: loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched (got
  handshake key 0xa480080, needed 0xa380080)

  This happens only for the armhf architecture. The package build status
  of the pspp 1.6.0-1 package is here:

  https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pspp/1.6.0-1

  You can also find the buildlogs for armhf and the architectures there.

  Is it possible that some perl modules have not been recompiled with
  the current perl version? Or is there any idea why this could fail
  only on armhf?

  Regards

  Friedrich

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pspp/+bug/1979610/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007668] [NEW] glitch on screen

2023-02-17 Thread worldmaker18349276
Public bug reported:

This always happens when the cursor sweeps over a height range
(approximately 960px ~ 990px from the top). Even when watching a video,
the top of the screen sometimes glitches.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1-generic 5.19.17
Uname: Linux 5.19.0-32-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.3
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri Feb 17 16:24:32 2023
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: jammy
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, including running git bisection searches
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation Device [8086:46aa] (rev 0c) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0b14]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-08-13 (187 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220809.1)
MachineType: Dell Inc. XPS 9315
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.19.0-32-generic 
root=UUID=3ba28059-7aea-46a5-bf4e-44dd0203b83d ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 01/04/2023
dmi.bios.release: 1.7
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 1.7.1
dmi.board.name: 02GGG1
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.board.version: A00
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.7.1:bd01/04/2023:br1.7:svnDellInc.:pnXPS9315:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn02GGG1:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr:sku0B14:
dmi.product.family: XPS
dmi.product.name: XPS 9315
dmi.product.sku: 0B14
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.113-2~ubuntu0.22.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 22.2.5-0ubuntu0.1~22.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:21.1.3-2ubuntu2.7
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20210115-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-2build1

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug corruption jammy ubuntu wayland-session

** Attachment added: "IMG_0023.HEIC"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2007668/+attachment/5648005/+files/IMG_0023.HEIC

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2007668

Title:
  glitch on screen

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This always happens when the cursor sweeps over a height range
  (approximately 960px ~ 990px from the top). Even when watching a
  video, the top of the screen sometimes glitches.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1-generic 5.19.17
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-32-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.3
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Feb 17 16:24:32 2023
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: jammy
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, including running git bisection searches
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation Device [8086:46aa] (rev 0c) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0b14]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-08-13 (187 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220809.1)
  MachineType: Dell Inc. XPS 9315
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.19.0-32-generic 
root=UUID=3ba28059-7aea-46a5-bf4e-44dd0203b83d ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  Symptom: display
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 01/04/2023
  dmi.bios.release: 1.7
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 1.7.1
  dmi.board.name: 02GGG1
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.board.version: A00
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.7.1:bd01/04/2023:br1.7:svnDellInc.:pnXPS9315:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn02GGG1:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr:sku0B14:
  dmi.product.family: XPS
  dmi.product.name: XPS 9315
  dmi.product.sku: 0B14
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.113-2~ubuntu0.22.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 22.2.5-0ubuntu0.1~22.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:21.1.3-2ubuntu2.7
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1794064] Re: Clicking a hyperlink in a PDF fails to open it if the default browser is a snap

2023-02-17 Thread Frédéric Grosshans
The bug still exist on Kinetic.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794064

Title:
  Clicking a hyperlink in a PDF fails to open it if the default browser
  is a snap

Status in apparmor package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in evince package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in apparmor source package in Jammy:
  Confirmed
Status in evince source package in Jammy:
  Confirmed
Status in evince package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * Users cannot open a hyperlink in a PDF opened with evince when the default 
browser is a snap.
   * The fix creates a snap_browsers abstraction on AppArmor which can be used 
in a transition for when the browser is executed. The snap_browsers abstraction 
provides the minimal amount of permissions required to execute a browser 
provided through snaps. This is a workaround since AppArmor currently does not 
provide mediation/filtering on enhanced environment variables.

  [Test Plan]

   * Make sure the default browser is provided through the snap store.
   * Open a PDF that contains a hyperlink using evince and click on the URL.
   * The browser should open the requested URL. 

  [Where problems could occur]

   * If the browser or snap core update to have new requirements for
  opening a browser, then the current policy could become obsolete and
  will need to be updated again.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1794064/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960736] Re: Libnss3 doesn't log SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_PKCS11_ERROR properly ( NSS error code: -8018 )

2023-02-17 Thread Bartłomiej Żogała
Thanks, what would be upstream bugzilla for libnss?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nss in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960736

Title:
  Libnss3 doesn't log SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_PKCS11_ERROR properly  ( NSS
  error code: -8018 )

Status in nss package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I've got the issue with Google Chrome not recognizing any of SSL/TSL 
certificates as trusted. When I look into certificate checksums it's renders 
all bytes of it as NULL bytes. I'm aware Google Chrome is proprietary but it 
depends on ubuntu provided libnss3-package. And libnss provides very nigmatic 
error code -8018:
  `/opt/google/chrome$ google-chrome
  [23391:23426:0213/133531.202486:ERROR:nss_util.cc(286)] After loading Root 
Certs, loaded==false: NSS error code: -8018
  [23434:23434:0213/133531.266711:ERROR:sandbox_linux.cc(377)] 
InitializeSandbox() called with multiple threads in process gpu-process.
  [23391:23427:0213/133531.313065:ERROR:cert_verify_proc_builtin.cc(681)] 
CertVerifyProcBuiltin for accounts.google.com failed:
  - Certificate i=3 (CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign 
nv-sa,C=BE) -
  ERROR: No matching issuer found

  '
  When trying to enter this particular error code into search engine nothing is 
found. So my suggestion with this bug is to make it more transparent by 
providing information to what happened - it seems other bug codes has better 
error messages. To get SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_PKCS11_ERROR string I was force to 
download source code and manually calculate offsets. Another issue is if 
failing to initialize PKCS11 token should make whole SSL/TLS crypto invalid ? 
I'm not sure if this is libnss or Google Chrome issue but it behaves 
differently in Chromium browser with same libnss so I assume either of two is 
doing better - it's worth to review this from security perspective.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: libnss3 2:3.35-2ubuntu2.13
  Uname: Linux 5.10.0-051000rc6-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.27
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun Feb 13 13:33:51 2022
  Dependencies:
   gcc-8-base 8.4.0-1ubuntu1~18.04
   libc6 2.27-3ubuntu1.5 [origin: LP-PPA-ubuntu-security-proposed]
   libgcc1 1:8.4.0-1ubuntu1~18.04
   libnspr4 2:4.18-1ubuntu1
   libsqlite3-0 3.22.0-1ubuntu0.4
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-05-08 (2473 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 15.04 "Vivid Vervet" - Release amd64 (20150422)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: nss
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-08-26 (1266 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nss/+bug/1960736/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007684] [NEW] package linux-image-5.19.0-32-generic 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

2023-02-17 Thread Dennis Layne
Public bug reported:

bug window popped up.  I clicked submit

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: linux-image-5.19.0-32-generic 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-60.66-generic 5.15.78
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-60-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.3
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
Date: Fri Feb 17 06:49:25 2023
ErrorMessage: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with 
return code 1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-09-11 (158 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220809.1)
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.10, Python 3.10.6, python3-minimal, 
3.10.6-1~22.04
PythonDetails: N/A
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.21.1ubuntu2.1
 apt  2.4.8
SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
Title: package linux-image-5.19.0-32-generic 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1 failed to 
install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with 
return code 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2007684

Title:
  package linux-image-5.19.0-32-generic 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools
  exited with return code 1

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  bug window popped up.  I clicked submit

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: linux-image-5.19.0-32-generic 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-60.66-generic 5.15.78
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-60-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.3
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  Date: Fri Feb 17 06:49:25 2023
  ErrorMessage: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with 
return code 1
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-09-11 (158 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220809.1)
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.10, Python 3.10.6, python3-minimal, 
3.10.6-1~22.04
  PythonDetails: N/A
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.21.1ubuntu2.1
   apt  2.4.8
  SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
  Title: package linux-image-5.19.0-32-generic 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1 failed to 
install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with 
return code 1
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/2007684/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007684] Re: package linux-image-5.19.0-32-generic 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

2023-02-17 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2007684

Title:
  package linux-image-5.19.0-32-generic 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools
  exited with return code 1

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  bug window popped up.  I clicked submit

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: linux-image-5.19.0-32-generic 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-60.66-generic 5.15.78
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-60-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.3
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  Date: Fri Feb 17 06:49:25 2023
  ErrorMessage: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with 
return code 1
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-09-11 (158 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220809.1)
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.10, Python 3.10.6, python3-minimal, 
3.10.6-1~22.04
  PythonDetails: N/A
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.21.1ubuntu2.1
   apt  2.4.8
  SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
  Title: package linux-image-5.19.0-32-generic 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1 failed to 
install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with 
return code 1
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/2007684/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007684] Re: package linux-image-5.19.0-32-generic 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

2023-02-17 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.  Reviewing your dmesg attachment in this bug report it
seems that there is a problem with your hardware.  I recommend
performing a back up and then investigating the situation.  Measures you
might take include checking cable connections and using software tools
to investigate the health of your hardware.  In the event that is is not
in fact an error with your hardware please set the bug's status back to
New.  Thanks and good luck!

[This is an automated message.  I apologize if it reached you
inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.]

** Tags added: hardware-error

** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2007684

Title:
  package linux-image-5.19.0-32-generic 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools
  exited with return code 1

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  bug window popped up.  I clicked submit

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: linux-image-5.19.0-32-generic 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-60.66-generic 5.15.78
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-60-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.3
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  Date: Fri Feb 17 06:49:25 2023
  ErrorMessage: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with 
return code 1
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-09-11 (158 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220809.1)
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.10, Python 3.10.6, python3-minimal, 
3.10.6-1~22.04
  PythonDetails: N/A
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.21.1ubuntu2.1
   apt  2.4.8
  SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
  Title: package linux-image-5.19.0-32-generic 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1 failed to 
install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with 
return code 1
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/2007684/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2000551] Re: [System Fonts] Replace default sinhala font from LKLUG to Noto

2023-02-17 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
> so this is not the expected solution :(

It's the solution we are able to offer ATM.

Please understand:

* It's not an option in the short run to install fonts-noto-core for all
Ubuntu users. At the moment that package gets installed as a language
support component for certain languages, including Sinhala due to the
fix of this bug. We deal with e.g. Arabic in a similar way.

* As a consequence of that, the user needs to tell the system somehow
that they want the relevant Sinhala language support. They can do so by:

- selecting Sinhala lanaguage in the installer,
- Go to Settings -> Region & Language -> Manage Installed Languages
  and install the Sinhala language from there, or
- simply install fonts-noto-core manually.

* It's unlikely that a package which installs only the Sinhala Noto
*.ttf files would be approved in Debian/Ubuntu, since those files are
already provided by fonts-noto-core.

It's worth mentioning that everybody is not happy with the packaging of
Noto fonts:

https://bugs.debian.org/983291

There is indeed work to be done in order to improve the selection of
fonts provided for Ubuntu by default, and the way the Noto fonts are
packaged makes that harder. In the future we will hopefully be able to
improve all this, but in the short run this is as long as we will get as
regards e.g. Sinhala.

HTH

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #983291
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983291

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2000551

Title:
  [System Fonts] Replace default sinhala font from LKLUG to Noto

Status in language-selector package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in language-selector source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in language-selector source package in Kinetic:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

  The current default font for Sinhala (LKLUG) is unmaintained and comes
  with issues. Noto offers Sinhala fonts with significantly higher
  quality.

  fonts-lklug-sinhala is pulled by quite a few meta packages. Instead of
  changing that, the proposed change makes fontconfig give Noto Sans
  Sinhala respective Noto Serif Sinhala higher precedence than LKLUG,
  and that — together with installation of fonts-noto-core — seems to be
  sufficient to achieve the desired result.

  [ Test Plan ]

  * Install language-selector-[common,gnome] from
  [jammy,kinetic]-proposed.

  * Open Language Support and install the Sinhala language.

  * Open a terminal window and run this command:

    fc-match -a | grep -E 'LKLUG|Sinhala'

  * Confirm that Noto Sans Sinhala is listed before LKLUG.

  * Close Firefox and re-open it.

  * Visit e.g. https://si.wikipedia.org and confirm the
    improvement. (Also I (Gunnar), who don't speak Sinhala,
    notice a remarkable difference.)

  [ Where problems could occur ]

  No real problem in sight. Some Sinhala speaking users with fonts-noto-
  core installed will indeed see a surprise change when it starts to
  render Sinhala via Noto fonts instead of LKLUG. But that surprise
  ought to make them happy. :)

  Please note Robie Basak's warning about the changed font metrics in
  comment #7, though.

  [ Original description ]

  **What's the problem?**

  Currently ubuntu comes with LKLUG font for sinhala (si). it's not
  clear. e.g. we cannot recognize vowel signs and read websites using
  that font. We can change it manually but such changes do not apply to
  some applications or application types e.g. snap apps etc.

  LKLUG (last active: 2012) no one maintain it now.
  https://web.archive.org/web/202200*/http://www.lug.lk/
  http://www.lug.lk/fonts/lklug

  **What expected to happen?**

  We would like to see Noto serif sinhala as the default font for sinhala 
language
  https://fonts.google.com/noto/specimen/Noto+Serif+Sinhala
  [Highlighs: clear (readable), thin, takes less space than sans sinhala]

  If noto sans is more suitable for ubuntuOS, you can add noto sans sinhala 
https://fonts.google.com/noto/specimen/Noto+Sans+Sinhala
  [Highlighs: clear (readable), thick, takes more space than serif sinhala]

  **Additional details**

  Screenshots (see the difference: LKLUG/Noto)

  LKLUG
  https://i.ibb.co/nbHM5Mw/lklug.jpg

  Noto Sinhala
  https://i.ibb.co/k9dbtYb/noto.jpg

  If you need more examples or clarifications, please add a comment

  Random posts
  1. https://groups.google.com/g/Sinhala-Unicode/c/LYxuJ44dY3g
  2. https://twitter.com/thilinag/status/1598707165920825344#m (LKLUG bug with 
some apps)
  3. 
https://www.reddit.com/r/srilanka/comments/nzpl9p/change_sinhala_font_in_ubuntu/

  Also, some developers already have designed tools, scripts for that problem 
however many people do not try to find these scripts and switch to other OS
  1. https://github.com/IMS94/UbuntuSinhalaFont (developer: PMC chai

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007698] [NEW] Please merge 1.9.12p2-1 into lunar

2023-02-17 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Public bug reported:

PPA available at
https://launchpad.net/~danilogondolfo/+archive/ubuntu/sudo

** Affects: sudo (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~danilogondolfo/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+git/sudo/+merge/437505

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2007698

Title:
  Please merge 1.9.12p2-1 into lunar

Status in sudo package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  PPA available at
  https://launchpad.net/~danilogondolfo/+archive/ubuntu/sudo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/2007698/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007698] Re: Please merge 1.9.12p2-1 into lunar

2023-02-17 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Autopkgtests are passing (tested on ppc64 and amd64)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2007698

Title:
  Please merge 1.9.12p2-1 into lunar

Status in sudo package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  PPA available at
  https://launchpad.net/~danilogondolfo/+archive/ubuntu/sudo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/2007698/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1999104] Re: arm64: broken c++ exception handler support leads to std::terminate() being called and program abort

2023-02-17 Thread William Ashley
Thank you for that thorough explanation and helping get this fix
released, Matthew.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libunwind in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1999104

Title:
  arm64: broken c++ exception handler support leads to std::terminate()
  being called and program abort

Status in libunwind package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libunwind source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in libunwind source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  On architectures other than i386 and amd64, the C++ exception support
  in libunwind appears to be broken, always failing and calling
  std::terminate() which leads to the program aborting.

  (gdb) bt
  #0  __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50
  #1  0xf7c2daac in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
  #2  0xf7e21868 in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler() ()
 from /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
  #3  0xf7e1f21c in ?? () from /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
  #4  0xf7e1f280 in std::terminate() ()
 from /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
  #5  0xf7e1f5e0 in __cxa_rethrow ()
 from /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
  #6  0xf7e21804 in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler() ()
 from /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
  #7  0xf7e1f21c in ?? () from /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
  #8  0xf7e1f280 in std::terminate() ()
 from /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
  #9  0xf7e1f574 in __cxa_throw ()
 from /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
  #10 0xf7fb9f50 in function_throws_int () at lib.cpp:9
  #11 0x0d54 in main (argc=1, argv=0xfab8) at main.cpp:9

  Compiling libunwind with --enable-cxx-exceptions enabled leads to
  _Unwind_RaiseException being called during __cxa_throw(), which fails
  to find a handler, and the generic std::terminate() is called instead,
  aborting the program.

  On i386 and amd64 this doesn't seem to be the case, and the libunwind
  handlers seem to be present.

  To fix, we only enable the configure option --enable-cxx-exceptions on
  i386 and amd64 only, in debian/rules. This lets other architectures
  fall back to the symbols provided by libgcc_s, which implementation
  works correctly.

  [Testcase]

  Ali Sadi has provided a reproducer program.

  Start an arm64 instance, for example, a c6g.medium instance on AWS,
  with either Bionic or Focal.

