Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Garden specification)
2010/5/19 "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" : > I see your point... I think the wiki definition of > landuse=recreation_ground is a bit in conflict with common sense (like > the leisure=garden was) and it should be changed. I don't think so. Recreation ground is a term that is refering to sports, even though it's name seems to be more generic. > I would say the land where are gardens, parks, zoos, sport centres, ... > is used for recreation, so it should be tagged landuse=recreation_ground. -1, see above. Not every area that can be used for recreation would be called a recreation ground as far as I know. cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Garden specification)
On 22 May 2010 20:13, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2010/5/19 "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" : >> I see your point... I think the wiki definition of >> landuse=recreation_ground is a bit in conflict with common sense (like >> the leisure=garden was) and it should be changed. > > I don't think so. Recreation ground is a term that is refering to > sports, even though it's name seems to be more generic. In Australia at least, recreation grounds are usually pretty specific areas used for things like horse sports. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Garden specification)
John Smith napsal(a): > On 22 May 2010 20:13, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> 2010/5/19 "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" : >>> I see your point... I think the wiki definition of >>> landuse=recreation_ground is a bit in conflict with common sense (like >>> the leisure=garden was) and it should be changed. >> >> I don't think so. Recreation ground is a term that is refering to >> sports, even though it's name seems to be more generic. > > In Australia at least, recreation grounds are usually pretty specific > areas used for things like horse sports. I admit, I'm not from English speaking country, so I have no idea if this term has any specific meaning, my interpretation is based on understanding it from sources like wikipedia and my own knowledge of English language. Even though Wikipedia says recreation isn't completely the same as leisure - that 'recreation' is more active way of spending free time (e.g. sport) than 'leisure' (e.g. reading a book in a park), all tags relating sports in OSM are under leisure, so I think it's no big deal. But I may be wrong (it wouldn't be the first time :-)). Anyway, what do you think is an appropriate landuse value for areas like public gardens and parks? By the way, you can do for example jogging in a park, so I would say those two terms at least overlap in those areas. Regards, Petr Morávek signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] wine roads in openstreetmap
Hi, I see that there is a feature suggestion for adding wine roads on the map. How should that be done? Is tourism=wine_road ok? Should roads be added into a new relation? I see only that Slovenians are talking about this, but still there is no suggestion on what tags to use: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_Trails_In_Slovenia#Tourism Does anybody tag wine roads? How? Thank you. -- pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt blog: http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com linux, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless, ronjenje, pametne kuće, zwave registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent.turko...@hotmail.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] wine roads in openstreetmap
On Sun, 23 May 2010, Valent Turkovic wrote: > Hi, > I see that there is a feature suggestion for adding wine roads on the map. > > How should that be done? Is tourism=wine_road ok? Should roads be > added into a new relation? > > I see only that Slovenians are talking about this, but still there is > no suggestion on what tags to use: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_Trails_In_Slovenia#Tourism > > Does anybody tag wine roads? How? > > Thank you. Not sure that my interpretation is correct. I think that you have routes through wine growing / making areas which take tourists to the wineries. This is not the only purpose of the physical roads. If so, then a relation would be a sensible suggestion I think we have used relation for "Tourist Route" in Australia. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Garden specification)
2010/5/23 "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" : >> In Australia at least, recreation grounds are usually pretty specific >> areas used for things like horse sports. > > Even though Wikipedia says recreation isn't completely the same as recreation ground and recreation are 2 different things, just like a park and a soccer field are 2 different things even if you can play soccer in a park. > Anyway, what do you think is an appropriate landuse value for areas like > public gardens and parks? By the way, you can do for example jogging in What's wrong with the current tags? leisure=park leisure=garden add access=public if you want it to be explicit as to who can access them. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] wine roads in openstreetmap
On 23 May 2010 08:24, Liz wrote: > If so, then a relation would be a sensible suggestion > I think we have used relation for "Tourist Route" in Australia. Tourist routes aren't only used for winery tours, maybe there needs to be a note or some other tag to indicate what the tourist route primary purpose is for? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
