Re: [Tagging] [Talk-GB] Fords and how to provide information to help with routing apps

[ael via Tagging]

On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 03:14:47PM +0100, Ian Dent wrote:
> Previously it was tagged as ford=impassable but this isn't a valid value and

On reflection, that doesn't seem such a bad tag. Why not just document
this on the wiki after discussion on the tagging list? Then it
should be a supported tag, and Komoot should add it to their routing
algorithm.

On the tagging list, you might want to discuss whether there should be 
grades of impassability...

ael


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-GB] Fords and how to provide information to help with routing apps

[Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging]

Jul 4, 2023, 17:05 by tagging@openstreetmap.org:

> On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 03:14:47PM +0100, Ian Dent wrote:
>
>> Previously it was tagged as ford=impassable but this isn't a valid value and
>>
>
> On reflection, that doesn't seem such a bad tag.
>
ford=impassable makes no sense

ford is by definition a passable place across waterway, if 
something is impassable then it is not a ford

if passage across waterway become destroyed: delete that
section of road/cycleway/footway.

(as usual, if really needed it is possible to temporarily use
lifecycle prefixes to prevent bad edits if nothing is left,
or map disused:highway= as long as some remains are visible

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging