Re: [Tagging] barrows and tumuli
Am Mi., 18. Jan. 2023 um 19:43 Uhr schrieb Philip Barnes < p...@trigpoint.me.uk>: > I am using local knowledge here, > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soulton_Long_Barrow > > It has been featured on Country File so known outside The Shire. > architectural style: "neoneolithic", ok, a fake neolithic structure, this is something that occurs occasionally, e.g. fake "castles", fake caves, fake buildings, fake trees, etc. I do not believe we should generally use a different key just because there is a handful of other objects in the world that do not fit. Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] barrows and tumuli
The one I mentioned is a bit unique. It's not fake or a folly, it is an active place for burials. The internal construction is clear on the current bing imagery. Phil On 19 January 2023 09:04:14 GMT, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >Am Mi., 18. Jan. 2023 um 19:43 Uhr schrieb Philip Barnes < >p...@trigpoint.me.uk>: > >> I am using local knowledge here, >> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soulton_Long_Barrow >> >> It has been featured on Country File so known outside The Shire. >> > > >architectural style: "neoneolithic", ok, a fake neolithic structure, this >is something that occurs occasionally, e.g. fake "castles", fake caves, >fake buildings, fake trees, etc. >I do not believe we should generally use a different key just because there >is a handful of other objects in the world that do not fit. > >Cheers, >Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] barrows and tumuli
sent from a phone > On 19 Jan 2023, at 10:25, Philip Barnes wrote: > > The one I mentioned is a bit unique. It's not fake or a folly, it is an > active place for burials. it may not be “fake” in the sense of pretending to be something different, but it mimics neolithic construction principles although it isn’t from the neolithic era. (I agree “fake” may not be the correct term, hard to tell from 2 pictures but I guess the architects sent out some hints that this is a modern structure, trying to avoid creating the impression that it is actually ancient). Still this (exception) is more a prove that these are almost always (pre)historic than a hint that we must use a different key. Cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
