[tor-relays] IP address change
Hi There My ISP changes my IP address about every 24 hours. It takes 10 minutes until my tor server recognises this, and an hour until all usual connections are reestablished. How can I speed this up? Does it help to use a DNS? To pay for a static address is not an option. Any ideas? Thank you. Mike___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] IP address change
Hi TimTNX for your fast response. I'm afaid, that I have to stay with my current ISP. However, from time to time he keeps my IP address unchanged for up to 4 days. Mike Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: teor Datum: 24.10.16 14:34 (GMT+01:00) An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] IP address change > On 24 Oct. 2016, at 23:12, balbea16 wrote: > > Hi There > My ISP changes my IP address about every 24 hours. It takes 10 minutes until > my tor server recognises this, and an hour until all usual connections are > reestablished. How can I speed this up? The tor directory authorities vote on relays every hour. There is no way to speed this up. > Does it help to use a DNS? No, Tor uses your IP address. > To pay for a static address is not an option. > Any ideas? Thank you. Mike I'm sorry, this is just how Tor is designed. But you are still contributing to the network. You could try renting a cheap server in a data centre. Most of them offer static IP addresses. Tim T -- Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n xmpp: teor at torproject dot org -- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] Outgoing Connections to middle nodes?
Hi There, I've got a quick question. I have been running a tor relay since 3 months. I don't have a guard flag, however many outgoing connections to non exit relays (i.e. that should be middles than). Does that mean I run an entry node (without having guard status)? How come?TNX Mike ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Outgoing Connections to middle nodes?
TNX for the fast response. Unfortunately I can't open .asc files on my mobile phone. I've to try this later at home. Von meinem Samsung Gerät gesendet. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: nusenu Datum: 03.12.16 13:12 (GMT+01:00) An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Outgoing Connections to middle nodes? ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Outgoing Connections to middle nodes?
Hi MichaelThanks for the hint. I guess you are totally right! I forgot about the hidden services. Right now I have about 1100 in and out connections, makes totally sense. Mike Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Rana Datum: 03.12.16 14:45 (GMT+01:00) An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Outgoing Connections to middle nodes? -Original Message- From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of Michael Armbruster Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2016 2:10 PM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Outgoing Connections to middle nodes? On 2016-12-03 at 12:56, balbea16 wrote: > Hi There, > I've got a quick question. I have been running a tor relay since 3 > months. I don't have a guard flag, however many outgoing connections > to non exit relays (i.e. that should be middles than). Does that mean > I run an entry node (without having guard status)? How come? > TNX Mike Hi Mike, you forget about hidden services IN the Tor network. Not every connection tries to connect to domains or services outside the Tor network. So it could be that you are a middle relay having many outgoing connections to so-called rendezvous points. Have a look at this sentence here from [1]: "In general, the complete connection between client and hidden service consists of 6 relays: 3 of them were picked by the client with the third being the rendezvous point and the other 3 were picked by the hidden service." Best, Michael [1] https://www.torproject.org/docs/hidden-services.html.en ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Second relay on same ESX
Hi Are you actually talking about identical relays, i.e. with the same fingerprint? That would be interessting for me, as I'd like to run a second Rasp Pi in parallel for redundency reasons.Mike Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Patrick DERWAEL Datum: 12.12.16 06:41 (GMT+01:00) An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Second relay on same ESX John, The host has 32GB RAM& 4 CPUs I have allocated 2GB & 2CPUs to my VM As the VM CPU usage is +/-40%, I'm not sure if I should reduce to 1CPU (would it then be used at 80% average?) P. 2016-12-11 18:22 GMT+01:00 John Ricketts : Patrick, I run all of my relays under VMware and I don't have any issues at all. How many CPUs do you have in the physical server and how many virtual CPUs do you have assigned to the VM? John On Dec 11, 2016, at 11:19, Patrick DERWAEL wrote: Hi guys, I'm running a relay in a VM on a physical server which is largely under used Current advertised bandwidth 26MB, consensus 76500 I'm considering running a second relay (2nd VM) on the very same hardware, but this brings a few questions: - is there any issue running it at the same geographical place? - would the current total BW effectively consumed (26MB) be divided in 2 (i.e. no added value in BW)? - basically, would it have any significant added value to the network? Thanks ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays -- Patrick Derwael Rue de la fontaine, 3 4210 Burdinne G:0479.80.50.79 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Second relay on same ESX
