Re: PEP668 / pipx and "--editable" installs
On 2023-09-18 18:56:35 +, c.buhtz--- via Python-list wrote: > On 2023-09-18 10:16 "Peter J. Holzer via Python-list" > wrote: > > On 2023-09-15 14:15:23 +, c.buhtz--- via Python-list wrote: > > > I tried to install it via "pipx install -e .[develop]". It's > > > pyproject.toml has a bug: A missing dependency "dateutil". But > > > "dateutil" is not available from PyPi for Python 3.11 (the default > > > in Debian 12). But thanks to great Debian they have a > > > "python3-dateutil" package. I installed it. > > > > This can be installed via pip: > > I'm aware of this. You wrote: > > > "dateutil" is not available from PyPi for Python 3.11 That's quite a curious thing to write if you are aware that dateutil is in fact available from PyPi for Python 3.11. > But this is not the question. I know. That's why I labeled my comment as a "Sidenote". hp -- _ | Peter J. Holzer| Story must make more sense than reality. |_|_) || | | | h...@hjp.at |-- Charles Stross, "Creative writing __/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!" signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: PEP668 / pipx and "--editable" installs
Dear Peter, maybe we have a missunderstanding. Am 20.09.2023 14:43 schrieb Peter J. Holzer via Python-list: > > "dateutil" is not available from PyPi for Python 3.11 That's quite a curious thing to write if you are aware that dateutil is in fact available from PyPi for Python 3.11. Do I miss something here? See https://pypi.org/project/dateutils/ and also the open Issue about the missing support for Python 3.11 https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/issues/1233 ? -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
dateutil on PyPI (was: PEP668 / pipx and "--editable" installs)
On 2023-09-20 13:31:14 +, c.buhtz--- via Python-list wrote: > Dear Peter, > > maybe we have a missunderstanding. > > Am 20.09.2023 14:43 schrieb Peter J. Holzer via Python-list: > > > > > "dateutil" is not available from PyPi for Python 3.11 > > > > That's quite a curious thing to write if you are aware that dateutil is > > in fact available from PyPi for Python 3.11. > > Do I miss something here? > > See https://pypi.org/project/dateutils/ and also the open Issue about the > missing support for Python 3.11 You are missing at least an "s". "dateutils" is not "dateutil". But dateutils can also be installed from PyPI. > https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/issues/1233 ? So it hasn't been tagged with any version >= 3.10 yet. That doesn't mean it isn't available. It requires a Python version >= 3.3, but 3.11 is >= 3.3, so that's not a problem. As I demonstrated, it installs just fine. hp -- _ | Peter J. Holzer| Story must make more sense than reality. |_|_) || | | | h...@hjp.at |-- Charles Stross, "Creative writing __/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!" signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
