[sr #106712] accepting follow-ups by email

[Alejandro Colomar]

Follow-up Comment #23, sr #106712 (group administration):

Hi!

+1 from me.  It's the least comfortable bug tracker I have to deal with, as I
get new comments by email, but then I have to log in to reply.

And I like the idea of using PGP signatures to authenticate the sender (while
possibly allowing unsigned email as anonymous senders) very much.

Dave and I were discussing about it here:


Have a lovely day!
Alex


___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/

[sr #106712] accepting follow-ups by email

[Dave]

Follow-up Comment #24, sr #106712 (group administration):

[comment #21 comment #21:]
> At a minimum the rationale for closing should be documented and
> a final status set.  In fact, I think we not only need to do
> this but that's it is a fairly high priority (for a wish-list
> item), so I've made that change also.

The wording here makes it unclear whether "do this" refers to documenting a
reason for the sr's closure, or implementing the requested feature.  From the
priority change of the sr, I infer you're adding another vote for the
feature.

If I'm correct, yours is in addition to the +1s in comment #3, comment #6,
comment #19, and comment #23 here, and the duplicate sr #107431.


___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/

[sr #106712] accepting follow-ups by email

[Corwin Brust]

Follow-up Comment #25, sr #106712 (group administration):


> If I'm correct, yours is in addition to the +1s in comment #3, comment #6,
comment #19, and comment #23 here, and the duplicate sr #107431.

You are entirely correct; please record me as +1 for this request and thanks
for pointing out that the phrasing was unclear.


___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/