Re: using names before they're defined

[jordan . nick]

Steve Holden wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have a problem. I'm writing a simulation program with a number of
> > mechanical components represented as objects. When I create instances
> > of objects, I need to reference (link) each object to the objects
> > upstream and downstream of it, i.e.
> >
> > supply = supply()
> > compressor = compressor(downstream=combustor, upstream=supply)
> > combuster = combuster(downstream=turbine, upstream=compressor)
> > etc.
> >
> > the problem with this is that I reference 'combustor' before is it
> > created. If I swap the 2nd and 3rd lines I get the same problem
> > (compressor is referenced before creation).
> >
> >
> > aargh!!! any ideas on getting around this?
> >
> Yes. You are building a generic data structure, so you shouldn't really
> be trying to store individual objects in variables like that. You need a
> data structure that's appropriate to your problem.
>
> For example, you could consider storing them in a list, so you have
>
> components = [supply(), compressor(), combuster()]
>
> Then components[n] is upstream of components[n-1] and downstream of
> components[n+1].

Unfortunately, if he wanted to make the topology more complicated, for
instance having two components downstream, it would be much more
cumbersome to inherit the list object and implement this.

> In short, your thinking about data representation might need to become a
> little more sophisticated.

That sounds a little arrogant. sorry!

> regards
>   Steve
> --
> Steve Holden   +44 150 684 7255  +1 800 494 3119
> Holden Web LLC/Ltd  http://www.holdenweb.com
> Skype: holdenweb   http://holdenweb.blogspot.com
> Recent Ramblings http://del.icio.us/steve.holden

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

A Universe Set

[jordan . nick]

Has the addition of a Universe Set object ever been suggested.  Like U
= set(0), so that any object was a member of U?  Maybe this gets into
some crazy Cantorian stuff since U is in U.  But it seems like it would
be useful and would have a nice symmetry with emptyset:set([]), that
is:

for any object a:
"a in set([])" returns False
"a in set(0)" returns True

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Need help with syntax on inheritance.

[jordan . nick]

SpreadTooThin wrote:
> If you are deriving a new class from another class,
> that you must (I assume) know the initializer of the other class.
>
> So in myClass
>
> import array
> class myClass(arrary.array):
>def __init__(self, now here I need to put array's constructor
> parameters..., then mine):
>   array.array.__init__(self, typecode[, initializer])
>   self.mine = mine
>
> So I'm confused...
> array has a typecode parameter and an optional initiializer...
> So could you help me with the class construction here please?

Lookup *args and **kargs in the python reference manual.

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list