  $ wget 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libunwind/+bug/1999104/+attachment/5635122/+files/libunwind.tar.gz
  $ sudo apt install -y build-essential libunwind-dev
  $ tar xvf libunwind.tar.gz && cd test
  $ make all

  There are two executable, main and main_unwind. main is not linked to
  libunwind, and main_unwind is linked to libunwind.

  $ ./main
  int throws lib
  int caught main
  $ ./main_unwind
  terminate called after throwing an instance of 'int'
  terminate called recursively
  Aborted (core dumped)

  If you install the test package available in the following ppa:

  https://launchpad.net/~mruffell/+archive/ubuntu/sf350246-test

  $ make clean
  $ sudo apt install -y libunwind-dev
  $ make all
  $ ./main
  int throws lib
  int caught main
  $ ./main_unwind
  int throws lib
  int caught main

  The exception is caught as expected the program does not abort.

  [Where problems could occur]

  For architectures other than i386 and amd64, we are changing from
  libunwind provided exception handlers for __cxa_throw(), and using
  those provided by libgcc_s instead.

  There are a few reverse dependencies for libunwind-dev and libunwind8,
  which need to be considered:

  $ apt rdepends libunwind-dev
  libunwind-dev
  Reverse Depends:
Depends: libunwind-setjmp0-dev (= 1.2.1-9build1)
Depends: libefl-all-dev

  t$ apt rdepends libunwind-dev8
  libunwind8
  Reverse Depends:
Depends: libunwind-dev (= 1.2.1-9build1)
Depends: xvfb
Depends: xnest
Depends: xdmx
Depends: xwayland
Depends: xserver-xorg-core
Depends: xserver-xephyr
Depends: linux-tools-5.4.0-*
Depends: linux-raspi-tools-*
Depends: linux-raspi2-tools-5.4.0-*
Depends: linux-raspi2-5.4-tools-5.4.0-*
Depends: linux-oracle-5.15-tools-5.15.0-*
Depends: linux-lowlatency-hwe-5.15-tools-5.15.0-*
Depends: linux-hwe-5.8-tools-5.8.0-*
Depends: linux-hwe-5.15-tools-5.15.0-*
Depends: linux-gke-tools-5.4.0-*
Depends: linux-gke-5.15-tools-5.15.0-*
Depends: linux-gcp-tools-5.4.0-*
Depends: linux-gcp-5.15-tools-5.15.0-*
Depends: linux-azure-tools-5.4.0-*
Depends: linux-azure-5.15-tools-5.15.0-*
Depends: linux-aws-tools-5.4.0-*
Depends: linux-aws-5.8-tools-5.8.0-*
Depends: linux-aws-5.15-tools-5.15.0-*
Depends: xvfb
Depends: xnest
Depends: xdmx
Depends: trafficserver
Depends: tilix
Depends: tigervnc-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007728] [NEW] resolved results differ from those from its current upstream server.

2023-02-17 Thread Frank Trampe
Public bug reported:

On a network with multiple DNS servers provided by DHCP, only the first
two of which cover local names, resolved returns universally known names
but fails to return the special names even when the "Current DNS Server"
shown by `resolvectl status` returns the special names.

Suppose that 172.16.9.5 and 172.16.10.5 are the two internal DNS servers
with the local names. Windows servers with Active Directory enabled in
this case. The DHCP server (a Cisco 4451 in this case) provides DNS
servers 172.16.9.5, 172.16.10.5, 192.168.0.1, and 8.8.8.8. `resolvectl
status` shows all of these as "DNS Servers" and 172.16.9.5 as the
"Current DNS Server".

`host localdomain.local` returns SRVFAIL, and `host localdomain.local
127.0.0.53` returns SRVFAIL, but `host localdomain.local 172.16.9.5`
returns the correct result. This all happens regardless of the "Current
DNS Server".

Sometimes the "Current DNS Server" switches to 8.8.8.8 for reasons that
are not clear even when the other servers are working properly, which
seems to violate the principle of RFC 2132 section 3.8 that servers are
listed in order of preference.

So, in short, it seems that the correct behavior is that (1) resolved
returns results consistent with its "Current DNS Server" and (2)
resolved picks as its "Current DNS Server" the first reachable server in
the list. The current behavior is that (1) resolved returns results
sometimes inconsistent with its "Current DNS Server" and (2) resolved
sometimes picks as its "Current DNS Server" some server other than the
first reachable server in the list. The first issue is consistently
reproducible, and the second is readily reproducible in a short period
of time.

The problem appears on Ubuntu 22.04 and seems not to be present on
Ubuntu 18.04.

** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2007728

Title:
  resolved results differ from those from its current upstream server.

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  On a network with multiple DNS servers provided by DHCP, only the
  first two of which cover local names, resolved returns universally
  known names but fails to return the special names even when the
  "Current DNS Server" shown by `resolvectl status` returns the special
  names.

  Suppose that 172.16.9.5 and 172.16.10.5 are the two internal DNS
  servers with the local names. Windows servers with Active Directory
  enabled in this case. The DHCP server (a Cisco 4451 in this case)
  provides DNS servers 172.16.9.5, 172.16.10.5, 192.168.0.1, and
  8.8.8.8. `resolvectl status` shows all of these as "DNS Servers" and
  172.16.9.5 as the "Current DNS Server".

  `host localdomain.local` returns SRVFAIL, and `host localdomain.local
  127.0.0.53` returns SRVFAIL, but `host localdomain.local 172.16.9.5`
  returns the correct result. This all happens regardless of the
  "Current DNS Server".

  Sometimes the "Current DNS Server" switches to 8.8.8.8 for reasons
  that are not clear even when the other servers are working properly,
  which seems to violate the principle of RFC 2132 section 3.8 that
  servers are listed in order of preference.

  So, in short, it seems that the correct behavior is that (1) resolved
  returns results consistent with its "Current DNS Server" and (2)
  resolved picks as its "Current DNS Server" the first reachable server
  in the list. The current behavior is that (1) resolved returns results
  sometimes inconsistent with its "Current DNS Server" and (2) resolved
  sometimes picks as its "Current DNS Server" some server other than the
  first reachable server in the list. The first issue is consistently
  reproducible, and the second is readily reproducible in a short period
  of time.

  The problem appears on Ubuntu 22.04 and seems not to be present on
  Ubuntu 18.04.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2007728/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1854383] Re: Extra window decorations are created on windows with client-side decorations.

2023-02-17 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: mate-netbook (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854383

Title:
  Extra window decorations are created on windows with client-side
  decorations.

Status in gtk+3.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in marco package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in mate-netbook package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in ubuntu-mate-meta package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Steps to reproduce after a minimal/full install of Ubuntu MATE:

  1. Start up a Gtk3 application with a header bar (tested with Gnome
  Software) or a browser (such as Firefox) without using a standard
  window title bar that saves the position and size of the window before
  it was closed.

  2. Maximize the application window, then close it without changing the
  window size

  3. Relaunch the application and resize/unmaximize it

  After this, dummy window decorations will be created around the
  window. This issue has been tested on a Dell XPS 9570 and using Gnome
  Boxes 3.34.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/1854383/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007625] Re: New upstream microrelease 2.5.14

2023-02-17 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~sergiodj/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+git/openldap/+merge/437540

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2007625

Title:
  New upstream microrelease 2.5.14

Status in openldap package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in openldap source package in Jammy:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

   * MRE for the latest stable OpenLDAP 2.5.x release, 2.5.14.

  This update includes bugfixes only following the SRU policy exception
  defined at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenLDAPUpdates.

  [ Major Changes ]

   * See the list of bugs fixed in this release here:

  https://lists.openldap.org/hyperkitty/list/openldap-
  annou...@openldap.org/thread/TZQHR4SIWUA5BZTKDAKSFDOOGDVU4TU7/

  [ Test Plan ]

   * Upstream gitlab pipeline results:
  https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/pipelines/4816

   * Upstream "call for testing":

  
https://lists.openldap.org/hyperkitty/list/openldap-techni...@openldap.org/message/ZJTFCIIY3HHUZIHENR3TUDGGFWIVJOCF/
  
https://lists.openldap.org/hyperkitty/list/openldap-techni...@openldap.org/message/XVFN3TCIDUZCWJA7RKFTZI2762UELAGM/
  
https://lists.openldap.org/hyperkitty/list/openldap-techni...@openldap.org/message/YZIFGANGSBCV2E547KS5C6DJGJ4Z4CEX/

   * As described in the MRE wiki page for OpenLDAP, the test plan is to
  build the package in bileto and make sure that (1) all build-time
  tests pass and (2) all autopkgtest runs (from reverse dependencies)
  also pass.

