[PATCH 1/1] Correctly handle flags being empty in list-keys
Since the change in list-keys to make it copy and pastable in to a tmux
config file, the flags field which determines if the key binding is
repeatable, etc., prints garbage if the binding in question has no flags.
---
trunk/cmd-list-keys.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/trunk/cmd-list-keys.c b/trunk/cmd-list-keys.c
index c88bea2..bdf41ad 100644
--- a/trunk/cmd-list-keys.c
+++ b/trunk/cmd-list-keys.c
@@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ cmd_list_keys_exec(struct cmd *self, struct cmd_ctx *ctx)
return (cmd_list_keys_table(self, ctx));
width = 0;
+ memset(flags, '\0', sizeof flags);
+
SPLAY_FOREACH(bd, key_bindings, &key_bindings) {
key = key_string_lookup_key(bd->key & ~KEYC_PREFIX);
if (key == NULL)
--
1.7.4.1
--
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
___
tmux-users mailing list
tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
Re: tmux-double-click-on-status-line-opens-new-window.patch
this is a great idea. i've been interested in making tmux "tablet" friendly Heh well totally (: in various ways, and my current solution (dwm + xdotool + shell scripts that call tmux) is totally hack. i'd like to see this even expanded a bit so that one could in their .tmux.conf bind functions to mice clicks (assocaited with regions, e.g., bind left-click-statusbar neww... current mouse input is somewhat shaky, there seems to be quite a bit of indeterminism in what mouse actions trigger what events, albeit on different machines. What i wanted to do is implement a tail queue of recent mouse events providing a deeper back record that can be traversed with some degree of fuzziness so stuff like multi-button actions, focus tracking and even 'terminal gestures' could be quite easily put on top. Not sure when i'll get around to test-implement, very likely will take till after my Fluid Dynamics exam on 5th of August - terminal multiplexing _is_ important, so is getting my engineering diploma over the finishing line ^^ #regards/marcel p.s.: this tmux 'newskool text mode desktop thang' is ever so awesome, aint it? simply loving it. folks what about a lil' logo contest? ;D <>-- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2___ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
Re: [PATCH 1/1] Correctly handle flags being empty in list-keys
Whoops,fixed, thanks!
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 08:46:08AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> Since the change in list-keys to make it copy and pastable in to a tmux
> config file, the flags field which determines if the key binding is
> repeatable, etc., prints garbage if the binding in question has no flags.
> ---
> trunk/cmd-list-keys.c |2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/trunk/cmd-list-keys.c b/trunk/cmd-list-keys.c
> index c88bea2..bdf41ad 100644
> --- a/trunk/cmd-list-keys.c
> +++ b/trunk/cmd-list-keys.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ cmd_list_keys_exec(struct cmd *self, struct cmd_ctx *ctx)
> return (cmd_list_keys_table(self, ctx));
>
> width = 0;
> + memset(flags, '\0', sizeof flags);
> +
> SPLAY_FOREACH(bd, key_bindings, &key_bindings) {
> key = key_string_lookup_key(bd->key & ~KEYC_PREFIX);
> if (key == NULL)
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
> --
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> ___
> tmux-users mailing list
> tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
--
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
___
tmux-users mailing list
tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
