Re: [Tagging] minibus routes

[althio]

On 26 June 2017 at 14:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> 2017-06-26 10:05 GMT+02:00 althio:
>>
>> + bus=minibus
>
> bus, according to the wiki, is a legal access restriction. Or do you suggest
> to use the same tags in different ways, according to the context?

Hi Martin,

If you really ask me how to deal with context and disambiguation, I would say:
- we should use (optional/under the hood) namespace for cascaded tags.

type=route
+ [type:]route=bus
+ [type:][route:]bus=minibus

highway=*
+ [access:]bus=yes/no
(under the hood, really it could be
[access:][vehicle:][motor_vehicle:][psv:]bus=*)

So, I guess, yes: I suggest to use the same tags in different ways,
according to the context.
If this is too much trouble (for the wiki, API, wherever?) then it
could be route:bus=minibus with compulsory namespace.
Then bus=* stays only a legal access restriction and nothing collides.

-- althio

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] minibus routes

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

2017-06-27 12:54 GMT+02:00 althio :

> So, I guess, yes: I suggest to use the same tags in different ways,
> according to the context.
>



This is fine --- as long as those tags are prefixed like in your examples
(i.e. a part is recurring, but the tag as a whole is distinct).

Using an implicit context would be asking for trouble.

Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] fire hydrants

[Viking]

I've updated the page [1], according to François' suggestions. Please check it.
Alberto

[1] 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Fire_Hydrant_Extensions




---
Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging