Re: Bug#900837: update on mass-rebuild of packages for reproducible builds

2020-12-04 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Vagrant

On 04-12-2020 03:46, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2019-03-05, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> I ran Chris's script again on coccia, with the result that currently
>> 6084 source packages in the archive need a rebuild for reproducible
>> builds, as they were built with an old dpkg version not producing
>> .buildinfo files.
> 
> I ran it just now, and we're down to 3433! Still a ways to go, but
> getting there...
> 
> Updated list attached.

Maybe it's slightly more interesting what's in bullseye as we have quite
a bit of junk in unstable.

Paul



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

Re: Bug#900837: update on mass-rebuild of packages for reproducible builds

2020-12-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:46:18PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2019-03-05, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > I ran Chris's script again on coccia, with the result that currently
> > 6084 source packages in the archive need a rebuild for reproducible
> > builds, as they were built with an old dpkg version not producing
> > .buildinfo files.
>
> I ran it just now, and we're down to 3433! Still a ways to go, but
> getting there...
>
> Updated list attached.

From a quick look the majority seem to build binary-all,
which is not binNMU-able.

> live well,
>   vagrant

cu
Adrian

___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

Re

2020-12-04 Thread Elizabeth Curd
I've been trying to reach you its pertinent
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds