[tor-talk] Optimizing Tor Client Settings for Tor2web?
Hi all, does anyone have a clear idea on how to optimize a Tor Client configuration for Tor2web nodes, by tweaking Torrc? Tor2web make *tons of new connections* to Tor Hidden services with a lot of short lived, sometimes pushing also a lot of bandwidth. Currently there are Tor2web nodes: - 3 on *.tor2web.org - 1 on *.tor2web.fi - 1 on *.tor2web.blutmagie.de On the code we're working on: - Optimistic Data - Connection Pooling (to avoid reopening a socks connection for each client request) - Smart Http Caching What to modify on Torrc to speedup/improve performance on high number of users? Fabio ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Minimum system for hidden service
32MB is a bit very minimal, especially since almost any linux distri needs at least 64-128MB for just loading the installer in RAM, etc. If you would increase your requirements up to 128MB you would be fine. Then I would recommend the pretty stable debian for your needs :) Of course debian isn't that pre-configured as tails is, but you can do that at your own. 2012/11/19 Jerzy Łogiewa > Hello! > > I asked question some month ago about configuring server for security with > hidden service. New question: since TAILS cannot install, what server OS > comes with minimum system, secure configured from first boot? > > Nice if can serve static pages in < 32MB RAM :-) Nothing more is needed! > > Thanks! > -- > Jerzy Łogiewa -- jerz...@interia.eu > > ___ > tor-talk mailing list > tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] upgrading procedure for TBB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> 1.1K bytes in 24 lines about: : Thnx for responding so quickly!...
> To make sure I understand perfectly well and don't screw anything
> up!... I delete the ENTIRE tor bundle file off my computer the just
> download and extract new one and DO NOT just download new file on
> top of old one!... Is that correct! Thanks again for ur help!...
>
> Here's what I just did to update my virtual machine with Tor
> Browser:
>
> 1. gpg --verify
> tor-browser-gnu-linux-x86_64-2.2.39-5-dev-en-US.tar.gz.asc 2. rm
> -rf tor-browser_en-US/
I'm surprised to see this 'rm -rf' command in a recommendation. I
thought you recommend to just unpack the tar file to preserve bookmarks..
Has that alternative approach ('tar xzf' without prior 'rm -rf')
negative side effects?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iF4EAREKAAYFAlCwszsACgkQyM26BSNOM7YPfAEAuehvn1oFrdOeGMcLZNG+E4RF
HmCrnu/Vk0VltmZWfzQA/iLbDCtvMQYIMVmEjkqQmrR4v0z9d2Yqf0dnB4DPXq1I
=e5ZK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Tor 0.2.3.25 is out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, great to see the first Tor 0.2.3 stable release! Maybe we can reach the point where the line for 0.2.3 relays crosses the line for 0.2.2 relays in the 'relays by version' - graph [1] earlier with announcements via additional channels: - - https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-announce - - https://blog.torproject.org/ - - https://twitter.com/#!/torproject [1] https://metrics.torproject.org/network.html#versions -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iF4EAREKAAYFAlCwszIACgkQyM26BSNOM7bCZAEAqGXWWMs0B3s/ItrxBwissity nBvhBLVur+moxnYNjHcA/iWUF9RzMeZiUBTtDF1GjO5toNf3PNe4CnMo8GWek4Nj =AUdf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Tor 0.2.3.25 is out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 24/11/12 12:44, tagnaq wrote: > Hi, > > great to see the first Tor 0.2.3 stable release! Can I upgrade from 0.2.2.x WITHOUT touching "torrc"?. Or should I review it line by line?. > [1] https://metrics.torproject.org/network.html#versions Please, somebody change the color schema to something with better contrast between versions :) - -- Jesús Cea Avión _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/_/ j...@jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ jabber / xmpp:j...@jabber.org _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ . _/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ "My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQCVAwUBULDk65lgi5GaxT1NAQKhywP+I/2tSD6xcAR5nbagnjo7MMy7lfAZ389M 3v2IYlRFm3Hom7FpiN2i1y0C+YJELjD4GzOgzxtQYp+ZXkqkVydqWUeDEyN0SXS0 nLiATDQANHChAR928yTOoVHFj+J+uv3BJpne5jAMaF9OFCaYJjWcnx2ql7eFF3OM ZMBDMPNYc0g= =AAyB -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] upgrading procedure for TBB
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 12:44:59PM +0100, tag...@gmail.com wrote 1.1K bytes in
31 lines about:
: I'm surprised to see this 'rm -rf' command in a recommendation. I
: thought you recommend to just unpack the tar file to preserve bookmarks..
We recommend you run TBB as is, not modify it. Personally, I keep my
bookmarks in a separate file and copy and paste between it and TBB if
I need something.
: Has that alternative approach ('tar xzf' without prior 'rm -rf')
: negative side effects?
I don't know. Maybe Mike or someone can answer better.
--
Andrew
http://tpo.is/contact
pgp 0x6B4D6475
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] upgrading procedure for TBB
One idea would be to put links to all your bookmarks in a simple html
file, and then keep that open in a tab. I used to do this back in the
days before tabs or "awesomebars".
--
Greg Norcie (g...@norcie.com)
GPG key: 0x1B873635
On 11/24/12 1:16 PM, and...@torproject.is wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 12:44:59PM +0100, tag...@gmail.com wrote 1.1K bytes
> in 31 lines about:
> : I'm surprised to see this 'rm -rf' command in a recommendation. I
> : thought you recommend to just unpack the tar file to preserve bookmarks..
>
> We recommend you run TBB as is, not modify it. Personally, I keep my
> bookmarks in a separate file and copy and paste between it and TBB if
> I need something.
>
> : Has that alternative approach ('tar xzf' without prior 'rm -rf')
> : negative side effects?
>
> I don't know. Maybe Mike or someone can answer better.
>
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
