Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool- Module lists
Joachim, Also, if there are no preferred modules listed the explanatory text should be in a not a because its not a list item. Thanks. by grace alone, Don A. Elbourne Jr. http://elbourne.org ___ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Re: [sword-devel] Having trouble rebuilding BibleCS (win32) with CBuilder 5.5 make. Where is {root}/Makefile.cfg?
Lynn,
Back from the move but in VA this week, so still might be a little
scarce. Thanks for the prayers, things went really well.
BibleCS should be buildable by C++Builder 6 personal free edition. If
it doesn't build, it's because we usually use v5 and just don't keep the
project file up to date. We're constantly adding new files to the
engine, and whenever this happens, they need to be added to the library
in the project group for BCB6 (and 5 for that matter, but we usually
take care of that). It's usually pretty straight forward: when you get
a link error, you can usually figure out what new file needs to be
added. If you still have troubles, let me know and I'll fire up my
virtual machine and bare looking at windows for 30 minutes for you :)
-Troy.
Lynn Allan wrote:
Inquiring (newbie) minds want to know:
* Is there a procedure documented somewhat to rebuild BibleCS (win32) using
the Borland CBuilder 5.5 command line compiler?
As part of getting up to speed with the sword-api, I've attempted to rebuild
BibleCs (win32) with CBuilder. No doubt there is operator error on my part,
but I'm baffled how to even get started. Using:
{root}\apps\windoze\CBuilder5\BibleCS\Makefile
the CBuilder make process pretty much immediately fails due to missing
include ${root}/Makefile.cfg
My impression is that there is a linux oriented .sh script that is supposed
to generate the Makefile.cfg. Was this left out of CVS? Is a win-32
developer wannabe supposed to have gnu or cygwin tools installed, and be
capable of generating {root}/Makefile.cfg?
___
sword-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
___
sword-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool- Module lists
On 30-Oct-2003 Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote: > Also, if there are no preferred modules listed the explanatory text > should > be in a not a because its not a list item. No it is a list item (these are elements of the same kind, not just text). Can we eliminate list item (to not take place) sign by CSS? I'm not sure that it is allowed for HTML documents but think that it is allowed. -- Victor Porton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]; http://ex-code.com) ___ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool- Module lists
I'm talking about the text that reads: "Preferred Translations can be selected from the preferences tab." That is not a list item. - Original Message - From: "Victor Porton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:44 AM Subject: Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool- Module lists > On 30-Oct-2003 Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote: > > Also, if there are no preferred modules listed the explanatory text > > should > > be in a not a because its not a list item. > > No it is a list item (these are elements of the same kind, not just text). > Can we eliminate list item (to not take place) sign by CSS? I'm not sure > that it is allowed for HTML documents but think that it is allowed. > > -- > Victor Porton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]; http://ex-code.com) > ___ > sword-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel ___ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
