Re: What people are using to access this mailing list

2010-11-03 Thread QoS

Dan M  wrote in message-id:  


> 
> On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 08:02:29 +, John Bond wrote:
> 
> > Hope this isn't too O/T - I was just wondering how people read/send to
> > this mailing list, eg. normal email client, gmane, some other software
> > or online service?
> > 
> > My normal inbox is getting unmanageable, and I think I need to find a
> > new way of following this and other lists.
> > 
> > Thanks for any suggestions.
> > 
> > Cheers, JB.
> 
> Pan newsreader

Using Perl and NewsSurfer to read this newsgroup (check headers).

Thanks,
J

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: What people are using to access this mailing list

2010-11-03 Thread QoS

Jed Smith  wrote in message-id:  


> 
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:02 AM, John Bond  wrote:
> > My normal inbox is getting unmanageable, and I think I need to find a new 
> > way
> > of following this and other lists.
> 
> I have to second (or third) the Gmail suggestion. I use Google Apps
> against my domain, and the Gmail interface is frightfully good at
> creating filters. For example, on most lists (particularly Mailman), I
> can hit "Filter messages like this", and Gmail automatically harvests
> the List header and writes a filter for it.
> 
> I just prefer the Gmail philosophy to mail, with tags that are *like*
> folders but not really.
> 

If that is what you used to post this reply then your client is broken somewhat.

Your client did not post using a well-formed references header and so your
post may/should not be grouped properly with the OP.

Here is what your client determined the references to be, you will se it has
no reference to the original posting.

  References: 

Below is a reply from someone using a well crafted client, this reply is 
certain to be
organized by other clients in the same thread:

  References:  
 
<87r5f2wr7t@rudin.co.uk> 

Hth
J


-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: What people are using to access this mailing list

2010-11-03 Thread QoS

Jed Smith  wrote in message-id:  


> 
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:02 AM, John Bond  wrote:
> > My normal inbox is getting unmanageable, and I think I need to find a new 
> > way
> > of following this and other lists.
> 
> I have to second (or third) the Gmail suggestion. I use Google Apps
> against my domain, and the Gmail interface is frightfully good at
> creating filters. For example, on most lists (particularly Mailman), I
> can hit "Filter messages like this", and Gmail automatically harvests
> the List header and writes a filter for it.
> 
> I just prefer the Gmail philosophy to mail, with tags that are *like*
> folders but not really.
> 

If that is what you used to post this reply then your client is broken somewhat.

Your client did not post using a well-formed references header and so your
post may/should not be grouped properly with the OP.

Here is what your client determined the references to be, you will se it has
no reference to the original posting.

  References: 

Below is a reply from someone using a well crafted client, this reply is 
certain to be
organized by other clients in the same thread:

  References:  
 
<87r5f2wr7t@rudin.co.uk> 
 
Hth
J


-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: What people are using to access this mailing list

2010-11-03 Thread QoS

Jed Smith  wrote in message-id:  


> 
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:02 AM, John Bond  wrote:
> > My normal inbox is getting unmanageable, and I think I need to find a new 
> > way
> > of following this and other lists.
> 
> I have to second (or third) the Gmail suggestion. I use Google Apps
> against my domain, and the Gmail interface is frightfully good at
> creating filters. For example, on most lists (particularly Mailman), I
> can hit "Filter messages like this", and Gmail automatically harvests
> the List header and writes a filter for it.
> 
> I just prefer the Gmail philosophy to mail, with tags that are *like*
> folders but not really.
> 
If that is what you used to post this reply then your client is broken somewhat.

Your client did not post using a well-formed references header and so your
post may/should not be grouped properly with the OP.

Here is what your client determined the references to be, you will se it has
no reference to the original posting.

  References: 

Below is a reply from someone using a well crafted client, this reply is 
certain to be
organized by other clients in the same thread:

  References:  
 
<87r5f2wr7t@rudin.co.uk> 
 
Hth
J

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: What people are using to access this mailing list

2010-11-03 Thread QoS

Jed Smith  wrote in message-id:  


> 
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:02 AM, John Bond  wrote:
> > My normal inbox is getting unmanageable, and I think I need to find a new 
> > way
> > of following this and other lists.
> 
> I have to second (or third) the Gmail suggestion. I use Google Apps
> against my domain, and the Gmail interface is frightfully good at
> creating filters. For example, on most lists (particularly Mailman), I
> can hit "Filter messages like this", and Gmail automatically harvests
> the List header and writes a filter for it.
> 
> I just prefer the Gmail philosophy to mail, with tags that are *like*
> folders but not really.
> 
If that is what you used to post this reply then your client is broken somewhat.

Your client did not post using a well-formed references header and so your
post may/should not be grouped properly with the OP.

Here is what your client determined the references to be, you will se it has
no reference to the original posting.

  References: 

Below is a reply from someone using a well crafted client, this reply is 
certain to be
organized by other clients in the same thread:

  References:  
 
<87r5f2wr7t@rudin.co.uk> 
 
Hth
J

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: What people are using to access this mailing list

2010-11-03 Thread QoS

Jed Smith  wrote in message-id:  


> 
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:02 AM, John Bond  wrote:
> > My normal inbox is getting unmanageable, and I think I need to find a new 
> > way
> > of following this and other lists.
> 
> I have to second (or third) the Gmail suggestion. I use Google Apps
> against my domain, and the Gmail interface is frightfully good at
> creating filters. For example, on most lists (particularly Mailman), I
> can hit "Filter messages like this", and Gmail automatically harvests
> the List header and writes a filter for it.
> 
> I just prefer the Gmail philosophy to mail, with tags that are *like*
> folders but not really.
> 
If that is what you used to post this reply then your client is broken somewhat.

Your client did not post using a well-formed references header and so your
post may/should not be grouped properly with the OP.

Here is what your client determined the references to be, you will se it has
no reference to the original posting.

  References: 

Below is a reply from someone using a well crafted client, this reply is 
certain to be
organized by other clients in the same thread:

  References:  
 
<87r5f2wr7t@rudin.co.uk> 
 
Hth
J

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: What people are using to access this mailing list

2010-11-03 Thread QoS

Jed Smith  wrote in message-id:  


> 
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:02 AM, John Bond  wrote:
> > My normal inbox is getting unmanageable, and I think I need to find a new 
> > way
> > of following this and other lists.
> 
> I have to second (or third) the Gmail suggestion. I use Google Apps
> against my domain, and the Gmail interface is frightfully good at
> creating filters. For example, on most lists (particularly Mailman), I
> can hit "Filter messages like this", and Gmail automatically harvests
> the List header and writes a filter for it.
> 
> I just prefer the Gmail philosophy to mail, with tags that are *like*
> folders but not really.
> 

Just in case the client may not display the headers, fyi:

If gmail is what you used to post this reply then your client is broken 
somewhat.

Your client did not post using a well-formed references header and so your
post may/should not be grouped properly with the OP.

Here is what your client determined the references to be, you will se it has
no reference to the original posting.

  References: 

Below is a reply from someone using a well crafted client, this reply is 
certain to be
organized by other clients in the same thread:

  References:  
 
<87r5f2wr7t@rudin.co.uk> 
 
Hth
J

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list