Re: [Tagging] [Voting] Feature Proposal - GTFS Tagging standard

[Zoon van Michiel]

Dear Tagging Mailing List,

Two weeks have passed and there were only 4 votes cast.
If you haven't voted, I encourage to read through the proposal and vote.
I will extend the deadline by another two weeks.
The new deadline is March 11th

Proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:GTFS_Tagging_Standard
Forum RFC thread: 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-feature-proposal-gtfs-tagging-standard/105763
Forum Voting thread: 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/voting-feature-proposal-gtfs-tagging-standard/106566/3
Kind Regards,
Jelmer
On Feb 11 2024, at 12:35 pm, Zoon van Michiel  wrote:
> Dear Tagging mailing list,
>
> I have started a new vote on my proposal for a GTFS tagging standard.
> The previous vote was aborted as many felt there was insufficient discussion.
> Since then I have made the following mayor changes to the proposal:
> Removed the feed relation which made the proposed scheme quite complicated
>
> Replaced it with a wiki page to manage the feed codes and the download URL's
>
>
>
> Links:
> Proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:GTFS_Tagging_Standard
> Forum RFC thread: 
> https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-feature-proposal-gtfs-tagging-standard/105763
>  
> (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-feature-proposal-gtfs-tagging-standard/105763/31)
>
> Forum Voting thread: 
> https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/voting-feature-proposal-gtfs-tagging-standard/106566/3
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Jelmer___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Deprecating demolished railway tags

[Volker Schmidt]

I put a comment in the discussion page, which is a pointer to the outline
of a counter-proposal.
Please have a look.
Thank you

On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 05:31, Ewrt1 OSM  wrote:

> This proposal aims to deprecate all Demolished Railway tags.
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Deprecating_demolished_railway_tags
> Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page.
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] [Voting] Feature Proposal - Barbers (hairdresser=barber)

[Nathan Case]

Hi all,

Voting has started for Barbers (hairdresser=barber): 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Barbers



 * [RFC] Barbers (hairdresser=barber) 

 * Previous community discussion 


As noted in the Community Forum 
 
voting announcement, the main objections raised in the RFC were:

 *

   *We don’t have barbers in X location:*
   It is clear that in some locations, the concept of a barbers does not exist 
or is not well understood. Whilst I do think we should try to make tags as 
understandable as possible to mappers, it seems that if the concept of a 
barbers doesn’t exist in X location, then it simply doesn’t need to be used in 
that location.

 *

   *male=yes is good enough*
   Although documented as an access restriction, it is clear that |male=*| is 
not always used as such and is instead sometimes used as a more generic 
descriptor. However, I still believe explicit tagging is better than relying on 
gender tags.

 *

   *Use a different tagging scheme*
   Some suggest using a different tagging scheme (e.g., |barbers=yes/no/only|). 
I understand the rationale and I don’t think there is a right or wrong way, 
however, we should chose one. I’ve kept with |hairdresser=barber| as this was 
the majority vote in the original discussion.

One (non-minor) change was made during the RFC:

 * *Semi-colon delimiter lists*
   Although not strictly part of the proposal, tagging businesses that are both 
a hairdresser’s salon and a barbers was raised. The suggestion from the 
community discussion was to use semi-colon delimiter lists (e.g., 
|hairdresser=salon, barber|). I added this to the tagging section of the 
proposal.

Many thanks to all who contributed to the discussion!
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Deprecating demolished railway tags

[Frederik Ramm]

Hi,

On 26/02/2024 05:26, Ewrt1 OSM wrote:

This proposal aims to deprecate all Demolished Railway tags.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Deprecating_demolished_railway_tags
Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page.


Please don't discuss this proposal on the wiki talk page, or at least 
not without having read and understood the rather long discussion in


https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposing-to-deprecate-railway-razed-and-railway-dismantled/109679

- else you'll just repeat what has been said there.

Bye
Frederik

--
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frede...@remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging