[R] Ctree plot

2012-08-09 Thread rodrock
HI everybody!

Has anybody figure out how would be possible to plot several ctree plots
beside each other?
I would really appreciate it
 My idea would be like this, but the par() function seem to be lower in
hierarchy
Thanks in advance
#
library(party)

mtree <- ctree(Species ~ ., data=iris)
sep.tree<-ctree(Sepal.Length ~ ., data=iris)

par(mfrow=c(1,2)) # Does not work
plot(mtree) 
plot(sep.tree) 




-
Rodrigo Vargas G.
-
Silviculture Institute
Freiburg University

--
View this message in context: 
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Ctree-plot-tp4639750.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] Envfit, inconsistant result?

2011-09-23 Thread rodrock
Hi R-experts,

I am using the envfit function over an ordination of floristic data.

The problem is that every time that I run it changes the results. Sometimes
dramatically, selecting variables that the first time were not significant.
I do not get what could be the problem or if is normal given the
permutations are different.

# the NMDS ordination

gap_flor_NMDS_chord <- metaMDS(gaps_flor, distance = "euclid", k = 2, trymax
= 20, autotransform =TRUE,
noshare = 0.1, wascores = TRUE, expand = TRUE, trace = 1,
plot = FALSE, old.wa = FALSE, zerodist = "add")

# the  environmental variables to use with enfit

explain1<- site[c("Tipo", "Gap.size", "Gap diameter (m)", "Size.cat",
"altitud", "Slope (%)", 
"Exp.deg", "form","formcont", "largo_medio_gmak_m", "Dom.Hight",
"d_m_gapmak_cm", "Cat_edad", 
 "uprooted_perc", "Snapped gap maker (%)", "stand_dead_perc",
"controlled_perc", 
 "nodet_orig_gmkr_perc",  "Total_borde", "PACL_diff_warm045",
  "rock", "musg_hep", "mantillo", "sm", "tronco_tot", "Time.ctr",
"mf_gmk_perc",
  "fm_gmk", "dc_gmk_perc", "be_gmk_perc", "ach_gmk_perc",
"nodet_spp_gmkr_perc",
 "Myrceugenia as border tree (%)", "Fm_borde.", "Dc_borde.", "Be_borde.",
"Rv_borde.", 
 "Aristotelia as border tree (%)")]   

# the  Envfit calculation
exp_flor1 <- envfit(gap_flor_NMDS_chord, explain1, permu = 999, na.rm=T)   


Thanks a lot for your help, comments and input!


-
Rodrigo Vargas G.
-
Silviculture Institute
Freiburg University

--
View this message in context: 
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Envfit-inconsistant-result-tp3836585p3836585.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] Envfit, inconsistant result?

2011-09-30 Thread rodrock
Thanks a lot !

At the end I found that the problem was in the data input. Once I normilized
the data input to use the chord distance as measure of dissimilarity

gaps_flor_norm<-decostand(gaps_flor, "norm"), then I run the nMDS several
times comparing them through procrustes

plot(procrustes(gap_flor_NMDS1, gap_flor_NMDS2))

Can not say more,
Thanks a lot for your response and all your work,

Cheers,


Rodrigo Vargas G.
-
Silviculture Institute
Freiburg University
+49 0761 203 8621
Tennenbacher str 4 Freiburg ibr


2011/9/28 Jari Oksanen [via R] 

> rodrock  gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> > I am using the envfit function over an ordination of floristic data.
> >
> > The problem is that every time that I run it changes the results.
> Sometimes
> > dramatically, selecting variables that the first time were not
> significant.
> > I do not get what could be the problem or if is normal given the
> > permutations are different.
> >
> > # the NMDS ordination
> >
> > gap_flor_NMDS_chord <- metaMDS(gaps_flor, distance = "euclid", k = 2,
> trymax
> > = 20, autotransform =TRUE,
> > noshare = 0.1, wascores = TRUE, expand = TRUE, trace = 1,
> > plot = FALSE, old.wa = FALSE, zerodist = "add")
> >
>
> > # the  Envfit calculation
> > exp_flor1 <- envfit(gap_flor_NMDS_chord, explain1, permu = 999, na.rm=T)
>
> >
>
> Rodrigo,
>
> Do you re-run your NMDS when the envfit results change? The results of NMDS
> may
> change between two runs. You should first check that the NMDS results are
> nearly
> identical. This you can do with procrustes() function in vegan:
>
> plot(procrustes(gap_flor_NMDS1, gap_flor_NMDS2))
>
> where the arguments gap_flor_NMDS1 and gap_flor_NMDS2 are two NMDS results
> that
> gave you different envfit results. Use of plot() above helps you to avoid
> looking at tiny differences in a numeric results: if you cannot see a
> difference
> in the procrustes plot, there is no difference you need to worry about.
> Only
> worry about envfit differences if the NMDS results are practically
> identical.
>
> I'm surprised if metaMDS didn't issue any warning on the combination of
> arguments you used in metaMDS: having no.share > 0 and distance = "euclid"
> sounds dubious, and I have tried to catch those cases and issue an
> informative
> warning. You could also try higher trymax to get more consistent NMDS
> results.
>
> Cheers, Jari Oksanen
>
> __
> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3850347&i=0>mailing 
> list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
>
> --
>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Envfit-inconsistant-result-tp3836585p3850347.html
>  To unsubscribe from Envfit, inconsistant result?, click 
> here<http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=3836585&code=cm9kcmlnby52YXJnYXNnYWV0ZUBnbWFpbC5jb218MzgzNjU4NXw5MTY2NDczMDU=>.
>
>


-
Rodrigo Vargas G.
-
Silviculture Institute
Freiburg University

--
View this message in context: 
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Envfit-inconsistant-result-tp3836585p3859115.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] Problem with factors in NMDS and Envfit

2012-05-10 Thread rodrock
Hi everybody, 
thanks in advance for your help!

I am working with genetic data performing an NMDS to visualize the genetic
differentiation of individuals from different species and populations in
different site conditions (site variables are all factors), and actually
genetic data also.
The data base is kind of big (> 1000 individuals x 551 variables)

Nmds so far has not worked with the genetic data input as factors it shows
me and error
 (maybe the distance is not the proper?)
as integer the NMDS works well

ord2<-metaMDS(gen_all_nonas,k = 2, distance="euclid", autotransform=F,
noshare=T, na.rm=T)

When I use envfit to see the correlation of the site factors it does not
work until I remove all Nas. Once I do that it works almost good ("I can
live" with the Nas removing) but somehow It show me an error considering the
factor: Populations where the individuals come from ("Pop")

exp_site<-envfit(ord2~Pop+Sp+Location+Soil+Water+Flooding+Ca, strata=Sp,
na.rm=T)# with strata
Error en `colnames<-`(`*tmp*`, value = "Pop") : 
  attempt to set colnames on object with less than two dimensions

I do not know what I am doing wrong, there are more than 40 Populations in
the data set but I get this problem. Once I remove "Pop" from the command It
works ok e.g., 
attach(site_all_nonas)

exp_site2<-envfit(ord2~Sp+Location+Soil+Water+Flooding+Ca, strata=Sp,
na.rm=T)# with strata Sp
exp_site2

Goodness of fit:
 r2 Pr(>r)
Sp   0.5398  0.001 ***
Location 0.4174  0.001 ***
Soil 0.0090  0.511
Water0.0103  0.873
Flooding 0.0234  0.515
Ca   0.0334  0.901
---
Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 
P values based on 999 permutations, stratified within strata.



-
Rodrigo Vargas G.
-
Silviculture Institute
Freiburg University

--
View this message in context: 
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Problem-with-factors-in-NMDS-and-Envfit-tp4623645.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.