Secdir early review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-16
Reviewer: Phillip Hallam-Baker Review result: Has Issues I have reviewed this document and in general, it seems ready. While it does raise serious security concerns, it is not clear that these are new to this proposal or that this proposal gives more leverage to an attacker. Specifically, the draft stipulates that 'the area is in a single administrative domain' the security considerations describes one set of attacks arising from customers served by the domain. However, this set of attacks may be broader than described. Consider for instance the case where there are two domains A and B that provide transit for ISP C. An attacker that wants to ensure C is serviced exclusively by B might perform a denial of service attack on A so as to increase the cost of that route so as to achieve that goal. A real world attack that has been seen in the past is country X preparing for an invasion of country Y, performing BGP level attacks to effectively reroute Internet traffic within Y so that the government Web sites were serviced by fake sites set up by X. These sites containing messages of the form 'don't worry about the military exercises'. ___ rtgwg mailing list -- rtgwg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to rtgwg-le...@ietf.org
Re: WG adoption for draft-acee-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc8347bis (10/9/24-10/25/24)
Hi all, The WG adoption is completed and the document is adopted. Please republish the document as draft-ietf-rtgwg-isis-vrrp-rfc8347bis-00 when the datatracker reopens. While there wasn't as much support as we would have liked maybe because it was close to the IETF meeting, there were no objections. The chairs believe this bis version is very much needed and thank the authors for working on it. Thanks, Yingzhen On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 8:50 AM Acee Lindem wrote: > Now all 5 co-authors have responded to the IPR poll. > > Thanks, > Acee > > On Oct 12, 2024, at 10:02, Ravi Parikh wrote: > > I am not aware of any IPR that applies to the draft. I support WG > adoption. > > Thank you, > Ravi Parikh. > > On Oct 12, 2024, at 5:06 AM, Xufeng Liu wrote: > > I am not aware of any IPR that applies to the draft. > > I support WG adoption. > > > ___ rtgwg mailing list -- rtgwg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to rtgwg-le...@ietf.org