Hi Tim,TNX for your fast response. That was more or less what I thought already. Mike Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: teor Datum: 12.12.16 07:28 (GMT+01:00) An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Second relay on same ESX > On 12 Dec. 2016, at 17:08, balbea16 wrote: > > Hi > Are you actually talking about identical relays, i.e. with the same > fingerprint? That would be interessting for me, as I'd like to run a second > Rasp Pi in parallel for redundency reasons. > Mike Please don't run a second relay on the same fingerprint. Your relay won't get much traffic, because it will look like its address and ports are changing all the time. Instead, run two relays with different keys, and let the network load-balance between them. Tim > Ursprüngliche Nachricht > Von: Patrick DERWAEL > Datum: 12.12.16 06:41 (GMT+01:00) > An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Second relay on same ESX > > John, > The host has 32GB RAM& 4 CPUs > I have allocated 2GB & 2CPUs to my VM > As the VM CPU usage is +/-40%, I'm not sure if I should reduce to 1CPU (would > it then be used at 80% average?) > > P. > > 2016-12-11 18:22 GMT+01:00 John Ricketts : > Patrick, > > I run all of my relays under VMware and I don't have any issues at all. > > How many CPUs do you have in the physical server and how many virtual CPUs do > you have assigned to the VM? > > John > > On Dec 11, 2016, at 11:19, Patrick DERWAEL wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I'm running a relay in a VM on a physical server which is largely under used >> Current advertised bandwidth 26MB, consensus 76500 >> I'm considering running a second relay (2nd VM) on the very same hardware, >> but this brings a few questions: >> >> - is there any issue running it at the same geographical place? >> - would the current total BW effectively consumed (26MB) be divided in 2 >> (i.e. no added value in BW)? >> - basically, would it have any significant added value to the network? >> >> Thanks >> >> ___ >> tor-relays mailing list >> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > > > > -- > Patrick Derwael > Rue de la fontaine, 3 > 4210 Burdinne > G:0479.80.50.79 > > > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays T -- Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n xmpp: teor at torproject dot org ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?
Hi ThereThis is a pretty interesting topic. I have been running a Rasp Pi 3 based relay since August this year. By now, I am up to about 1,300 incomming and outgoing connections, and a max of about 21mbps. This is about 50% of the max. upload speed. Consensus weight is between 3,000 and 6,000. The CPU is running at 20% max. However, my local ISP disconnects me after 24 to 36 hours. From my point of view this is the only disadvantage. For a home based relay, is that good, bad, or just average? Is there a chance for me to get a stable, or even guard flag? What are your experiances?Mike___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?
Pls. refer to may answers after each of your questions. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Rana Datum: 15.12.16 07:44 (GMT+01:00) An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment? >Hi There>This is a pretty interesting topic. I have been running a Rasp Pi 3 >based relay since August this year. By now, I am up to about 1,300 incomming >and outgoing connections, and a max of >about 21mbps. This is about 50% of the >max. upload speed. Consensus weight is between 3,000 and 6,000. The CPU is >running at 20% max. However, my local ISP disconnects me after 24 >to 36 >hours. From my point of view this is the only disadvantage. > >For a home >based relay, is that good, bad, or just average? Is there a chance for me to >get a stable, or even guard flag? What are your experiances?>MikeMy experience >is bad, the relay is not taking off at all, I have consensus weight of 19 and >am sending less than 20 MB every 6 hours despite having bandwidth measured by >Tor of between 70 and 120 KB/s. The total up bandwidth I have in ISP >connection is 1.5 mbps and this is probably the issue. I also run this on Pi >3. I did, however, get a stable flag after 5 days, and have had it since then. >My IP is dynamic and did not change in these 5 days or in the 4 days that >passed since I got the Stable flag. My relay nickname is ZG0.Based on your >experience I think your are doing fabulously well for a home relay, and that >what really counts is the ISP bandwidth, and the Stable flag does not have >much to do with how much traffic you get. Moreover, your 20% cpu util confirms >my opinion that Pi is the perfect, most cost efficient way to run a relay and >that running it on a larger computer is a waste of resources and money (up to >the point Raspi chokes which we are yet to discover J)Moreover, clearly Pi’s >cpu power will never be the bottleneck, only its memory size. You have a total >of 1GB of memory on your Pi 3, what’s your memory utilization? about 513 MB >What’s the total traffic the Pi sends every 6 hours (reported in the Tor log >file /var/log/tor/notices.log and, for the previous time window, in >/var/log/tor/notices.log.1)? About 19 GB in the last 6 hour period, with a >total sent 2671.53 GB and received 2625.31 GB. What’s your relay’s nickname? >Balbea16 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?
Hi Peter unfortunately your message is empty, it only shows the signature. This occurs with all signed messages. I have no idea how to solve the problem.Mike Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Peter Ludikovsky Datum: 15.12.16 07:22 (GMT+01:00) An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment? ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?
You are totally right. Besides the "cost" for the PI, I pay some additional Euros per month for the 40 MBIT upload, that's it. I really can recomment to run a relay on a Pi 3. Let's see how the Tor authorities handle this. By the way the CPU temperature levels around 60 Celsius (without running arm). I don't cool it. Mike Von meinem Samsung Gerät gesendet. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Rana Datum: 15.12.16 08:53 (GMT+01:00) An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment? OK then let me summarize. 1. You are running a Pi from Cologne, at 21 mbps (measured) peak, 900 kbps (measured) average utilization by Tor, with 1300 connections.2. Your Pi is under-utilized, probably limited by your ISP’s peering with those to which DirAuths are connected. 20% CPU utilization, 50% memory utilization. 3. Given that part of the memory is used by Linux kernel, and that the PI Ethernet interface is nominally 100 mbps, the Pi is probably able to sustain up to 3000 connections. Bottom line: the $35 Pi is a killer and running a Tor node with up to 3000 connections on another computer is probably a big waste of money. Comments welcome. From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of balbea16 Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 9:04 AM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment? Pls. refer to may answers after each of your questions. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Rana Datum: 15.12.16 07:44 (GMT+01:00) An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment? >Hi There>This is a pretty interesting topic. I have been running a Rasp Pi 3 based relay since August this year. By now, I am up to about 1,300 incomming and outgoing connections, and a max of >about 21mbps. This is about 50% of the max. upload speed. Consensus weight is between 3,000 and 6,000. The CPU is running at 20% max. However, my local ISP disconnects me after 24 >to 36 hours. From my point of view this is the only disadvantage. > >For a home based relay, is that good, bad, or just average? Is there a chance for me to get a stable, or even guard flag? What are your experiances?>MikeMy experience is bad, the relay is not taking off at all, I have consensus weight of 19 and am sending less than 20 MB every 6 hours despite having bandwidth measured by Tor of between 70 and 120 KB/s. The total up bandwidth I have in ISP connection is 1.5 mbps and this is probably the issue. I also run this on Pi 3. I did, however, get a stable flag after 5 days, and have had it since then. My IP is dynamic and did not change in these 5 days or in the 4 days that passed since I got the Stable flag. My relay nickname is ZG0.Based on your experience I think your are doing fabulously well for a home relay, and that what really counts is the ISP bandwidth, and the Stable flag does not have much to do with how much traffic you get. Moreover, your 20% cpu util confirms my opinion that Pi is the perfect, most cost efficient way to run a relay and that running it on a larger computer is a waste of resources and money (up to the point Raspi chokes which we are yet to discover J)Moreover, clearly Pi’s cpu power will never be the bottleneck, only its memory size. You have a total of 1GB of memory on your Pi 3, what’s your memory utilization? about 513 MB What’s the total traffic the Pi sends every 6 hours (reported in the Tor log file /var/log/tor/notices.log and, for the previous time window, in /var/log/tor/notices.log.1)? About 19 GB in the last 6 hour period, with a total sent 2671.53 GB and received 2625.31 GB. What’s your relay’s nickname? Balbea16 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?
J, TNX for the recommendation. Just used a spare one. Temperature dropped to 41 C. Didn't like the noise, because it's running permanentely. However, you are right :-) Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Rana Datum: 15.12.16 09:34 (GMT+01:00) An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment? Well I do suggest that you get a set of Pi heat sinks on ebay for $0.70 (including postage from China, adhesive and sinks for all 3 chips on the Pi). And if you are as extravagant as I you will even shell out an additional $1.20 for a Pi case. Your 20 mbps relay has some value, you do not want to step on it accidentally J From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of balbea16 Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 10:24 AM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment? You are totally right. Besides the "cost" for the PI, I pay some additional Euros per month for the 40 MBIT upload, that's it. I really can recomment to run a relay on a Pi 3. Let's see how the Tor authorities handle this. By the way the CPU temperature levels around 60 Celsius (without running arm). I don't cool it. Mike Von meinem Samsung Gerät gesendet. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Rana Datum: 15.12.16 08:53 (GMT+01:00) An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment? OK then let me summarize. 1. You are running a Pi from Cologne, at 21 mbps (measured) peak, 900 kbps (measured) average utilization by Tor, with 1300 connections.2. Your Pi is under-utilized, probably limited by your ISP’s peering with those to which DirAuths are connected. 20% CPU utilization, 50% memory utilization. 3. Given that part of the memory is used by Linux kernel, and that the PI Ethernet interface is nominally 100 mbps, the Pi is probably able to sustain up to 3000 connections. Bottom line: the $35 Pi is a killer and running a Tor node with up to 3000 connections on another computer is probably a big waste of money. Comments welcome. From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of balbea16 Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 9:04 AM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment? Pls. refer to may answers after each of your questions. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Rana Datum: 15.12.16 07:44 (GMT+01:00) An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment? >Hi There>This is a pretty interesting topic. I have been running a Rasp Pi 3 based relay since August this year. By now, I am up to about 1,300 incomming and outgoing connections, and a max of >about 21mbps. This is about 50% of the max. upload speed. Consensus weight is between 3,000 and 6,000. The CPU is running at 20% max. However, my local ISP disconnects me after 24 >to 36 hours. From my point of view this is the only disadvantage. > >For a home based relay, is that good, bad, or just average? Is there a chance for me to get a stable, or even guard flag? What are your experiances?>MikeMy experience is bad, the relay is not taking off at all, I have consensus weight of 19 and am sending less than 20 MB every 6 hours despite having bandwidth measured by Tor of between 70 and 120 KB/s. The total up bandwidth I have in ISP connection is 1.5 mbps and this is probably the issue. I also run this on Pi 3. I did, however, get a stable flag after 5 days, and have had it since then. My IP is dynamic and did not change in these 5 days or in the 4 days that passed since I got the Stable flag. My relay nickname is ZG0.Based on your experience I think your are doing fabulously well for a home relay, and that what really counts is the ISP bandwidth, and the Stable flag does not have much to do with how much traffic you get. Moreover, your 20% cpu util confirms my opinion that Pi is the perfect, most cost efficient way to run a relay and that running it on a larger computer is a waste of resources and money (up to the point Raspi chokes which we are yet to discover J)Moreover, clearly Pi’s cpu power will never be the bottleneck, only its memory size. You have a total of 1GB of memory on your Pi 3, what’s your memory utilization? about 513 MB What’s the total traffic the Pi sends every 6 hours (reported in the Tor log file /var/log/tor/notices.log and, for the previous time window, in /var/log/tor/notices.log.1)? About 19 GB in the last 6 hour period, with a total sent 2671.53 GB and received 2625.31 GB. What’s your relay’s nickname? Balbea16 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?
Hi J. I know. But I need a fan on top of the sinks. Just the heat sinks are not efficient enough. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Rana Datum: 15.12.16 11:19 (GMT+01:00) An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment? I meant aluminum heat sink, not a fanHeat sinks do not make noise, they are flat pieces of metal with rib structure for improved heat radiation. You glue them on the chips that tend to become hot as they crunch your Tor relay traffic. But hey, whatever turns you on J___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] Flags?
Hi There, I assume, that this has been discussed here already pretty often. However, it seems to be, that the "stable flag" is only assigned to relays with a static, or at least long lasting, IP address. It also seems to be, that the stable flag is mandatory to get the guard flag. If so, that would mean: Dynamic address = no chance to obtain the guard flag. Is that the truth? Tnx Mike ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] Speed up of reconnections after IP Address change
Hi There,I only have a dynamic IP address and my ISP changes it almost every time after 24 hours. It is somehow sad to see 1.400 connections drop to almost none. After the change it takes 20 minutes until my OR notices this (our IP Address has changed from ...). It than takes another hour until the connections start to actualy rebuild. This means it takes more than an hour (every per day) to reach the normal operating Mode. Is there any way to speed up this process? Could adjust the torrc script for instance? TNX Mike ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] What's a "useful" relay?
Hi There I am actually a little bit confused now. I am one of (as Rana knows) those Pi 3 based OR operators with daily changing IP address. My consensus weight is about 5,000, with a max. of 1,400 connections. I would like to recomment, that the TOR org should publish minimum requirements to run a relay. And, if my kind of relays would bring disadvantage to the network, I would shut it off. So far, I think, that small and large relays in combination are good for anonymity. Mike___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP
Hi There I evaluated some relays with newly assigned (red) guard flags. All of them had already the stable flag assigned. And (so far I could see) all of them had (almost) static IP addresses. In my case, this may be the reason why I don't get a guard flag. My ISP changes it every 24 hours. However, I'd be fine with "just" operating a fast middle node. I will keep an eye on this. Mike ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Speed up of reconnections after IP Address change
Hi ThereI've just written a simple bash script which verifies (in a while loop) every 2 minutes if the OR address has been changed by my ISP. If so, it stops and then restarts the Tor service again. Then it sleeps for 24 hours and starts the 2 minute loop again. Not very sophisticated, but it might work. Mike___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Speed up of reconnections after IP Address change
'tor service start' disconnects all connections, START uses the new IP address. Which is important. I am not sure if Sighup does the same. I assume it only reloads the config file. Any ideas? ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
