Re: [Tagging] amenity=hospital on things that are not hospitals - is it a good idea?
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 09:44:50AM +0100, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > "sign having a hospital icon and no name can simply be tagged > type=destination_sign + amenity=hospital" > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign if similar stuff occurs frequently I would suggest opening also a JOSM validator ticket Richard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Pedestrian lane
Hi everyone, Following the recent discussion about pedestrian lanes (marked lanes on a roadway, designated for pedestrians), i've now written a proposal page for a new key pedestrian_lane=*: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Pedestrian_lane Best regards Markus ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Pedestrian lane
currently your proposal is a description of the physical appearance of the feature, but for highways what is needed are usually functional and legal definitions. A cycleway is a way designated for bicycles, a motorway excludes slow traffic, and so on. To make sense of a pedestrian lane it would either have to bear implications on different modes of transport (e.g. in Switzerland motor vehicles can use this lane, unlike sidewalks or other footways), or we would have to state these for every instance of it (like we do for example with gates). currently the proposal doesn’t say anything about it. Cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
