Guinness Mail list

2000-11-29 Thread Ray Atnip

Is there a guinness mail list? If so, how/where to subscribe?

thanks
-- 
Ray Atnip
"If we couldn't laugh, we would all go insane." -- Jimmy Buffett



___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list



Excellent Job Red Hat!

1999-10-21 Thread Ray Atnip

Well it's about time for a positive note.

I just got my 6.1 CDs today.
Did a fresh install on a Dual PII box.
The install went flawless.
If I wanted to whine about anything it would be
that my monitor wasn't listed the the 100 or so
that were there but it only slowed me down a 
few minutes.

I think this is the best install process yet.
The graphic came up, all my hardware was recognized,
I answered the typical questions IP, passwd, partitions
to use, etc.
It took less than 10 minutes to install and reboot.

It is working fine and I for one could not find any
problems, but then I didn't do the text mode install nor
did I do an upgrade.

I have two other machines to upgrade and will try to do
an 'upgrade' install and report on that later.

GOOD JOB RedHat
-- 
Ray Atnip
IBM AIX, ADSM, & SP Certified
CTSInc.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wk: 972-934-7626
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hm: 972-539-2600

-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null



Re: Noise about the installer...

1999-10-21 Thread Ray Atnip

Kevin Waterson wrote:
> 
> Chuck Mead wrote:
> 
> >
> > In summation... good job Red Hat, and thank you!
> >
> 
> Indeed, good job.
> 
> However, the feed back I have been getting has been mostly negative.
> What the most of it seems to be is a _percieved_  short coming in the
> installation
> Whether it is good or not does not sway public perceptions.
> 
> $0.02
> 
> Kevin

That is because few, if any people, bother to write about a good experience,
just bad ones.

So if 1000 people had no problems but 10 did and they publish it here,
then the perception is a 'bad' one to those who are just readers.

-- 
Ray Atnip
IBM AIX, ADSM, & SP Certified
CTSInc.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wk: 972-934-7626
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hm: 972-539-2600

-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null



Re: Staroffice

1999-10-22 Thread Ray Atnip

Steve Dixon wrote:
> 
> We just recieved our copy of 6.1 Professional.  I'm lost in all of these
> cd's, but I can't find StarOffice for the life of me.  Your webpage says
> that it is supposed to be on the Applications cd?  Anyone else happen to
> find it?
> --

Mine is on a separate CD in Sun Microsystems package and says
StarOffice 5.1 on it.
-- 
Ray Atnip
IBM AIX, ADSM, & SP Certified
CTSInc.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wk: 972-934-7626
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hm: 972-539-2600

-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null



Re: Staroffice

1999-10-22 Thread Ray Atnip

"Gene C." wrote:
> 
> I have both the "Deluxe" package and the "Professional" package.  The "Deluxe"
> package includes rhl 6.1 (2 cds), Powetools and applications (2 cds), and
> StarOffice in a Sun cd (1 cd).  The "Professional" package includes rhl 6.1 (2
> cds), applications and powetools (2 cds), Secure Web Server (1 cd), Linux Appl
> Lib server edition (DB2 cd, Tird Party server cd, CPAN cd) ... NO StarOffice
> CD.  I (also) seem to remembetr that "Professional" was suppose to come with
> StarOffice.
> 
> Gene
> 
> On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Steve Dixon wrote:
> > anyone with the professional edition get theirs because i see no such
> > cd.
> >
> > Ray Atnip wrote:
> > >
> > > Steve Dixon wrote:
> > > >
> > > > We just recieved our copy of 6.1 Professional.  I'm lost in all of these
> > > > cd's, but I can't find StarOffice for the life of me.  Your webpage says
> > > > that it is supposed to be on the Applications cd?  Anyone else happen to
> > > > find it?
> > > > --
> > >
> > > Mine is on a separate CD in Sun Microsystems package and says
> > > StarOffice 5.1 on it.
> > > --
> > > Ray Atnip
> > > IBM AIX, ADSM, & SP Certified
> > > CTSInc.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wk: 972-934-7626
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] hm: 972-539-2600
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe:
> > > mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
> >
> > --

I forgot to include I have the Deluxe Edition.

-- 
Ray Atnip
IBM AIX, ADSM, & SP Certified
CTSInc.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wk: 972-934-7626
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hm: 972-539-2600

-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null



Where can I find libXm.so

1999-10-23 Thread Ray Atnip

Which rpm package has the file libXm.so
--
Ray Atnip
IBM AIX, ADSM, & SP Certified
CTSInc.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wk: 972-934-7626
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hm: 972-539-2600

-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null



Re: Where can I find libXm.so

1999-10-23 Thread Ray Atnip

Matthew Campbell wrote:
> 
> Ray Atnip writes:
>  > Which rpm package has the file libXm.so
> 
> libXm.so is the main shared library for Motif, a commercial GUI
> toolkit that is not open-source software.  Since Motif isn't
> open-source software, it's not included with Red Hat Linux or
> PowerTools.  However, there is an open-source clone of Motif called
> lesstif, and you can find RPM's for that in Red Hat PowerTools.
>

thanks.
I had just tried to install jre-1.1.6_v5-2glibc and it requires
that library. I had downloaded it from the contrib site. Is there
a jre that doesn't need the Motif libraries?

-- 
Ray Atnip
IBM AIX, ADSM, & SP Certified
CTSInc.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wk: 972-934-7626
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hm: 972-539-2600

-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null



Installing netscape 4.7

1999-10-26 Thread Ray Atnip

I just downloaded 
netscape-common-4.7-1.1us.i386.rpm.rhmask
netscape-communicator-4.7-1.1us.i386.rpm.rhmask
from updates/6.1us

How do I get them to install?
When I run rhmask against the netscape rpm on the 6.1 CD
which netscape 4.6, it doesn't verify which is
the only version I received with the CDs.


-- 
Ray Atnip
IBM AIX, ADSM, & SP Certified
CTSInc.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wk: 972-934-7626
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hm: 972-539-2600

-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null



Re: pidentd >= 3.0 question

1999-10-31 Thread Ray Atnip

Also why is it started with an init.d script and it is also listed in the
inetd.conf file.

Svante Signell wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Obviously the 3.x series of pidentd behaves differently than the 2.x
> versions. Earlier version created log entries like:
>  identd[6577]: Connection from localhost
>  identd[6577]: from: 127.0.0.1 ( localhost ) for: 1932, 25
> while the newer ones give
>  in.identd[14472]: started
> 
> How do I configure /etc/inetd.conf and /etc/identd.conf to restore the
> connecting parties identity? Also there does not seem to be any entry
> any longer for identd in ntsysv or linuxconf. Is this due to that
> (in.)identd is started differently than for 2.x versions?
> 
> Svante Signell
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe:
> mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null

-- 
Ray Atnip
IBM AIX, ADSM, & SP Certified
CTSInc.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wk: 972-934-7626
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hm: 972-539-2600

-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null



Re: mandated charceters in usernames

1999-11-07 Thread Ray Atnip

Kevin Waterson wrote:
> 
> Why is it I cannot have a username such as  2bad yet can have bad2
> 

User names must start with an alpha character.

-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null



Logitech Internet Keyboard

1999-12-05 Thread Ray Atnip

I just bought one and was looking for a way to make use of the
xtra keys for internet and audio play.
Anyone know where to find the info?
-- 
Ray Atnip

-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null



Problems with up2date

2000-01-07 Thread Ray Atnip

As of tonite, my up2date package now tells me that
my user/authentication is not valid. It has been 
previously (since I recvd 6.1 in Nov). 

user id is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
passwd - i could tell you, but then I would have to shoot you.

server: priority.redhat.com
program: /up2date/server.cgi


Also I don't understand why the last four updates
that were posted from redhat were never placed in
the server/directory up2date uses. I thought that's
what the extra $$ were for.

Later...
-- 
Ray Atnip
IBM AIX, ADSM, & SP Certified
CTSInc.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wk: 972-934-7626
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hm: 972-539-2600

-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null



Re: kudzu problem

2000-02-06 Thread Ray Atnip

John Summerfield wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > When I build a 2.2.12 or 2.2.14 kernel for my own, kudzu crashes with a
> > segmentation fault. I think that I forgot something to enable which is
> > needed by kudzu. I suppose it depends on the pci settings, but I don't
> > know on which particular. I am using the kudzu tool which was delivered
> > with RH 6.1.
> >
> > thanx for your help,
> 
> I think kudzu is extremely well named. The best way I know of using it is
> don't. Just disable it from being run by the init scripts.
> 
> It won't do automatic hardware detection, but then I've never seen the
> need for it. I have noted kudzu stuffing things up.
> 

I have to disagree with that statement. I have found kudzu to do a very nice
job of detecting hardware and also changes to my system. I have both added
and deleted hardware and each time kudzu detected the change and made the
appropriate changes.

I'm sure it's is not perfect nor that it hasn't caused problems, but to say
that it doesn't do automatic hardware detection is just not true.

-- 
Ray Atnip
"If we couldn't laugh, we would all go insane." -- Jimmy Buffett

-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null



Unresolved symbols?

2000-03-20 Thread Ray Atnip

I'm getting lots of these with depmod -a.
I have built a lot of uni-processor kernels and modules and have
never had this problem.
When I build them with SMP on in a SMP machine, I keep getting
these unresolved symbols.

Kernel is 2.2.15 w/RedHat 6.2beta

Any suggestions?
-- 
Ray Atnip
"If we couldn't laugh, we would all go insane." -- Jimmy Buffett

-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null




Re: Unresolved symbols?

2000-03-21 Thread Ray Atnip

Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > I have built a lot of uni-processor kernels and modules and have
> > never had this problem.
> > When I build them with SMP on in a SMP machine, I keep getting
> > these unresolved symbols.
> 
> Make sure you make mrproper and clean up everything in your build tree
> when you change the SMP configuration. Then build your kernel/modules
> 

Thanks, that appears to do the trick. I've never had to do that before.

-- 
Ray Atnip
"If we couldn't laugh, we would all go insane." -- Jimmy Buffett

-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null




Re: kernel-heades not installed correctly

2000-06-01 Thread Ray Atnip

rpm -i --force kernel-headers...

Somehow the include files have been deleted but the rpm
data base is only updated by rpm commands.

forcing the install will put everything back.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> I have kernel-headers-2.2.12-20.i386.rpm installed.
> 
> When I do
> 
>rpm -ql kernel-headers
> 
> it lists a large number of .h files, many of which are supposed to
> be in the directory /usr/src/linux-2.2.12/
> 
> But when I look in that directory, these files are not present.
> Even the directory linux-2.2.12 is missing.  The only thing in
> /usr/src is a redhat directory which has several empty
> subdirectories (RPMS, SOURCE etc.)
> 
> Also,  /usr/include/linux is a symbolic link to some path below
> /usr/src/linux - but /usr/src/linux doesn't exist.
> 
> Because of all of this, I am unable to compile things (in this case,
> I'm trying to build the print manager PDQ, but gcc fails because it
> can't find
> 
> If I try to reinstall the kernel-headers RPM, it complains that it is
> already installed.  I'm fearful of removing it in case it breaks
> something else.  Would it be safe to remove it and reinstall?
> 
> Will Irwin
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe:
> mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null

-- 
Ray Atnip
"If we couldn't laugh, we would all go insane." -- Jimmy Buffett

-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null