   * Build log (amd64) confirming that the build-time testsuite has been
  performed and completed successfully: TBD

   * Bileto ticket: TBD

  [ Where problems could occur ]

   * Upstream tests are always executed during build-time. There are
  many reverse dependencies whose dep8 tests depend on OpenLDAP so the
  coverage is good. Nevertheless, there is always a risk for something
  to break since we are dealing with a microrelease upgrade. Whenever a
  test failure is detected, we will be on top of it and make sure it
  doesn't affect existing users.

  [ Other Info ]

   * This is a reoccurring MRE. See below for links to previous OpenLDAP
  MREs.

   * CVEs fixed by this release:
 - None.

  Current versions in supported releases that got updates:
   openldap | 2.5.13+dfsg-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 | jammy-updates   | source

  Special cases:
  - None.

  Previous MREs for OpenLDAP:
  - https://pad.lv/1977627
  - https://pad.lv/1983618

  As usual we test and prep from the PPA and then push through
  SRU/Security as applicable.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/2007625/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2006517] Re: Bluetooth works on desktop but not on ubuntu core

2023-02-17 Thread AceLan Kao
>From the dmesg logs, the kernel you use on desktop(5.15.0-56) and on
core(5.15.0-58) are not the same, but I've checked the kernel logs,
there is no update on bt driver part between the 2 kernel versions. It'd
be good if you can help me to update the kernel to make sure the kernel
versions are identical and check the issue again.(I feel the result
won't change)

The snap package works on desktop, but not on core, this doesn't look
like a kernel/driver issue. Could you provide more info about which
function call failed? or provide a simple program that we could try on
our side?

BTW, the difference between the dmesg logs is that rfcomm is loaded on
the desktop, but not on the core system, could you also try to load it
on the core system to see if it makes any difference, thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2006517

Title:
  Bluetooth works on desktop but not on ubuntu core

Status in bluez package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  We have built a snap that uses some bluetooth functionality.

  The snap runs well when using Ubuntu desktop 22.04 (all updates applied end 
of Jan 2022).
  We have tried using this same snap on Ubuntu Core 22 running on X86_64.

  On some hardware platforms (thinkpad E15 and x86 Mac) everything works as 
expected.
  We can install the snap on Jammy 22.04 or Core 22 on these platforms and get 
expected functionality regardless of OS.

  
  On our targeted platform (a Dell 5570) things are not working.  When running 
22.04 Jammy, everything works.  When running Core 22, some advanced bluetooth 
functionality is not available.
  Since the Core 22 image installs and runs on other X86_64 hardware we suspect 
a device driver issue.

  Attached are several files taken from the Dell 5570
  1) dmesg from Core 22.
  2) dmesg from Jammy 22.04
  3) output of lspci from Jammy 22.04
  4) Output of lsusb from Jammy 22.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/2006517/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1983185] Re: Recent commit breaks /etc/X11/Xsession

2023-02-17 Thread Keepiru
Some notes:

* "/usr/bin/which true" returned "/usr/bin/true"
* "command -v true" returns "true" because it is a shell builtin
* on the next line, "[ -e "$STARTUP_FULL_PATH" ]" returns false because "true" 
(no path) does not exist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983185

Title:
  Recent commit  breaks /etc/X11/Xsession

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in xorg package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  The following command:

  $/etc/X11/Xsession true

  opens a dialog with the following error message:

  "Xsession: unable to launch "true" X session --- "true" not found;
  falling back to default session."

  There is a "Okay" button on this message, and clicking it does bad
  things if one happens to be running Ubuntu 22.04 on Xorg (or running
  Gnome on Xorg, which is seemingly a different option for the the low
  latency installation I am running: 5.15.0-43-generic #46-Ubuntu SMP
  Tue Jul 12 10:30:17 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux).

  See Brendan O'Dea's related comment about this behavior on debian-
  bugs-dist: https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-
  d...@lists.debian.org/msg1857023.html

  This has consequences in my use of xpra. For example, if I use xpra
  via the run_scaled-master script to magnify a single application's
  interface for a 4K display I get the error dialog mentioned above,
  often with resulting system instability.

  This behavior cropped up last month.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-43.46-generic 5.15.39
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-43-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon 
znvpair
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..01.00.0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
  .proc.driver.nvidia.version:
   NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  510.73.05  Sat May  7 
05:30:26 UTC 2022
   GCC version:
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CompositorRunning: None
  Date: Sat Jul 30 10:14:43 2022
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: jammy
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   virtualbox/6.1.34, 5.15.0-41-lowlatency, x86_64: installed
   virtualbox/6.1.34, 5.15.0-43-generic, x86_64: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation Device [8086:3e94] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:2269]
   NVIDIA Corporation GP104GLM [Quadro P5200 Mobile] [10de:1bb5] (rev a1) 
(prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Lenovo GP104GLM [Quadro P5200 Mobile] [17aa:2269]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-07-13 (16 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  MachineType: LENOVO 20MBCTO1WW
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/BOOT/ubuntu_aze0rg@/vmlinuz-5.15.0-43-generic 
root=ZFS=rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_aze0rg ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 06/10/2022
  dmi.bios.release: 1.47
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: N2CET64W (1.47 )
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available
  dmi.board.name: 20MBCTO1WW
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: Not Defined
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.chassis.version: None
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.16
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrN2CET64W(1.47):bd06/10/2022:br1.47:efr1.16:svnLENOVO:pn20MBCTO1WW:pvrThinkPadP72:rvnLENOVO:rn20MBCTO1WW:rvrNotDefined:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNone:skuLENOVO_MT_20MB_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPadP72:
  dmi.product.family: ThinkPad P72
  dmi.product.name: 20MBCTO1WW
  dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_20MB_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPad P72
  dmi.product.version: ThinkPad P72
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.110-1ubuntu1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 22.0.1-1ubuntu2.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 22.0.1-1ubuntu2.1
  version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers-* N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:21.1.3-2ubuntu2.1
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2ubuntu1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20210115-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-vi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907878] Re: wrong var declaration in if-up.d/resolved (nm-dispatcher[54417]: /etc/network/if-up.d/resolved: 12: mystatedir: not found)

2023-02-17 Thread ALinuxUser
That other bug report says:

> I fixed it by removing the quotes around $DNS and $DOMAINS on line 47
and 51.

I found that in my version of the relevant file (which is - yes? -
/etc/network/if-up.d/resolved) the lines at issue were lines 48 and 52.
(I use Linux Mint 21.1, which is based upon Ubuntu 22.04.)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ifupdown in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907878

Title:
  wrong var declaration in if-up.d/resolved (nm-dispatcher[54417]:
  /etc/network/if-up.d/resolved: 12: mystatedir: not found)

Status in ifupdown package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ifupdown source package in Jammy:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Syslog error:

 nm-dispatcher[...]: /etc/network/if-up.d/resolved: 12: mystatedir:
  not found

  I think it's because of this line:

if systemctl is-enabled systemd-resolved > /dev/null 2>&1; then
mystatedir statedir ifindex interface <- this 
is interpreted as a 'mystatedir' command and fails

interface=$IFACE
if [ ! "$interface" ]; then

  
  Perhaps the intention was to 'export mystatedir statedir ...'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1907878/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949340] Re: [upstream] Saving downloads or pages is difficult because of unfocused file chooser dialog

2023-02-17 Thread ADFH
Ahh.. Perhaps they have been conflated the two somewhere in amongst all
the tickets here marked as duplicates. I'm talking about the bug where
focus remains on browser window, rather than file dialog, requiring
pointer device interaction to target the newly opened file dialog... as
opposed to focus within the file dialog being unusual (which also seems
to be a thing).

This issue (file dialog not focused when launched from browser) is
arguably an accessibility issue as well, if a pointing device is
required to control file dialogs where previously it could be driven by
kbd alone.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949340

Title:
  [upstream] Saving downloads or pages is difficult because of unfocused
  file chooser dialog

Status in Mozilla Firefox:
  New
Status in GTK+:
  Unknown
Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in gtk+3.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in gtk4 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in xdg-desktop-portal-gnome package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in xdg-desktop-portal-gtk package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in gtk+3.0 source package in Jammy:
  Confirmed
Status in gtk4 source package in Jammy:
  Triaged
Status in gtk+3.0 source package in Kinetic:
  Confirmed
Status in gtk4 source package in Kinetic:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Steps to reproduce:
  1. Open Chromium (release does not matter, here deb-packaged version from 
18.04 LTS is used)
  2a. Navigate to some page, press +
  2b. Navigate to some page, with "Ask where to save each file before 
downloading" enabled try to download some file

  Actual result:
  * file chooser dialog is unfocused, user should select the window by mouse 
and then hit  for specified location

  Expected result:
  * file chooser dialog is focused, user can simply hit  to save in 
previously selected location.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1949340/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp