[Tagging] Marking intersections complete

[Alan Mintz]

I'm doing detailed surveying and tagging of intersection turn restrictions. 
However, I'm not always able to safely get pics from all four directions of 
a typical intersection, so I want to be able to know to go back and do 
those again later.

Any suggestion on how to tag an intersection as complete (that is, to state 
that all turn restrictions have been tagged)?

--
Alan Mintz 


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Marking intersections complete

[John Smith]

On 13 March 2010 14:05, Alan Mintz  wrote:
> Any suggestion on how to tag an intersection as complete (that is, to state
> that all turn restrictions have been tagged)?

Why not just tag those that are incomplete?

incomplete=yes/no

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Marking intersections complete

[Alan Mintz]

At 2010-03-12 20:07, John Smith wrote:
>On 13 March 2010 14:05, Alan Mintz  wrote:
> > Any suggestion on how to tag an intersection as complete (that is, to state
> > that all turn restrictions have been tagged)?
>
>Why not just tag those that are incomplete?
>
>incomplete=yes/no

That would be most of the planet, as opposed to just a few thousand that I 
may actually survey/tag :)

How about complete:x=yes where x is one of:

turn_restrictions
maxspeed
maxweight
bicycle
hgv
etc.


--
Alan Mintz 


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Marking intersections complete

[John Smith]

On 13 March 2010 14:21, Alan Mintz  wrote:
> That would be most of the planet, as opposed to just a few thousand that I
> may actually survey/tag :)

You are assuming others are going to mark things complete, or that
turning restrictions are static.

My suggestion allows you to mark things you are tagging as incomplete
until you can complete them.

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Marking intersections complete

[John Smith]

On 13 March 2010 14:25, John Smith  wrote:
> On 13 March 2010 14:21, Alan Mintz  wrote:
>> That would be most of the planet, as opposed to just a few thousand that I
>> may actually survey/tag :)
>
> You are assuming others are going to mark things complete, or that
> turning restrictions are static.
>
> My suggestion allows you to mark things you are tagging as incomplete
> until you can complete them.
>

Alternatively you can just add a note/fixme tag.

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-ca] FW: Canvec Product - osm format

[Sam Vekemans]

Cool,
As of right now, the wiki is the most current source for the tagging details.

The GoogleDocs chart is not far behind. :-)

Because this is a NRCan vanvec product (directly from the source) any
changes to the tagging structure needs to be directly with the
talk-ca@ AND NRCan directly, so then the master conversion program can
be edited.

So the wiki (although it can be edited) needs to be grayed out & a
notice put at the top indicating this.

So, the biggest change is in the new tag 'natural=landform;
landform=*' with a few subvalues.
I hope next week we can get that sorted out.

My aim for next week is to get a wiki link/proposal/voting page or
detailed section available for ALL of the canvec features. This way,
there wont be any surprises once the data is available :-)

This past week i continued work on wiki pages, (with some fierce
editing of aboriginal lands as an example) so please join in & help
make these wiki pages the best they can be.

Thanks,
Sam Vekemans
Across Canada Trails
Victoria, BC


On 3/12/10, Bégin, Daniel  wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The proposed tagging for each Canvec theme is open for discussion...
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec:_Buildings_and_structures_(BS)
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec:_Energy_(EN)
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec:_Relief_and_landforms_(FO)
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec:_Hydrography_(HD)
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec:_Industrial_and_commercial_areas_(IC)
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec:_Administrative_boundaries_(LI)
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec:_Places_of_interest_(LX)
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec:_Water_saturated_soils_(SS)
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec:_Toponymy_(TO)
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec:_Transportation_(TR)
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec:_Vegetation_(VE)
>
> This is based on previous community works and CTIS knowledge of the data. I
> hope it will help everyone understanding the future Canvec.osm files
> content.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Daniel
>
> 
>
> From: Bégin, Daniel
> Sent: 10 mars 2010 09:05
> To: 'talk...@openstreetmap.org'
> Subject: Canvec Product - osm format
>
>
> Bonjour tout le monde,
>
> I've started to document the Canvec.osm product in the wiki.  I'll use the
> Canvec related pages to do it http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec
>  .
>
> The geometric data model is open for discussion
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec:_Geometric_Model
>
> The proposed tagging will be updated soon in the corresponding Canvec:*
> pages
>
> I'm inviting you to look at the documentation and comment on appropriate
> discussion pages on via this mailling list.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Twitter: @Acrosscanada
Blog:  http://Acrosscanadatrails.blogspot.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans
Skype: samvekemans
OpenStreetMap IRC: http://irc.openstreetmap.org
@Acrosscanadatrails

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Marking intersections complete

[Anthony]

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Alan Mintz

> wrote:

> At 2010-03-12 20:07, John Smith wrote:
> >On 13 March 2010 14:05, Alan Mintz 
> >>
> wrote:
> > > Any suggestion on how to tag an intersection as complete (that is, to
> state
> > > that all turn restrictions have been tagged)?
> >
> >Why not just tag those that are incomplete?
> >
> >incomplete=yes/no
>
> That would be most of the planet, as opposed to just a few thousand that I
> may actually survey/tag :)
>

The vast majority of intersections in OSM are complete (that is, all turn
restrictions have been tagged).  Of course, that's because the vast majority
of intersections in OSM don't have any turn restrictions.

Verified as complete, on the other hand, is a different story.  If you're
talking about verified as complete, then you're looking for some sort of
source:* tag.  Source:restriction=image?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging