[toaster] QmailMRTG and IMAP graphs
Hello, Is there any way to get imap, imap-ssl graphics using QmailMRTG??? The only info i get is in maillog file. Regards Juan
Re: [toaster] QmailMRTG and IMAP graphs
On Wednesday 05 Apr 2006 14:26, Juan Jose Miquel wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any way to get imap, imap-ssl graphics using QmailMRTG??? > > The only info i get is in maillog file. You would have to write your own mrtg filter have a look at http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/ there is a contrib directory on the download page, you might find some inspiration there. HTH -- - Bob Hutchinson Midwales dot com -
[toaster] Bandwidth Logging
Hey Guys; I have installed the toaster and everything works in a most excellent fashion. I have written a tool to give me usage and statistics reporting based on qmail log files. It's designed to help me determine how much email my clients are sending both using regular email and via EZMLM. I also wanted it to tell me how much bandwidth people use downloading their email. Granted, I could likely use a mathematical formula based on the size of each email and just double the amount delivered to their mail box and such, but I was hoping for something that would track connections where nothing was downloaded. Does this make sense? My thought was to have the username logged to the pop3 log file. That would provide the data needed to track the # of bytes and the session. Has anyone thought of this or should I pursue the more mathematical angle. Thanks; Michael Bagnall http://elusivemind.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[toaster] LogWatch and MultiLog
People with CentOS and RedHat get LogWatch installed by default. Unfortunately, out of the box LogWatch does not grok MultiLog files at all. I've searched as thoroughly as I can, but I haven't found a solution to this yet. So, although I'm not a Perl programmer, I'm fiddling with the LogWatch scripts at the moment, trying to get it to work. If I do, I'll be able to feed all the MultiLog logs into LogWatch. Does anyone else here have LogWatch, and, if so, what have you done about this? Would anyone be interested in seeing the result if/when I get it working? Is there likely to be anything interesting in the pop3ds, pop3d and smtpd files? If so, are there separate LogWatch scripts for them, or do they all come under qmail as far as LogWatch is concerned? -- Nikki Locke, Trumphurst Ltd. PC & Unix consultancy & programming http://www.trumphurst.com/
Re: [toaster] Bandwidth Logging
Michael Bagnall wrote: > Hey Guys; > > I have installed the toaster and everything works in a most excellent > fashion. I have written a tool to give me usage and statistics reporting > based on qmail log files. It's designed to help me determine how much > email my clients are sending both using regular email and via EZMLM. I > also wanted it to tell me how much bandwidth people use downloading > their email. Granted, I could likely use a mathematical formula based on > the size of each email and just double the amount delivered to their > mail box and such, but I was hoping for something that would track > connections where nothing was downloaded. > > Does this make sense? > > My thought was to have the username logged to the pop3 log file. That > would provide the data needed to track the # of bytes and the session. > > Has anyone thought of this or should I pursue the more mathematical angle. Sounds like qmailanalog. See http://cr.yp.to/qmailanalog.html for more details. Regards, Bill
[toaster] Sorting spam mail into a separate folder
I would like to sort my spam tagged email into a separate spam folder automatically. I've seen lots of different ways to do that, or varying complexity, on the 'Net. Is there an easy way, that works well with the Toaster? -- Nikki Locke, Trumphurst Ltd. PC & Unix consultancy & programming http://www.trumphurst.com/
Re: [toaster] LogWatch and MultiLog
On Wednesday 05 Apr 2006 19:55, Nikki Locke wrote: > People with CentOS and RedHat get LogWatch installed by default. > Unfortunately, out of the box LogWatch does not grok MultiLog files at all. > > I've searched as thoroughly as I can, but I haven't found a solution to > this yet. > > So, although I'm not a Perl programmer, I'm fiddling with the LogWatch > scripts at the moment, trying to get it to work. > > If I do, I'll be able to feed all the MultiLog logs into LogWatch. > > Does anyone else here have LogWatch, and, if so, what have you done about > this? More recent versions of Logwatch do support qmail running with Multilog. Look for qmail-pop3d, qmail-pop3ds, qmail-send and qmail-smtpd in the scripts/services directory. > > Would anyone be interested in seeing the result if/when I get it working? > > Is there likely to be anything interesting in the pop3ds, pop3d and smtpd > files? If so, are there separate LogWatch scripts for them, or do they all > come under qmail as far as LogWatch is concerned? -- - Bob Hutchinson Midwales dot com -
Re: [toaster] Sorting spam mail into a separate folder
On Wednesday 05 Apr 2006 19:55, Nikki Locke wrote: > I would like to sort my spam tagged email into a separate spam folder > automatically. I've seen lots of different ways to do that, or varying > complexity, on the 'Net. > > Is there an easy way, that works well with the Toaster? yeah, maildrop search the archive for this list for details, roundabout mid-february -- - Bob Hutchinson Midwales dot com -
RE: [toaster] Bandwidth Logging
http://www.enderunix.org/isoqlog/ my choice for that Regards, Edvin -Original Message- From: Bill Shupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mittwoch, 05. April 2006 20:43 To: toaster@shupp.org Subject: Re: [toaster] Bandwidth Logging Michael Bagnall wrote: > Hey Guys; > > I have installed the toaster and everything works in a most excellent > fashion. I have written a tool to give me usage and statistics reporting > based on qmail log files. It's designed to help me determine how much > email my clients are sending both using regular email and via EZMLM. I > also wanted it to tell me how much bandwidth people use downloading > their email. Granted, I could likely use a mathematical formula based on > the size of each email and just double the amount delivered to their > mail box and such, but I was hoping for something that would track > connections where nothing was downloaded. > > Does this make sense? > > My thought was to have the username logged to the pop3 log file. That > would provide the data needed to track the # of bytes and the session. > > Has anyone thought of this or should I pursue the more mathematical angle. Sounds like qmailanalog. See http://cr.yp.to/qmailanalog.html for more details. Regards, Bill
[toaster] clamav-0.88.1
clamav-0.88.1 came out today. One of the toaster patches failed: (0.87) patching file ./clamd/clamd.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 138 (offset 1 line). patching file ./shared/output.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 115. Hunk #2 succeeded at 158 (offset 6 lines). 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ./shared/output.c.rej patching file ./shared/output.h patching file etc/clamd.conf Hunk #1 succeeded at 5 with fuzz 1. patching file etc/freshclam.conf -- - Bob Hutchinson Midwales dot com -
Re: [toaster] Submitting spam to Bayesian filter from SquirrelMail
Bob Hutchinson wrote: > The squirrelmail spam-button plugin works for me. .. > This will allow your customers to train spamassassin. > > Wether they will or not is another matter ;-( Pity the plugin doesn't delete the spam mail automatically. There is at least one user (me) who will be using it religously! -- Nikki Locke, Trumphurst Ltd. PC & Unix consultancy & programming http://www.trumphurst.com/
Re: [toaster] clamav-0.88.1
Bob Hutchinson wrote: > clamav-0.88.1 came out today. > > One of the toaster patches failed: (0.87) > > patching file ./clamd/clamd.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 138 (offset 1 line). > patching file ./shared/output.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 115. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 158 (offset 6 lines). > 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ./shared/output.c.rej > patching file ./shared/output.h > patching file etc/clamd.conf > Hunk #1 succeeded at 5 with fuzz 1. > patching file etc/freshclam.conf Thanks, I'll get it fixed. Regards, Bill
Re: [toaster] Submitting spam to Bayesian filter from SquirrelMail
On Wednesday 05 Apr 2006 19:55, Nikki Locke wrote: > Bob Hutchinson wrote: > > The squirrelmail spam-button plugin works for me. > > .. > > > This will allow your customers to train spamassassin. > > > > Wether they will or not is another matter ;-( > > Pity the plugin doesn't delete the spam mail automatically. I bet there is a way, but I don't understand the squirrelmail API enough to identify the mail and delete it. > > There is at least one user (me) who will be using it religously! Personally I'm sticking to TMDA, despite the collateral mail. -- - Bob Hutchinson Midwales dot com -
Re: [toaster] Bandwidth Logging
These are well and good, but they do not report on POP3 connections. These are primarily SMTP connections. The other thing I'll mention is I wrote a tool to dump all of the data to SQL so that the data can be parsed and fed into my billing system. That way I can feed the boiled down monthly numbers into a bandwidth parser and calculate the overages for my clients. Pretty handy... does reports too. Thanks; Michael Bagnall ElusiveMind [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://elusivemind.net On Apr 5, 2006, at 3:43 PM, Seferovic Edvin wrote: http://www.enderunix.org/isoqlog/ my choice for that Regards, Edvin -Original Message- From: Bill Shupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mittwoch, 05. April 2006 20:43 To: toaster@shupp.org Subject: Re: [toaster] Bandwidth Logging Michael Bagnall wrote: Hey Guys; I have installed the toaster and everything works in a most excellent fashion. I have written a tool to give me usage and statistics reporting based on qmail log files. It's designed to help me determine how much email my clients are sending both using regular email and via EZMLM. I also wanted it to tell me how much bandwidth people use downloading their email. Granted, I could likely use a mathematical formula based on the size of each email and just double the amount delivered to their mail box and such, but I was hoping for something that would track connections where nothing was downloaded. Does this make sense? My thought was to have the username logged to the pop3 log file. That would provide the data needed to track the # of bytes and the session. Has anyone thought of this or should I pursue the more mathematical angle. Sounds like qmailanalog. See http://cr.yp.to/qmailanalog.html for more details. Regards, Bill
