Re: [toaster] Latest installer for Bill Shup Toaster

[Ahmet YAZICI]

SKT/MIS/ROZI wrote:

Currently i have simscan 1.3.1 which i get from rpm at qmailtoaster site.
Can i applied this patch?

Currently i have problem with qmailtoaster from qmailtoaster.com 
(Double email)

I just want to reformat again and try your install. I'm using Centos here.
I also heard about the eliminate-dups. is it working?
Regards
   
Muhammad Fakhrul Rozi Bin Mohd Seth

IT Engineer
SOODE (JOHOR) SDN. BHD.
Tel: 607-8821075 ext. 143
Fax: 607-8821080
H/P: 6012-7656047
  

I think, Bill's toaster is all in one solution. You don't need to 
anything install from qmailtoaster. Follow the instruction carefully, 
i'm sure you will be happy :)



--
Ahmet YAZICI
UIN : 1265244
Y!  : yaziciahmet
MSN : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WEB : http://www.ahmetyazici.org


"In general, avoiding problems is better than solving them." 

Re: [toaster] CRLF - LF - Exchange

[Maciej Sołtysiak]

Bill wrote:


I don't like the idea of patching qmail to compensate for broken MTAs.
For those folks that need it, either use fixcrio, or apply the patch
yourself (which is trivial to do so).  So I will not commit it to my
toaster patch.
Bill, Isn't that against the "be liberal in what you accept; be conservative 
in what you send"
thing ? It's all about interoperability, not eye-poking in broken MTAs' 
users.

Good software/setup should be resilient against any input.


I will be happy to note this in the toaster docs so that it's easier to
understand and resolve, though.

Excellent.

Regards,
Maciej

[toaster] Spam Service / Solution (slightly off topic)

[Maxwell]

Hi, I thought I'd query the list about anti-spam services.  Does anybody
have any recommendations?  The spam assassin, rules du jour, etc just isn't
cutting it.  I've seen services like ems.netriplex.com , mxlogic.com ,
appriver , but have always had mixed results.  Does anyone have any good
advice for a solid anti spam service especially that can be configured for
many domains with many users?

Re: [toaster] Spam Service / Solution (slightly off topic)

[Claas Langbehn]

Check out http://dspam.nuclearelephant.com :)

Re: [toaster] CRLF - LF - Exchange

[Bill Shupp]

Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:

> Bill, Isn't that against the "be liberal in what you accept; be
> conservative in what you send"
> thing ? It's all about interoperability, not eye-poking in broken MTAs'
> users.
> Good software/setup should be resilient against any input.

I feel that the days of "be liberal in what you accept" for SMTP are
long over.  Yahoo! uses greylisting now.  How liberal is that?  Mail
abuse is just too prevalent.  Being RFC compliant is not too much to ask
IMO.  I never run into this problem myself anyway, and I maintain many
systems, big and small.  Besides, by not including the patch by default,
I'm not preventing anyone from using it.

Regards,

Bill

[toaster] QmailAdmin and Qmail behind proxy

[SKT/MIS/ROZI]

hi all,

I have a big problem here.
Can i install the qmailadmin on different server? Letsay my email server 
is at 192.168.0.11 ip and my qmailadmin is on 192.168.0.12 ip?

Is it have a way to let them communicate?

Regards
  
Rozi