Re: .WAV processing library ?
Chris Stiles wrote: > Is there a library available for python that will enable me to process .wav > files ? > > Preferably extensible so I can write handlers for dealing with the non audio > sections. You will probably find everything you're looking for here: http://www.python.org/moin/PythonInMusic AK -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: why no python setup.py uninstall?
Peter Hansen wrote: > On your specific reason for asking: I would suggest > just not worrying about "being extra clean about it". > Python's generally pretty good about not messing up > when you install a new version of something without > uninstalling the previous version. Granted. However, the reason I did bring this up to begin with was the odd 'exceptional' case when doing the python setup.py install incantation over an older installation did cause problems. I think a little database (maybe in xml?) of installed files/modules and their locations would be useful, perhaps even for a future automatic download/installation/dependency-tracking thingmabob that still regretably still doesn't exist as parth of the stdlib in Pythonia. AK -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: why no python setup.py uninstall?
Peter Hansen wrote: > On your specific reason for asking: I would suggest > just not worrying about "being extra clean about it". > Python's generally pretty good about not messing up > when you install a new version of something without > uninstalling the previous version. Granted. However, the reason I did bring this up to begin with was the odd 'exceptional' case when doing the python setup.py install incantation over an older installation did cause problems. I think a little database (maybe in xml?) of installed files/modules and their locations would be useful, perhaps even for a future automatic download/installation/dependency-tracking thingmabob that still regretably still doesn't exist as parth of the stdlib in Pythonia. AK -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: PEP 338: Executing modules inside packages with '-m'
A useful feature that is a logical extension of current '-m' behaviour. (I'm actually surprised it was left out in the first place) This will definitely allow me and other python programmers to package our scripts better Sounds Good to me. (-; Thank you for the PEP AK -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
