Re: [toaster] SIMSCAN

2005-02-22 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
Eero Volotinen wrote:
There is some _benefits_, but I still recommed more cpu/memory power 
instead of it...

Can you elaborate on this?  I've found simscan to be significantly 
faster and easier to manage than qmail-scanner.  The load on my machines 
have reached an all time low due to simscan...

--
Eero

--
---
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
Engine / Technology Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RedHat Certified - RHCE # 803004140609871
MySQL Pro Certified - ID# 207171862
MySQL Core Certified - ID# 205982910
---
"Something mysterious is formed, born in the silent void. Waiting alone and 
unmoving, it is at once still and yet in constant motion. It is the source of all 
programs. I do not know its name, so I will call it the Tao of Programming."


Re: [toaster] SIMSCAN

2005-02-22 Thread Jeff Koch
Well, last night we switched one of our larger mailservers from 
qmail-scanner/fsavd to simscan/clamd and the improvement was dramatic. CPU 
usage fell from an average of 60% to less than 10% and the load average 
dropped from 3.00 to 4.00 down to .80 to 1.40. We would always have 4 or 5 
Perl processes showing on top and they are gone.

We'll wait a day of so and then convert the other mailservers.
At 01:03 AM 2/22/2005, you wrote:
Jeff Koch wrote:
It's been almost a year since I installed my last toaster and I see that 
Bill is now using simscan and clamav instead of qmail-scanner. What do 
you all think about simscan? - have you seen a substantial reduction in 
server load and cpu load?
I would love some opinions - we have four mailservers running with loads 
that are higher than we'd like and it would be easy to switch them over 
to simscan if the benefit is there.
There is some _benefits_, but I still recommed more cpu/memory power 
instead of it...

--
Eero
Best Regards,
Jeff Koch, Intersessions 



Re: [toaster] Zombie Connections

2005-02-22 Thread Tom Collins
On Feb 21, 2005, at 10:05 PM, Chris Moody wrote:
I'm not running SMTP auth.  All my SMTP is controlled specifically via 
tcp.smtp or relay-ctrl managed ip addresses.  The strange thing is 
that these messages do not seem to deliver...just sit in my queue and 
build up over time.
They will eventually (after 5 days) get doublebounced and go away.  If 
you were to pick one of of the queue and monitor it, it would disappear 
on its own.

I'm pretty sure the chkuser patch is what you want.
--
Tom Collins  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/  Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/
You don't need a laptop to troubleshoot high-speed Internet: 
sniffter.com