Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-03

2020-11-09 Thread James Galvin 

The WGLC for this document is now closed.

The Chairs do not believe this document is ready for publication.  
Unfortunately, a number of items were brought up during the last call 
that have not received enough discussion to resolve.


This document will remain a working group document.

The authors may wish to consider bringing the open issues to the floor 
during the upcoming IETF109 meeting; there is some time on the agenda.


Regard,

Antoin and Jim




On 26 Oct 2020, at 10:23, James Galvin wrote:

The Chairs would like to extend this WG Last Call for an additional 
two weeks, to close on Friday, 30 October 2020.


Although there have been 2 indications of support, James Gould 
provided some extensive comments, most of which have been addressed in 
version -04 of the document.  However, Jody Kolker indicated in his 
response that he’d appreciate some additional comments on a few 
items.


The Chairs would like to see some discussion of the remaining items.  
Would others please indicate their point of view in the active thread 
between Jody and James.


Thank you,

Antoin and Jim



On 2 Oct 2020, at 16:57, James Galvin wrote:

The following working group document is believed to be ready for 
submission to the IESG for publication as a standards track document:


https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance/

This WG last call will end at close of business, Friday, 16 October 
2020.


Please review this document and indicate your support (a simple 
“+1” is sufficient) or concerns with the publication of this 
document by replying to this message on the list.


The document shepherd for this document is James Galvin.

Regards,

Antoin and Jim


___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-03

2020-11-09 Thread James Galvin 

The WGLC for this document is now closed.

Thanks to the working group for the additional discussion on the concern 
raised by Patrick Mevzek.  Two additional people - Thomas Corte and 
Martin Casanova - have indicated their support for the document.


The Chairs believe this document is now ready for submission to the 
IESG.  The document shepherd, David Smith, is requested to prepare the 
shepherd writeup.  Please be sure to note the last concern raised and 
its resolution in the technical writeup.


Thanks,

Antoin and Jim




On 26 Oct 2020, at 10:01, James Galvin wrote:

The Chairs would like to extend this WG Last Call for an additional 
two weeks, to close on Friday, 30 October 2020.


Although there have been 3 indications of support, Patrick Mevzek and 
James Gould have been having an extended discussion on the mailing 
list about one issue.  The chairs believe it is important to get 
additional points of view, ideally from other EPP client developers 
but all opinions are welcome.


Current consensus is to seek publication.  However, we are a 
relatively small group and we would like all comments considered by 
multiple people.  Would others please indicate their point of view in 
the active thread between James and Patrick?


Thank you,

Antoin and Jim




On 2 Oct 2020, at 16:52, James Galvin wrote:

The following working group document is believed to be ready for 
submission to the IESG for publication as a standards track document:


https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces/

This WG last call will end at close of business, Friday, 16 October 
2020.


Please review this document and indicate your support (a simple 
“+1” is sufficient) or concerns with the publication of this 
document by replying to this message on the list.


The document shepherd for this document is David Smith.

Regards,

Antoin and Jim


___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-03

2020-11-09 Thread Gould, James 
Jim,



There is an update planned for draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-05 that 
addresses the concerns that Thomas Corte raised during the WGLC, with the 
following changes:



  1.  Based on feedback from Thomas Corte, added a description of the 
 element in RFC 5730 and it being extended to support returning 
unhandled namespace information.
  2.  Based on feedback from Thomas Corte, added a Implementation 
Considerations section to cover client and server implementation 
recommendations such as monitoring unhandled namespaces in the server to report 
to the clients out-of-band and monitoring for responses containing unhanded 
namespace information in the client to proactively add support for the 
unhandled namespaces.



draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-05 will be posted once the draft 
submission window opens up.



Thanks,



--



JG







James Gould

Fellow Engineer

jgo...@verisign.com 




703-948-3271

12061 Bluemont Way

Reston, VA 20190



Verisign.com 



On 11/9/20, 12:01 PM, "regext on behalf of James Galvin" 
 wrote:



The WGLC for this document is now closed.



Thanks to the working group for the additional discussion on the concern

raised by Patrick Mevzek.  Two additional people - Thomas Corte and

Martin Casanova - have indicated their support for the document.



The Chairs believe this document is now ready for submission to the

IESG.  The document shepherd, David Smith, is requested to prepare the

shepherd writeup.  Please be sure to note the last concern raised and

its resolution in the technical writeup.



Thanks,



Antoin and Jim









On 26 Oct 2020, at 10:01, James Galvin wrote:



> The Chairs would like to extend this WG Last Call for an additional

> two weeks, to close on Friday, 30 October 2020.

>

> Although there have been 3 indications of support, Patrick Mevzek and

> James Gould have been having an extended discussion on the mailing

> list about one issue.  The chairs believe it is important to get

> additional points of view, ideally from other EPP client developers

> but all opinions are welcome.

>

> Current consensus is to seek publication.  However, we are a

> relatively small group and we would like all comments considered by

> multiple people.  Would others please indicate their point of view in

> the active thread between James and Patrick?

>

> Thank you,

>

> Antoin and Jim

>

>

>

>

> On 2 Oct 2020, at 16:52, James Galvin wrote:

>

>> The following working group document is believed to be ready for

>> submission to the IESG for publication as a standards track document:

>>

>> 
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1dzUO4TGHUUPomDmedIaC2XjNHykoP8AdoJi85uaef2rF8hGoMlvw0I2YAm8WFgiX-mzllTPy1a0LGQm-VEZ5CMmOPg0r5o-wWe8dEnQikqWPx1MJ2NT3RvBRXaLLtiMLUpZuWv72D8eP0LCrbgC5pbvt4jJ2-YqPhi2_zOueQTxMCs0GfX5DzM1BCZhljRy2zuZVoFsMvkYUvcCj_muzL1hwjPvALejlQqWHl30Wsu_gSYNguMHS2NDCtWpqqQk2NMjR2FC2sPTxmfbT8vUJaQ/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces%2F

>>

>> This WG last call will end at close of business, Friday, 16 October

>> 2020.

>>

>> Please review this document and indicate your support (a simple

>> “+1” is sufficient) or concerns with the publication of this

>> document by replying to this message on the list.

>>

>> The document shepherd for this document is David Smith.

>>

>> Regards,

>>

>> Antoin and Jim



___

regext mailing list

regext@ietf.org


https://secure-web.cisco.com/1Md8cfFbq82PdmCgP_5bkiKpd1-RKysH7Jp8FwK8d3ONPrqMvzZ4_v3LIxtHfYOtp22T88dX3wYPxwF2nQG9xzvABH3P04oDLXETu6QEq0HMbX7h4LS7Eit6jnKSejLb4hpmhhW8gEtQOJrKNHt9LKstOriCunNufoXXFMdczhcEiHS3wLB3Fm80FjxVLpur-SJoXtKfy5MIINe6ZHe14V-XTDsfibS6kXlYFt9CMrfysfYxArNudz_DLq377Rftr_Ud4Y496kNDvEPEWairXBX1pU0etlgJ_6h1jDhcp5zs/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext
___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-03

2020-11-09 Thread James Galvin 
Thanks for calling this out Jim.  Antoin and I were talking about this 
this morning and still I managed to miss it when sending the note out.


The document shepherd - David Smith - should wait for the latest version 
of the document to do his writeup.


Jim



On 9 Nov 2020, at 12:30, Gould, James wrote:


Jim,



There is an update planned for 
draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-05 that addresses the concerns 
that Thomas Corte raised during the WGLC, with the following changes:




  1.  Based on feedback from Thomas Corte, added a description of the 
 element in RFC 5730 and it being extended to support 
returning unhandled namespace information.
  2.  Based on feedback from Thomas Corte, added a Implementation 
Considerations section to cover client and server implementation 
recommendations such as monitoring unhandled namespaces in the server 
to report to the clients out-of-band and monitoring for responses 
containing unhanded namespace information in the client to proactively 
add support for the unhandled namespaces.




draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-05 will be posted once the 
draft submission window opens up.




Thanks,



--



JG







James Gould

Fellow Engineer

jgo...@verisign.com 





703-948-3271

12061 Bluemont Way

Reston, VA 20190



Verisign.com 



On 11/9/20, 12:01 PM, "regext on behalf of James Galvin" 
 wrote:




The WGLC for this document is now closed.



Thanks to the working group for the additional discussion on the 
concern


raised by Patrick Mevzek.  Two additional people - Thomas Corte 
and


Martin Casanova - have indicated their support for the document.



The Chairs believe this document is now ready for submission to 
the


IESG.  The document shepherd, David Smith, is requested to prepare 
the


shepherd writeup.  Please be sure to note the last concern raised 
and


its resolution in the technical writeup.



Thanks,



Antoin and Jim









On 26 Oct 2020, at 10:01, James Galvin wrote:



> The Chairs would like to extend this WG Last Call for an 
additional


> two weeks, to close on Friday, 30 October 2020.

>

> Although there have been 3 indications of support, Patrick 
Mevzek and


> James Gould have been having an extended discussion on the 
mailing


> list about one issue.  The chairs believe it is important to get

> additional points of view, ideally from other EPP client 
developers


> but all opinions are welcome.

>

> Current consensus is to seek publication.  However, we are a

> relatively small group and we would like all comments considered 
by


> multiple people.  Would others please indicate their point of 
view in


> the active thread between James and Patrick?

>

> Thank you,

>

> Antoin and Jim

>

>

>

>

> On 2 Oct 2020, at 16:52, James Galvin wrote:

>

>> The following working group document is believed to be ready 
for


>> submission to the IESG for publication as a standards track 
document:


>>

>> 
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1dzUO4TGHUUPomDmedIaC2XjNHykoP8AdoJi85uaef2rF8hGoMlvw0I2YAm8WFgiX-mzllTPy1a0LGQm-VEZ5CMmOPg0r5o-wWe8dEnQikqWPx1MJ2NT3RvBRXaLLtiMLUpZuWv72D8eP0LCrbgC5pbvt4jJ2-YqPhi2_zOueQTxMCs0GfX5DzM1BCZhljRy2zuZVoFsMvkYUvcCj_muzL1hwjPvALejlQqWHl30Wsu_gSYNguMHS2NDCtWpqqQk2NMjR2FC2sPTxmfbT8vUJaQ/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces%2F


>>

>> This WG last call will end at close of business, Friday, 16 
October


>> 2020.

>>

>> Please review this document and indicate your support (a simple

>> “+1” is sufficient) or concerns with the publication of 
this


>> document by replying to this message on the list.

>>

>> The document shepherd for this document is David Smith.

>>

>> Regards,

>>

>> Antoin and Jim



___

regext mailing list

regext@ietf.org


https://secure-web.cisco.com/1Md8cfFbq82PdmCgP_5bkiKpd1-RKysH7Jp8FwK8d3ONPrqMvzZ4_v3LIxtHfYOtp22T88dX3wYPxwF2nQG9xzvABH3P04oDLXETu6QEq0HMbX7h4LS7Eit6jnKSejLb4hpmhhW8gEtQOJrKNHt9LKstOriCunNufoXXFMdczhcEiHS3wLB3Fm80FjxVLpur-SJoXtKfy5MIINe6ZHe14V-XTDsfibS6kXlYFt9CMrfysfYxArNudz_DLq377Rftr_Ud4Y496kNDvEPEWairXBX1pU0etlgJ_6h1jDhcp5zs/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext



___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext