[toaster] badhelo
hello is it possible to include the badhelo patch? as long as i know, badhelo is now part of qregex patch (http://www.arda.homeunix.net/store/qmail/) thank you costin
[toaster] Happy Sysadmin Day!
Happy sysadmin day everyone! http://www.sysadminday.com/ :)
Re: [toaster] Interesting story about greylisting with the toaster
hello you probably are speaking about xxx if you are not sure what xx is going on, you should read xxx at page x have a good day costin - Original Message - From: "Eero Volotinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 12:03 PM Subject: Re: [toaster] Interesting story about greylisting with the toaster > What this means? > > -- > Eer > > > bject: failure notice > > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at . > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. > This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > AUTORESPOND: too many received from [x] > I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long.
Fw: [toaster] badhelo
Hi Bill, I apologise for reposting. I was wondering if you have any plans about including the new qregex patch which has the badhelo feature (home of the current qregex component of the toaster, http://www.unixpimps.org/software/qregex/, points to the new maintained address) Thank you very much Costin - Original Message - From: "Costin Gusa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 4:53 PM Subject: [toaster] badhelo > hello > is it possible to include the badhelo patch? as long as i know, badhelo is > now part of qregex patch (http://www.arda.homeunix.net/store/qmail/) > > thank you > costin >
Re: Fw: [toaster] badhelo
wow this is soo cool. y ou really deserve a beer (in case you ever come in a trip to romania :D ) - Original Message - From: "Bill Shupp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 10:54 PM Subject: Re: Fw: [toaster] badhelo > Costin Gusa wrote: > > >Hi Bill, > >I apologise for reposting. > >I was wondering if you have any plans about including the new qregex > >patch which has the badhelo feature (home of the current qregex component of > >the toaster, http://www.unixpimps.org/software/qregex/, points to the new > >maintained address) > > > >Thank you very much > >Costin > > > > > > Yeah, I have that in the 0.7 toaster patch, along with the throttle > patch (instead of tarpit), and updated patches for the other features. > But alas, I went on tour for 3 weeks and never got it tested enough to > post. I'll try to get to that this week. Oh, SPF is in it too. > > Cheers, > > Bill
Re: [toaster] TLS Delays?
did you forget to set up a cron job for update_tmprsdh ? - Original Message - From: "Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 10:52 PM Subject: Re: [toaster] TLS Delays? > Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > >I'm using the smtpauth and tls patch located here : > > http://shupp.org/patches/netqmail-1.05-tls-smtpauth-20040705.patch > > > >I'm seeing significant delays (20-30 seconds) when sending mail > > from both Thunderbird and Evolution. These delays only occur when > > using secure SMTP. The logs show the TLS session starting, the client > > sends some TLS stuff (I can't read it) and then the waiting begins. > > About 20-30 seconds later, the server starts responding with more > > stuff and the email is sent. > > > >Any idea what the problem here may be? Any clue how I can fix it? > > This occurs on every mail sent via secure SMTP. Turn off Secure SMTP > > and the emails fly through like it's nothing. > > > > Thanks! > > > I did some debugging via openssl s_client and it seems that the wait is > between the client hello and the server hello. Once the server hello > comes back, the key exchange, cipher stuff, handshakes, and actual > sending of mail take only a second or so... > > qmail-smtpd seems to jump to 100% processor when I try to negotiate > TLS... This would, obviously, be a problem.. :) Any idea why it might > do this?? > > -- > --- > Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold > Engine / Technology Programmer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > RedHat Certified - RHCE # 803004140609871 > MySQL Pro Certified - ID# 207171862 > MySQL Core Certified - ID# 205982910 > --- > "Something mysterious is formed, born in the silent void. Waiting alone and unmoving, it is at once still and yet in constant motion. It is the source of all programs. I do not know its name, so I will call it the Tao of Programming." >
Re: [toaster] TLS Delays?
" Also, qmail-remote will try to do TLS with other smtp servers and fail if there is no certificate. Also, MAKE SURE you run "make tmprsadh", and setup the cron job for update_tmprsadh (per the TLS instructions) so that you don't saturate your CPU with temp key generations. " - Original Message - From: "Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 10:52 PM Subject: Re: [toaster] TLS Delays? > Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > >I'm using the smtpauth and tls patch located here : > > http://shupp.org/patches/netqmail-1.05-tls-smtpauth-20040705.patch > > > >I'm seeing significant delays (20-30 seconds) when sending mail > > from both Thunderbird and Evolution. These delays only occur when > > using secure SMTP. The logs show the TLS session starting, the client > > sends some TLS stuff (I can't read it) and then the waiting begins. > > About 20-30 seconds later, the server starts responding with more > > stuff and the email is sent. > > > >Any idea what the problem here may be? Any clue how I can fix it? > > This occurs on every mail sent via secure SMTP. Turn off Secure SMTP > > and the emails fly through like it's nothing. > > > > Thanks! > > > I did some debugging via openssl s_client and it seems that the wait is > between the client hello and the server hello. Once the server hello > comes back, the key exchange, cipher stuff, handshakes, and actual > sending of mail take only a second or so... > > qmail-smtpd seems to jump to 100% processor when I try to negotiate > TLS... This would, obviously, be a problem.. :) Any idea why it might > do this?? > > -- > --- > Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold > Engine / Technology Programmer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > RedHat Certified - RHCE # 803004140609871 > MySQL Pro Certified - ID# 207171862 > MySQL Core Certified - ID# 205982910 > --- > "Something mysterious is formed, born in the silent void. Waiting alone and unmoving, it is at once still and yet in constant motion. It is the source of all programs. I do not know its name, so I will call it the Tao of Programming." >
Re: [toaster] qmail same patch
it will mess just follow the readmes from netqmail (www.lifewithqmail.org) and toaster - Original Message - From: "Eric Noel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 4:13 AM Subject: [toaster] qmail same patch > Ive seen some patches for qmail (e.g. spf), my problem is that i know i > have patched my qmail before but i dont remember some :(, if i patched > my qmail with the same patch before will it mess up my qmail or it will > just ignore the patch?
Re: [toaster] qmail same patch
cd /usr/local/src make sure you renamed old qmail sources folder to something else like qmail-old or qmail-working-ok - Original Message - From: "Eero Volotinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 8:24 AM Subject: Re: [toaster] qmail same patch > Costin Gusa kirjoitti: > > it will mess > > just follow the readmes from netqmail (www.lifewithqmail.org) and toaster > > patch says. allready applied, assume [r] reverse? That means that patch > is already applied. > > -- > Eero
Re: [toaster] catch ip of spammer
put rblsmtpd -r bl.spamcop.net just before calling qmail-smtpd in /service/qmail-smtpd/run and you will not need to manually collect spammers ip - Original Message - From: "Eric Noel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 8:33 AM Subject: [toaster] catch ip of spammer > Thanks to all those who responded to my previous question about patching. > Ive been trying to find the ipaddress of most senders both > outside/local, i tried qmailanalog but i only get recipients list or > senders list with no ip. Are there any good scripts there to list a > summary with ip of senders, ive been trying to catch those nasty virus > wildly emailing to anyone on our email before it gets to my poor clamav. > most of the time we cant get into our qmail my guess is that those > spammer/virus fully exhausted our smtp ports
Re: [toaster] SPF-rc3 on 0.7?
Carlos Solano wrote: >I haven't seen spf patch in changelog...is it included too? > > No, as stated here before it will be separate. I have not had time to test and post it. I will as soon as I get time. Bill - Original Message - From: "Eduardo Cortés" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 5:26 PM Subject: [toaster] SPF-rc3 on 0.7? > Hi all, > will SPF patch (http://www.saout.de/misc/spf/qmail-spf-rc3.patch) be included > on 0.7? > Regards, > Eduardo Cortés
Re: [toaster] A nice script to remove and restore qmail queue
http://jeremy.kister.net/code/perl/qmqtool/ - Original Message - From: "saki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 9:26 AM Subject: [toaster] A nice script to remove and restore qmail queue > Hello all, >There is a couple of nice script to remove > unwanted mail from qmail queue and restore important > mail to qmail queue. Try it. :-) > http://www.redwoodsoft.com/~dru/mailRemove/ > > > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Re: [toaster] mysql / 551 error
- Original Message - From: "Júlio Olivares" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 7:14 PM Subject: Re: [toaster] mysql / 551 error > > > He's already added that fix, and I have it in the latest beta toaster > > patch. I'll be posting that next week after further testing is done on > > the SPF and Greylisting stuff. > > > > Regards, > > > > Bill > > > > Any news about this ? patience. bill's work is free for us, in his spare time; personally i just say thank you and wait :)
Re: [toaster] Help: question regarding limiting bandwith of outbound emails
- Original Message - From: "Bill Shupp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 11:50 PM Subject: Re: [toaster] Help: question regarding limiting bandwith of outbound emails > Joe Young wrote: > > > Bill, > > will this help with outbound emails as well? The company I am > > working with have a 256K upload connection and they will send a 8meg > > email to 2 or 3 addresses at different locations. When they send the > > email, it will slow down their internet browsing. I know that they > > should upgrade thier DSL service, but they can't. > > > I'm unaware of how to limit ONLY qmail-remote process. My advice is to in mangle/OUTGOING mark packets generated by qmail-remote (check it's uid - grep qmailr /etc/passwd) with iptables -m owner --uid-owner , then qos them with tc filter > use databytes to limit qmail-smtpd message sizes, and then force all > incoming mail to this server to go through smtp (i.e. tell local clients > like squirrelmail to use smtp rather than the sendmail wrapper to that > the size limit is enforced). > > Regards, > > Bill
Re: [toaster] features to need to be add..
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 11:04 PM Subject: [toaster] features to need to be add.. qmailtap (http://www.inter7.com/?page=qmailtap) this patch should be applied to toaster, since nowday there are regulations that address that ISPs need to save mails for n months. http://www.cyber-sentry.com/index.php?id=35
