Re: [spring] Completion of WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

[Francois Clad (fclad)]

Hi Jim, chairs,

I am not aware of any IPR related to this document.

Thanks,
Francois

From: spring  on behalf of James Guichard 

Date: Thursday, 11 February 2021 at 18:06
To: James Guichard , spring@ietf.org 

Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org 
Subject: [spring] Completion of WG Adoption Call for 
draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn
Dear WG:

This email ends the 2 week WG adoption call for 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn/.

Having reviewed all of the responses, the chairs believe that enough support 
was received to adopt this document into the WG. However, while the document is 
informational in nature, it does have a normative dependency on 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments/
 which will need to successfully complete WG LC before this document will be 
able to progress from the WG queue. The chairs feel that more work is necessary 
in terms of definition and interoperability of resource-aware SIDs. In addition 
several comments were received during the adoption call that will need to be 
addressed as the document progresses through the WG process. Further, the 
chairs would like to make it clear that adopting an informational document that 
proposes a particular solution which utilizes resource-aware SIDs does *not* 
preclude future adoption of other documents which propose a different solution 
if the trade-offs are significantly different.

Authors, please resubmit the document as draft-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn-00 
and also provide explicit confirmation as to whether you are aware of any IPR 
related to this document.

Regards,

Jim, Joel & Bruno


From: James Guichard 
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 5:47 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

Dear WG:

This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call for 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn/
 ending February 10th 2021.

After review of the document please indicate support (or not) for WG adoption 
to the mailing list and if you are willing to work on the document, please 
state this explicitly. This gives the chairs an indication of the energy level 
of people in the working group willing to work on this document. Please also 
provide comments/reasons for your support (or lack thereof) as this is a 
stronger way to indicate your (non) support as this is not a vote.

Thanks!

Jim, Bruno & Joel



___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Re: [spring] Completion of WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

[Lizhenbin]

Hi All,

I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR.

Best regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)




From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2021 1:06 AM
To: James Guichard 
mailto:james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>>; 
spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] Completion of WG Adoption Call for 
draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

Dear WG:

This email ends the 2 week WG adoption call for 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn/.

Having reviewed all of the responses, the chairs believe that enough support 
was received to adopt this document into the WG. However, while the document is 
informational in nature, it does have a normative dependency on 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments/
 which will need to successfully complete WG LC before this document will be 
able to progress from the WG queue. The chairs feel that more work is necessary 
in terms of definition and interoperability of resource-aware SIDs. In addition 
several comments were received during the adoption call that will need to be 
addressed as the document progresses through the WG process. Further, the 
chairs would like to make it clear that adopting an informational document that 
proposes a particular solution which utilizes resource-aware SIDs does *not* 
preclude future adoption of other documents which propose a different solution 
if the trade-offs are significantly different.

Authors, please resubmit the document as draft-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn-00 
and also provide explicit confirmation as to whether you are aware of any IPR 
related to this document.

Regards,

Jim, Joel & Bruno


From: James Guichard 
mailto:james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 5:47 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

Dear WG:

This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call for 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn/
 ending February 10th 2021.

After review of the document please indicate support (or not) for WG adoption 
to the mailing list and if you are willing to work on the document, please 
state this explicitly. This gives the chairs an indication of the energy level 
of people in the working group willing to work on this document. Please also 
provide comments/reasons for your support (or lack thereof) as this is a 
stronger way to indicate your (non) support as this is not a vote.

Thanks!

Jim, Bruno & Joel



___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

[spring] 答复: Completion of WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

[qinfengwei]

Hi,

 

I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR.

 

 

 

Thanks,

Fengwei Qin

 

发件人: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 James Guichard
发送时间: 2021年2月12日 01:06
收件人: James Guichard; spring@ietf.org
抄送: spring-cha...@ietf.org
主题: [spring] Completion of WG Adoption Call for
draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

 

Dear WG:

 

This email ends the 2 week WG adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn/
 . 

 

Having reviewed all of the responses, the chairs believe that enough support
was received to adopt this document into the WG. However, while the document
is informational in nature, it does have a normative dependency on
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments/

which will need to successfully complete WG LC before this document will be
able to progress from the WG queue. The chairs feel that more work is
necessary in terms of definition and interoperability of resource-aware
SIDs. In addition several comments were received during the adoption call
that will need to be addressed as the document progresses through the WG
process. Further, the chairs would like to make it clear that adopting an
informational document that proposes a particular solution which utilizes
resource-aware SIDs does *not* preclude future adoption of other documents
which propose a different solution if the trade-offs are significantly
different.

 

Authors, please resubmit the document as draft-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn-00
and also provide explicit confirmation as to whether you are aware of any
IPR related to this document.

 

Regards,

 

Jim, Joel & Bruno

 

 

From: James Guichard  
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 5:47 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

 

Dear WG:

 

This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn/

ending February 10th 2021.

 

After review of the document please indicate support (or not) for WG
adoption to the mailing list and if you are willing to work on the document,
please state this explicitly. This gives the chairs an indication of the
energy level of people in the working group willing to work on this
document. Please also provide comments/reasons for your support (or lack
thereof) as this is a stronger way to indicate your (non) support as this is
not a vote.

 

Thanks!

 

Jim, Bruno & Joel

 

 

 

___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Re: [spring] WG Last Call draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr

[Greg Mirsky]

Dear All,
I have several questions about the draft:

   - When using the approach described in Section 4, i.e., SR-based SFC
   with the integrated NSH, how does a re-Classifier scenario be handled? If I
   understand it correctly, a re-Classifier can change the SPI of the
   NSH coming back from the SF. If that is the case, the SFF will not match it
   to the saved SR information because the SPI had changed. How would SFF
   forward the NSH and the payload?
   - Related to the scenario from the above. The stored SR information that
   is not being used appears to become stale. It seems that it creates a leak
   of resources in a system that should be controlled somehow.

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:31 AM  wrote:

> Dear WG,
>
>
>
> This message starts a 2 weeks WG last call for draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr
> [1].
>
> After review of the document please indicate whether you believe this
> document should be progressed to the IESG.
>
>
>
> In addition to yes/no, please consider providing a technical review of
> this document; in particular if you care for this document.
>
> Indeed, since WG adoption, this document had benefited from little reviews
> from the WG, so we need more review from the SPRING WG.
>
>
>
> If you are aware of an implementation of this document, please report the
> implementation either on the list or to the chairs so that the shepherd can
> report implementations in the writeup.
>
>
>
> Note that I’ll forward that call to the SFC WG.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr
>
>
>
> --Bruno
>
>
>
> _
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu 
> ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
> falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
> this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
> ___
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring