[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.4.final sources are out
mabshoff wrote: > > > I started building binaries and am preparing to push out the release > for upgrades, so just don't attempt to upgrade just yet :) > Perhaps this is a question for sage-support, but when I try to upgrade from my sage 3.1.2, I get the message "make: Nothing to be done for `all'.". Shouldn't it upgrade to 3.1.3 at least? Does a ./sage -upgrade ultimately lead to the same result as a fresh install of the source? Thanks for your help! Stan --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: modular forms talk slides
2008/10/17 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Alex Ghitza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> A few things that Craig didn't catch: :) > > Thanks! > >> page 7: the exponent should be k, not 2k >> page 9: "since such formulas perhaps do not exist" sounds weird to me; I >> would say "since no such formulas are currently known" > > I actually really mean that I think simple formulas for level one > modular forms dimensions don't *exist*. I.e., there aren't any. > I don't mean that they aren't know. I've had some interesting > discussions with Kevin Buzzard about that. > >> page 10: "then have basis" should be "then have bases" >> >> page 16: "are beautiful piece" should be "are a beautiful piece" >> >> page 23: "polynomial multiplies" should be "polynomial multiplications" >> >> page 30: "se can compute" should be "we can compute" >> >> >> Best, >> Alex > > Thanks! > >> >> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:18 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> My last talk at Bordeaux is tomorrow morning (in 7 hours) on modular >>> forms. >>> See the attached slides or Sage notebook file. >>> >>> Note that I view the "slide version" of this talk exists really only >>> for the talk I'm >>> giving tomorrow. The sage notebook and a normal article (or new section >>> for the Sage documentation that will be in ReST) or the real format in >>> which >>> this talk will live longterm... Great talks! Thanks! John (at 10am plus epsilon in Bordeaux) >>> >>> -- William >>> >>> -- >>> William Stein >>> Associate Professor of Mathematics >>> University of Washington >>> http://wstein.org >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Alex Ghitza -- Lecturer in Mathematics -- The University of Melbourne -- >> Australia -- http://www.ms.unimelb.edu.au/~aghitza/ >> >> > >> > > > > -- > William Stein > Associate Professor of Mathematics > University of Washington > http://wstein.org > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] bordeaux
Hi, I put all my Bordeaux talks together into a single article: http://wstein.org/papers/2008-bordeaux/ William -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.4.final sources are out
On Oct 17, 12:59 am, Stan Schymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mabshoff wrote: > > Hi Stan, > > I started building binaries and am preparing to push out the release > > for upgrades, so just don't attempt to upgrade just yet :) > > Perhaps this is a question for sage-support, but when I try to upgrade > from my sage 3.1.2, I get the message "make: Nothing to be done for > `all'.". > Shouldn't it upgrade to 3.1.3 at least? The question is fair game here. The reason the upgrade does not work to 3.1.3 is that I held up pushing out the spkgs since the critical ipython vs. init.sage bug was not fixed yet. I just got home and I need to catch up on sleep for a couple hours, so expect the official upgrade to work in the near term. > Does a ./sage -upgrade ultimately lead to the same result as a fresh > install of the source? Yes, at least when nothing goes wrong :) > Thanks for your help! > > Stan Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.4.final sources are out
Hi Michael, Thanks a lot for the reply. Sorry, I forgot that you mentioned this before. No hassle about the upgrades, as it's easy enough to compile from source. Sleep well! Stan mabshoff wrote: > The question is fair game here. The reason the upgrade does not work > to 3.1.3 is that I held up pushing out the spkgs since the critical > ipython vs. init.sage bug was not fixed yet. I just got home and I > need to catch up on sleep for a couple hours, so expect the official > upgrade to work in the near term. > > >> Does a ./sage -upgrade ultimately lead to the same result as a fresh >> install of the source? >> > > Yes, at least when nothing goes wrong :) > > >> Thanks for your help! >> >> Stan >> > > Cheers, > > Michael > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Source on webpage
On Oct 17, 4:38 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Harald for adding the link > tohttp://www.sagemath.org/hg/sage-main?cmd=manifest;manifest=-1;path=/s... > But the changeset indicates this is almost a month old. Is > there a way to get the more recent version? 3.1.4 will be pushed out in the next 24 hours, i.e. when I have recovered from SD 10. Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Source on webpage
Thanks Harald for adding the link to http://www.sagemath.org/hg/sage-main?cmd=manifest;manifest=-1;path=/sage/ But the changeset indicates this is almost a month old. Is there a way to get the more recent version? On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Harald Schilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, I know that it is important to emphasize on open source. Therefore > I even mention the GPL license in the first sentence. There are also > two links to the source browser on the index.html page since a long > time: > one is in the header of each page, "open source" in the first line and > below the 6 big buttons on the index page is a "Read the Code" > hotlink. I renamed it to "Browse the Code" ... perhaps it's now easier > to find? I'll also revisit the whole download process, but that's > related to scripts and rather boring,... but i'll do it some time in > the near future. Right now I'll change a bit at the download link. > > H > > On Oct 15, 3:44 pm, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I propose that there should be links from the front page of >> sagemath.org to: >> >> 1. The source download >> >> 2. The source browser >> >> Since, after all the emphasis is on open source. It's a pretty trivial >> point, but it would be nice to be one click away... > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: bordeaux
Very nice! Bill. On 17 Oct, 11:00, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I put all my Bordeaux talks together into a single article: > > http://wstein.org/papers/2008-bordeaux/ > > William > > -- > William Stein > Associate Professor of Mathematics > University of Washingtonhttp://wstein.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Source on webpage
I wonder if it might be useful to have a "recommended" flag for the source. I.e., if a version is released that turns out to have some serious problems, mark the previous version as the recommended one, until a version with no serious bugs is released. This would avoid the complexity of having stable/unstable branches but might make releasing a somewhat lower-pressure affair. -M. Hampton On Oct 17, 6:39 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 17, 4:38 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks Harald for adding the link > > tohttp://www.sagemath.org/hg/sage-main?cmd=manifest;manifest=-1;path=/s... > > But the changeset indicates this is almost a month old. Is > > there a way to get the more recent version? > > 3.1.4 will be pushed out in the next 24 hours, i.e. when I have > recovered from SD 10. > > Cheers, > > Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Source on webpage
mhampton wrote: > I wonder if it might be useful to have a "recommended" flag for the > source. I.e., if a version is released that turns out to have some > serious problems, mark the previous version as the recommended one, > until a version with no serious bugs is released. This would avoid > the complexity of having stable/unstable branches but might make > releasing a somewhat lower-pressure affair. > We sort of have this now. Notice how the webpage still points to 3.1.2. In a sense, that's the recommended version (at least until the binaries for 3.1.4 get built). Thanks, Jason --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Source on webpage
On Oct 17, 2:48 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We sort of have this now. Notice how the webpage still points to 3.1.2. Just to make this clear: I update the webpage rather late, because it doesn't satisfy a normal user, if it would say 3.1.3 but there are only sources. Therefore, I wait until most of the mirrors have the binaries and no serious problems arise. I think that's a better solution than being too accurate about the real state of development. greetings harald --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Source on webpage
Harald Schilly wrote: > On Oct 17, 2:48 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> We sort of have this now. Notice how the webpage still points to 3.1.2.. > > Just to make this clear: I update the webpage rather late, because it > doesn't satisfy a normal user, if it would say 3.1.3 but there are > only sources. Therefore, I wait until most of the mirrors have the > binaries and no serious problems arise. I think that's a better > solution than being too accurate about the real state of development. I totally agree with your decision. I think it also addresses the "recommended version" question nicely as well. Jason --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Source on webpage
OK. It was just a thought. I guess it would only matter to people were going straight to the source page but weren't following things on this group, which is probably a small number of people. -Marshall On Oct 17, 8:02 am, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Harald Schilly wrote: > > On Oct 17, 2:48 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> We sort of have this now. Notice how the webpage still points to 3.1.2.. > > > Just to make this clear: I update the webpage rather late, because it > > doesn't satisfy a normal user, if it would say 3.1.3 but there are > > only sources. Therefore, I wait until most of the mirrors have the > > binaries and no serious problems arise. I think that's a better > > solution than being too accurate about the real state of development. > > I totally agree with your decision. I think it also addresses the > "recommended version" question nicely as well. > > Jason --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] laplace transforms
In the documentation for inverse_laplace, we see this example:
sage: f(t) = t*cos(t)
sage: s = var('s')
sage: L = laplace(f, t, s); L
t |--> 2*s^2/(s^2 + 1)^2 - 1/(s^2 + 1)
Shouldn't that last function take the parameter s instead of t? In
other words, shouldn't that last returned result be:
sage: L = laplace(f, t, s); L
s |--> 2*s^2/(s^2 + 1)^2 - 1/(s^2 + 1)
Thanks,
Jason
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Notebook Version #
> > yesterday, i had exactly the same idea ;) > > Harald, glad I wasn't the only one! > > > (but please make it small > > and not very distracting). > > Yes, the request for small font is in the trac ticket. > For those who were interested in this, a patch is up for review at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4177 - kcrisman --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.4.final sources are out
mabshoff wrote: > Hello folks, > > due to the init.sage vs. IPython SNAFU I have just released a Sage > 3.1.4 with two additional small fixes. Sources and a sage.math only > binary (this time tested to extract :)) are in > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.1.4/ > I did not try this on Fedora 9 yet, but on Fedora 8, 32 bits no problems: all tests passed. Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: mercurial-howto.txt
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:59 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[...]
> What you might do is run sage and type
> sage: install_scripts('%s/software/bin/'%os.environ['HOME'])
> This will, among other things, put an hg script in that directory,
> which contains this:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/bin$ cat hg
> #!/bin/sh
> sage -hg $*
Should this be
sage -hg "$@"
?
Otherwise, parameters with spaces won't work... right?
Best, Gonzalo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: mercurial-howto.txt
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Gonzalo Tornaria
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:59 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>[...]
>> What you might do is run sage and type
>> sage: install_scripts('%s/software/bin/'%os.environ['HOME'])
>> This will, among other things, put an hg script in that directory,
>> which contains this:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/bin$ cat hg
>> #!/bin/sh
>> sage -hg $*
>
>
> Should this be
>
> sage -hg "$@"
>
> ?
>
> Otherwise, parameters with spaces won't work... right?
>
> Best, Gonzalo
>
You're right. You should change the install_scripts function
that is in Sage and post a patch. Thanks!
william
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
