[techtalk] hdparm and DMA "not permitted"
Little problem here with hdparm and DMA. I'm using an AMD K6-2 350MHz on some kind of amibios mobo with "Ultra DMA Enabled" in CMOS but I cannot set "using dma" for the drive(s). [root]# /sbin/hdparm -d 1 /dev/hda /dev/hda: setting using_dma to 1 (on) HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted using_dma= 0 (off) dmesg returns: PCI_IDE: unknown IDE controller on PCI bus 00 device 78, VID=10b9, DID=5229 PCI_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later PCI_IDE: simplex device: DMA disabled ide0: PCI_IDE Bus-Master DMA disabled (BIOS) PCI_IDE: simplex device: DMA disabled ide1: PCI_IDE Bus-Master DMA disabled (BIOS) hda: Maxtor 91021U2, ATA DISK drive hdb: FUJITSU MPD3084AT, ATA DISK drive hdc: ATAPI 52X CDROM, ATAPI CDROM drive hdd: PHILIPS CDD3610 CD-R/RW, ATAPI CDROM drive ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15 hda: Maxtor 91021U2, 9770MB w/512kB Cache, CHS=1245/255/63 hdb: FUJITSU MPD3084AT, 8063MB w/512kB Cache, CHS=1027/255/63 Any thoughts? Conor -- Conor Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Domestic Sysadmin :-) - Faenor.cod.ie 11:04am up 23:12, 0 users, load average: 0.15, 0.18, 0.08 Hobbiton.cod.ie 11:04am up 4 min, 2 users, load average: 0.23, 0.33, 0.15 ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
Re: [techtalk] hdparm and DMA "not permitted"
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Conor Daly wrote: > Little problem here with hdparm and DMA. I'm using an AMD K6-2 350MHz on > some kind of amibios mobo with "Ultra DMA Enabled" in CMOS but I cannot > set "using dma" for the drive(s). > > [root]# /sbin/hdparm -d 1 /dev/hda > > /dev/hda: > setting using_dma to 1 (on) > HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted > using_dma= 0 (off) > > > dmesg returns: > > PCI_IDE: unknown IDE controller on PCI bus 00 device 78, VID=10b9, > DID=5229 > PCI_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later > PCI_IDE: simplex device: DMA disabled > ide0: PCI_IDE Bus-Master DMA disabled (BIOS) > PCI_IDE: simplex device: DMA disabled > ide1: PCI_IDE Bus-Master DMA disabled (BIOS) > hda: Maxtor 91021U2, ATA DISK drive > hdb: FUJITSU MPD3084AT, ATA DISK drive > hdc: ATAPI 52X CDROM, ATAPI CDROM drive > hdd: PHILIPS CDD3610 CD-R/RW, ATAPI CDROM drive > ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 > ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15 > hda: Maxtor 91021U2, 9770MB w/512kB Cache, CHS=1245/255/63 > hdb: FUJITSU MPD3084AT, 8063MB w/512kB Cache, CHS=1027/255/63 > > Any thoughts? Enabling DMA requires the right driver in the kernel; there is an option for "Generic PCI DMA support" or similar, which might be worth a try if you can't find an exact match for your IDE chipset. What does /proc/pci have to say about your IDE controller? This should tell you which driver to use - then just recompile, reboot, and you have DMA... James. ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
Fwd: Re: [techtalk] My bad NT day
I asked a colleague of mine who is/was using a FreeBSD box as firewall for comments. Here's what he said... Conor - Forwarded message from Steffen Higel - On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 08:42:52PM +0100, Conor Daly articulated: > > Did you get your FreeBSD firewall set up? Would you care to contribute > your thoughts to the above? I did indeed get it up and running, with NAT and firewalling. At present, the machine is sitting gathering dust as my Alpha can only run GNU/Linux, and it is handling dial up and security duties. (blasphemous that such a powerful machine is doing that and seti, but hey...) OpenBSD firewalling from what I can tell isn't too different. It uses the familiar ipfw to add rules. I think it uses the same ppp as FreeBSD, which handles NAT itself. If you are connected to the internet using anything other than a ppp connection, you should use natd to handle what GNU/Linux people know as ipmasqing. I'd say go for it,(Free|Open)BSD are as if not more capable than GNU/Linux in a majority of circumstances. There are a few differences here and there from the sysadmins perspective, but overall it is a pleasurable experience. Hope that helps, any questions, fire 'em my way. -- Steffen Higel - End forwarded message - -- Conor Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Domestic Sysadmin :-) - Faenor.cod.ie 11:13am up 23:21, 0 users, load average: 0.08, 0.03, 0.03 Hobbiton.cod.ie 11:13am up 14 min, 2 users, load average: 0.02, 0.09, 0.09 ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
Re: [techtalk] Yet Another Installation Question
From: Mary Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 08:49:20PM +0100, Conor Daly wrote: > > Interesting something comes to mind there... What will it cost me to put > > /home on an NFS volume over a 4-box 10Mbit network? It's gotta be slower > > than local disk but you get to carry your settings across boxes. Not that > > anyone else in the house uses much more than the "main" computer though. > > Having had thar experience at both work and uni (although the networks may be > 100MB) I don't think you notice the difference, except that large file moves > will be slower. Not to be the mistress of understatement, but I found a big difference between double-digit nets (16Mb token ring) and triple digit nets (220Mb glass). If possible, as in, Conor is wiring his house himself, I'd suggest going with 100Mb copper. -- Julie. ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
[techtalk] Re: [ILUG] hdparm and DMA "not permitted"
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Conor Daly wrote: > ide0: PCI_IDE Bus-Master DMA disabled (BIOS) > ide1: PCI_IDE Bus-Master DMA disabled (BIOS) > Any thoughts? uh... DMA is disabled in the BIOS? :) eg, perhaps you've manually set the disks i9n the bios to PIO only? so try just setting them to "auto" or similar, and see what happens. > > Conor > --paulj ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
[techtalk] New E-mail addy
Greets, For those of you who care, my new e-mail address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please update your address book. -- Julie. ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
Re: [techtalk] hdparm and DMA "not permitted"
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:17:18PM +0100 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, James Sutherland thought: > On Sun, 20 May 2001, Conor Daly wrote: > > > Little problem here with hdparm and DMA. I'm using an AMD K6-2 350MHz on > > some kind of amibios mobo with "Ultra DMA Enabled" in CMOS but I cannot > > set "using dma" for the drive(s). > > > > [root]# /sbin/hdparm -d 1 /dev/hda > > > > /dev/hda: > > setting using_dma to 1 (on) > > HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted > > using_dma= 0 (off) > > > > > > dmesg returns: > > > > PCI_IDE: unknown IDE controller on PCI bus 00 device 78, VID=10b9, > > DID=5229 > > PCI_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later > > PCI_IDE: simplex device: DMA disabled > > hda: Maxtor 91021U2, 9770MB w/512kB Cache, CHS=1245/255/63 > > hdb: FUJITSU MPD3084AT, 8063MB w/512kB Cache, CHS=1027/255/63 > > > > Any thoughts? > > Enabling DMA requires the right driver in the kernel; there is an option > for "Generic PCI DMA support" or similar, which might be worth a try if > you can't find an exact match for your IDE chipset. > > What does /proc/pci have to say about your IDE controller? This should > tell you which driver to use - then just recompile, reboot, and you have > DMA... /proc/pci has this to say... Bus 0, device 15, function 0: IDE interface: Acer Labs M5229 TXpro (rev 193). Medium devsel. Fast back-to-back capable. Master Capable. Latency=32. Min Gnt=2.Max Lat=4. I/O at 0xffa0 [0xffa1]. will poke around the kernel and see what I come up with. Somebody else said something about ### hda: Maxtor 91021U2, ATA DISK drive hdb: FUJITSU MPD3084AT, ATA DISK drive Longshot here, but wasn't there at one stage a fairly serious problem with these makes of drive interoperating on the same IDE controller? ### Anyone know anything about that? I haven't had any issues myself with these two drives. Conor -- Conor Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Domestic Sysadmin :-) - Faenor.cod.ie 2:47pm up 1 day, 2:56, 0 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Hobbiton.cod.ie 2:47pm up 3:48, 1 user, load average: 0.37, 0.14, 0.04 ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
[techtalk] Harping on Win 2K
Sorry to bring this up, if you are not running Win 2K ignore this. But I did some more research on the hack attempt on my home server the other day and found some interesting articles on a mailing list. It appears that even if you have installed the security patches--if you install SP2 you have to go back and reinstall those patches for the OS and IIS5 as well. The guy talking about it was able to scan his registry and found that the security patches he installed pre SP2 were removed. If you are interested let me know. -sap ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
Re: [techtalk] My bad NT day
On Sat, 19 May 2001, coldfire wrote: > i guess if it's your thing, you'll really stand by it ;P i have a friend > who's totally into FreeBSD, but i always here him complaining about lack > of documentation and lack of support for some of his hardware. maybe he's > just an idiot though :) It does come down to what you are most comfortable with. When I moved from BSDI to Linux I had a rough time dealing with /home/scott instead or /usr/var/shell/scott, but I was able to get it over it quickly. The bottom line is that we support each other and to improve the options that are available to us. I respect the BSD family as they have some great track records. I support the Linux family as the innovation is great, the stability is awesome and the fact it just works is tops for me. To quote ID4, "spread the word"! -sap ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
[techtalk] PWM grouping windows
Someone mentioned the window manager PWM the other day. There is an
option in pwm.conf for grouping Netscape. I was wondering if anyone has
gotten any other applications to group like xterm or gnome-terminal?
I've tried various instances of -
winprop "Xterm.xterm" {
frame 10
}
but can't get any of them to work.
Thanks,
kent
--
From seeing and seeing the seeing has become so exhausted
First line of "The Panther" - R. M. Rilke
___
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
Re: [techtalk] Yet Another Installation Question
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 10:38:20PM -0500 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, Julie thought: > From: Mary Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 08:49:20PM +0100, Conor Daly wrote: > > > Interesting something comes to mind there... What will it cost me to > put > > > /home on an NFS volume over a 4-box 10Mbit network? It's gotta be > slower > > > than local disk but you get to carry your settings across boxes. Not > that > > > anyone else in the house uses much more than the "main" computer though. > > > > Having had thar experience at both work and uni (although the networks may > be > > 100MB) I don't think you notice the difference, except that large file > moves > > will be slower. > > Not to be the mistress of understatement, but I found a big > difference between double-digit nets (16Mb token ring) and > triple digit nets (220Mb glass). > > If possible, as in, Conor is wiring his house himself, I'd > suggest going with 100Mb copper. You mean 8-core cat5 cabling? Thet's the plan then all I gotta do is get 100Mbit hubs and NICs. I somehow doubt that it's that crucial though for the home environment. Conor -- Conor Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Domestic Sysadmin :-) - Faenor.cod.ie 6:27pm up 1 day, 6:35, 0 users, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.01 Hobbiton.cod.ie 6:27pm up 7:28, 2 users, load average: 0.06, 0.06, 0.01 ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
Re: [techtalk] hdparm and DMA "not permitted"
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Conor Daly wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:17:18PM +0100 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, > James Sutherland thought: > > On Sun, 20 May 2001, Conor Daly wrote: > > > > > Little problem here with hdparm and DMA. I'm using an AMD K6-2 350MHz on > > > some kind of amibios mobo with "Ultra DMA Enabled" in CMOS but I cannot > > > set "using dma" for the drive(s). > > > > > > [root]# /sbin/hdparm -d 1 /dev/hda > > > > > > /dev/hda: > > > setting using_dma to 1 (on) > > > HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted > > > using_dma= 0 (off) > > > > > > > > > dmesg returns: > > > > > > PCI_IDE: unknown IDE controller on PCI bus 00 device 78, VID=10b9, > > > DID=5229 > > > PCI_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later > > > PCI_IDE: simplex device: DMA disabled > > > hda: Maxtor 91021U2, 9770MB w/512kB Cache, CHS=1245/255/63 > > > hdb: FUJITSU MPD3084AT, 8063MB w/512kB Cache, CHS=1027/255/63 > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > Enabling DMA requires the right driver in the kernel; there is an option > > for "Generic PCI DMA support" or similar, which might be worth a try if > > you can't find an exact match for your IDE chipset. > > > > What does /proc/pci have to say about your IDE controller? This should > > tell you which driver to use - then just recompile, reboot, and you have > > DMA... > > /proc/pci has this to say... > > Bus 0, device 15, function 0: > IDE interface: Acer Labs M5229 TXpro (rev 193). > Medium devsel. Fast back-to-back capable. Master Capable. > Latency=32. Min Gnt=2.Max Lat=4. > I/O at 0xffa0 [0xffa1]. > > will poke around the kernel and see what I come up with. Hmm - can't see a specific driver. Enabling "Generic PCI bus-master DMA support" and "Use PCI DMA by default when available" (under "Generic PCI IDE chipset support") should give you DMA, though... > Somebody else said something about > > ### > hda: Maxtor 91021U2, ATA DISK drive > hdb: FUJITSU MPD3084AT, ATA DISK drive > > Longshot here, but wasn't there at one stage a fairly serious problem > with these makes of drive interoperating on the same IDE controller? > ### > > Anyone know anything about that? I haven't had any issues myself with > these two drives. I remember something similar, but can't recall the details ATM - trawling the LKML archives should reveal more details, though? James. -- "Our attitude with TCP/IP is, `Hey, we'll do it, but don't make a big system, because we can't fix it if it breaks -- nobody can.'" "TCP/IP is OK if you've got a little informal club, and it doesn't make any difference if it takes a while to fix it." -- Ken Olson, in Digital News, 1988 ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
Re: [techtalk] PWM grouping windows
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 01:50:28PM -0500, ktb wrote:
> Someone mentioned the window manager PWM the other day. There is an
> option in pwm.conf for grouping Netscape. I was wondering if anyone has
> gotten any other applications to group like xterm or gnome-terminal?
> I've tried various instances of -
> winprop "Xterm.xterm" {
> frame 10
> }
> but can't get any of them to work.
> Thanks,
> kent
It was I who mentioned PWM but unfortunately I can't help you much with the
configuration - I've only been using it for a few weeks.
I tend not to do much configuration for my tools until I really need it :(
Mary.
--
Mary Gardiner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG Key ID: 77625870
___
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
Re: [techtalk] Yet Another Installation Question
From: Conor Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 10:38:20PM -0500 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, > Julie thought: > > Not to be the mistress of understatement, but I found a big > > difference between double-digit nets (16Mb token ring) and > > triple digit nets (220Mb glass). > > > > If possible, as in, Conor is wiring his house himself, I'd > > suggest going with 100Mb copper. > > You mean 8-core cat5 cabling? Thet's the plan then all I gotta do is get > 100Mbit hubs and NICs. I somehow doubt that it's that crucial though for > the home environment. Yes, Cat5 and a 100Mb switch (not a hub) and 100Mb NICs. Think about the transfer rates on your disks and CDs and then think about how many machines you're going to have on your LAN. The idea is to keep your network from being the slowest component. In other words, make sure there is enough network bandwidth to hand disk I/O and then you're just as limited by disk I/O rates remotely as you are locally. That was as your CPU and disks get faster (they always do, right?) you'll see the performance improvement passed along. If you start off limited by your LAN things never get faster ... -- Julie. ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
[techtalk] Star Office - failed to load necessary component
Hi! I have a problem with Star Office 5.2 on RedHat 7.1. Star Office is being installed with the /net option on a local harddisk. The user's homes get mounted from an HP server via NFS. When a new user executes "soffice" for the first time, the user part of the installation process runs as it should. When the user runs "soffice" for the first time AFTER the user installation, the program fails with the error message "failed to load the necessary components". I have been told that this message means that the file ~/.user52.rdb is corrupted and that deleting this file should fix it. At first, this seemed to work. Star Office started perfectly. But when I tried to start Star Office for the second time, it showed a Basic error message and the icons on the desktop were missing. During the following attempts several other error messages occured. I've also been told that there are problems with the NFS server that can cause these errors to happen. I was able to exclude this possibility because the server machine is the same as for our RedHat 6.2 machines on which Star Office works perfectly. When a user who has already been using Star Office on RedHat 6.2 moves to 7.1 with the configuration files in place Star Office also works on RedHat 7.1. Sun Microsystems only told me to "please make sure you really use Star Office 5.2" ... very funny ... especially if you consider that I wrote that I was using 5.2 serveral times in my message just to make sure they wouldn't give me their "default answer" :-( I really would appreciate any help. Has anyone knowledge of the details of the configuration files Star Office writes to a user's home directory? Or any other hints? I really don't want to have to tell our users to boot Win2K and use MS Office when we upgrade to RedHat 7.1 in the next couple of days :-( Christina -- --- "I smile because I have no idea what's going on." --- ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
[techtalk] IRC security with Linux
This is such a newbie question but here goes. Someone in the IRC channel #linuxhelp on undernet told me about a patch I should get for IRC security (kernek patch) and I'm wondering which kernel needs to be upgraded for that. The server is running Caldera 2.4 and kernel 2.2.14. The client is running Mandrake 8 with the 2.4.3-20mk kernel. I've got rc.firewall running on Caldera and the built in Bastille firewall running on Mandrake. Is it preventing me from uploading via DCC in irc because I have two firewalls? I'm afraid of turning off my client firewall for fear the firewall I set up on Caldera isn't very good. Thanks! Joe __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
Re: [techtalk] PWM grouping windows
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 01:50:28PM -0500, ktb wrote:
> Someone mentioned the window manager PWM the other day. There is an
> option in pwm.conf for grouping Netscape. I was wondering if anyone has
> gotten any other applications to group like xterm or gnome-terminal?
> I've tried various instances of -
> winprop "Xterm.xterm" {
> frame 10
> }
> but can't get any of them to work.
Hi,
just tried PWM ... wow! it's simply great. Up to the very moment I've
been a real fan of wmx [1], but this one seems to be even better!
Thanks Mary for mentioning it :)
As to your grouping problem, Kent, I think it's simply "XTerm.xterm"
(note the capital T) -- at least that works for me. In case of doubt
about a window's class/instance properties, just use xprop(1) (and
look for WM_CLASS).
- Almut
[1] wmx-6: http://www.all-day-breakfast.com/wmx/
(just in case someone wants to try another simplistic wm)
___
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
Re: [techtalk] PWM grouping windows
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 08:13:56AM +1000, Mary Gardiner wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 01:50:28PM -0500, ktb wrote:
> > Someone mentioned the window manager PWM the other day. There is an
> > option in pwm.conf for grouping Netscape. I was wondering if anyone has
> > gotten any other applications to group like xterm or gnome-terminal?
> > I've tried various instances of -
> > winprop "Xterm.xterm" {
> > frame 10
> > }
> > but can't get any of them to work.
> > Thanks,
> > kent
>
> It was I who mentioned PWM but unfortunately I can't help you much with the
> configuration - I've only been using it for a few weeks.
>
> I tend not to do much configuration for my tools until I really need it :(
Not configure, how do you do it;) I'm really glad you mentioned PWM, I
ditched window maker for it. It's light and I love the way you can
group at least Netscape and xterm into one window and toggle between
them with keys.
I finally found this worked for xterm in my setup -
winprop "Xterm.term" {
frame 1
}
Then start xterm with "-name term" all will be loaded into one frame.
kent
--
From seeing and seeing the seeing has become so exhausted
First line of "The Panther" - R. M. Rilke
___
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
[techtalk] (no subject)
Some other things one might consider are: -turning off ipforwarding entierely and running heavily logged proxies instead -turning off access from TROTW (The Rest Of The World) to things you need through hosts.deny/hosts.access rules -keeping up with bugtraq advisories and new security patches provided for your distro -providing physical security and improving your boundaries against "social engineering" (otherwise known as learning how to keep a secret) -coming up with more effective strategies for dealing with intruders (e.g. honeypots and off-site logging, doing the diffs auto- matically, setting alarm levels appropriately, etc) Perhaps the least effective security measure is throwing your toys on-list. It's uh...*pretty* silly. The closest thing I've seen to an out-of-the-box linux firewall would be the SuSE "minimal install" followed by running the hardsuse script. There is a description of what this does at: http://portal.suse.de/en/content.php?SEARCH&content/security/secure_webserv.html And even Marc Heuse recommends OpenBSD for those who aren't 100% satisfied with the measures taken in hardSuSE and, say, Bastille. And don't underestimate the power of unplugging your network from the rest of the world if you have security concerns. Cheryl ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
Re: [techtalk] PWM grouping windows
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 09:58:15PM -0500, ktb wrote:
> Not configure, how do you do it;) I'm really glad you mentioned PWM, I
> ditched window maker for it. It's light and I love the way you can
> group at least Netscape and xterm into one window and toggle between
> them with keys.
>
> I finally found this worked for xterm in my setup -
> winprop "Xterm.term" {
> frame 1
> }
>
> Then start xterm with "-name term" all will be loaded into one frame.
> kent
Woohoo, sounds good.
My last wm was windowmaker too (don't like double clicking at all), sawfish on
Helix Gnome before that and fvwm2 before that.
Here's to PWM and key-bindings.
Mary.
--
Mary Gardiner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG Key ID: 77625870
___
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
