Re: [Tagging] opening hours
John Smith wrote: > Well opening_hours already covers months, and this is nerd speak so it would > be: > > We[-1] 19:00-21:00 Aug > > Aug - 1 Wednesday = last wednesday in July... Maybe I'm used to a different dialect of nerd speak, but I'd intuitively expect "Aug Th[-1]" to mean "last Thursday of August". On a more practical note, I'd prefer the month and (nth) weekday substrings to be independently useable (to check whether the facility is currently open, compare month with current month, compare weekday with current weekday, compare time with current time etc.). Tobias Knerr ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] opening hours
On 24 February 2010 01:49, Tobias Knerr wrote: > Maybe I'm used to a different dialect of nerd speak, but I'd intuitively > expect "Aug Th[-1]" to mean "last Thursday of August". *shrug* it's how php works... http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.mktime.php > On a more practical note, I'd prefer the month and (nth) weekday > substrings to be independently useable (to check whether the facility is > currently open, compare month with current month, compare weekday with > current weekday, compare time with current time etc.). That was a specific example, one that probably won't ever be used, there is nothing stopping you from using just the day without the month. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] source:geolocation?
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: > > > 1) Use source: to refer to geolocation, where is some string > > that is never going to be used as a key on its own, or > > Solution 1 looks perfectly good to me. Position, location, whatever. > If a consensus ever emerges, it's trivial to normalise them. Yeah that seems to be the consensus here. Does anyone feel strongly about needing a vote for this, or should I go ahead and add source:location to Map Features and Key:source on the wiki? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Narrow width
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: > >> I come to a road with width=3 - that is indeed "useful". >> I come to a road with narrow=yes - that is not as "useful". > > I just don't understand how everyone can have the same argument, again > and again, about every new tag or idea suggested. That's because it's a good argument. > ... Now, the > concept of "narrow" ... could be defined by the > presence of warning signs, by reference to standard road widths in the > area, or simply the mapper's intuition. If you propose a verifiable "definition" for "narrow", I will support it. But "warning signs OR reference to standard road width OR intuition" is not verifiable. There you go, the same argument once again - it's not going to go away... :) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] source:geolocation?
On 24 February 2010 07:32, Roy Wallace wrote: > Does anyone feel strongly about needing a vote for this, or should I > go ahead and add source:location to Map Features and Key:source on the > wiki? I've given up on any notion that voting is actually useful, 30k+ active mappers, and most don't care to vote etc, only the voictress minority bothers. Pick which ever has the most widespread use and document it. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] source:geolocation?
At 2010-02-22 22:29, Steve Bennett wrote: >... >and there is not (afaik) any way to tell what changes >were included in a changeset, or modify changeset comments after the >fact... OT: Can someone create the ability to edit one's own changeset comments after creation (maybe from the http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/* page)? I'd sure like to be able to clean up my occasional mistakes. I use these comments to keep track of my progress on a particular survey or area. -- Alan Mintz ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] source:geolocation?
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:40 AM, John Smith wrote: > > Pick which ever has the most widespread use and document it. Hmm now that I check again, [1] lists a few hundred uses of source:position, but only 2 uses of source:location. Better go with source:position, then. [1] http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/Germany/En/tags.html ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] source:geolocation?
On 24 February 2010 15:53, Roy Wallace wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:40 AM, John Smith wrote: >> >> Pick which ever has the most widespread use and document it. > > Hmm now that I check again, [1] lists a few hundred uses of > source:position, but only 2 uses of source:location. > > Better go with source:position, then. > > [1] http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/Germany/En/tags.html http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/Australia-oceania/En/tags.html lists source:position as 2, source:location as 80... Is there anyway to get a total for all countries, rather than scanning them one by one and trying to tally it manually? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
