[Touch-packages] [Bug 1878094] Re: Ubuntu 20.04 / Pulseaudio RTP receive broken sound

2021-05-11 Thread Guest
The bug was submitted for Ubuntu 20.04, which is an LTS release.
The comment changing the status to "Fix Released" mentions a fix is available 
for Ubuntu 20.10 (groovy), which is the next, non-LTS release.

I'm not familiar with the procedure of back-porting code to LTS
releases, but since upstream did not release a new mayor/minor version
but a small bug fix, the bug fix should not be that problematic to be
included in Ubuntu 20.04.

Are there any chances for this bug to be fixed in the reported version
Ubuntu 20.04, too?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878094

Title:
  Ubuntu 20.04 / Pulseaudio RTP receive broken sound

Status in PulseAudio:
  Unknown
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  just upgraded some of my computers to Ubuntu 20.04, also tried with
  fresh install, in all case the pulseaudio rtp receive module is giving
  me very poor sound.

  Easily reproducible on a single machine :

  pacmd load-module module-null-sink sink_name=MyNullSink
  pacmd load-module module-rtp-send source=MyNullSink.monitor loop=true
  pacmd load-module module-rtp-recv

  And then play something in the null sink, loopback sound will be bad
  (lags).

  What I noticed : if I open the rtp stream with vlc, it's ok, sound is
  good.

  Ubuntu 20 uses PulseAudio 13.99, aka (I guess) PulseAudio 14 which
  implements RTP through gstreamer, which is new.

  So I tested my rtp stream with gstreamer:

  gst-launch-1.0 udpsrc address=224.0.0.56 port=46586
  caps="application/x-rtp, media=audio, payload=10, clock-rate=44100" !
  .recv_rtp_sink_0 rtpbin ! rtpL16depay ! audioconvert ! audioresample !
  pulsesink

  And it works fine, so I definitively believe there is an issue in the
  new module-rtp-recv.so bundled with PulseAudio and that is now based
  on gstreamer.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: pulseaudio 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-29.33-generic 5.4.30
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-29-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/controlC0', 
'/dev/snd/hwC0D2', '/dev/snd/hwC0D0', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D9p', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D8p', 
'/dev/snd/pcmC0D7p', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D3p', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D2c', 
'/dev/snd/pcmC0D1p', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D0c', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p', 
'/dev/snd/by-id', '/dev/snd/by-path', '/dev/snd/controlC2', 
'/dev/snd/pcmC2D0c', '/dev/snd/controlC1', '/dev/snd/pcmC1D0p', '/dev/snd/seq', 
'/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1:
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon May 11 22:22:55 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-03-31 (407 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20190210)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No 
PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
  SourcePackage: pulseaudio
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-05-09 (2 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 09/13/2018
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 1404
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.board.name: ROG STRIX H370-I GAMING
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.board.version: Rev X.0x
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Default string
  dmi.chassis.version: Default string
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr1404:bd09/13/2018:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnROGSTRIXH370-IGAMING:rvrRevX.0x:cvnDefaultstring:ct3:cvrDefaultstring:
  dmi.product.family: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.product.name: System Product Name
  dmi.product.sku: ASUS_MB_CNL
  dmi.product.version: System Version
  dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer
  modified.conffile..etc.pulse.daemon.conf: [modified]
  modified.conffile..etc.pulse.default.pa: [modified]
  modified.conffile..etc.pulse.system.pa: [modified]
  modified.conffile..etc.xdg.autostart.pulseaudio.desktop: [deleted]
  mtime.conffile..etc.pulse.daemon.conf: 2020-05-10T12:17:27.278185
  mtime.conffile..etc.pulse.default.pa: 2020-05-10T12:13:15.278817
  mtime.conffile..etc.pulse.system.pa: 2020-05-11T16:24:47.654012

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pulseaudio/+bug/1878094/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1878094] Re: Ubuntu 20.04 / Pulseaudio RTP receive broken sound

2021-05-11 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Now requested a fix for 20.04.

** Tags added: rls-ff-incoming

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878094

Title:
  Ubuntu 20.04 / Pulseaudio RTP receive broken sound

Status in PulseAudio:
  Unknown
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  just upgraded some of my computers to Ubuntu 20.04, also tried with
  fresh install, in all case the pulseaudio rtp receive module is giving
  me very poor sound.

  Easily reproducible on a single machine :

  pacmd load-module module-null-sink sink_name=MyNullSink
  pacmd load-module module-rtp-send source=MyNullSink.monitor loop=true
  pacmd load-module module-rtp-recv

  And then play something in the null sink, loopback sound will be bad
  (lags).

  What I noticed : if I open the rtp stream with vlc, it's ok, sound is
  good.

  Ubuntu 20 uses PulseAudio 13.99, aka (I guess) PulseAudio 14 which
  implements RTP through gstreamer, which is new.

  So I tested my rtp stream with gstreamer:

  gst-launch-1.0 udpsrc address=224.0.0.56 port=46586
  caps="application/x-rtp, media=audio, payload=10, clock-rate=44100" !
  .recv_rtp_sink_0 rtpbin ! rtpL16depay ! audioconvert ! audioresample !
  pulsesink

  And it works fine, so I definitively believe there is an issue in the
  new module-rtp-recv.so bundled with PulseAudio and that is now based
  on gstreamer.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: pulseaudio 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-29.33-generic 5.4.30
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-29-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/controlC0', 
'/dev/snd/hwC0D2', '/dev/snd/hwC0D0', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D9p', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D8p', 
'/dev/snd/pcmC0D7p', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D3p', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D2c', 
'/dev/snd/pcmC0D1p', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D0c', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p', 
'/dev/snd/by-id', '/dev/snd/by-path', '/dev/snd/controlC2', 
'/dev/snd/pcmC2D0c', '/dev/snd/controlC1', '/dev/snd/pcmC1D0p', '/dev/snd/seq', 
'/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1:
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon May 11 22:22:55 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-03-31 (407 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20190210)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No 
PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
  SourcePackage: pulseaudio
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-05-09 (2 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 09/13/2018
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 1404
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.board.name: ROG STRIX H370-I GAMING
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.board.version: Rev X.0x
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Default string
  dmi.chassis.version: Default string
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr1404:bd09/13/2018:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnROGSTRIXH370-IGAMING:rvrRevX.0x:cvnDefaultstring:ct3:cvrDefaultstring:
  dmi.product.family: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.product.name: System Product Name
  dmi.product.sku: ASUS_MB_CNL
  dmi.product.version: System Version
  dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer
  modified.conffile..etc.pulse.daemon.conf: [modified]
  modified.conffile..etc.pulse.default.pa: [modified]
  modified.conffile..etc.pulse.system.pa: [modified]
  modified.conffile..etc.xdg.autostart.pulseaudio.desktop: [deleted]
  mtime.conffile..etc.pulse.daemon.conf: 2020-05-10T12:17:27.278185
  mtime.conffile..etc.pulse.default.pa: 2020-05-10T12:13:15.278817
  mtime.conffile..etc.pulse.system.pa: 2020-05-11T16:24:47.654012

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pulseaudio/+bug/1878094/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928048] [NEW] Get black screen on bootup

2021-05-11 Thread Azarudeen Ginx
Public bug reported:

Recently installed xubuntu using live usb, the problem is after installation 
the os is not booting. i had to use "nomodeset" to access the environment.
what i want is to boot into my OS easily without making changes in codes or 
creating nomodesets. just as how windows logs in easily.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-50.56~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-50-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.17
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: XFCE
Date: Tue May 11 12:37:15 2021
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: focal
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics 
Controller [8086:0102] (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Lenovo 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics 
Controller [17aa:362a]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-05-11 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
MachineType: LENOVO Lenovo C320
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-50-generic 
root=UUID=234ce4f5-05c2-46d4-8195-ccc7a37c627e ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 
nomodeset
SourcePackage: xorg
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 05/08/2012
dmi.bios.release: 0.21
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: E4KT21AUS
dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.type: 13
dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrE4KT21AUS:bd05/08/2012:br0.21:svnLENOVO:pnLenovoC320:pvrLenovoProduct:rvnLENOVO:rnTobefilledbyO.E.M.:rvrTobefilledbyO.E.M.:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct13:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:
dmi.product.family: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.product.name: Lenovo C320
dmi.product.sku: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.product.version: Lenovo Product
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.102-1ubuntu1~20.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 20.2.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.9-2ubuntu1.2~20.04.2
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200226-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal ubuntu

** Description changed:

- Recently installed xubuntu using live usb, the problem is after
- installation the os is not booting. i had to use "nomodeset" to access
- the environment.
- 
+ Recently installed xubuntu using live usb, the problem is after installation 
the os is not booting. i had to use "nomodeset" to access the environment.
+ what i want is to boot into my OS easily without making changes in codes or 
creating nomodesets. just as how windows logs in easily.
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-50.56~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
  Uname: Linux 5.8.0-50-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.17
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Tue May 11 12:37:15 2021
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: focal
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
  GraphicsCard:
-  Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics 
Controller [8086:0102] (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
-Subsystem: Lenovo 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics 
Controller [17aa:362a]
+  Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics 
Controller [8086:0102] (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
+    Subsystem: Lenovo 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics 
Controller [17aa:362a]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-05-11 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
  MachineType: LENOVO Lenovo C320
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-50-generic 
root=UUID=234ce4f5-05c2-46d4-8195-ccc7a37c627e ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 
nomodeset
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 05/08/2012
  dmi.bios.release: 0.21
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: E4KT21AUS
  dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.board.name: To be filled by O.E.M.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928048] Re: Get black screen on bootup

2021-05-11 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Thanks for the bug report. We will need to see a system log from a
failed boot. To do that, please:

1. Reproduce the bug again (without nomodeset).

2. Reboot with nomodeset.

3. Run:

   journalctl -b-1 > prevboot1.txt
   journalctl -b-2 > prevboot2.txt

4. Attach the resulting text files here.

** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => xorg-server (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928048

Title:
  Get black screen on bootup

Status in xorg-server package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Recently installed xubuntu using live usb, the problem is after installation 
the os is not booting. i had to use "nomodeset" to access the environment.
  what i want is to boot into my OS easily without making changes in codes or 
creating nomodesets. just as how windows logs in easily.
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-50.56~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
  Uname: Linux 5.8.0-50-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.17
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Tue May 11 12:37:15 2021
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: focal
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics 
Controller [8086:0102] (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
     Subsystem: Lenovo 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics 
Controller [17aa:362a]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-05-11 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
  MachineType: LENOVO Lenovo C320
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-50-generic 
root=UUID=234ce4f5-05c2-46d4-8195-ccc7a37c627e ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 
nomodeset
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 05/08/2012
  dmi.bios.release: 0.21
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: E4KT21AUS
  dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.board.name: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.chassis.type: 13
  dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrE4KT21AUS:bd05/08/2012:br0.21:svnLENOVO:pnLenovoC320:pvrLenovoProduct:rvnLENOVO:rnTobefilledbyO.E.M.:rvrTobefilledbyO.E.M.:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct13:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:
  dmi.product.family: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.product.name: Lenovo C320
  dmi.product.sku: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.product.version: Lenovo Product
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.102-1ubuntu1~20.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 20.2.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.9-2ubuntu1.2~20.04.2
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200226-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1928048/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926437] Re: [SRU] Backport zstd support, fix bug in python-apt

2021-05-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The xenial SRU should be good to go now, the snapcraft failures are
unrelated and also reproduced in vorlon's retry of snapcraft itself.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926437

Title:
  [SRU] Backport zstd support, fix bug in python-apt

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in python-apt package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in python-apt source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in python-apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in python-apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in python-apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in python-apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Committed
Status in python-apt source package in Impish:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  APT in xenial needs to learn about zstd support to enable Launchpad to work 
with zstd packages.

  python-apt in all releases needs to be adjusted to pass the compressor
  names instead of programs to ExtractTar, as otherwise, if
  /usr/bin/zstd does not exist, it will pass "false" as the compressor,
  and then ExtractTar fails (same for other compressors).

  On hirsute, the python-apt upload also includes some new  
annotations for build-dependencies, as it's a straight upload of the 2.2
  stable series.

  [Test plan]
  The apt regression tests cover the compression methods extensively, including 
even stored compressed lists in /var/lib/apt and fetching Packages files 
compressed with such methods, for all compression methods.

  The final test is to make apt_inst.DebFile("glibc-doc-
  reference_2.33-0ubuntu2~zstd1_all.deb").control.extractall() from
  1923845 work in python3-apt.

  For hirsute, the build dependency changes will verify themselves
  during the build ;)

  [Where problems could occur]

  APT:

  The changes to APT are adding the zstd compression backend to FileFd
  and then linking it into the configuration. The former is adding new
  code, triggered only on zstd files, and should not be able to cause
  regressions.

  The latter is a bunch of small lines here and there, and it caused
  issues during backporting in the test suite because it expected
  compressors in a specific order. However, chances are that nothing
  else has as stringent requirements as the test suite, so I don't
  believe that is a problem for existing users.

  Bugs can of course be in the code dealing with zstd, and that might
  open you up to security vulnerabilities in the zstd code if you pass
  APT zstd compressed files.

  A regression can be if clients used apt-helper cat-file to cat a zstd-
  compressed file ending in .zst - they'll now get uncompressed content,
  rather than compressed.

  python-apt:

  The change just replaces Binary with Name, aligning the code with APT
  itself, so it's so trivial, we don't expect regressions.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1926437/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914278] Re: discover is not removing unused kernels

2021-05-11 Thread Aex Rauch
this bug is somehow in packagekit.  I do not use some ui/gui for
packagekit, nor unattended-upgrades nor ather automatic update tools.
Normally I use apt.

apt-mark showmanual | egrep linux-'[g|m|h|i]'
linux-generic
linux-headers-5.4.0-73
linux-headers-5.4.0-73-generic
linux-image-5.4.0-73-generic
linux-modules-5.4.0-73-generic
linux-modules-extra-5.4.0-73-generic  

the kernel comes new.
This appears after I upgrade with pkcon from commandline. As long I use apt all 
is okay.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914278

Title:
  discover is not removing unused kernels

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in discover package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in packagekit package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  With the machines I help administer, we have been finding situations
  where the /boot directory is filling-up beyond 3 kernels on LUKS
  encrypted systems. apt autoremove is not removing old kernels as
  expected.

  This may also be an issue with unattended-upgrades since I found the
  following line commented-out by default:

  // Remove unused automatically installed kernel-related packages
  // (kernel images, kernel headers and kernel version locked tools).
  // Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Kernel-Packages "true";

  We have had a system with as many as 15 kernel packages installed as a
  result of this not working as expected.

  The majority of these machines are using Discover to do their package
  upgrading, which uses PackageKit as its backend.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: apt 2.0.4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-41.46~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
  Uname: Linux 5.8.0-41-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.14
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Tue Feb  2 09:29:01 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-11-07 (87 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20200731)
  SourcePackage: apt
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1914278/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887964] Re: VG unavailable after upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 Cannot process volume group vg01 Volume group "vg01" not found

2021-05-11 Thread Michel Bretschneider
So I upgraded from 18.04 LTS to 20.04 LTS too and found that the
installed 5.4 kernel panics complaining something about volume group. I
booted the 4.15 kernel wich put in a volume group warning too but at
least runs. After adding 8.8.8.8 to the resolv.conf the machine is
almost ready to work with (yup, I run my own dns/dhcp/dovecot/postfix
which all need attention once that kernel/vg bug is no longer in the
way).

Since my /boot partition is small, I initially thought the ramdisk image
is missing/broken/corrupted (there were some warnings in the upgrade
process which got stuck between cannot upgrade and cannot restore to
initial state - which let me to reboot the machine, trying to fix that
on my own). So I uninstalled the 4.4 kernel so only 4.15 and 5.4 are
left. While grub was updating I noticed several

 WARNING: PV /dev/sda1 in VG nameOfVolumeGroup is using an old PV header, 
modify the VG to update.
 
So I ran sudo vgck --updatemetadata nameOfVolumeGroup to fix that, hoping it 
would suffice to make 5.4 boot. It didn't:

 Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-
block(0,0)

So I booted the 4.15 which complained

 Volume Group not found nameOfVolumeGroup
 Cannot process volume group nameOfVolumeGroup

but at least booted. Once the machine is booted the volume seems to be
accessible, not sure why. Not sure why that didn't work for 5.4.

I checked /etc/crypttab but as I don't have crypted drives it contains
only the comment header, hexdump -C shows it ends with 0a so no problem
there.

Now I'm a bit lost:

- why is grub still giving me the option to boot the 4.4 kernel, although it's 
uninstalled?
- why does 5.4 fail to process the volume group and panic?
- why does 4.15 complain about the vg but still manages to start? (the only 
good thing so far)
- what should I do to make 5.4 (and updated kernels in the future) work on this 
system?
- why does dns does not fall back to 8.8.8.8 or something if the local dns got 
broken by the update (yeah, that's another issue - point me in the right 
direction or I'll search for that once the kernel/vg foo is fixed)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887964

Title:
  VG unavailable after upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 Cannot process volume
  group vg01 Volume group "vg01" not found

Status in lvm2 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in lvm2 source package in Focal:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After upgrading a laptop configured with LVM from 18.04 to 20.04 the volume 
group is no longer found.
  During boot the console shows

  Volume group "vg01" not found
  Cannot process volume group vg01
  Gave up waiting for suspend/resume device
  ALERT! /dev/mapper/vg01-root does not exist. Dropping to a shell!

  Attached dist-upgrade logs and console output.

  Tried the "vgck --updatemetadata vg01" recommended on this bug report:
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1874381

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+bug/1887964/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927796] Re: [SRU]pam_tally2 can cause accounts to be locked by correct password. pam_faillock use is the recommended fix

2021-05-11 Thread Marc Deslauriers
** Also affects: pam (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: pam (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: pam (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: pam (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: pam (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927796

Title:
  [SRU]pam_tally2 can cause accounts to be locked by correct password.
  pam_faillock use is the recommended fix

Status in pam package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in pam source package in Bionic:
  New
Status in pam source package in Focal:
  New
Status in pam source package in Groovy:
  New
Status in pam source package in Hirsute:
  New
Status in pam source package in Impish:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  [IMPACT]
  There is a known issue in pam_tally2 which may cause an account to be lock 
down even with correct password, in a busy node environment where simultaneous 
logins takes place (https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/71).

  There are already two customer cases from Canonical clients
  complaining about this behavior (00297697 and 00303806).

  Also, potentially, this will cause further problems in the future,
  since both STIG benchmarks and CIS benchmarks rely on pam_tally2 to
  lock accounts when wrong passwords are used. And both benchmarks - but
  specially STIG - requires use of a lot of audit rules, which can lead
  to the busy node environment.

  The issue impacts all pam_tally2 versions distributed in all currently
  supported Ubuntu versions and also the next unreleased one. Note that,
  according to https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/71, there
  is no plan to fix this issue!

  [FIX]
  This fix proposes to add pam_faillock module to the PAM package, so users of 
pam_tally2 having issues can migrate to pam_faillock. We also plan to modify 
the current STIG benchmarks to rely on pam_faillock instead of pam_tally2, but 
in order to do so, we need the pam_faillock module to be available.

  Note that we don't propose to remove pam_tally2, since not every user
  of this module is affected.

  [TEST]
  Tested on a VM installed with Focal server iso and on another with Bionic 
server iso. Enabled pam_faillock module as recommeded by its man page. Then 
tried to log over ssh with an incorrect password, until the account got locked. 
Waited for the configured grace time to unlock and logged in using the correct 
password.

  Note that, since the pam_tally2 issue is caused by a racing condition,
  with a hard to recreate environment (we could not even reproduce it
  with pam_tally2), we could not reproduce the conditions to test
  pam_faillock with.

  [REGRESSION POTENTIAL]
  The regression potential for this is small, since we're not removing the old 
pam_tally2 module, just adding another one. So anyone still using pam_tally2 
will be able to do so.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1927796/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926316] Re: lxappearance crashes on launch

2021-05-11 Thread Sebastien Bacher
The glib update has been synced to impish,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/2.68.1-2

There is also a SRU in the hirsute queue

** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Iain Lane (laney)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926316

Title:
  lxappearance crashes on launch

Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Backtrace of the segmentation fault

  Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
  0x7790c79d in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
  (gdb) bt
  #0  0x7790c79d in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
  #1  0x7790ccc1 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
  #2  0x7790cf41 in  () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
  #3  0x7790d079 in g_key_file_load_from_file () at 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
  #4  0x55407072 in load_icon_themes_from_dir ()
  #5  0x554073dd in icon_theme_init ()
  #6  0x55404c92 in main ()

  Strace shows that the programs borks while trying to load the icon
  theme "/usr/share/icons/gnome/index.theme".

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
  Package: lxappearance 0.6.3-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-16.17-generic 5.11.12
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-16-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  Config_System_openbox: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 
'/etc/xdg/lxsession/openbox/desktop.conf'
  CurrentDesktop: lxde
  Date: Tue Apr 27 21:47:03 2021
  Icons_Default: No icons theme configured by default
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-01-12 (105 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Release amd64 (20201022)
  SourcePackage: lxappearance
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to hirsute on 2021-04-22 (5 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1926316/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887964] Re: VG unavailable after upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 Cannot process volume group vg01 Volume group "vg01" not found

2021-05-11 Thread Michel Bretschneider
FYI: my system is quite old, I started with 8.04 server LTS and upgraded
since so my problems are rarely reproducible on systems that were
conceived later.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887964

Title:
  VG unavailable after upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 Cannot process volume
  group vg01 Volume group "vg01" not found

Status in lvm2 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in lvm2 source package in Focal:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After upgrading a laptop configured with LVM from 18.04 to 20.04 the volume 
group is no longer found.
  During boot the console shows

  Volume group "vg01" not found
  Cannot process volume group vg01
  Gave up waiting for suspend/resume device
  ALERT! /dev/mapper/vg01-root does not exist. Dropping to a shell!

  Attached dist-upgrade logs and console output.

  Tried the "vgck --updatemetadata vg01" recommended on this bug report:
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1874381

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+bug/1887964/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887964] Re: VG unavailable after upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 Cannot process volume group vg01 Volume group "vg01" not found

2021-05-11 Thread Michel Bretschneider
Update: I installed 5.4.0-73 via update, grub config got updated but
after reboot only

5.4.0-72 (the broken one)
4.15
4.4 (the uninstalled one)

appeared in the grub menu. After "reparing" the grub update (see:
https://askubuntu.com/a/1207143), the machine boots into 5.4.0-73
without major issues. There are still a bunch of warnings but at least
it starts.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887964

Title:
  VG unavailable after upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 Cannot process volume
  group vg01 Volume group "vg01" not found

Status in lvm2 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in lvm2 source package in Focal:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After upgrading a laptop configured with LVM from 18.04 to 20.04 the volume 
group is no longer found.
  During boot the console shows

  Volume group "vg01" not found
  Cannot process volume group vg01
  Gave up waiting for suspend/resume device
  ALERT! /dev/mapper/vg01-root does not exist. Dropping to a shell!

  Attached dist-upgrade logs and console output.

  Tried the "vgck --updatemetadata vg01" recommended on this bug report:
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1874381

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+bug/1887964/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925823] Re: losts or misinterprets the newline character coming from mouse paste

2021-05-11 Thread Péter Prőhle
** Summary changed:

- losts or ignore the newline character coming from mouse paste
+ losts or misinterprets the newline character coming from mouse paste

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925823

Title:
  losts or misinterprets the newline character coming from mouse paste

Status in bash package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  If there is a complete bash command with terminating newline in the
  cut and paste buffer,

  and it is pasted into a gnome-terminal,

  then the command is *not* executed, the newline is ignored by the
  terminal.

  But in return this bug, the pasted command is showed in reverse
  coloring,

  what is very disturbing when a command is not executed, but decorated
  in a funny way instead.

  This is new in 21.04, the dropping commands into a gnome-terminal
  worked fine in 20.10, ...

  ... and in the last 27 years of my linux usage.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1925823/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928082] [NEW] the minimize display freezes

2021-05-11 Thread moshood ope
Public bug reported:

the display freezes when i try minimizing after a very long use time

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+22ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-16.17-generic 5.11.12
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-16-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue May 11 13:09:28 2021
DistUpgraded: 2021-04-26 11:56:19,497 ERROR got error from PostInstallScript 
./xorg_fix_proprietary.py (g-io-error-quark: Failed to execute child process 
“./xorg_fix_proprietary.py”: Failed to execve: No such file or directory (1))
DistroCodename: hirsute
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus:
 virtualbox, 6.1.18, 5.11.0-16-generic, x86_64: installed
 virtualbox, 6.1.18, 5.8.0-50-generic, x86_64: installed
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, including running git bisection searches
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller [8086:0166] (rev 
09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Lenovo 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller [17aa:21f3]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-06-10 (701 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416)
MachineType: LENOVO 23445HU
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_NG:en
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_NG
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-16-generic 
root=UUID=65bd11b5-874d-460b-8539-b2b68af2927a ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to hirsute on 2021-04-26 (15 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 03/06/2014
dmi.bios.release: 2.64
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: G1ETA4WW (2.64 )
dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available
dmi.board.name: 23445HU
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: Not Defined
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.13
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrG1ETA4WW(2.64):bd03/06/2014:br2.64:efr1.13:svnLENOVO:pn23445HU:pvrThinkPadT430:rvnLENOVO:rn23445HU:rvrNotDefined:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
dmi.product.family: ThinkPad T430
dmi.product.name: 23445HU
dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_2344
dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T430
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.14.1+20.10.20200813-0ubuntu4
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.104-1build1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 21.0.1-2
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200714-1ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-1

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug hirsute ubuntu wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928082

Title:
  the minimize  display freezes

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  the display freezes when i try minimizing after a very long use time

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+22ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-16.17-generic 5.11.12
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-16-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue May 11 13:09:28 2021
  DistUpgraded: 2021-04-26 11:56:19,497 ERROR got error from PostInstallScript 
./xorg_fix_proprietary.py (g-io-error-quark: Failed to execute child process 
“./xorg_fix_proprietary.py”: Failed to execve: No such file or directory (1))
  DistroCodename: hirsute
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   virtualbox, 6.1.18, 5.11.0-16-generic, x86_64: installed
   virtualbox, 6.1.18, 5.8.0-50-generic, x86_64: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, including running git bisection searches
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller [8086:0166] 
(rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Lenovo 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller [17aa:21f3]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-06-10 (701 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416)
  MachineType: LENOVO 23445HU
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_NG:en
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_NG
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-16-generic 
root=UUID=65bd11b5-874d-460b-8539-b2b68af2927a ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  Symptom

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927796] Re: [SRU]pam_tally2 can cause accounts to be locked by correct password. pam_faillock use is the recommended fix

2021-05-11 Thread Marc Deslauriers
The debdiffs in comment #1 currently create a multiarch manpage
collision because of a pam packaging particularity. (See bug 1558597 for
an example)

I will update the debdiffs to correct the issue and will post them here
once done.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927796

Title:
  [SRU]pam_tally2 can cause accounts to be locked by correct password.
  pam_faillock use is the recommended fix

Status in pam package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in pam source package in Bionic:
  New
Status in pam source package in Focal:
  New
Status in pam source package in Groovy:
  New
Status in pam source package in Hirsute:
  New
Status in pam source package in Impish:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  [IMPACT]
  There is a known issue in pam_tally2 which may cause an account to be lock 
down even with correct password, in a busy node environment where simultaneous 
logins takes place (https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/71).

  There are already two customer cases from Canonical clients
  complaining about this behavior (00297697 and 00303806).

  Also, potentially, this will cause further problems in the future,
  since both STIG benchmarks and CIS benchmarks rely on pam_tally2 to
  lock accounts when wrong passwords are used. And both benchmarks - but
  specially STIG - requires use of a lot of audit rules, which can lead
  to the busy node environment.

  The issue impacts all pam_tally2 versions distributed in all currently
  supported Ubuntu versions and also the next unreleased one. Note that,
  according to https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/71, there
  is no plan to fix this issue!

  [FIX]
  This fix proposes to add pam_faillock module to the PAM package, so users of 
pam_tally2 having issues can migrate to pam_faillock. We also plan to modify 
the current STIG benchmarks to rely on pam_faillock instead of pam_tally2, but 
in order to do so, we need the pam_faillock module to be available.

  Note that we don't propose to remove pam_tally2, since not every user
  of this module is affected.

  [TEST]
  Tested on a VM installed with Focal server iso and on another with Bionic 
server iso. Enabled pam_faillock module as recommeded by its man page. Then 
tried to log over ssh with an incorrect password, until the account got locked. 
Waited for the configured grace time to unlock and logged in using the correct 
password.

  Note that, since the pam_tally2 issue is caused by a racing condition,
  with a hard to recreate environment (we could not even reproduce it
  with pam_tally2), we could not reproduce the conditions to test
  pam_faillock with.

  [REGRESSION POTENTIAL]
  The regression potential for this is small, since we're not removing the old 
pam_tally2 module, just adding another one. So anyone still using pam_tally2 
will be able to do so.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1927796/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925823] Re: losts or misinterprets the newline character coming from mouse paste

2021-05-11 Thread Péter Prőhle
Sorry that I edited the original bug report, but I think it was better
to make it more informative, and not to grab these improvements of the
bug description among the comments.  Read please, re-read please the new
version of the bug report.

** Description changed:

+ Quiete a few experients shows, that bash misinterprets the newline-
+ character coming from mouse paste, while in the same terminals the emacs
+ or vim or alpine and many other character oriented programs interprest
+ correctly.
+ 
+ The problem is specific to the situation when we are at a bash prompt of
+ a new version of bash we got in Ubuntu 21.04. As soon as I invoke an ssh
+ session, the interpretation of the newline-caharcter becomes correct,
+ since the remote older bash interprets correctly.
+ 
+ >>> Newline bug of first kind:
+ 
  If there is a complete bash command with terminating newline in the cut
  and paste buffer,
  
  and it is pasted into a gnome-terminal,
  
  then the command is *not* executed, the newline is ignored by the
  terminal.
  
- But in return this bug, the pasted command is showed in reverse
- coloring,
+ >>> Newline bug of second kind:
  
- what is very disturbing when a command is not executed, but decorated in
- a funny way instead.
+ If I prepare a bash command say
  
- This is new in 21.04, the dropping commands into a gnome-terminal worked
- fine in 20.10, ...
+ cp  target-directory
  
- ... and in the last 27 years of my linux usage.
+ and I collect into the paste buffer "source-file newline-character"
+ 
+ and I drop it IN BETWEEN the prepared "cp" and "target-directory"
+ 
+ then the result is wrong:
+ 
+ instead of interpreting the newline-character as "push enter"
+ 
+ the command is broken into the followint 2 lines:
+ 
+ cp source-file
+ 
+ target-directory
+ 
+ and I get an error message about missing target specification.
+ 
+ cp: missing destination file operand after 'source-file'
+ Try 'cp --help' for more information.
+ bash: target-directory: Is a directory
+ 
+ I found better to make this original bug descripton more informative.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925823

Title:
  losts or misinterprets the newline character coming from mouse paste

Status in bash package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Quiete a few experients shows, that bash misinterprets the newline-
  character coming from mouse paste, while in the same terminals the
  emacs or vim or alpine and many other character oriented programs
  interprest correctly.

  The problem is specific to the situation when we are at a bash prompt
  of a new version of bash we got in Ubuntu 21.04. As soon as I invoke
  an ssh session, the interpretation of the newline-caharcter becomes
  correct, since the remote older bash interprets correctly.

  >>> Newline bug of first kind:

  If there is a complete bash command with terminating newline in the
  cut and paste buffer,

  and it is pasted into a gnome-terminal,

  then the command is *not* executed, the newline is ignored by the
  terminal.

  >>> Newline bug of second kind:

  If I prepare a bash command say

  cp  target-directory

  and I collect into the paste buffer "source-file newline-character"

  and I drop it IN BETWEEN the prepared "cp" and "target-directory"

  then the result is wrong:

  instead of interpreting the newline-character as "push enter"

  the command is broken into the followint 2 lines:

  cp source-file

  target-directory

  and I get an error message about missing target specification.

  cp: missing destination file operand after 'source-file'
  Try 'cp --help' for more information.
  bash: target-directory: Is a directory

  I found better to make this original bug descripton more informative.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1925823/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928088] [NEW] Empty pockets don't end up in the cache - E: The value 'hirsute-backports' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as such a release is not available in the sources

2021-05-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported:

[Impact]
If a pocket is empty, apt will not download the empty packages files, causing 
the repository to not be added to the cache. This in turn breaks commands such 
as using apt install -t hirsute-backports as apt is unable to find the release 
in the archive.

[Test plan]
Assuming an empty pocket is around, use apt install -t - to 
see it's in the cache.

An appropriate test case for empty stuff should be added to the test
suite as well (FIXME before SRUing), the test suite is extensive and
prevents most regressions

[Where problems could occur]
TBD

[Other info]
Originally reported at 
https://www.reddit.com/r/Kubuntu/comments/n9vg9e/cant_make_backports_repo_for_hirsute_to_work/

** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  If a pocket is empty, apt will not download the empty packages files, causing 
the repository to not be added to the cache. This in turn breaks commands such 
as using apt install -t hirsute-backports as apt is unable to find the release 
in the archive.
  
  [Test plan]
  Assuming an empty pocket is around, use apt install -t - to 
see it's in the cache.
  
  An appropriate test case for empty stuff should be added to the test
  suite as well (FIXME before SRUing), the test suite is extensive and
  prevents most regressions
  
  [Where problems could occur]
  TBD
+ 
+ [Other info]
+ Originally reported at 
https://www.reddit.com/r/Kubuntu/comments/n9vg9e/cant_make_backports_repo_for_hirsute_to_work/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928088

Title:
  Empty pockets don't end up in the cache - E: The value 'hirsute-
  backports' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as such a release is
  not available in the sources

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  If a pocket is empty, apt will not download the empty packages files, causing 
the repository to not be added to the cache. This in turn breaks commands such 
as using apt install -t hirsute-backports as apt is unable to find the release 
in the archive.

  [Test plan]
  Assuming an empty pocket is around, use apt install -t - to 
see it's in the cache.

  An appropriate test case for empty stuff should be added to the test
  suite as well (FIXME before SRUing), the test suite is extensive and
  prevents most regressions

  [Where problems could occur]
  TBD

  [Other info]
  Originally reported at 
https://www.reddit.com/r/Kubuntu/comments/n9vg9e/cant_make_backports_repo_for_hirsute_to_work/

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1928088/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928100] [NEW] TLS handshake is fatal, not transient - hence not retried

2021-05-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported:

[Impact]
TLS handshakes are reported as fatal errors rather than transient errors like 
other connection errors on unencrypted connections. This seems wrong - a server 
may just be spinning up or down and fail during the handshake, and prevents 
retrying such downloads

[Test plan]

A test case has been added to the integration test suite that ensures
handshake errors are retried upon configuration.

[Where problems could occur]
Transient errors do not cause an error exit from apt update, so scripts relying 
on errors from TLS handshakes in such situations will fail.

** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928100

Title:
  TLS handshake is fatal, not transient - hence not retried

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  TLS handshakes are reported as fatal errors rather than transient errors like 
other connection errors on unencrypted connections. This seems wrong - a server 
may just be spinning up or down and fail during the handshake, and prevents 
retrying such downloads

  [Test plan]

  A test case has been added to the integration test suite that ensures
  handshake errors are retried upon configuration.

  [Where problems could occur]
  Transient errors do not cause an error exit from apt update, so scripts 
relying on errors from TLS handshakes in such situations will fail.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1928100/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926437] Re: [SRU] Backport zstd support, fix bug in python-apt

2021-05-11 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package python-apt - 2.2.0

---
python-apt (2.2.0) unstable; urgency=medium

  [ Helmut Grohne ]
  * Annotate test dependencies with  (Closes: #980719)

  [ Julian Andres Klode ]
  * debian/rules: Re-enable PIE hardening
  * Mirror list updates
  * debfile: Pass `Name` instead of `Binary` to ExtractTar.
Passing the binary causes it to fail trying to find the `false`
compressor when a binary for a given compressor is not installed.
(LP: #1926437)
  * debian/gbp.conf: Branch name is main

 -- Julian Andres Klode   Thu, 29 Apr 2021 09:49:08
+0200

** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926437

Title:
  [SRU] Backport zstd support, fix bug in python-apt

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in python-apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in python-apt source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in python-apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in python-apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in python-apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in python-apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Committed
Status in python-apt source package in Impish:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  APT in xenial needs to learn about zstd support to enable Launchpad to work 
with zstd packages.

  python-apt in all releases needs to be adjusted to pass the compressor
  names instead of programs to ExtractTar, as otherwise, if
  /usr/bin/zstd does not exist, it will pass "false" as the compressor,
  and then ExtractTar fails (same for other compressors).

  On hirsute, the python-apt upload also includes some new  
annotations for build-dependencies, as it's a straight upload of the 2.2
  stable series.

  [Test plan]
  The apt regression tests cover the compression methods extensively, including 
even stored compressed lists in /var/lib/apt and fetching Packages files 
compressed with such methods, for all compression methods.

  The final test is to make apt_inst.DebFile("glibc-doc-
  reference_2.33-0ubuntu2~zstd1_all.deb").control.extractall() from
  1923845 work in python3-apt.

  For hirsute, the build dependency changes will verify themselves
  during the build ;)

  [Where problems could occur]

  APT:

  The changes to APT are adding the zstd compression backend to FileFd
  and then linking it into the configuration. The former is adding new
  code, triggered only on zstd files, and should not be able to cause
  regressions.

  The latter is a bunch of small lines here and there, and it caused
  issues during backporting in the test suite because it expected
  compressors in a specific order. However, chances are that nothing
  else has as stringent requirements as the test suite, so I don't
  believe that is a problem for existing users.

  Bugs can of course be in the code dealing with zstd, and that might
  open you up to security vulnerabilities in the zstd code if you pass
  APT zstd compressed files.

  A regression can be if clients used apt-helper cat-file to cat a zstd-
  compressed file ending in .zst - they'll now get uncompressed content,
  rather than compressed.

  python-apt:

  The change just replaces Binary with Name, aligning the code with APT
  itself, so it's so trivial, we don't expect regressions.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1926437/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1903048] Re: [SRU] Bluetooth won't activate on the pi 400

2021-05-11 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package bluez - 5.53-0ubuntu3.1

---
bluez (5.53-0ubuntu3.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * Add support for the pi 400 (LP: #1903048)

 -- William 'jawn-smith' Wilson   Mon, 15
Mar 2021 19:25:22 +

** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903048

Title:
  [SRU] Bluetooth won't activate on the pi 400

Status in bluez package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in bluez source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in bluez source package in Groovy:
  Fix Released
Status in bluez source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Without these patches, Bluetooth is inoperable on the recently
  released Raspberry Pi 400.

  [Test Case]

  * Boot the Ubuntu Desktop for Pi image on a Pi 400.
  * Start the Settings application and switch to the Bluetooth tab
  * Verify that Bluetooth is not enabled and attempting to activate it fails
  * Enable the -proposed repository for the release (groovy)
  * sudo apt update
  * sudo apt install bluez
  * sudo reboot
  * Start the Settings application and switch to the Bluetooth tab
  * Verify that Bluetooth is active and that Bluetooth devices (e.g. mice, 
mobile phones, headphones, etc.) can connect and operate correctly

  [Regression Potential]

  Extremely low (on groovy in particular, this has the same version of
  bluez as hirsute). The only significant risk is to non-Pi platforms or
  dongles which also use the Broadcom 43xx (or Cypress 305) chips for
  Bluetooth which might be inadvertently affected by these patches.

  [Original Description]

  The new Pi 400 has a slightly different Wifi/BT chip to the Pi4.
  Whilst wifi works happily, Bluetooth fails to operate. This doesn't
  appear to be an issue with either the firmware (the latest versions
  from upstream Raspbian have been tried), or the kernel (a known-good
  raspi kernel has been tested under Ubuntu), but with Bluez itself.
  Specifically, tracing the initialization with btmon on Raspbian and
  Ubuntu, the stack consistently fails when attempting to "Set Default
  PHY" on the latter. Curiously, under Ubuntu the adapter also appears
  to lack a MAC address.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1903048/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927796] Re: [SRU]pam_tally2 can cause accounts to be locked by correct password. pam_faillock use is the recommended fix

2021-05-11 Thread Marc Deslauriers
** Patch added: "Hirsute debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1927796/+attachment/5496423/+files/pam_1.3.1-5ubuntu6.21.04.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927796

Title:
  [SRU]pam_tally2 can cause accounts to be locked by correct password.
  pam_faillock use is the recommended fix

Status in pam package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in pam source package in Bionic:
  New
Status in pam source package in Focal:
  New
Status in pam source package in Groovy:
  New
Status in pam source package in Hirsute:
  New
Status in pam source package in Impish:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  [IMPACT]
  There is a known issue in pam_tally2 which may cause an account to be lock 
down even with correct password, in a busy node environment where simultaneous 
logins takes place (https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/71).

  There are already two customer cases from Canonical clients
  complaining about this behavior (00297697 and 00303806).

  Also, potentially, this will cause further problems in the future,
  since both STIG benchmarks and CIS benchmarks rely on pam_tally2 to
  lock accounts when wrong passwords are used. And both benchmarks - but
  specially STIG - requires use of a lot of audit rules, which can lead
  to the busy node environment.

  The issue impacts all pam_tally2 versions distributed in all currently
  supported Ubuntu versions and also the next unreleased one. Note that,
  according to https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/71, there
  is no plan to fix this issue!

  [FIX]
  This fix proposes to add pam_faillock module to the PAM package, so users of 
pam_tally2 having issues can migrate to pam_faillock. We also plan to modify 
the current STIG benchmarks to rely on pam_faillock instead of pam_tally2, but 
in order to do so, we need the pam_faillock module to be available.

  Note that we don't propose to remove pam_tally2, since not every user
  of this module is affected.

  [TEST]
  Tested on a VM installed with Focal server iso and on another with Bionic 
server iso. Enabled pam_faillock module as recommeded by its man page. Then 
tried to log over ssh with an incorrect password, until the account got locked. 
Waited for the configured grace time to unlock and logged in using the correct 
password.

  Note that, since the pam_tally2 issue is caused by a racing condition,
  with a hard to recreate environment (we could not even reproduce it
  with pam_tally2), we could not reproduce the conditions to test
  pam_faillock with.

  [REGRESSION POTENTIAL]
  The regression potential for this is small, since we're not removing the old 
pam_tally2 module, just adding another one. So anyone still using pam_tally2 
will be able to do so.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1927796/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927796] Re: [SRU]pam_tally2 can cause accounts to be locked by correct password. pam_faillock use is the recommended fix

2021-05-11 Thread Marc Deslauriers
** Patch added: "Focal debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1927796/+attachment/5496425/+files/pam_1.3.1-5ubuntu4.2.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927796

Title:
  [SRU]pam_tally2 can cause accounts to be locked by correct password.
  pam_faillock use is the recommended fix

Status in pam package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in pam source package in Bionic:
  New
Status in pam source package in Focal:
  New
Status in pam source package in Groovy:
  New
Status in pam source package in Hirsute:
  New
Status in pam source package in Impish:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  [IMPACT]
  There is a known issue in pam_tally2 which may cause an account to be lock 
down even with correct password, in a busy node environment where simultaneous 
logins takes place (https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/71).

  There are already two customer cases from Canonical clients
  complaining about this behavior (00297697 and 00303806).

  Also, potentially, this will cause further problems in the future,
  since both STIG benchmarks and CIS benchmarks rely on pam_tally2 to
  lock accounts when wrong passwords are used. And both benchmarks - but
  specially STIG - requires use of a lot of audit rules, which can lead
  to the busy node environment.

  The issue impacts all pam_tally2 versions distributed in all currently
  supported Ubuntu versions and also the next unreleased one. Note that,
  according to https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/71, there
  is no plan to fix this issue!

  [FIX]
  This fix proposes to add pam_faillock module to the PAM package, so users of 
pam_tally2 having issues can migrate to pam_faillock. We also plan to modify 
the current STIG benchmarks to rely on pam_faillock instead of pam_tally2, but 
in order to do so, we need the pam_faillock module to be available.

  Note that we don't propose to remove pam_tally2, since not every user
  of this module is affected.

  [TEST]
  Tested on a VM installed with Focal server iso and on another with Bionic 
server iso. Enabled pam_faillock module as recommeded by its man page. Then 
tried to log over ssh with an incorrect password, until the account got locked. 
Waited for the configured grace time to unlock and logged in using the correct 
password.

  Note that, since the pam_tally2 issue is caused by a racing condition,
  with a hard to recreate environment (we could not even reproduce it
  with pam_tally2), we could not reproduce the conditions to test
  pam_faillock with.

  [REGRESSION POTENTIAL]
  The regression potential for this is small, since we're not removing the old 
pam_tally2 module, just adding another one. So anyone still using pam_tally2 
will be able to do so.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1927796/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927796] Re: [SRU]pam_tally2 can cause accounts to be locked by correct password. pam_faillock use is the recommended fix

2021-05-11 Thread Marc Deslauriers
** Patch added: "Bionic debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1927796/+attachment/5496426/+files/pam_1.1.8-3.6ubuntu2.18.04.3.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927796

Title:
  [SRU]pam_tally2 can cause accounts to be locked by correct password.
  pam_faillock use is the recommended fix

Status in pam package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in pam source package in Bionic:
  New
Status in pam source package in Focal:
  New
Status in pam source package in Groovy:
  New
Status in pam source package in Hirsute:
  New
Status in pam source package in Impish:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  [IMPACT]
  There is a known issue in pam_tally2 which may cause an account to be lock 
down even with correct password, in a busy node environment where simultaneous 
logins takes place (https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/71).

  There are already two customer cases from Canonical clients
  complaining about this behavior (00297697 and 00303806).

  Also, potentially, this will cause further problems in the future,
  since both STIG benchmarks and CIS benchmarks rely on pam_tally2 to
  lock accounts when wrong passwords are used. And both benchmarks - but
  specially STIG - requires use of a lot of audit rules, which can lead
  to the busy node environment.

  The issue impacts all pam_tally2 versions distributed in all currently
  supported Ubuntu versions and also the next unreleased one. Note that,
  according to https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/71, there
  is no plan to fix this issue!

  [FIX]
  This fix proposes to add pam_faillock module to the PAM package, so users of 
pam_tally2 having issues can migrate to pam_faillock. We also plan to modify 
the current STIG benchmarks to rely on pam_faillock instead of pam_tally2, but 
in order to do so, we need the pam_faillock module to be available.

  Note that we don't propose to remove pam_tally2, since not every user
  of this module is affected.

  [TEST]
  Tested on a VM installed with Focal server iso and on another with Bionic 
server iso. Enabled pam_faillock module as recommeded by its man page. Then 
tried to log over ssh with an incorrect password, until the account got locked. 
Waited for the configured grace time to unlock and logged in using the correct 
password.

  Note that, since the pam_tally2 issue is caused by a racing condition,
  with a hard to recreate environment (we could not even reproduce it
  with pam_tally2), we could not reproduce the conditions to test
  pam_faillock with.

  [REGRESSION POTENTIAL]
  The regression potential for this is small, since we're not removing the old 
pam_tally2 module, just adding another one. So anyone still using pam_tally2 
will be able to do so.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1927796/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927796] Re: [SRU]pam_tally2 can cause accounts to be locked by correct password. pam_faillock use is the recommended fix

2021-05-11 Thread Marc Deslauriers
** Patch added: "Groovy debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1927796/+attachment/5496424/+files/pam_1.3.1-5ubuntu6.20.10.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927796

Title:
  [SRU]pam_tally2 can cause accounts to be locked by correct password.
  pam_faillock use is the recommended fix

Status in pam package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in pam source package in Bionic:
  New
Status in pam source package in Focal:
  New
Status in pam source package in Groovy:
  New
Status in pam source package in Hirsute:
  New
Status in pam source package in Impish:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  [IMPACT]
  There is a known issue in pam_tally2 which may cause an account to be lock 
down even with correct password, in a busy node environment where simultaneous 
logins takes place (https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/71).

  There are already two customer cases from Canonical clients
  complaining about this behavior (00297697 and 00303806).

  Also, potentially, this will cause further problems in the future,
  since both STIG benchmarks and CIS benchmarks rely on pam_tally2 to
  lock accounts when wrong passwords are used. And both benchmarks - but
  specially STIG - requires use of a lot of audit rules, which can lead
  to the busy node environment.

  The issue impacts all pam_tally2 versions distributed in all currently
  supported Ubuntu versions and also the next unreleased one. Note that,
  according to https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/71, there
  is no plan to fix this issue!

  [FIX]
  This fix proposes to add pam_faillock module to the PAM package, so users of 
pam_tally2 having issues can migrate to pam_faillock. We also plan to modify 
the current STIG benchmarks to rely on pam_faillock instead of pam_tally2, but 
in order to do so, we need the pam_faillock module to be available.

  Note that we don't propose to remove pam_tally2, since not every user
  of this module is affected.

  [TEST]
  Tested on a VM installed with Focal server iso and on another with Bionic 
server iso. Enabled pam_faillock module as recommeded by its man page. Then 
tried to log over ssh with an incorrect password, until the account got locked. 
Waited for the configured grace time to unlock and logged in using the correct 
password.

  Note that, since the pam_tally2 issue is caused by a racing condition,
  with a hard to recreate environment (we could not even reproduce it
  with pam_tally2), we could not reproduce the conditions to test
  pam_faillock with.

  [REGRESSION POTENTIAL]
  The regression potential for this is small, since we're not removing the old 
pam_tally2 module, just adding another one. So anyone still using pam_tally2 
will be able to do so.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1927796/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925379] Re: Auto-Correct in LibreOffice does not work with 3.24.25-1ubuntu4

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
This bug report is missing SRU information as described here:

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template

Additionally, the version number 3.24.25-1ubuntu5 isn't great as if
there is another SRU of gtk+3.0 it'd be version 3.24.25-1ubuntu5.1
(because 3.24.25-1ubuntu6 is in Impish). Subsequently, I'm going to
reject this and reupload it as 3.24-25-1ubuntu4.1.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925379

Title:
  Auto-Correct in LibreOffice does not work with 3.24.25-1ubuntu4

Status in gtk+3.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gtk+3.0 source package in Hirsute:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  I just did a fresh install of Ubuntu 21.04 (smooth as silk), but then
  discovered that Auto-Correct in LibreOffice does not work. Yesterday,
  when I was still running 20.04, Auto-Correct worked fine -- same
  LibreOffice version, same LibreOffice profile, same LibreOffice
  document, and no changes on my part to my LibreOffice settings since I
  installed Ubuntu 21.04.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/1925379/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927796] Re: [SRU]pam_tally2 can cause accounts to be locked by correct password. pam_faillock use is the recommended fix

2021-05-11 Thread Marc Deslauriers
I have uploaded packages for processing by the SRU team.

** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927796

Title:
  [SRU]pam_tally2 can cause accounts to be locked by correct password.
  pam_faillock use is the recommended fix

Status in pam package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in pam source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in pam source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in pam source package in Groovy:
  In Progress
Status in pam source package in Hirsute:
  In Progress
Status in pam source package in Impish:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [IMPACT]
  There is a known issue in pam_tally2 which may cause an account to be lock 
down even with correct password, in a busy node environment where simultaneous 
logins takes place (https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/71).

  There are already two customer cases from Canonical clients
  complaining about this behavior (00297697 and 00303806).

  Also, potentially, this will cause further problems in the future,
  since both STIG benchmarks and CIS benchmarks rely on pam_tally2 to
  lock accounts when wrong passwords are used. And both benchmarks - but
  specially STIG - requires use of a lot of audit rules, which can lead
  to the busy node environment.

  The issue impacts all pam_tally2 versions distributed in all currently
  supported Ubuntu versions and also the next unreleased one. Note that,
  according to https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/71, there
  is no plan to fix this issue!

  [FIX]
  This fix proposes to add pam_faillock module to the PAM package, so users of 
pam_tally2 having issues can migrate to pam_faillock. We also plan to modify 
the current STIG benchmarks to rely on pam_faillock instead of pam_tally2, but 
in order to do so, we need the pam_faillock module to be available.

  Note that we don't propose to remove pam_tally2, since not every user
  of this module is affected.

  [TEST]
  Tested on a VM installed with Focal server iso and on another with Bionic 
server iso. Enabled pam_faillock module as recommeded by its man page. Then 
tried to log over ssh with an incorrect password, until the account got locked. 
Waited for the configured grace time to unlock and logged in using the correct 
password.

  Note that, since the pam_tally2 issue is caused by a racing condition,
  with a hard to recreate environment (we could not even reproduce it
  with pam_tally2), we could not reproduce the conditions to test
  pam_faillock with.

  [REGRESSION POTENTIAL]
  The regression potential for this is small, since we're not removing the old 
pam_tally2 module, just adding another one. So anyone still using pam_tally2 
will be able to do so.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1927796/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926843] Re: online accounts integration with fb isn't working

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Lars, or anyone else affected,

Accepted gnome-online-accounts into hirsute-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/gnome-online-accounts/3.38.1-1ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for
you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to
verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your
testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-hirsute

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926843

Title:
  online accounts integration with fb isn't working

Status in gnome-online-accounts package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-online-accounts source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  * Impact

  The online accounts setting are proposing a facebook item which isn't
  working

  * Test case

  Go to settings -> online account, browse the accounts option proposed,
  facebook shouldn't be in the list since it doesn't work.

  * Regression potential

  The change is to disable the facebook provider using the upstream
  provided build option. Check that facebook isn't listed anymore but
  that the other providers still are. Since it's a build option change
  it could fail to build so check for that as well on launchpad.

  Since the facebook service currently doesn't consider gnome-online-
  accounts as a valid client there should be no user with that provider
  configured. Even if there were since the service isn't working they
  would see a functional regression.

  ---

  Hi i tryed to use gnome-control-center online-accounts to make easy
  like windows 10 to login to email or add other login so its more easy
  with ID to use pincode or other ID fingerprint and other.

  But its look its much issue compared with windows 10 with thunderbird,
  firefox, and other program.

  Worst is facebook only little windows with issue with login?

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
  Package: gnome-online-accounts 3.38.1-1ubuntu1
  Uname: Linux 5.12.0-051200-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sat May  1 19:38:03 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-05-07 (725 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416)
  SourcePackage: gnome-online-accounts
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to hirsute on 2021-04-06 (24 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/1926843/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926843] Please test proposed package

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Lars, or anyone else affected,

Accepted gnome-online-accounts into hirsute-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/gnome-online-accounts/3.38.1-1ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for
you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to
verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your
testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926843

Title:
  online accounts integration with fb isn't working

Status in gnome-online-accounts package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-online-accounts source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  * Impact

  The online accounts setting are proposing a facebook item which isn't
  working

  * Test case

  Go to settings -> online account, browse the accounts option proposed,
  facebook shouldn't be in the list since it doesn't work.

  * Regression potential

  The change is to disable the facebook provider using the upstream
  provided build option. Check that facebook isn't listed anymore but
  that the other providers still are. Since it's a build option change
  it could fail to build so check for that as well on launchpad.

  Since the facebook service currently doesn't consider gnome-online-
  accounts as a valid client there should be no user with that provider
  configured. Even if there were since the service isn't working they
  would see a functional regression.

  ---

  Hi i tryed to use gnome-control-center online-accounts to make easy
  like windows 10 to login to email or add other login so its more easy
  with ID to use pincode or other ID fingerprint and other.

  But its look its much issue compared with windows 10 with thunderbird,
  firefox, and other program.

  Worst is facebook only little windows with issue with login?

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
  Package: gnome-online-accounts 3.38.1-1ubuntu1
  Uname: Linux 5.12.0-051200-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sat May  1 19:38:03 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-05-07 (725 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416)
  SourcePackage: gnome-online-accounts
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to hirsute on 2021-04-06 (24 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/1926843/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928001] Re: [SRU] New stable release 2.68.1

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Iain, or anyone else affected,

Accepted glib2.0 into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/2.68.1-1~ubuntu21.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for
you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to
verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your
testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-hirsute

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928001

Title:
  [SRU] New stable release 2.68.1

Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in glib2.0 source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [ Description ]

  Take this new upstream stable release.

  * Fix a crash in `GKeyFile` when parsing a file which contains translations
using a `GKeyFile` instance which has loaded another file previously (#2361)

  * Pin GIO DLL in memory on Windows (!2016)

  * Bugs fixed:
   - #2361 g_key_file_load_from_file segfaults on "Key[*]="like lines
   - !1997 Backport !1996 “Include glibconfig.h to get the G_OS_UNIX token” to 
glib-2-68
   - !2016 GIO W32: Pin gio DLL
   - !2021 Backport MR !2016 (GIO W32: Pin gio DLL) into glib-2-68
   - !2022 Few fixes and notes for building on Visual Studio 2012 and earlier
   - !2034 Backport MR !2032 (gkeyfile: Drop a redundant check) into glib-2-68
   - !2035 Backport !2026 “Split g_test_log() messages that contain multiple 
lines” to glib-2-68

  [ QA ]

  Upstream release, so QA already performed by maintainers

  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME

  This upload will trigger many autopkgtests that we expect to not be
  regressed by this upload.

  [ What could go wrong ]

  This update contains fixes in multiple places so multiple apps could
  be affected. The consequences of a broken GLib can range from some
  functions returning bad results sometimes, which have minimal runtime
  implications, up to the system simply crashing all the time.

  Pretty much all parts of GNOME use GLib, so test anything in the
  desktop that you can. If you reboot the machine and can get to the
  desktop, that's already tested GLib extensively. But also run
  applications like GNOME terminal, Files and Epiphany.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1928001/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928001] Please test proposed package

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Iain, or anyone else affected,

Accepted glib2.0 into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/2.68.1-1~ubuntu21.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for
you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to
verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your
testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928001

Title:
  [SRU] New stable release 2.68.1

Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in glib2.0 source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [ Description ]

  Take this new upstream stable release.

  * Fix a crash in `GKeyFile` when parsing a file which contains translations
using a `GKeyFile` instance which has loaded another file previously (#2361)

  * Pin GIO DLL in memory on Windows (!2016)

  * Bugs fixed:
   - #2361 g_key_file_load_from_file segfaults on "Key[*]="like lines
   - !1997 Backport !1996 “Include glibconfig.h to get the G_OS_UNIX token” to 
glib-2-68
   - !2016 GIO W32: Pin gio DLL
   - !2021 Backport MR !2016 (GIO W32: Pin gio DLL) into glib-2-68
   - !2022 Few fixes and notes for building on Visual Studio 2012 and earlier
   - !2034 Backport MR !2032 (gkeyfile: Drop a redundant check) into glib-2-68
   - !2035 Backport !2026 “Split g_test_log() messages that contain multiple 
lines” to glib-2-68

  [ QA ]

  Upstream release, so QA already performed by maintainers

  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME

  This upload will trigger many autopkgtests that we expect to not be
  regressed by this upload.

  [ What could go wrong ]

  This update contains fixes in multiple places so multiple apps could
  be affected. The consequences of a broken GLib can range from some
  functions returning bad results sometimes, which have minimal runtime
  implications, up to the system simply crashing all the time.

  Pretty much all parts of GNOME use GLib, so test anything in the
  desktop that you can. If you reboot the machine and can get to the
  desktop, that's already tested GLib extensively. But also run
  applications like GNOME terminal, Files and Epiphany.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1928001/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926843] Autopkgtest regression report (gnome-online-accounts/3.38.1-1ubuntu1.1)

2021-05-11 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted gnome-online-accounts 
(3.38.1-1ubuntu1.1) for hirsute have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

libgdata/0.18.1-1 (armhf)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/hirsute/update_excuses.html#gnome-online-accounts

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926843

Title:
  online accounts integration with fb isn't working

Status in gnome-online-accounts package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-online-accounts source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  * Impact

  The online accounts setting are proposing a facebook item which isn't
  working

  * Test case

  Go to settings -> online account, browse the accounts option proposed,
  facebook shouldn't be in the list since it doesn't work.

  * Regression potential

  The change is to disable the facebook provider using the upstream
  provided build option. Check that facebook isn't listed anymore but
  that the other providers still are. Since it's a build option change
  it could fail to build so check for that as well on launchpad.

  Since the facebook service currently doesn't consider gnome-online-
  accounts as a valid client there should be no user with that provider
  configured. Even if there were since the service isn't working they
  would see a functional regression.

  ---

  Hi i tryed to use gnome-control-center online-accounts to make easy
  like windows 10 to login to email or add other login so its more easy
  with ID to use pincode or other ID fingerprint and other.

  But its look its much issue compared with windows 10 with thunderbird,
  firefox, and other program.

  Worst is facebook only little windows with issue with login?

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
  Package: gnome-online-accounts 3.38.1-1ubuntu1
  Uname: Linux 5.12.0-051200-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sat May  1 19:38:03 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-05-07 (725 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416)
  SourcePackage: gnome-online-accounts
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to hirsute on 2021-04-06 (24 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/1926843/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876570] Please test proposed package

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Rasmus, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into groovy-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.137ubuntu12.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
groovy to verification-done-groovy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-groovy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876570

Title:
  Could not resume from hibernation when swap is specified as device

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [impact]

  unable to resume from hibernation when resume= boot param is specified
  as device path

  [test case]

  set up device/partition for swap, e.g. /dev/vda2

  add 'resume=/dev/vda2' kernel boot parameter

  hibernate

  power system back on; it should resume from /dev/vda2 instead of
  coldboot

  [regression potential]

  any regression would likely result in failure to correctly resume from
  hibernation, incorrectly attempting to resume from hibernation, or
  failing to resume from hibernation.

  [scope]

  this is needed in b/f/g/h

  this bug was introduced, ironically, by bug 1644975, which was added
  in bionic, so this bug doesn't exist in xenial.

  this code that introduced this bug isn't included in Debian, so no
  change is needed there.

  [original description]

  I originally experienced this on Pop!_OS but I have reproduced it on a
  freshly installed Ubuntu.

  1. Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
  2. initramfs-tools-core 0.136ubuntu6
  3. I expect the system to resume from hibernation when running pm_hibernate
  4. The system starts up anew when I try to resume

  I have setup a swap partition on /dev/vda2 in /etc/fstab. To enable
  hibernate I added the kernel parameter "resume=/dev/vda2" to
  GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT in /etc/default/grub and run update-grub.

  From debugging initramfs it tries to follow a symbolic link

  DEV=$(readlink "$resume")
  (see /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-premount/resume, line 35)

  which works well when swap is specified with uuid. When swap is
  specified as a device directly the readlink returns an empty string
  and the system does not resume from hibernation.

  To verify this I added the parameter -f to readlink and run "update-
  initramfs -u". The system now hibernates successfully.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-28.32-generic 5.4.30
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-28-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun May  3 13:26:02 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-05-03 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1876570/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927779] Please test proposed package

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Dan, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.136ubuntu6.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927779

Title:
  MODULES=list results in error

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Bionic:
  Invalid
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [impact]

  setting MODULES=list in /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf results in
  an error/warning when running update-initramfs

  [test case]

  edit initramfs.conf to change MODULES=list and run update-initramfs:

  $ grep MODULES /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
  # MODULES: [ most | netboot | dep | list ]
  MODULES=list
  $ sudo update-initramfs -u
  update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-48-generic
  find: ‘/var/tmp/mkinitramfs_Yr04uh/lib/modules/5.8.0-48-generic/kernel’: No 
such file or directory

  [regression potential]

  any regression would likely result in an initramfs that did not
  include the correct/required modules, and/or failure to build a new
  initramfs

  [scope]

  this is needed for f and g.

  this is not fixed in debian, but is fixed in h and i.

  the code in b is different and doesn't include this bug, so this
  doesn't apply to b.

  for debian, MR open:
  https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/48

  [other info]

  this caused some of the 'amd64-*' autopkgtests to fail in h until it
  was fixed. those autopkgtests don't exist in g and earlier so this was
  not noticed until now.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1927779/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876570] Please test proposed package

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Rasmus, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.136ubuntu6.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876570

Title:
  Could not resume from hibernation when swap is specified as device

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [impact]

  unable to resume from hibernation when resume= boot param is specified
  as device path

  [test case]

  set up device/partition for swap, e.g. /dev/vda2

  add 'resume=/dev/vda2' kernel boot parameter

  hibernate

  power system back on; it should resume from /dev/vda2 instead of
  coldboot

  [regression potential]

  any regression would likely result in failure to correctly resume from
  hibernation, incorrectly attempting to resume from hibernation, or
  failing to resume from hibernation.

  [scope]

  this is needed in b/f/g/h

  this bug was introduced, ironically, by bug 1644975, which was added
  in bionic, so this bug doesn't exist in xenial.

  this code that introduced this bug isn't included in Debian, so no
  change is needed there.

  [original description]

  I originally experienced this on Pop!_OS but I have reproduced it on a
  freshly installed Ubuntu.

  1. Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
  2. initramfs-tools-core 0.136ubuntu6
  3. I expect the system to resume from hibernation when running pm_hibernate
  4. The system starts up anew when I try to resume

  I have setup a swap partition on /dev/vda2 in /etc/fstab. To enable
  hibernate I added the kernel parameter "resume=/dev/vda2" to
  GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT in /etc/default/grub and run update-grub.

  From debugging initramfs it tries to follow a symbolic link

  DEV=$(readlink "$resume")
  (see /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-premount/resume, line 35)

  which works well when swap is specified with uuid. When swap is
  specified as a device directly the readlink returns an empty string
  and the system does not resume from hibernation.

  To verify this I added the parameter -f to readlink and run "update-
  initramfs -u". The system now hibernates successfully.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-28.32-generic 5.4.30
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-28-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun May  3 13:26:02 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-05-03 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1876570/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1917780] Please test proposed package

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Ioanna, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.136ubuntu6.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917780

Title:
  initramfs-tools does not include fsck binaries in the initrd if all
  mount pass are 0

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * initramfs-tools does not include fsck in initrd if MNT_PASS equals
  zero in the fstab entries.

  This has lead to the following situation :
  when dropping to initramfs shell during boot due to fs errors, we are not 
able to run fsck manually
  because it is not included in initrd.

  fsck should be included regardless of the MNT_PASS value.

  [Test Plan]

   * change /etc/fstab with PASSNO set to 0 for all entries
   * update-initramfs -u
   * lsinitramfs that is just generated
   * observe that it includes fsck utilities for the filesystems in /etc/fstab. 
I.e. fsck.ext4 e2fsck must exist

  [Where problems could occur]

   * The initramfs size will increase slightly upon upgrade, for the
  same initramfs-tools default options & kernel. However, one can
  control and remove fsck binaries (or include more of them) by setting
  FSTYPE variable in the initramfs settings.

  [scope]

  this is required for b/f/g

  this is fixed already in h and i

  [other info]

  debian MR is open:
  https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/49

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1917780/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1917780] Please test proposed package

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Ioanna, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.136ubuntu6.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917780

Title:
  initramfs-tools does not include fsck binaries in the initrd if all
  mount pass are 0

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * initramfs-tools does not include fsck in initrd if MNT_PASS equals
  zero in the fstab entries.

  This has lead to the following situation :
  when dropping to initramfs shell during boot due to fs errors, we are not 
able to run fsck manually
  because it is not included in initrd.

  fsck should be included regardless of the MNT_PASS value.

  [Test Plan]

   * change /etc/fstab with PASSNO set to 0 for all entries
   * update-initramfs -u
   * lsinitramfs that is just generated
   * observe that it includes fsck utilities for the filesystems in /etc/fstab. 
I.e. fsck.ext4 e2fsck must exist

  [Where problems could occur]

   * The initramfs size will increase slightly upon upgrade, for the
  same initramfs-tools default options & kernel. However, one can
  control and remove fsck binaries (or include more of them) by setting
  FSTYPE variable in the initramfs settings.

  [scope]

  this is required for b/f/g

  this is fixed already in h and i

  [other info]

  debian MR is open:
  https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/49

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1917780/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1917780] Please test proposed package

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Ioanna, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into groovy-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.137ubuntu12.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
groovy to verification-done-groovy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-groovy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917780

Title:
  initramfs-tools does not include fsck binaries in the initrd if all
  mount pass are 0

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * initramfs-tools does not include fsck in initrd if MNT_PASS equals
  zero in the fstab entries.

  This has lead to the following situation :
  when dropping to initramfs shell during boot due to fs errors, we are not 
able to run fsck manually
  because it is not included in initrd.

  fsck should be included regardless of the MNT_PASS value.

  [Test Plan]

   * change /etc/fstab with PASSNO set to 0 for all entries
   * update-initramfs -u
   * lsinitramfs that is just generated
   * observe that it includes fsck utilities for the filesystems in /etc/fstab. 
I.e. fsck.ext4 e2fsck must exist

  [Where problems could occur]

   * The initramfs size will increase slightly upon upgrade, for the
  same initramfs-tools default options & kernel. However, one can
  control and remove fsck binaries (or include more of them) by setting
  FSTYPE variable in the initramfs settings.

  [scope]

  this is required for b/f/g

  this is fixed already in h and i

  [other info]

  debian MR is open:
  https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/49

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1917780/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927779] Re: MODULES=list results in error

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Dan, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into groovy-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.137ubuntu12.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
groovy to verification-done-groovy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-groovy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-groovy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927779

Title:
  MODULES=list results in error

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Bionic:
  Invalid
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [impact]

  setting MODULES=list in /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf results in
  an error/warning when running update-initramfs

  [test case]

  edit initramfs.conf to change MODULES=list and run update-initramfs:

  $ grep MODULES /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
  # MODULES: [ most | netboot | dep | list ]
  MODULES=list
  $ sudo update-initramfs -u
  update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-48-generic
  find: ‘/var/tmp/mkinitramfs_Yr04uh/lib/modules/5.8.0-48-generic/kernel’: No 
such file or directory

  [regression potential]

  any regression would likely result in an initramfs that did not
  include the correct/required modules, and/or failure to build a new
  initramfs

  [scope]

  this is needed for f and g.

  this is not fixed in debian, but is fixed in h and i.

  the code in b is different and doesn't include this bug, so this
  doesn't apply to b.

  for debian, MR open:
  https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/48

  [other info]

  this caused some of the 'amd64-*' autopkgtests to fail in h until it
  was fixed. those autopkgtests don't exist in g and earlier so this was
  not noticed until now.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1927779/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876570] Re: Could not resume from hibernation when swap is specified as device

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Rasmus, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into groovy-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.137ubuntu12.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
groovy to verification-done-groovy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-groovy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-groovy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876570

Title:
  Could not resume from hibernation when swap is specified as device

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [impact]

  unable to resume from hibernation when resume= boot param is specified
  as device path

  [test case]

  set up device/partition for swap, e.g. /dev/vda2

  add 'resume=/dev/vda2' kernel boot parameter

  hibernate

  power system back on; it should resume from /dev/vda2 instead of
  coldboot

  [regression potential]

  any regression would likely result in failure to correctly resume from
  hibernation, incorrectly attempting to resume from hibernation, or
  failing to resume from hibernation.

  [scope]

  this is needed in b/f/g/h

  this bug was introduced, ironically, by bug 1644975, which was added
  in bionic, so this bug doesn't exist in xenial.

  this code that introduced this bug isn't included in Debian, so no
  change is needed there.

  [original description]

  I originally experienced this on Pop!_OS but I have reproduced it on a
  freshly installed Ubuntu.

  1. Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
  2. initramfs-tools-core 0.136ubuntu6
  3. I expect the system to resume from hibernation when running pm_hibernate
  4. The system starts up anew when I try to resume

  I have setup a swap partition on /dev/vda2 in /etc/fstab. To enable
  hibernate I added the kernel parameter "resume=/dev/vda2" to
  GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT in /etc/default/grub and run update-grub.

  From debugging initramfs it tries to follow a symbolic link

  DEV=$(readlink "$resume")
  (see /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-premount/resume, line 35)

  which works well when swap is specified with uuid. When swap is
  specified as a device directly the readlink returns an empty string
  and the system does not resume from hibernation.

  To verify this I added the parameter -f to readlink and run "update-
  initramfs -u". The system now hibernates successfully.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-28.32-generic 5.4.30
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-28-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun May  3 13:26:02 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-05-03 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1876570/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876570] Please test proposed package

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Rasmus, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.136ubuntu6.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876570

Title:
  Could not resume from hibernation when swap is specified as device

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [impact]

  unable to resume from hibernation when resume= boot param is specified
  as device path

  [test case]

  set up device/partition for swap, e.g. /dev/vda2

  add 'resume=/dev/vda2' kernel boot parameter

  hibernate

  power system back on; it should resume from /dev/vda2 instead of
  coldboot

  [regression potential]

  any regression would likely result in failure to correctly resume from
  hibernation, incorrectly attempting to resume from hibernation, or
  failing to resume from hibernation.

  [scope]

  this is needed in b/f/g/h

  this bug was introduced, ironically, by bug 1644975, which was added
  in bionic, so this bug doesn't exist in xenial.

  this code that introduced this bug isn't included in Debian, so no
  change is needed there.

  [original description]

  I originally experienced this on Pop!_OS but I have reproduced it on a
  freshly installed Ubuntu.

  1. Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
  2. initramfs-tools-core 0.136ubuntu6
  3. I expect the system to resume from hibernation when running pm_hibernate
  4. The system starts up anew when I try to resume

  I have setup a swap partition on /dev/vda2 in /etc/fstab. To enable
  hibernate I added the kernel parameter "resume=/dev/vda2" to
  GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT in /etc/default/grub and run update-grub.

  From debugging initramfs it tries to follow a symbolic link

  DEV=$(readlink "$resume")
  (see /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-premount/resume, line 35)

  which works well when swap is specified with uuid. When swap is
  specified as a device directly the readlink returns an empty string
  and the system does not resume from hibernation.

  To verify this I added the parameter -f to readlink and run "update-
  initramfs -u". The system now hibernates successfully.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-28.32-generic 5.4.30
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-28-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun May  3 13:26:02 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-05-03 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1876570/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1917780] Re: initramfs-tools does not include fsck binaries in the initrd if all mount pass are 0

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Ioanna, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into groovy-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.137ubuntu12.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
groovy to verification-done-groovy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-groovy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-groovy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917780

Title:
  initramfs-tools does not include fsck binaries in the initrd if all
  mount pass are 0

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * initramfs-tools does not include fsck in initrd if MNT_PASS equals
  zero in the fstab entries.

  This has lead to the following situation :
  when dropping to initramfs shell during boot due to fs errors, we are not 
able to run fsck manually
  because it is not included in initrd.

  fsck should be included regardless of the MNT_PASS value.

  [Test Plan]

   * change /etc/fstab with PASSNO set to 0 for all entries
   * update-initramfs -u
   * lsinitramfs that is just generated
   * observe that it includes fsck utilities for the filesystems in /etc/fstab. 
I.e. fsck.ext4 e2fsck must exist

  [Where problems could occur]

   * The initramfs size will increase slightly upon upgrade, for the
  same initramfs-tools default options & kernel. However, one can
  control and remove fsck binaries (or include more of them) by setting
  FSTYPE variable in the initramfs settings.

  [scope]

  this is required for b/f/g

  this is fixed already in h and i

  [other info]

  debian MR is open:
  https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/49

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1917780/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927779] Please test proposed package

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Dan, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into groovy-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.137ubuntu12.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
groovy to verification-done-groovy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-groovy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927779

Title:
  MODULES=list results in error

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Bionic:
  Invalid
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [impact]

  setting MODULES=list in /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf results in
  an error/warning when running update-initramfs

  [test case]

  edit initramfs.conf to change MODULES=list and run update-initramfs:

  $ grep MODULES /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
  # MODULES: [ most | netboot | dep | list ]
  MODULES=list
  $ sudo update-initramfs -u
  update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-48-generic
  find: ‘/var/tmp/mkinitramfs_Yr04uh/lib/modules/5.8.0-48-generic/kernel’: No 
such file or directory

  [regression potential]

  any regression would likely result in an initramfs that did not
  include the correct/required modules, and/or failure to build a new
  initramfs

  [scope]

  this is needed for f and g.

  this is not fixed in debian, but is fixed in h and i.

  the code in b is different and doesn't include this bug, so this
  doesn't apply to b.

  for debian, MR open:
  https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/48

  [other info]

  this caused some of the 'amd64-*' autopkgtests to fail in h until it
  was fixed. those autopkgtests don't exist in g and earlier so this was
  not noticed until now.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1927779/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927779] Please test proposed package

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Dan, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.136ubuntu6.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927779

Title:
  MODULES=list results in error

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Bionic:
  Invalid
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [impact]

  setting MODULES=list in /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf results in
  an error/warning when running update-initramfs

  [test case]

  edit initramfs.conf to change MODULES=list and run update-initramfs:

  $ grep MODULES /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
  # MODULES: [ most | netboot | dep | list ]
  MODULES=list
  $ sudo update-initramfs -u
  update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-48-generic
  find: ‘/var/tmp/mkinitramfs_Yr04uh/lib/modules/5.8.0-48-generic/kernel’: No 
such file or directory

  [regression potential]

  any regression would likely result in an initramfs that did not
  include the correct/required modules, and/or failure to build a new
  initramfs

  [scope]

  this is needed for f and g.

  this is not fixed in debian, but is fixed in h and i.

  the code in b is different and doesn't include this bug, so this
  doesn't apply to b.

  for debian, MR open:
  https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/48

  [other info]

  this caused some of the 'amd64-*' autopkgtests to fail in h until it
  was fixed. those autopkgtests don't exist in g and earlier so this was
  not noticed until now.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1927779/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1917780] Please test proposed package

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Ioanna, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.130ubuntu3.12 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917780

Title:
  initramfs-tools does not include fsck binaries in the initrd if all
  mount pass are 0

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * initramfs-tools does not include fsck in initrd if MNT_PASS equals
  zero in the fstab entries.

  This has lead to the following situation :
  when dropping to initramfs shell during boot due to fs errors, we are not 
able to run fsck manually
  because it is not included in initrd.

  fsck should be included regardless of the MNT_PASS value.

  [Test Plan]

   * change /etc/fstab with PASSNO set to 0 for all entries
   * update-initramfs -u
   * lsinitramfs that is just generated
   * observe that it includes fsck utilities for the filesystems in /etc/fstab. 
I.e. fsck.ext4 e2fsck must exist

  [Where problems could occur]

   * The initramfs size will increase slightly upon upgrade, for the
  same initramfs-tools default options & kernel. However, one can
  control and remove fsck binaries (or include more of them) by setting
  FSTYPE variable in the initramfs settings.

  [scope]

  this is required for b/f/g

  this is fixed already in h and i

  [other info]

  debian MR is open:
  https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/49

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1917780/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1917780] Re: initramfs-tools does not include fsck binaries in the initrd if all mount pass are 0

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Ioanna, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.130ubuntu3.12 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917780

Title:
  initramfs-tools does not include fsck binaries in the initrd if all
  mount pass are 0

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * initramfs-tools does not include fsck in initrd if MNT_PASS equals
  zero in the fstab entries.

  This has lead to the following situation :
  when dropping to initramfs shell during boot due to fs errors, we are not 
able to run fsck manually
  because it is not included in initrd.

  fsck should be included regardless of the MNT_PASS value.

  [Test Plan]

   * change /etc/fstab with PASSNO set to 0 for all entries
   * update-initramfs -u
   * lsinitramfs that is just generated
   * observe that it includes fsck utilities for the filesystems in /etc/fstab. 
I.e. fsck.ext4 e2fsck must exist

  [Where problems could occur]

   * The initramfs size will increase slightly upon upgrade, for the
  same initramfs-tools default options & kernel. However, one can
  control and remove fsck binaries (or include more of them) by setting
  FSTYPE variable in the initramfs settings.

  [scope]

  this is required for b/f/g

  this is fixed already in h and i

  [other info]

  debian MR is open:
  https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/49

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1917780/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876570] Please test proposed package

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Rasmus, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.130ubuntu3.12 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876570

Title:
  Could not resume from hibernation when swap is specified as device

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [impact]

  unable to resume from hibernation when resume= boot param is specified
  as device path

  [test case]

  set up device/partition for swap, e.g. /dev/vda2

  add 'resume=/dev/vda2' kernel boot parameter

  hibernate

  power system back on; it should resume from /dev/vda2 instead of
  coldboot

  [regression potential]

  any regression would likely result in failure to correctly resume from
  hibernation, incorrectly attempting to resume from hibernation, or
  failing to resume from hibernation.

  [scope]

  this is needed in b/f/g/h

  this bug was introduced, ironically, by bug 1644975, which was added
  in bionic, so this bug doesn't exist in xenial.

  this code that introduced this bug isn't included in Debian, so no
  change is needed there.

  [original description]

  I originally experienced this on Pop!_OS but I have reproduced it on a
  freshly installed Ubuntu.

  1. Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
  2. initramfs-tools-core 0.136ubuntu6
  3. I expect the system to resume from hibernation when running pm_hibernate
  4. The system starts up anew when I try to resume

  I have setup a swap partition on /dev/vda2 in /etc/fstab. To enable
  hibernate I added the kernel parameter "resume=/dev/vda2" to
  GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT in /etc/default/grub and run update-grub.

  From debugging initramfs it tries to follow a symbolic link

  DEV=$(readlink "$resume")
  (see /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-premount/resume, line 35)

  which works well when swap is specified with uuid. When swap is
  specified as a device directly the readlink returns an empty string
  and the system does not resume from hibernation.

  To verify this I added the parameter -f to readlink and run "update-
  initramfs -u". The system now hibernates successfully.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-28.32-generic 5.4.30
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-28-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun May  3 13:26:02 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-05-03 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1876570/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876570] Re: Could not resume from hibernation when swap is specified as device

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Rasmus, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.130ubuntu3.12 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876570

Title:
  Could not resume from hibernation when swap is specified as device

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [impact]

  unable to resume from hibernation when resume= boot param is specified
  as device path

  [test case]

  set up device/partition for swap, e.g. /dev/vda2

  add 'resume=/dev/vda2' kernel boot parameter

  hibernate

  power system back on; it should resume from /dev/vda2 instead of
  coldboot

  [regression potential]

  any regression would likely result in failure to correctly resume from
  hibernation, incorrectly attempting to resume from hibernation, or
  failing to resume from hibernation.

  [scope]

  this is needed in b/f/g/h

  this bug was introduced, ironically, by bug 1644975, which was added
  in bionic, so this bug doesn't exist in xenial.

  this code that introduced this bug isn't included in Debian, so no
  change is needed there.

  [original description]

  I originally experienced this on Pop!_OS but I have reproduced it on a
  freshly installed Ubuntu.

  1. Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
  2. initramfs-tools-core 0.136ubuntu6
  3. I expect the system to resume from hibernation when running pm_hibernate
  4. The system starts up anew when I try to resume

  I have setup a swap partition on /dev/vda2 in /etc/fstab. To enable
  hibernate I added the kernel parameter "resume=/dev/vda2" to
  GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT in /etc/default/grub and run update-grub.

  From debugging initramfs it tries to follow a symbolic link

  DEV=$(readlink "$resume")
  (see /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-premount/resume, line 35)

  which works well when swap is specified with uuid. When swap is
  specified as a device directly the readlink returns an empty string
  and the system does not resume from hibernation.

  To verify this I added the parameter -f to readlink and run "update-
  initramfs -u". The system now hibernates successfully.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-28.32-generic 5.4.30
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-28-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun May  3 13:26:02 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-05-03 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1876570/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1571506] Re: update-initramfs should include firmware from /lib/firmware/updates

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Qiang, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.130ubuntu3.12 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags removed: verification-done
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571506

Title:
  update-initramfs should include firmware from /lib/firmware/updates

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Groovy:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * Firmware files under /lib/firmware/updates would not be
 processed when running update-initramfs
   
   * The kernel org specifies that this is a location where
 firmware can be stored, so we should search there

  [Test Case]

   * Stage some firmware under /lib/firmware/updates

   * Run update-initramfs and ensure that the firmware in 
 /lib/firmware/updates is found and included in the initramfs

  [Where problems could occur]

   * Since dpkg places no files in /lib/firmware/updates, we
 could end up picking up firmware changes that we did not intend

  [Other info]

   * This change already exists in groovy and beyond. It was pulled in
 when initramfs-tools version 0.137 was merged from Debian

  according to the kernel doc
  
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/firmware_class/README

  Linux kernel will search firmware from
  "/lib/firmware/updates/" UTS_RELEASE,
  "/lib/firmware/updates",
  "/lib/firmware/" UTS_RELEASE,
  "/lib/firmware"

  But the add module function in initramfs-tools won't search the
  "/lib/firmware/updates".

  This problem applies to all Ubuntu releases.

  Attach patch to fix this.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: initramfs-tools 0.103ubuntu4.2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.2.0-30.36~14.04.1-generic 4.2.8-ckt3
  Uname: Linux 4.2.0-30-generic i686
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19
  Architecture: i386
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Mon Apr 18 14:24:29 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-23 (725 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release i386 (20140417)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1571506/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1571506] Please test proposed package

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Qiang, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.130ubuntu3.12 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571506

Title:
  update-initramfs should include firmware from /lib/firmware/updates

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Groovy:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * Firmware files under /lib/firmware/updates would not be
 processed when running update-initramfs
   
   * The kernel org specifies that this is a location where
 firmware can be stored, so we should search there

  [Test Case]

   * Stage some firmware under /lib/firmware/updates

   * Run update-initramfs and ensure that the firmware in 
 /lib/firmware/updates is found and included in the initramfs

  [Where problems could occur]

   * Since dpkg places no files in /lib/firmware/updates, we
 could end up picking up firmware changes that we did not intend

  [Other info]

   * This change already exists in groovy and beyond. It was pulled in
 when initramfs-tools version 0.137 was merged from Debian

  according to the kernel doc
  
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/firmware_class/README

  Linux kernel will search firmware from
  "/lib/firmware/updates/" UTS_RELEASE,
  "/lib/firmware/updates",
  "/lib/firmware/" UTS_RELEASE,
  "/lib/firmware"

  But the add module function in initramfs-tools won't search the
  "/lib/firmware/updates".

  This problem applies to all Ubuntu releases.

  Attach patch to fix this.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: initramfs-tools 0.103ubuntu4.2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.2.0-30.36~14.04.1-generic 4.2.8-ckt3
  Uname: Linux 4.2.0-30-generic i686
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19
  Architecture: i386
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Mon Apr 18 14:24:29 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-23 (725 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release i386 (20140417)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1571506/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925742] Missing SRU information

2021-05-11 Thread Brian Murray
Thanks for uploading the fix for this bug report to -proposed.  However,
when reviewing the package in -proposed and the details of this bug
report I noticed that the bug description is missing information
required for the SRU process.  You can find full details at
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure but essentially
this bug is missing some of the following: a statement of impact, a test
case and details regarding where problems may occur.  Thanks in advance!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925742

Title:
  Recent iCloud versions trigger an issue in IMAP x

Status in evolution-data-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  There is a recently introduced bug in evolution-data-server which
  broke access to email in iCloud.

  The bug has been fixed yesterday by Evolution's developer:
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/-/issues/1468

  However, the package in Ubuntu (at least in Focal Fosa) still needs to
  be updated.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data-server/+bug/1925742/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926254] Re: x509 Certificate verification fails when basicConstraints=CA:FALSE, pathlen:0 on self-signed leaf certs

2021-05-11 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Performing verification for Focal

Generating the ssl certificates, and reproducing the problem with version
1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.3 from -updates.

ubuntu@select-lobster:~$ sudo apt-cache policy openssl | grep Installed
  Installed: 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.3
ubuntu@select-lobster:~$ mkdir reproducer
ubuntu@select-lobster:~$ cd reproducer
ubuntu@select-lobster:~/reproducer$ mkdir CA
ubuntu@select-lobster:~/reproducer$ cat << EOF >> rootCA.cnf
> [ req ]
> prompt = no
> distinguished_name = req_distinguished_name
> x509_extensions = usr_cert
> 
> [ req_distinguished_name ]
> C = DE
> O = Test Org
> CN = Test RSA PSS Root-CA
> 
> [ usr_cert ]
> basicConstraints = critical,CA:TRUE
> keyUsage = critical,keyCertSign,cRLSign
> subjectKeyIdentifier = hash
> authorityKeyIdentifier = keyid:always
> EOF
ubuntu@select-lobster:~/reproducer$ cat << EOF >> subCA.cnf
> [ req ]
> prompt = no
> distinguished_name = req_distinguished_name
> x509_extensions = usr_cert
> 
> [ req_distinguished_name ]
> C = DE
> O = Test Org
> CN = Test RSA PSS Sub-CA
> 
> [ usr_cert ]
> basicConstraints = critical,CA:TRUE,pathlen:0
> keyUsage = critical,keyCertSign,cRLSign
> subjectKeyIdentifier = hash
> authorityKeyIdentifier = keyid:always
> EOF
ubuntu@select-lobster:~/reproducer$ cat << EOF >> user.cnf
> [ req ]
> prompt = no
> distinguished_name = req_distinguished_name
> x509_extensions = usr_cert
> 
> [ req_distinguished_name ]
> C = DE
> O = Test Org
> CN = Test User
> 
> [ usr_cert ]
> basicConstraints = critical,CA:FALSE,pathlen:0
> keyUsage = critical,digitalSignature,keyAgreement
> extendedKeyUsage = clientAuth,serverAuth
> subjectKeyIdentifier = hash
> authorityKeyIdentifier = keyid:always
> EOF
ubuntu@select-lobster:~/reproducer$ openssl genpkey -algorithm RSA-PSS -out 
rootCA_key.pem -pkeyopt rsa_keygen_bits:2048
..+
+
ubuntu@select-lobster:~/reproducer$ openssl req -config rootCA.cnf -set_serial 
01 -new -batch -sha256 -nodes -x509 -days 9125 -out CA/rootCA_cert.pem -key 
rootCA_key.pem -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:-1
ubuntu@select-lobster:~/reproducer$ openssl genpkey -algorithm RSA-PSS -out 
subCA_key.pem -pkeyopt rsa_keygen_bits:2048
+
+
ubuntu@select-lobster:~/reproducer$ openssl req -config subCA.cnf -new -out 
subCA_req.pem -key subCA_key.pem -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt 
rsa_pss_saltlen:-1
ubuntu@select-lobster:~/reproducer$ openssl x509 -req -sha256 -in subCA_req.pem 
-CA CA/rootCA_cert.pem -CAkey rootCA_key.pem -out CA/subCA_cert.pem -CAserial 
rootCA_serial.txt -CAcreateserial -extfile subCA.cnf -extensions usr_cert -days 
4380 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:-1
Signature ok
subject=C = DE, O = Test Org, CN = Test RSA PSS Sub-CA
Getting CA Private Key
ubuntu@select-lobster:~/reproducer$ c_rehash CA
Doing CA
ubuntu@select-lobster:~/reproducer$ openssl genpkey -algorithm RSA-PSS -out 
user1_key.pem -pkeyopt rsa_keygen_bits:2048
...+
.+
ubuntu@select-lobster:~/reproducer$ openssl req -config user.cnf -new -out 
user1_req.pem -key user1_key.pem -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt 
rsa_pss_saltlen:-1
ubuntu@select-lobster:~/reproducer$ openssl x509 -req -sha256 -in user1_req.pem 
-CA CA/subCA_cert.pem -CAkey subCA_key.pem -out user1_cert.pem -CAserial 
subCA_serial.txt -CAcreateserial -extfile user.cnf -extensions usr_cert -days 
1825 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:-1
Signature ok
subject=C = DE, O = Test Org, CN = Test User
Getting CA Private Key

Now, we verify the certificates:

ubuntu@select-lobster:~/reproducer$ openssl verify -CAfile CA/rootCA_cert.pem 
-untrusted CA/subCA_cert.pem user1_cert.pem
C = DE, O = Test Org, CN = Test User
error 20 at 0 depth lookup: unable to get local issuer certificate
error user1_cert.pem: verification failed

We see verification fail, due to CA:FALSE,pathlen:0 basicConstraints.

I then enabled -proposed, and installed openssl and libssl1.1 version
1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.4

If we then repeat the certificate validation:

ubuntu@select-lobster:~/reproducer$ openssl verify -CAfile CA/rootCA_cert.pem 
-untrusted CA/subCA_cert.pem user1_cert.pem
user1_cert.pem: OK

The certificates validate properly.

Additionally, if we examine the new unit tests added to openssl's testsuite in
the buildlog for focal:

https://launchpadlibrarian.net/537505620/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-
amd64.openssl_1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.4_BUILDING.txt.gz

we see:

../../../test/certs/ee-pathlen.pem: OK
../../util/shlib_wrap.sh ../../apps/openssl verify -auth_level 1 -purpose 
sslserver -trusted ../../../test/certs/root-cert.pem -untrusted 
../../../test/certs/ca-cert.pem ../../../test/certs/ee-pathlen.pem => 0
ok 84 - accept non-ca with pathlen:0 by default
CN = server.example
error 41 at 0 depth lookup: invalid or inconsistent certificate extension
error ../../../test/certs/ee-pathlen.pem: verification failed
../../util/shlib_wrap.sh ../../apps/openssl verify -auth_level 1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928082] Re: the minimize display freezes

2021-05-11 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Thanks for the bug report. Next time the freeze happens, please:

1. Wait 10 seconds.

2. Reboot.

3. Run:

   journalctl -b-1 > prevboot.txt

4. Attach the resulting text file here.

5. Also check for crashes using these instructions:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Missing_a_crash_report_or_having_a_.crash_attachment

** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => gnome-shell (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928082

Title:
  the minimize  display freezes

Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  the display freezes when i try minimizing after a very long use time

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+22ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-16.17-generic 5.11.12
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-16-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue May 11 13:09:28 2021
  DistUpgraded: 2021-04-26 11:56:19,497 ERROR got error from PostInstallScript 
./xorg_fix_proprietary.py (g-io-error-quark: Failed to execute child process 
“./xorg_fix_proprietary.py”: Failed to execve: No such file or directory (1))
  DistroCodename: hirsute
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   virtualbox, 6.1.18, 5.11.0-16-generic, x86_64: installed
   virtualbox, 6.1.18, 5.8.0-50-generic, x86_64: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, including running git bisection searches
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller [8086:0166] 
(rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Lenovo 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller [17aa:21f3]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-06-10 (701 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416)
  MachineType: LENOVO 23445HU
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_NG:en
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_NG
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-16-generic 
root=UUID=65bd11b5-874d-460b-8539-b2b68af2927a ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  Symptom: display
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to hirsute on 2021-04-26 (15 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 03/06/2014
  dmi.bios.release: 2.64
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: G1ETA4WW (2.64 )
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available
  dmi.board.name: 23445HU
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: Not Defined
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.13
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrG1ETA4WW(2.64):bd03/06/2014:br2.64:efr1.13:svnLENOVO:pn23445HU:pvrThinkPadT430:rvnLENOVO:rn23445HU:rvrNotDefined:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
  dmi.product.family: ThinkPad T430
  dmi.product.name: 23445HU
  dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_2344
  dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T430
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
  version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.14.1+20.10.20200813-0ubuntu4
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.104-1build1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 21.0.1-2
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200714-1ubuntu1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1928082/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888016] Re: Slow wifi, buggy bluethooth, slow startup. SEND HELP

2021-05-11 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888016

Title:
  Slow wifi, buggy bluethooth, slow startup. SEND HELP

Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  new to ubuntu and linux in general. installed it two days ago. get
  repeated errors thoughout the day. it's really bugging me. i hope my
  system doesn't crash soon.

  
  22:55:57 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  22:50:39 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  22:50:36 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  22:50:34 bluetoothd: Failed to set mode: Blocked through rfkill (0x12)
  22:28:09 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  21:47:54 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  21:33:57 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  20:48:55 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  20:48:16 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  20:20:28 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  20:20:25 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  20:20:23 bluetoothd: Failed to set mode: Blocked through rfkill (0x12)
  20:20:23 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  18:50:51 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  18:35:47 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  17:51:56 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  17:48:39 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  17:48:37 kernel: debugfs: File 'force_bredr_smp' in directory 'hci0' already 
present!
  17:46:44 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  17:26:22 udev-configure-: no corresponding CUPS device found
  17:26:20 hpfax: [17493]: error: Failed to create /var/spool/cups/tmp/.hplip
  17:19:56 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  16:53:01 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  16:46:20 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  16:41:25 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  16:33:06 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  16:03:52 bluetoothd: Unable to get io data for 
:1.72/Profile/HSPHSProfile/1108--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb: getpeername: 
Transport endpoint is not connected (107)
  16:02:58 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  16:01:10 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  16:01:08 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  16:01:06 bluetoothd: Failed to set mode: Blocked through rfkill (0x12)
  15:10:21 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  14:55:02 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  14:54:29 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  13:56:04 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  13:17:41 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  12:57:06 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  12:56:45 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  11:58:54 gdm-session-wor: gkr-pam: unable to locate daemon control file
  11:58:47 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  11:58:44 bluetoothd: Failed to set mode: Blocked through rfkill (0x12)
  11:58:43 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  11:58:39 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  11:58:39 bluetoothd: Failed to set mode: Blocked through rfkill (0x12)
  11:58:36 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.WLBU._STA due to previous 
error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20190816/psparse-529)
  --- 
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.3
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-07-14 (4 days ago)
  InstallationMed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926254] Re: x509 Certificate verification fails when basicConstraints=CA:FALSE, pathlen:0 on self-signed leaf certs

2021-05-11 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Performing verification for Groovy.

I went and generated the ssl certificates and attempted to verify them with
the openssl version 1.1.1f-1ubuntu4.3 from -updates.

ubuntu@deep-mako:~$ sudo apt-cache policy openssl | grep Installed
  Installed: 1.1.1f-1ubuntu4.3
ubuntu@deep-mako:~$ mkdir reproducer
ubuntu@deep-mako:~$ cd reproducer
ubuntu@deep-mako:~/reproducer$ mkdir CA
ubuntu@deep-mako:~/reproducer$ cat << EOF >> rootCA.cnf
> [ req ]
> prompt = no
> distinguished_name = req_distinguished_name
> x509_extensions = usr_cert
> 
> [ req_distinguished_name ]
> C = DE
> O = Test Org
> CN = Test RSA PSS Root-CA
> 
> [ usr_cert ]
> basicConstraints = critical,CA:TRUE
> keyUsage = critical,keyCertSign,cRLSign
> subjectKeyIdentifier = hash
> authorityKeyIdentifier = keyid:always
> EOF
ubuntu@deep-mako:~/reproducer$ cat << EOF >> subCA.cnf
> [ req ]
> prompt = no
> distinguished_name = req_distinguished_name
> x509_extensions = usr_cert
> 
> [ req_distinguished_name ]
> C = DE
> O = Test Org
> CN = Test RSA PSS Sub-CA
> 
> [ usr_cert ]
> basicConstraints = critical,CA:TRUE,pathlen:0
> keyUsage = critical,keyCertSign,cRLSign
> subjectKeyIdentifier = hash
> authorityKeyIdentifier = keyid:always
> EOF
ubuntu@deep-mako:~/reproducer$ cat << EOF >> user.cnf
> [ req ]
> prompt = no
> distinguished_name = req_distinguished_name
> x509_extensions = usr_cert
> 
> [ req_distinguished_name ]
> C = DE
> O = Test Org
> CN = Test User
> 
> [ usr_cert ]
> basicConstraints = critical,CA:FALSE,pathlen:0
> keyUsage = critical,digitalSignature,keyAgreement
> extendedKeyUsage = clientAuth,serverAuth
> subjectKeyIdentifier = hash
> authorityKeyIdentifier = keyid:always
> EOF
ubuntu@deep-mako:~/reproducer$ openssl genpkey -algorithm RSA-PSS -out 
rootCA_key.pem -pkeyopt rsa_keygen_bits:2048
+
+
ubuntu@deep-mako:~/reproducer$ openssl req -config rootCA.cnf -set_serial 01 
-new -batch -sha256 -nodes -x509 -days 9125 -out CA/rootCA_cert.pem -key 
rootCA_key.pem -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:-1
ubuntu@deep-mako:~/reproducer$ openssl genpkey -algorithm RSA-PSS -out 
subCA_key.pem -pkeyopt rsa_keygen_bits:2048
..+
.+
ubuntu@deep-mako:~/reproducer$ openssl req -config subCA.cnf -new -out 
subCA_req.pem -key subCA_key.pem -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt 
rsa_pss_saltlen:-1
ubuntu@deep-mako:~/reproducer$ openssl x509 -req -sha256 -in subCA_req.pem -CA 
CA/rootCA_cert.pem -CAkey rootCA_key.pem -out CA/subCA_cert.pem -CAserial 
rootCA_serial.txt -CAcreateserial -extfile subCA.cnf -extensions usr_cert -days 
4380 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:-1
Signature ok
subject=C = DE, O = Test Org, CN = Test RSA PSS Sub-CA
Getting CA Private Key
ubuntu@deep-mako:~/reproducer$ c_rehash CA
Doing CA
ubuntu@deep-mako:~/reproducer$ openssl genpkey -algorithm RSA-PSS -out 
user1_key.pem -pkeyopt rsa_keygen_bits:2048
...+
.+
ubuntu@deep-mako:~/reproducer$ openssl req -config user.cnf -new -out 
user1_req.pem -key user1_key.pem -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt 
rsa_pss_saltlen:-1
ubuntu@deep-mako:~/reproducer$ openssl x509 -req -sha256 -in user1_req.pem -CA 
CA/subCA_cert.pem -CAkey subCA_key.pem -out user1_cert.pem -CAserial 
subCA_serial.txt -CAcreateserial -extfile user.cnf -extensions usr_cert -days 
1825 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:-1
Signature ok
subject=C = DE, O = Test Org, CN = Test User
Getting CA Private Key

Now going and verifying the certificates:

ubuntu@deep-mako:~/reproducer$ openssl verify -CAfile CA/rootCA_cert.pem 
-untrusted CA/subCA_cert.pem user1_cert.pem
C = DE, O = Test Org, CN = Test User
error 20 at 0 depth lookup: unable to get local issuer certificate
error user1_cert.pem: verification failed 

We see verification failed, again on CA:FALSE,pathlen:0
basicConstraints.

Now if we enable -proposed and install openssl 1.1.1f-1ubuntu4.4.

$ openssl verify -CAfile CA/rootCA_cert.pem -untrusted CA/subCA_cert.pem 
user1_cert.pem
user1_cert.pem: OK

The certificate verifies properly. The problem is fixed.

Additionally, if we examine the new unit tests added to openssl's testsuite in
the buildlog for Groovy:

https://launchpadlibrarian.net/537503607/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy-
amd64.openssl_1.1.1f-1ubuntu4.4_BUILDING.txt.gz

We see:

../../util/shlib_wrap.sh ../../apps/openssl verify -auth_level 1 -purpose 
sslserver -trusted ../../../test/certs/root-cert.pem -untrusted 
../../../test/certs/ca-cert.pem ../../../test/certs/ee-pathlen.pem => 0
ok 84 - accept non-ca with pathlen:0 by default
CN = server.example
error 41 at 0 depth lookup: invalid or inconsistent certificate extension
error ../../../test/certs/ee-pathlen.pem: verification failed
../../util/shlib_wrap.sh ../../apps/openssl verify -auth_level 1 -purpose 
sslserver -x509_strict -trusted ../../../test/certs/root-cert.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888016] Re: Slow wifi, buggy bluethooth, slow startup.

2021-05-11 Thread Daniel Letzeisen
** Summary changed:

- Slow wifi, buggy bluethooth, slow startup. SEND HELP
+ Slow wifi, buggy bluethooth, slow startup.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888016

Title:
  Slow wifi, buggy bluethooth, slow startup.

Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  new to ubuntu and linux in general. installed it two days ago. get
  repeated errors thoughout the day. it's really bugging me. i hope my
  system doesn't crash soon.

  
  22:55:57 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  22:50:39 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  22:50:36 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  22:50:34 bluetoothd: Failed to set mode: Blocked through rfkill (0x12)
  22:28:09 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  21:47:54 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  21:33:57 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  20:48:55 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  20:48:16 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  20:20:28 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  20:20:25 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  20:20:23 bluetoothd: Failed to set mode: Blocked through rfkill (0x12)
  20:20:23 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  18:50:51 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  18:35:47 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  17:51:56 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  17:48:39 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  17:48:37 kernel: debugfs: File 'force_bredr_smp' in directory 'hci0' already 
present!
  17:46:44 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  17:26:22 udev-configure-: no corresponding CUPS device found
  17:26:20 hpfax: [17493]: error: Failed to create /var/spool/cups/tmp/.hplip
  17:19:56 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  16:53:01 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  16:46:20 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  16:41:25 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  16:33:06 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  16:03:52 bluetoothd: Unable to get io data for 
:1.72/Profile/HSPHSProfile/1108--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb: getpeername: 
Transport endpoint is not connected (107)
  16:02:58 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  16:01:10 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  16:01:08 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  16:01:06 bluetoothd: Failed to set mode: Blocked through rfkill (0x12)
  15:10:21 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  14:55:02 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  14:54:29 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  13:56:04 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  13:17:41 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  12:57:06 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  12:56:45 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  11:58:54 gdm-session-wor: gkr-pam: unable to locate daemon control file
  11:58:47 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  11:58:44 bluetoothd: Failed to set mode: Blocked through rfkill (0x12)
  11:58:43 kernel: rtw_pci :03:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  11:58:39 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPC0.EC0._Q42 due to 
previous error (AE_NOT_EXIST) (20190816/psparse-529)
  11:58:39 bluetoothd: Failed to set mode: Blocked through rfkill (0x12)
  11:58:36 kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.WLBU._STA due to previous 
error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20190816/psparse-529)
  --- 
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.3
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-07-14 (4 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Foss

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928172] [NEW] Xorg freeze

2021-05-11 Thread Dominik Szczepaniak
Public bug reported:

If i sometimes missclick and click my Windows button on keyboard,
Preview mode show up and sometimes i can't come back to full window
mode, my Linux just freezes there.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+22ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-16.17-generic 5.11.12
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-16-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
.proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: [Errno 21] Jest katalogiem: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/capabilities/gpu0'
.proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: [Errno 21] Jest katalogiem: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/capabilities/mig'
.proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..01.00.0: Error: [Errno 21] Jest katalogiem: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/:01:00.0'
.proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
.proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
.proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
.proc.driver.nvidia.version:
 NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  460.73.01  Thu Apr  1 21:40:36 
UTC 2021
 GCC version:
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Brak dostępu: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Wed May 12 08:02:20 2021
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: hirsute
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical
GraphicsCard:
 NVIDIA Corporation GP106 [GeForce GTX 1060 6GB] [10de:1c03] (rev a1) (prog-if 
00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. [MSI] GP106 [GeForce GTX 1060 
6GB] [1462:3283]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-05-03 (8 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.04 "Hirsute Hippo" - Release amd64 (20210420)
MachineType: MSI MS-7978
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-16-generic 
root=UUID=08cc25bc-76b2-4d2b-a729-e006642c7cb8 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
Title: Xorg freeze
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 12/21/2016
dmi.bios.release: 5.12
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: B.90
dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string
dmi.board.name: B150 GAMING M3 (MS-7978)
dmi.board.vendor: MSI
dmi.board.version: 2.0
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Default string
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: MSI
dmi.chassis.version: 2.0
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrB.90:bd12/21/2016:br5.12:svnMSI:pnMS-7978:pvr2.0:rvnMSI:rnB150GAMINGM3(MS-7978):rvr2.0:cvnMSI:ct3:cvr2.0:
dmi.product.family: Default string
dmi.product.name: MS-7978
dmi.product.sku: Default string
dmi.product.version: 2.0
dmi.sys.vendor: MSI
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.104-1build1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 21.0.1-2
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers-* N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200714-1ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-1

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug false-gpu-hang freeze hirsute ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928172

Title:
  Xorg freeze

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  If i sometimes missclick and click my Windows button on keyboard,
  Preview mode show up and sometimes i can't come back to full window
  mode, my Linux just freezes there.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+22ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-16.17-generic 5.11.12
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-16-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: [Errno 21] Jest katalogiem: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/capabilities/gpu0'
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: [Errno 21] Jest katalogiem: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/capabilities/mig'
  .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..01.00.0: Error: [Errno 21] Jest katalogiem: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/:01:00.0'
  .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
  .proc.driver.nvidia.version:
   NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  460.73.01  Thu Apr  1 
21:40:36 UTC 2021
   GCC version:
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Brak dostępu: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed May 12 08:02:20 202

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925742] Re: Recent iCloud versions trigger an issue in IMAP x

2021-05-11 Thread Denys Rtveliashvili
Brian, seriously?


"Evolution" is broken in your "stable" release for almost a month and you are 
requesting some meaningless paperwork? People CAN NOT READ THEIR EMAIL for 
God's sake. Everyone using Apple's email is affected.

Is this really the approach in Ubuntu these days?

When a house is on fire, do firefighters ask people to
(a) explain the effect of fire on the people in the house;
(b) justify why the fire should be put out;
(c) explain how to notice the raging inferno;
(d) how to spot that the fire is gone when it is put out;
(e) describe what else can happen when the fire it put out (lots actually - a 
cat can deliver a litter of kittens, for example)?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925742

Title:
  Recent iCloud versions trigger an issue in IMAP x

Status in evolution-data-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  There is a recently introduced bug in evolution-data-server which
  broke access to email in iCloud.

  The bug has been fixed yesterday by Evolution's developer:
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/-/issues/1468

  However, the package in Ubuntu (at least in Focal Fosa) still needs to
  be updated.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data-server/+bug/1925742/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928172] Re: Xorg freeze

2021-05-11 Thread Daniel van Vugt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1922353 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922353

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 1922353, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you
can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may
find.


** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => gnome-shell (Ubuntu)

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1922353
   Overview sometimes fails to appear or disappear in 21.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928172

Title:
  Xorg freeze

Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  If i sometimes missclick and click my Windows button on keyboard,
  Preview mode show up and sometimes i can't come back to full window
  mode, my Linux just freezes there.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+22ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-16.17-generic 5.11.12
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-16-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: [Errno 21] Jest katalogiem: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/capabilities/gpu0'
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: [Errno 21] Jest katalogiem: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/capabilities/mig'
  .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..01.00.0: Error: [Errno 21] Jest katalogiem: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/:01:00.0'
  .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
  .proc.driver.nvidia.version:
   NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  460.73.01  Thu Apr  1 
21:40:36 UTC 2021
   GCC version:
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Brak dostępu: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed May 12 08:02:20 2021
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: hirsute
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical
  GraphicsCard:
   NVIDIA Corporation GP106 [GeForce GTX 1060 6GB] [10de:1c03] (rev a1) 
(prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. [MSI] GP106 [GeForce GTX 
1060 6GB] [1462:3283]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-05-03 (8 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.04 "Hirsute Hippo" - Release amd64 (20210420)
  MachineType: MSI MS-7978
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-16-generic 
root=UUID=08cc25bc-76b2-4d2b-a729-e006642c7cb8 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  Symptom: display
  Title: Xorg freeze
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 12/21/2016
  dmi.bios.release: 5.12
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: B.90
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.board.name: B150 GAMING M3 (MS-7978)
  dmi.board.vendor: MSI
  dmi.board.version: 2.0
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: MSI
  dmi.chassis.version: 2.0
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrB.90:bd12/21/2016:br5.12:svnMSI:pnMS-7978:pvr2.0:rvnMSI:rnB150GAMINGM3(MS-7978):rvr2.0:cvnMSI:ct3:cvr2.0:
  dmi.product.family: Default string
  dmi.product.name: MS-7978
  dmi.product.sku: Default string
  dmi.product.version: 2.0
  dmi.sys.vendor: MSI
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.104-1build1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 21.0.1-2
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
  version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers-* N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200714-1ubuntu1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1928172/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp