Re: [Sursound] Eigenmike

[Richard Lee]

I must agree with Fons on Eigenmike.

IMHO, Angelo's software for Eigenmike is loads better than what's supplied by 
the makers.  Its nea...aarly good enough for recording music  but certainly 
not there yet.  There's a paper on the new software on Angelo's website.

I'm not sure if there is a sensible (in Ambi mike terms) calibration procedure 
for it.  The makers claim you just stick a mike calibrator on each capsule.  
Excuse me if I ROTFL.
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] Eigenmike

[umashankar manthravadi]

dear ricardo
 
I could not locate angelo's paper. what is it called?
I saw his earlier powerpoint on eigenmike, and the idea I took away from that 
is producing a modified sine sweep to correct for loudspeaker errors so I can 
use it to calibrate my cardioid capsules without having to compare it to an 
Omni source each time.
 
umashankar
 
ps, I always wondered if the eigenmike might not be  eight first order 
ambisonic microphones slightly staggered and superimposed on a single sphere.
 
> From: rica...@justnet.com.au
> To: sursound@music.vt.edu
> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 15:34:51 +
> Subject: Re: [Sursound] Eigenmike
> 
> I must agree with Fons on Eigenmike.
> 
> IMHO, Angelo's software for Eigenmike is loads better than what's supplied by 
> the makers.  Its nea...aarly good enough for recording music  but 
> certainly not there yet.  There's a paper on the new software on Angelo's 
> website.
> 
> I'm not sure if there is a sensible (in Ambi mike terms) calibration 
> procedure for it.  The makers claim you just stick a mike calibrator on each 
> capsule.  Excuse me if I ROTFL.��
> ___
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
  
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound