Re: [Tagging] admin_level on nodes: wiki vs practice

2014-05-11 Thread sabas88
On 11 May 2014 06:32, "Fernando Trebien"  wrote:
>
> Hm I've looked up a few other cities (Hamburg, Munich, Cologne, Lyon,
> Marseille, Rotterdam, Zurich, Manchester, Birmingham, Salzburg,
> Aarhus) and they do not have an admin_level tag on the place=* node.
> At the same time, I found some other cities that do: Paris [1],
> Kopenhagen [2], Barcelona [3], Madrid [4], Brussels [5], Amsterdam
> [6], Bern [7], Vienna [8], Rome [9], Milan [10]:

In Italy we use capital=* with the corresponding (minimum) admin level, so
Rome has capital=2 and so on..

Regards,
Stefano

>
> [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/17807753
> [2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13707878
> [3] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/152364165
> [4] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/21068295
> [5] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1635651356
> [6] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/268396336
> [7] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/18477455
> [8] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/17328659
> [9] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/72959652
> [10] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/62505581
>
> I see an approximate pattern: capital cities tend to have an
> admin_level tag, others tend not to have it. Maybe it's something in
> use for backward compatibility, such as an with and old renderer that
> uses it instead of the capital tag to render a label at lower zoom
> levels.
>
> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Andreas Goss 
wrote:
> >> Berlin
> >
> >
> > Honestly looks like and error nobody has noticed yet. I mean
admin_level=2 ?
> > Berlin is a city state which might justify =4, but unless we somehow tag
> > capitals like this I don't see the reasoning behind this tag in the
first
> > place.
> >
> > Andi
> > __
> > openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88
> > wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88‎
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> --
> Fernando Trebien
> +55 (51) 9962-5409
>
> "Nullius in verba."
>
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] admin_level on nodes: wiki vs practice

2014-05-11 Thread Colin Smale
 

See also the use of the admin_centre in boundary relations. This allows
a place to have a different role/importance for each admin area it is
in. An interesting case is Amsterdam, which is the capital of NL but not
the provincial capital of the province it is in (that's Haarlem). The
tagging reflects the facts, and how they are represented on the map is a
matter for the renderer... 

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary 

Colin 

On 2014-05-11 10:37, sabas88 wrote: 

> On 11 May 2014 06:32, "Fernando Trebien"  wrote:
>>
>> Hm I've looked up a few other cities (Hamburg, Munich, Cologne, Lyon,
>> Marseille, Rotterdam, Zurich, Manchester, Birmingham, Salzburg,
>> Aarhus) and they do not have an admin_level tag on the place=* node.
>> At the same time, I found some other cities that do: Paris [1],
>> Kopenhagen [2], Barcelona [3], Madrid [4], Brussels [5], Amsterdam
>> [6], Bern [7], Vienna [8], Rome [9], Milan [10]: 
> 
> In Italy we use capital=* with the corresponding (minimum) admin level, so 
> Rome has capital=2 and so on.. 
> 
> Regards,
> Stefano 
> 
>> 
>> [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/17807753 [2]
>> [2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13707878 [3]
>> [3] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/152364165 [4]
>> [4] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/21068295 [5]
>> [5] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1635651356 [6]
>> [6] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/268396336 [7]
>> [7] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/18477455 [8]
>> [8] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/17328659 [9]
>> [9] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/72959652 [10]
>> [10] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/62505581 [11]
>>
>> I see an approximate pattern: capital cities tend to have an
>> admin_level tag, others tend not to have it. Maybe it's something in
>> use for backward compatibility, such as an with and old renderer that
>> uses it instead of the capital tag to render a label at lower zoom
>> levels.
>>
>> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Andreas Goss  wrote:
>> >> Berlin
>> >
>> >
>> > Honestly looks like and error nobody has noticed yet. I mean admin_level=2 
>> > ?
>> > Berlin is a city state which might justify =4, but unless we somehow tag
>> > capitals like this I don't see the reasoning behind this tag in the first
>> > place.
>> >
>> > Andi
>> > __
>> > openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88 [12]
>> > wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88 [13]‎
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Tagging mailing list
>> > Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging [1]
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fernando Trebien
>> +55 (51) 9962-5409
>>
>> "Nullius in verba."
>>
>> ___
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging [1] 
> 
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging [1]
 

Links:
--
[1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/17807753
[3] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13707878
[4] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/152364165
[5] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/21068295
[6] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1635651356
[7] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/268396336
[8] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/18477455
[9] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/17328659
[10] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/72959652
[11] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/62505581
[12] http://openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88
[13] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] access=public and access=yes

2014-05-11 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer


> Am 10/mag/2014 um 19:19 schrieb bulwersator :
> 
> Is there any difference between access=public and access=yes?


I am not aware of any, seems synonymous to me in the access context, suggest to 
normalize to yes

cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] access=public and access=yes

2014-05-11 Thread Richard Welty
On 5/11/14 5:48 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>> Am 10/mag/2014 um 19:19 schrieb bulwersator :
>>
>> Is there any difference between access=public and access=yes?
>
> I am not aware of any, seems synonymous to me in the access context, suggest 
> to normalize to yes
>
i concur.

richard

-- 
rwe...@averillpark.net
 Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
 OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
 Java - Web Applications - Search




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] admin_level on nodes: wiki vs practice

2014-05-11 Thread Andreas Goss
In the German Forum we came to the conclusion that the idea probably was 
to indicate it's the capital (which should be done with role: 
admin_centre) http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=25418


I removed that Tag from Berlin.

Andi

Am 5/11/14 06:31 , schrieb Fernando Trebien:

Hm I've looked up a few other cities (Hamburg, Munich, Cologne, Lyon,
Marseille, Rotterdam, Zurich, Manchester, Birmingham, Salzburg,
Aarhus) and they do not have an admin_level tag on the place=* node.
At the same time, I found some other cities that do: Paris [1],
Kopenhagen [2], Barcelona [3], Madrid [4], Brussels [5], Amsterdam
[6], Bern [7], Vienna [8], Rome [9], Milan [10]:

[1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/17807753
[2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13707878
[3] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/152364165
[4] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/21068295
[5] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1635651356
[6] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/268396336
[7] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/18477455
[8] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/17328659
[9] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/72959652
[10] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/62505581

I see an approximate pattern: capital cities tend to have an
admin_level tag, others tend not to have it. Maybe it's something in
use for backward compatibility, such as an with and old renderer that
uses it instead of the capital tag to render a label at lower zoom
levels.

On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Andreas Goss  wrote:

Berlin



Honestly looks like and error nobody has noticed yet. I mean admin_level=2 ?
Berlin is a city state which might justify =4, but unless we somehow tag
capitals like this I don't see the reasoning behind this tag in the first
place.

Andi
__
openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88‎



___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging







--
__
openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88‎


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging