[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.11.alpha1 released!
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 1:03 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Mar 23, 8:43 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 12:38 PM, mabshoff > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 23, 4:09 pm, "Bill Furnish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'd like to encourage everyone to try out sage -tp for the parallel > > > > doctester (even if you only run it with one thread) and report any > > > > bugs as we are hoping to remove the old doctester entirely for the > > > > release of 2.11. > > > > > Well, you ought to tell people how to actually use it since it isn't > > > documented: > > > > > ./sage -tp #thread [-long] devel/sage/sage > > > > > If you "export SAGE_TEST_TEX=1" before running sage it will > > > automatically add the tex files to the files it tests and also report > > > issues at the very end. > > > > > > > > Failure report: > > > > On G5 osx10.5: > > > > The following tests failed: > > > > sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/matrix/matrix_real_double_dense.pyx > > I would like to see this failure. > I put logs from all tests here: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/build/tests/2.11.alpha1/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.11.alpha1 released!
On Mar 23, 9:54 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 1:03 PM, mabshoff > > I put logs from all tests here: > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/build/tests/2.11.alpha1/ Thanks, meccah's unusual failures are due to timeouts, some corrupted GAP workspace and inability to start a second Sage process. Re the doctest failure on Clement's G5: sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/matrix/matrix_real_double_dense.pyx ** File "matrix_real_double_dense.pyx", line 331: sage: ~A Expected: [ 0.1 0.0] [ 0.0 0.01] Got: [ 0.1 -0.0] [-0.0 0.01] ** File "matrix_real_double_dense.pyx", line 349: sage: A.inverse() Expected: [nan nan] [nan inf] Got: [ nan nan] [ nan -inf] ** It is a sign issue, but I am not sure what we can do here. Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.11.alpha1 released!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On a Dual Core machine running Gentoo, I've tried ./sage -tp 1 devel/sage/sage and ./sage -tp 2 devel/sage/sage Both appeared to run fine; the first used only one core and the second used both. Running times: 1878 seconds for one core and 1031 seconds for two cores. Good stuff! Alex PS: no doctest failures other than the highly infamous plot.py. mabshoff wrote: | | | On Mar 23, 4:09 pm, "Bill Furnish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |> I'd like to encourage everyone to try out sage -tp for the parallel |> doctester (even if you only run it with one thread) and report any |> bugs as we are hoping to remove the old doctester entirely for the |> release of 2.11. |> | | Well, you ought to tell people how to actually use it since it isn't | documented: | | ./sage -tp #thread [-long] devel/sage/sage | | If you "export SAGE_TEST_TEX=1" before running sage it will | automatically add the tex files to the files it tests and also report | issues at the very end. | | Cheers, | | Michael | | | - -- Alexandru Ghitza Assistant Professor Department of Mathematics Colby College Waterville, ME 04901 http://bayes.colby.edu/~ghitza/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH5w+KdZTaNFFPILgRAoBpAKCpAVtRk+jbj+dhU0bRCu76GdYVpwCfSMBk Gvt9L51zfmdBJuuz407ZaCM= =PkqZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] zero-dimensional schemes and multivariate polynomials in zero variables
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Martin Albrecht brought up the following issue, in relation to http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2634 "I am not convinced that it is actually desired to allow 0 generators for multivariate polynomial rings. We allowed that before and thus I reintroduced that behaviour but I would like to get rid of it: It will be a no fun to support once the generic multivariate polynomials get closer to C and I don't see the point." I'm not sure whether the pun at the end of the quote was intended or not. But we definitely want to be able to work with zero-dimensional schemes (points), e.g. A0 = AffineSpace(ZZ, 0, 'a'). As far as I can tell, the trouble comes up only in A0.coordinate_ring(), which currently looks at this as a multivariate polynomial ring in zero variables. I think we can just make coordinate_ring() return the base ring in the case of dimension zero, and this would allow Martin to get rid of zero-variable ring. Thoughts? Best, Alex - -- Alexandru Ghitza Assistant Professor Department of Mathematics Colby College Waterville, ME 04901 http://bayes.colby.edu/~ghitza/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH5xbndZTaNFFPILgRAhRBAJ953dtdZWJOj5wRnu9IrQiZfPpLtgCeLs4v NYcnKo4t3u1hci77x++SG6Y= =OrNC -END PGP SIGNATURE- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
