[sane-devel] options for epson perfection V100 PHOTO?

2007-01-09 Thread David Roundy
Hi all,

Sad to say, I've made the mistake of purchasing an epson perfection V100
photo scanner, and am now wondering what I can do with this thing.  I see
now that it's not supported, although there's a proprietary iscan thing
that works with it, but it doesn't seem to be available for x86-64.

I'd also like to point out that the first google result when searching for
"linux scanners" is

http://www.buzzard.me.uk/jonathan/scanners-usb.html

which gives some rather misleading advice regarding epson scanners--which
is that except for one model they're all supported.  :( Which is why I made
the mistake of buying this particular scanner.

Any ideas what I could do with this thing? :(
-- 
David Roundy
Department of Physics
Oregon State University


[sane-devel] options for epson perfection V100 PHOTO?

2007-01-11 Thread David Roundy
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 01:13:22PM +0100, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> David Roundy  wrote:
> > Sad to say, I've made the mistake of purchasing an epson perfection V100
> > photo scanner, and am now wondering what I can do with this thing.  I see
> > now that it's not supported, although there's a proprietary iscan thing
> > that works with it, but it doesn't seem to be available for x86-64.
> 
>  Hello David,

Hello!

>   we should first understand if this scanner uses the 
>  EPSON ESC/I protocol. You might want to enable debugging
>  (man sane-epson) and report the results of scanimage -L .

I'm attaching the output.  I went with full debugging, since you didn't
specify, and I'm not sure what you'd need.  Thanks for your help!
-- 
David Roundy
Department of Physics
Oregon State University
-- next part --
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level of epson to 128.
[epson] sane_init: sane-backends 1.0.18
[epson] sane_init, ># epson.conf<
[epson] sane_init, >#<
[epson] sane_init, ># here are some examples for how to configure the EPSON 
backend<
[epson] sane_init, >#<
[epson] sane_init, ># SCSI scanner:<
[epson] sane_init, >scsi EPSON<
[epson] sane_init, ># for the GT-6500:<
[epson] sane_init, >scsi "EPSON SC"<
[epson] sane_init, >#<
[epson] sane_init, ># Parallel port scanner:<
[epson] sane_init, >#pio 0x278<
[epson] sane_init, >#pio 0x378<
[epson] sane_init, >#pio 0x3BC<
[epson] sane_init, >#<
[epson] sane_init, ># USB scanner:<
[epson] sane_init, ># There are two different methods of configuring a USB 
scanner: libusb and the kernel module<
[epson] sane_init, ># For any system with libusb support (which is pretty much 
any recent Linux distribution) the<
[epson] sane_init, ># following line is sufficient. This however assumes that 
the connected scanner (or to be more<
[epson] sane_init, ># accurate, it's device ID) is known to the backend.<
[epson] sane_init, >usb 0x4b8 0x12d<
[epson] attach_one_usb(libusb:003:033)
[epson] SANE Epson Backend v0.2.46 - 2006-06-11
[epson] attach(libusb:003:033, 3)
[epson] attach: opening libusb:003:033
[epson] Found valid EPSON scanner: 0x4b8/0x12d (vendorID/productID)
[epson] reset()
[epson] send buf, size = 2
[epson] buf[0] 1b .
[epson] buf[1] 40 @
[epson] w_cmd_count = 1
[epson] r_cmd_count = 0
[epson] w_cmd_count = 1
[epson] r_cmd_count = 1
[epson] receive buf, expected = 1, got = 1
[epson] buf[0] 15 .
[epson] get_identity_information()
[epson] send buf, size = 2
[epson] buf[0] 1b .
[epson] buf[1] 49 I
[epson] w_cmd_count = 2
[epson] r_cmd_count = 1
[epson] w_cmd_count = 2
[epson] r_cmd_count = 2
[epson] receive buf, expected = 4, got = 1
[epson] buf[0] 15 .
[epson] code   15
[epson] type 0x00
[epson] level    0x00
[epson] no option equipment installed
[epson] Unknown type  or level , using B3
[epson] fbf tlx 0.00 tly 0.00 brx -32768.00 bry -32768.00 [mm]
[epson] send buf, size = 2
[epson] buf[0] 1b .
[epson] buf[1] 44 D
[epson] w_cmd_count = 3
[epson] r_cmd_count = 2
[epson] w_cmd_count = 3
[epson] r_cmd_count = 3
[epson] receive buf, expected = 1, got = 1
[epson] buf[0] 15 .
[epson] send buf, size = 2
[epson] buf[0] 1b .
[epson] buf[1] 44 D
[epson] w_cmd_count = 4
[epson] r_cmd_count = 3
[epson] w_cmd_count = 4
[epson] r_cmd_count = 4
[epson] receive buf, expected = 1, got = 1
[epson] buf[0] 15 .
[epson] send buf, size = 2
[epson] buf[0] 1b .
[epson] buf[1] 44 D
[epson] w_cmd_count = 5
[epson] r_cmd_count = 4
[epson] w_cmd_count = 5
[epson] r_cmd_count = 5
[epson] receive buf, expected = 1, got = 1
[epson] buf[0] 15 .
[epson] Max. supported color depth = 8
[epson] request_focus_position()
[epson] Disabling 'Set Focus' support
[epson] send buf, size = 2
[epson] buf[0] 1b .
[epson] buf[1] 66 f
[epson] w_cmd_count = 6
[epson] r_cmd_count = 5
[epson] w_cmd_count = 6
[epson] r_cmd_count = 6
[epson] receive buf, expected = 4, got = 1
[epson] buf[0] 15 .
[epson] code   15
[epson] scanner model: 
[epson] close_scanner(fd = 0)
[epson] w_cmd_count = 6
[epson] r_cmd_count = 6
[epson] w_cmd_count = 6
[epson] r_cmd_count = 6
[epson] sane_init, ># For libusb support for unknown scanners use the following 
command<
[epson] sane_init, ># usb  <
[epson] sane_init, ># e.g.:<
[epson] sane_init, ># usb 0x4b8 0x110<
[epson] sane_init, ># And for the scanner module, use the following 
configuration:<
[epson] sane_init, >#usb /dev/usbscanner0<
[epson] sane_init, >#usb /dev/usb/scanner0<
[epson] sane_get_devices()
device `epson:libusb:003:033' is a Epson  flatbed scanner
From azummo-li...@towertech.it  Thu Jan 11 21:38:40 2007
From: azummo-li...@towertech.it (Alessandro Zummo)
Date: Thu Jan 11 21:45:30 2007
Subject: [sane-devel] options for epson perfection V100 PHOTO?
In-Reply-To:

[sane-devel] Problem with my Canon LIDE25

2007-01-22 Thread David Roundy
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 04:12:03PM +0100, Marc Hansen wrote:
> Hi,
> I have the problem, that my scanner does not go back to the startposition and 
> stop working.
> After a next scan under windows it does work again.
> 
> Does anybody have a hint. The newest sane and plustek-drivers are installed.

I have no idea what could be the problem, but my CanoScan LIDE 25 works
just fine with debian etch.  (I know this isn't particularly helpful, but
knowing that at least it *can* would should be helpful.)
-- 
David Roundy
Department of Physics
Oregon State University