Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-flanagan-regext-datadictionary
Hi all, Re Section 3, my understanding is that this section is intended to describe how new data elements would be created for use across the entire domain system, as opposed to describing how a specific data element is populated for a given domain. If that is correct (it is for creating new data elements), could some further explanation be added to section 3 “IANA Considerations”? And if not, please let me know. Thanks, -- Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they sw...@tucows.com +1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392 From: James Galvin Sent: December 20, 2021 9:28 AM To: Registration Protocols Extensions Subject: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-flanagan-regext-datadictionary This is the formal adoption request for DNS Data Dictionary: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-flanagan-regext-datadictionary/ Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by REGEXT and comment to the list, clearly stating your view. This Call For Adoption will close on Monday, 10 January. If there are no objections, the chairs will consider this document adopted. Thanks, Your REGEXT co-chairs Antoin and Jim ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
Re: [regext] Anyone interested in being a document shepherd for theData Dictionary?
I’m fairly new to the process so likely not a good candidate for helping shepherd this doc, but I do want to make sure that my question re the scope of Section 3 eventually gets addressed. Thanks Heather! -- Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they sw...@tucows.com +1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392 From: Heather Flanagan Sent: January 24, 2022 1:12 PM To: Registration Protocols Extensions Subject: [regext] Anyone interested in being a document shepherd for theData Dictionary? Hello all, As Jim and Antoin have noted, we need to get a doc shepherd assigned to the data dictionary draft. Do we have any volunteers? (Reminder re: doc shepherd responsibilities: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/wgchairs/wiki/ExtendedDocumentShepherding) It’s an important role, and very much appreciated! Thanks, Heather Heather Flanagan Spherical Cow Consulting Translator of Geek to Human h...@sphericalcowconsulting.com ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
Re: [regext] Anyone interested in being a document shepherd fortheData Dictionary?
That’s great to hear, thanks Heather. -- Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they sw...@tucows.com +1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392 From: Heather Flanagan Sent: January 24, 2022 1:17 PM To: Registration Protocols Extensions; Sarah Wyld Subject: RE: [regext] Anyone interested in being a document shepherd fortheData Dictionary? On Jan 24, 2022, 10:14 AM -0800, Sarah Wyld , wrote: I’m fairly new to the process so likely not a good candidate for helping shepherd this doc, but I do want to make sure that my question re the scope of Section 3 eventually gets addressed. Thanks Heather! Definitely. I’ve created a doc with all the comments received to date regarding this draft to make sure we address everything. Right now, that’s on my own system; if the WG has a wiki, I’m happy to move it there (insert implied question here to the chairs - do we have a space for this kind of thing?). -Heather ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
