[Tagging] bicycle_parking=? for stands where handlebar is used to hold bicycle in position

[Toggenburger Lukas]

Hi all

The kind of bicycle stand you can see in the attached picture is present every 
then and when in Switzerland and possibly in other parts of the world as well.

How would you tag this? None of the values described at 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking seem to fit well.

Best regards

Lukas___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] bicycle_parking=? for stands where handlebar is used to hold bicycle in position

[Toggenburger Lukas]

Thank you Hidde!

I've added a german translation of your text at 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:DE:Bicycle_parking

I did a small crosscheck: At 
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/L0mLQtnwvDlEfB0tHlzeAQ I've found a picture of 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697927260 that was tagged with 
bicycle_parking=handlebar_holder about a year ago. That seems to add up.

Do we need additional steps to make this value "official"? I would like to 
propose it as an additional option in StreetComplete ( 
https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete ) but don't want to do it 
prematurely.




Von: Hidde Wieringa 
Gesendet: Sonntag, 14. Juni 2020 17:01
An: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: Re: [Tagging] bicycle_parking=? for stands where handlebar is used to 
hold bicycle in position

The table with value in the bicycle_parking wiki has been updated with this new 
value handlebar_holder.

The photo has been uploaded to WikiMedia Commons (CC0).

Kind regards,
Hidde Wieringa


On 13-06-2020 23:22, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
Can you take your own photo of such bicycle parking and upload it to Wikimedia 
Commons ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page )?

Given that it is a clearly distinct bicycle parking type it would be nice to 
add it to the list on Wiki.

Jun 13, 2020, 21:56 by hi...@hiddewieringa.nl:

Hello,

The wiki for bicycle_parking suggests that additional values may be used. When 
I look in the TagInfo for the key 
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/bicycle_parking, then I find 
bicycle_parking=handlebar_holder which seems to fit your description/photo.

See some example locations here: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/V2l

For completeness, these methods of parking your bicycle also exist in The 
Netherlands.

Kind regards,
Hidde Wieringa


On 13-06-2020 21:47, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
It probably needs a new value, maybe one
not yet documented on that page.

Looks like equivalent of bicycle_parking=ground_slots
(0 security, but designated place to leave bicycle)
but is something different.


Jun 13, 2020, 20:52 by 
lukas.toggenbur...@fhgr.ch:
Hi all

The kind of bicycle stand you can see in the attached picture is present every 
then and when in Switzerland and possibly in other parts of the world as well.

How would you tag this? None of the values described at 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking seem to fit well.

Best regards

Lukas



___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging






___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging



___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] bicycle_parking=? for stands where handlebar is used to hold bicycle in position

[Toggenburger Lukas]

Hidde, good links you posted!

I started with a pull request for Vespucci: 
https://github.com/simonpoole/beautified-JOSM-preset/pull/187

I will continue with pull requests for the other editors...
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] addr:street=* combined with place=square, name=*

[Toggenburger Lukas]

Hi

I'm the main author of the address view of Geofabrik's OSM inspector: 
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses , a QA tool for OSM, whose 
sourcecode you can find at https://github.com/ltog/osmi-addresses/ 

Some time ago I received the following issue and subsequent pull request:

- https://github.com/ltog/osmi-addresses/issues/111
- https://github.com/ltog/osmi-addresses/pull/115

The submitter johsin18 proposes the following:

Given a (node|way) with addr:street=theName and a (node|way) with place=square, 
name=theName, the first object should logically be tied to the second. 
Correspondingly, osmi-addresses should recognize this and not display it as an 
error as it is currently the case, e.g. at: 
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=7.59448&lat=47.54290&zoom=18&overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,entrances_deprecated,entrances,no_addr_street,street_not_found,place_not_found,misformatted_housenumber,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads,nearest_areas,addrx_on_nonclosed_way

osmi-addresses currently expects either
addr:street=* used in combination with highway=*, name=*
or 
addr:place=* used in combination with place=*, name=*

Both myself and the current maintainer of osmi-addresses (=Nakaner) are unsure 
if this proposed change would be appreciated by the larger public or not. We 
are therefore seeking your opinion.

Best regards

Lukas

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging