Hello,
On 05/06/2017 21:04, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions of the
> IETF.
>
> Title : Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible
> Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
> Authors : Roger Carney
> Gavin Brown
> Jothan Frakes
> Filename: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-04.txt
> ...
Thanks for this new version. We're getting there :-)
In addition to what James wrote about section 3.1. ("Client Commands"),
there's also a discrepancy in that the text explicitly mentions the
"update" command, while the enumeration "commandEnum" doesn't contain
that command. I know it's unusual for registries to charge for updates,
and that this could essentially be covered by the "custom" case, but I
think it should be included as a first-class command for consistency.
This would require an XSD change though.
While we're at it, we should think about maybe including *automatic*
renewals (as opposed to explicit renewals) as a first-class type (e.g.
"auto-renew") here, too.
I know that it's not really a command (but an action that happens due to
the lack of a delete command), but *in theory* (and our own registry
system supports that) the price for an automatic renewal could be
different from an explicit renewal, e.g. if a registry wants to promote
the early renewal of domains. But if this deemed too exotic, I could live
with using the "custom" case to signal this.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
TANGO REGISTRY SERVICES® is a product of:
Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH
Technologiepark Phone: +49 231 9703-222
Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9 Fax: +49 231 9703-200
D-44227 Dortmund E-Mail: supp...@tango-rs.com
Germany
___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
