Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file
If you like patching boxes together there's also OM-SoX, a visual programming front-end to SoX (it's free, cross-platform and open-source): http://sourceforge.net/projects/omsox/, http://linux-sound.org/omsox-review/omsox-review.html Cheers, Marlon On Sep 3, 2014, at 12:00 , sursound-requ...@music.vt.edu wrote: > Message: 9 > Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:20:45 +0100 > From: Dave Malham > To: Surround Sound discussion group > Subject: Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Some fine command line tools there, should be easy with them but Max > would be ok if if you're allergic to the command line, tho' I would use > Plogue Bidule as it's more straightforward for that sort of task. > Alternatively, Audacity will split to separate channels (works up to at > least 32 channels - just checked) but you might not wish to use that for > mixer. > > Dave ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
[Sursound] Question about UHJ
Dear list, A friend of mine was planning to encode a recording of his instrumental music (appr. 20 mic feeds) into 2-channel (2D) UHJ format and was strongly discouraged as UHJ would introduce nasty phasing effects. Since there should be some hundred 2-channel UHJ LPs and CDs (which should be stereo compatible) I wonder if this is true? I read about the stereo-widening effect when listened to undecoded (which was sometimes purposely used asa production effect), but wasn't aware of these phasing artefacts. I'd be happy about any advice/comments. Thanks, Marlon ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Re: [Sursound] Question about UHJ
Hi, Thanks everybody for your well-considered comments. The reason for going for a 2-channel format is compatibility with distribution media formats (CD) - and I suppose it will mostly be listened to without a decoder. The possibility of recovering (2D) B-Format can be very useful, I think (although apparently not 100% possible). Cheers, Marlon On Mar 15, 2014, at 12:00 , sursound-requ...@music.vt.edu wrote: > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:08:22 - (GMT) > From: "Michael Chapman" > To: "Surround Sound discussion group" > Subject: Re: [Sursound] Question about UHJ > Message-ID: <54597.109.213.106.225.1394813302.m...@i-a-a.ch> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 > >> There is another point - you can recover the B-Format horizontal >> information from UHj - so, notionally, using Bruce Wiggins' irregular >> decoding, you could display it on 5.1 >> > > Why not make a three/four track ambisonic (B-format) master and make > derivatives (such as UHJ) from that ? > > Marie-Antoinette ... ur no, sorry, Michael > >> Dr. Peter Lennox >> >> School of Technology, >> Faculty of Arts, Design and Technology >> University of Derby, UK >> e: p.len...@derby.ac.uk >> t: 01332 593155 ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
